Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 290-754-9 | CAS number: 90218-76-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 19 June 2013 to 11 July 2013
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP study conducted in accordance with OECD and EU Guidelines.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Details on properties of test surrogate or analogue material (migrated information):
Not applicable - Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: Main test: nominal loading rate of 100 mg/L. Range-finding test: nominal loading rates of 10 and 100 mg/L
- Sampling method: Main test: Samples were taken from the control and the 100 mg/L loading rate WAF test group (replicates R1 - R6, pooled) at 0 and 72 hours for quantitative analysis. Range-finding test: Samples of each loading rate WAF were taken for chemical analysis at 0 and 72 hours in order to determine the stability of the test item over the test duration. Duplicate samples were taken at each occasion.
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: All samples were stored at approximately -20 °C prior to analysis. - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: Due to the low aqueous solubility and complex nature of the test item for the purposes of the test the test item was prepared as a Water Accommodated Fraction (WAF).
- Eluate: None
- Differential loading: Based on the result of the range-finding test a "limit test" was conducted at a single loading rate of 100 mg/L to confirm that no effect on algal growth was observed.
- Controls: Yes - not exposed to test item. Positive control: potassium dichromate
- Chemical name of vehicle (organic solvent, emulsifier or dispersant): None
- Concentration of vehicle in test medium (stock solution and final test solution(s) including control(s)): None
- Evidence of undissolved material (e.g. precipitate, surface film, etc): Microscopic inspection of the WAFs showed no micro-dispersions or undissolved test item to be present.
FURTHER DETAILS:
Range-finding test
Amounts of test item (20 and 200 mg) were each separately added to the surface of 2 liters of culture medium to give the 10 and 100 mg/L loading rates respectively. After the addition of the test item, the culture medium was stirred by magnetic stirrer using a stirring rate such that a vortex was formed to give a dimple at the water surface. The stirring was stopped after 47 hours and the mixtures allowed to stand for 1 hour. A wide bore glass tube, covered at one end with Nescofilm was submerged into the vessel, sealed end down, to a depth of approximately 5 cm from the bottom of the vessel. A length of Tygon tubing was inserted into the glass tube and pushed through the Nescofilm seal. The aqueous phase or WAF was removed by mid-depth siphoning (the first 75-100 mL discarded) to give the 10 and 100 mg/L loading rate WAFs. Microscopic inspection of the WAFs showed no micro-dispersions or undissolved test item to be present.
An aliquot (500 mL) of each of the loading rate WAFs was separately inoculated with algal suspension (2.5 mL) to give the required test concentrations of IO and 100 mg/L loading rate WAF. The control group was maintained under identical conditions but not exposed to the test item.
Main test:
An amount of test item (250 mg) was added to the surface of 2.5 liters of culture medium to give the 100 mg/L loading rate. After the addition of the test item, the culture medium was stirred by magnetic stirrer using a stirring rate such that a vortex was formed to give a dimple at the water surface. The stirring was stopped after 47 hours and the mixture allowed to stand for 1 hour. A wide bore glass tube, covered at one end with Nescofilm was submerged into the vessel, sealed end down, to a depth of approximately 5 cm from the bottom of the vessel. A length of Tygon tubing was inserted into the glass tube and pushed through the Nescofilm seal. The aqueous phase or WAF was removed by mid-depth siphoning (the first 75-100 mL discarded) to give the 100 mg/L loading rate WAF. Microscopic inspection of the WAF showed no micro-dispersions or undissolved test item to be present. An aliquot (1 liter) of the WAF was inoculated with algal suspension (7.1 mL) to give the required test concentration of 100 mg/L loading rate WAF. The control group was maintained under identical conditions but not exposed to the test item. - Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata
- Strain: CCAP 278/4.
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa (CCAP), SAMS Research Services Ltd, Scottish Marine Institute, Oban, Argyll, Scotland.
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): Not specified.
- Method of cultivation: Master cultures were maintained in the laboratory by the periodic replenishment of culture medium.
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: Not specified. Prior to the start of the test sufficient master culture was added to approximately 100 mL volumes of culture media contained in conical flasks to give an initial cell density of approximately 10 E+3 cells/mL. The flasks were plugged with polyurethane foam stoppers and kept under constant agitation by orbital shaker (100 - 150 rpm) and constant illumination at 24 ± 1 °C until the algal cell density was approximately 104 - 10 E+5 cells/mL.
- Culturing media and conditions (same as test or not): The culture medium used for both the range-finding and definitive tests was the same as that used to maintain the stock culture.
- Any deformed or abnormal cells observed: No data.
TEST SYSTEM:
Prior to the start of the test sufficient master culture was added to approximately 100 mL volumes of culture media contained in conical flasks to give an initial cell density of approximately 10 E+3 cells/mL. The flasks were plugged with polyurethane foam stoppers and kept under constant agitation by orbital shaker (100 - 150 rpm) and constant illumination at 24 ± 1 °C until the algal cell density was approximately 10 E+4 - 10 E+5 cells/mL. - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- None
- Hardness:
- Not specified.
- Test temperature:
- Temperature of 24 ± 1 °C.
- pH:
- At 0 hours: pH = 7.7 to 7.9. At 72 hours: pH = 8.0.
- Dissolved oxygen:
- Not specified.
- Salinity:
- Not applicable
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal loading rate of 100 mg/L.
Measured: less than the limit of quantitation (LOQ): 0.00097 mg/L - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: Glass conical flasks
- Type: closed. Plugged with polyurethane foam bungs to reduce evaporation.
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: Glass, 250 mL containing 100 mL of test preparation
- Aeration: Not specified.
- Type of flow-through (e.g. peristaltic or proportional diluter): N/A, static
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): N/A
- Initial cells density: Initial nominal cell density of 5 x 10 E+3 cells per mL
- Control end cells density: 1.13 x 10 E+6 cells per mL. The cell concentration of the control cultures increased by a factor of 181 after 72 hours.
- No. of organisms per vessel: 5 x 10 E+5
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 6
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6
- No. of vessels per vehicle control (replicates): N/A
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: No information.
- Detailed composition if non-standard medium was used:
NaNO3 25.5 mg/L
MgCl2.6H2O 12.16 mg/L
CaCl2.2H2O 4.41 mg/L
MgS04.7H2O 14.6 mg/L
K2HPO4 1.044 mg/L
NaHCO3 15.0 mg/L
H3BO3 0.186 mg/L
MnCl2.4H2O 0.415 mg/L
ZnCl2 0.00327 mg/L
FeCl3.6H2O 0.160 mg/L
CoCl2.6H2O 0.00143 mg/L
Na2MoO4.2H2O 0.00726 mg/L
CuCl2.2H2O 0.000012 mg/L
Na2EDTA.2H2O 0.30 mg/L
The culture medium was prepared using reverse osmosis purified deionized water* and the pH adjusted to 7.5 ± 0.1 with O.lN NaOH or HCl.
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: The culture medium was prepared using reverse osmosis purified deionized water and the pH adjusted to 7.5 ± 0.1 with 0.1 M NaOH or HCl.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: no information
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: under continuous illumination
- Light intensity and quality: Intensity approximately 7000 lux provided by warm white lighting (380 - 730 nm).
- Salinity (for marine algae): N/A
The pH of the control and the 100 mg/L loading rate WAF test preparation was determined at initiation of the test and after 72 hours exposure. The pH was measured using a WTW pH 320 pH meter. The temperature within the incubator was recorded daily.
Vortex Depth Measurements: The vortex depth was recorded at the start and end of the mixing period
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
- Determination of cell concentrations: Coulter® Multisizer Particle Counter
- Chlorophyll measurement: No
- Other: Growth rates and yields were calculated from cell densities.
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: One concentration in main test. Factor of 10 for dose range finding test.
- Justification for using less concentrations than requested by guideline: It was considered unnecessary and unrealistic to test at loading rates in excess of 100 mg/L.
- Range finding study
- Test concentrations: 10 and 100 mg/L loading rate WAF.
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: The results showed no effect on growth at 10 and 100 mg/L loading rate WAF. Based on the result of the range-finding test a "limit test" was conducted at a single loading rate of 100 mg/L to confirm that no effect on algal growth was observed. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- potassium dichromate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOELR
- Effect conc.:
- 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOELR
- Effect conc.:
- 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Details on results:
- - Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
The cell concentration of the control cultures increased by a factor of 181 after 72 hours. This increase was in line with the OECD Guideline that states the enhancement must be at least by a factor of 16 after 72 hours. Mean cell density of control at 0 hours = 6.21 x 103 cells per mL. Mean cell density of control at 72 hours = 1.13 x 106 cells per mL.
- Observation of abnormalities (for algal test): All test and control cultures were inspected microscopically at 72 hours. There were no abnormalities detected in any of the control or test cultures.
- Any stimulation of growth found in any treatment: No. There were no statistically significant decreases in growth rate or yield (p=/>0.05), between the control and 100 mg/L loading rate WAF test group.
- Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: Observations on the test media were carried out during the mixing and testing of the WAF. At both the start and end of the mixing period, and following a 1-Hour standing period, the 100 mg/L loading rate WAF was observed to have formed a clear colorless media column with oily globules of test item on the media surface. Microscopic examination of the WAF showed there to be no micro-dispersions of test item present. At the start of the test all control and test cultures were observed to be clear colorless solutions. After the 72-Hour test period all control and test cultures were observed to be green dispersions.
- Effect concentrations exceeding solubility of substance in test medium: Loading rate WAF reported due to low aqueous water solubility.
Physico-Chemical Measurements:
Temperature was maintained at 24 ± 1 °C throughout the test.
The pH value of the control cultures was observed to increase from pH 7.7 at 0 hours to pH 8.0 at 72 hours. The pH deviation in the control cultures was less than 1.5 pH units after 72 hours and therefore was within the limits given in the Test Guidelines.
Vortex Depth Measurements:
The vortex depth was recorded at the start and end of the mixing period and was observed to have formed a dimple at the media surface. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - Results with reference substance valid? Yes
- EC50:
ErC50 (0 - 72 h) = 1.2 mg/L; 95% confidence limits 1.0 - 1.3 mg/L
EyC50 (0 -72 h) = 0.52 mg/L; 95% confidence limits 0.45 - 0.62 mg/L
No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) based on growth rate: 0.25 mg/L
No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) based on yield: 0.25 mg/L
Lowest Observed Effect Concentration (LOEC) based on growth rate: 0.50 mg/L
Lowest Observed Effect Concentration (LOEC) based on yield: 0.50 mg/L
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- There were no statistically significant decreases in yield or growth (p=/>0.05), between the control and 100 mg/L loading rate WAF and, therefore the "No Observed Effect Loading Rate" (NOEL) based on yield was 100 mg/L loading rate WAF.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The effect of the test item on the growth of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata has been investigated and gave EL50 values of greater than 100 mg/L loading rate WAF. The No Observed Effect Loading Rate was 100 mg/L loading rate WAF.
- Executive summary:
Introduction
A study was performed to assess the effect of the test item on the growth of the green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. The method followed was designed to be compatible with the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals (2006) No 201, "Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test" referenced as Method C.3 of Commission Regulation (EC) 761/2009.
Methods
Due to the low aqueous solubility and complex nature of the test item for the purposes of the test the test item was prepared as a Water Accommodated Fraction (WAF).
Following a preliminary range-finding test, Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata was exposed to a Water Accommodated Fraction (WAF) of the test item, at a single nominal loading rate of 100 mg/L (six replicate flasks) for 72 hours, under constant illumination and shaking at a temperature of 24 ± 1 °C.
Samples of the algal populations were removed daily and cell concentrations determined for each control and treatment group, using a Coulter® Multisizer Particle Counter.
Results
Exposure of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata to the test item gave EL50 values of greater than 100 mg/L loading rate WAF. The No Observed Effect Loading Rate was 100 mg/L loading rate WAF.
Analysis of the test preparations at 0 and 72 hours showed measured test concentrations of less than the limit of quantitation (LOQ) of the analytical method employed, which was determined to be 0.00097 mg/L, were obtained. This does not infer that no test item was in solution, just that any which was dissolved, was at a concentration of less than 0.00097 mg/L.
Given that the toxicity cannot be attributed to a single component or a mixture of components but to the test item as a whole, and the dissolved test item was below the quantifiable limit of the analytical method, the results were based on nominal loading rates only.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1994-02-01 to 1994-02-04
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- As the test substance was poorly soluble in water, a 1 g/L mixture with deionised water was prepared. This mixture was stirred for 18 hours and filtrated afterwards. The filtrate was analysed and showed an initial content of 3.9 mg/L DOC and was used as stock solution.
- Test organisms (species):
- Desmodesmus subspicatus (previous name: Scenedesmus subspicatus)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Green algae
- Strain: Scenedesmus subspicatus (CHODAT (86.81 SAG))
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): Institut für Wasser-, Boden- und Lufthygiene, Berlin; subsequently in-house breeding
- Method of cultivation: in sterile-aerated Erlenmeyer flasks on light benches
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: A preculture is withdrawn from a stock culture by transfer 3 days prior to the beginning of the test from which preculture the test cultures are inoculated at a cell density of approximately 20 000 cells/mL.
- Culturing media and conditions (same as test or not): not mentioned
- Any deformed or abnormal cells observed: not mentioned - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- none
- Hardness:
- Growth/test medium chemistry as described in guideline 92/69/EEC (C.3.), no further details mentioned
- Test temperature:
- 24 ± 2 °C
- pH:
- 8.0 - 8.9 (start of test)
8.7 - 9.3 (end of test) - Dissolved oxygen:
- not mentioned
- Salinity:
- according to guideline
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal: 0.24 / 0.39 / 0.67 / 1.2 / 2.0 / 3.5 mg/L
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: sterile-aerated Erlenmeyes flasks
- Initial cells density: 2x10E4 cells/mL
- Control end cells density: 88x10E4 cells/mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 5
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 8
- No. of vessels per vehicle control (replicates): not applicable
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
no details mentioned
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: yes
- Adjustment of pH: not adjusted
- Photoperiod: not specified
- Light intensity and quality: approx. 8000 lux, white
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) : Cell numbers for exposure times of 24, 48, 72 h
- Determination of cell concentrations: The cell numbers were determined photometrically at a wavelenght of 685 nm
- Chlorophyll measurement: no
- Other: none
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: not mentioned
- Range finding study: not mentioned - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 3.5 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- dissolved
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Details on results:
- - Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Observation of abnormalities (for algal test): no observations made
- Any stimulation of growth found in any treatment: no
- Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: no
- Effect concentrations exceeding solubility of substance in test medium: no - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- no reference substance tested
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- no statistical evaluation performed
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Not toxic under test conditions in the range of water solubility.
- Executive summary:
The inhibitory effect of 1,2,4-Benzenetricarboxylic acid, mixed decyl and octyl triesters on the growth of the green alga Scenedesmus subspicatus, strain CHODAT (86.81 SAG) had been tested in accordance with OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No.201 and EEC Methods for Determination of Ecotoxicity, Annex to Directive 92/69/EEC.
The test algae were exposed to 6 concentrations of 1,2,4-Benzenetricarboxylic acid, mixed decyl and octyl triesters, ranging from 0.24 to 3.5 mg/L. As the test substance was poorly soluble in water, a 1 g/L mixture with deionised water was prepared. This mixture was stirred for 18 hours and filtrated afterwards. The filtrate was analysed and showed an initial content of 3.9 mg/L DOC and was used as stock solution. The cultures were incubated on sterile ventilated Erlenmeyer flasks on light tables at 24±2 °C. Growth was monitored by determining the cell number photometrically at a wave length of 685 nm after 24, 48 and 72 hours. No inhibitory effects on the growth of the green alga were observed.
On the basis of cell growth, a mean effective concentration was calculated to be EbC50 (72 h) > 3.5 mg/L.
On the basis of the growth rate, a mean effective concentration was calculated to be ErC50 (0 -72 h) > 3.5 mg/L.
The NOEC value was >= 3.5 mg/L (on basis of cell growth).
Referenceopen allclose all
Cell Densities and Percentage Inhibition of Growth from the Range-finding Test:
Nominal Loading Rate (mg/L) |
Cell Densities (cells per mL) |
Inhibition Values (%) |
|||
0 Hours |
72 Hours |
Growth Rate |
Yield |
||
Control |
R1 |
5.71E+03 |
6.05E+05 |
- |
- |
R2 |
4.56E+03 |
6.81E+05 |
|||
Mean |
5.14E+03 |
6.43E+05 |
|||
10 |
R1 |
5.23E+03 |
8.22E+05 |
[6] |
[29] |
R2 |
5.02E+03 |
8.33E+05 |
|||
Mean |
5.13E+03 |
8.27E+05 |
|||
100 |
R1 |
5.09E+03 |
9.17E+05 |
[9] |
[59] |
R2 |
5.66E+03 |
l.12E+06 |
|||
Mean |
5.38E+03 |
l.02E+06 |
* Cell densities represent the mean number of cells per mL calculated from the mean of the cell counts from 3 counts for each of the replicate flasks.
R1 and R2= Replicates 1 and 2
[Increase in growth compared to controls]
Cell Densities and pH Values in the Definitive Test
Nominal Loading Rate (mg/L) |
pH |
Cell Densities (cells per mL) |
pH |
||||
Oh |
Oh |
24h |
48h |
72h |
72h |
||
Control |
R1 |
7.7 |
6.30E+03 |
3.12E+04 |
l.94E+05 |
l.19E+06 |
8.0 |
R2 |
5.79E+03 |
2.99E+04 |
l.71E+05 |
l.16E+06 |
|||
R3 |
5.82E+03 |
3.00E+04 |
l.50E+05 |
9.63E+05 |
|||
R4 |
6.06E+03 |
3.49E+04 |
l.96E+05 |
l.27E+06 |
|||
R5 |
6.16E+03 |
3.33E+04 |
l.88E+05 |
l.11E+06 |
|||
R6 |
7.09E+03 |
3.08E+04 |
l.77E+05 |
l.06E+06 |
|||
Mean |
6.21E+03 |
3.17E+04 |
l.79E+05 |
l.13E+06 |
|||
100 |
R1 |
7.9 |
6.22E+03 |
3.17E+04 |
2.01E+05 |
l.19E+06 |
8.0 |
R2 |
5.79E+03 |
2.82E+04 |
2.06E+05 |
1.20E+06 |
|||
R3 |
4.98E+03 |
3.34E+04 |
2.10E+05 |
l.34E+06 |
|||
R4 |
4.98E+03 |
3.21E+04 |
l.86E+05 |
l.07E+06 |
|||
R5 |
5.10E+03 |
3.28E+04 |
2.00E+05 |
l.03E+06 |
|||
R6 |
4.83E+03 |
3.33E+04 |
l.79E+05 |
l.16E+06 |
|||
Mean |
5.32E+03 |
3.19E+04 |
l.97E+05 |
l.17E+06 |
*Cell densities represent the mean number of cells per ml calculated from the mean of the cell counts from 3 counts for each of the replicate flasks.
R1 - 6 = Replicates 1 to 6
Daily Specific Growth Rates for the Control Cultures in the DefinitiveTest
|
Daily Specific Growth Rate (cells/mL/hour) |
|||
Day 0 -1 |
Day 1-2 |
Day 2 -3 |
||
Control |
R1 |
0.076 |
0.076 |
0.076 |
R2 |
0.074 |
0.073 |
0.080 |
|
R3 |
0.075 |
0.067 |
0.077 |
|
R4 |
0.081 |
0.072 |
0.078 |
|
R5 |
0.079 |
0.072 |
0.074 |
|
R6 |
0.076 |
0.073 |
0.075 |
|
Mean |
0.077 |
0.072 |
0.077 |
R1 - 6 = Replicates 1 to 6
Inhibition of Growth Rate and Yield in the Definitive Test
Nominal Loading Rate (mg/L) |
Growth Rate (cells/mL/hour) |
Yield (cells/mL) |
|||
0 -72h |
%Inhibition |
0 -72h |
%Inhibition* |
||
Control |
R1 |
0.076 |
|
l.18E+06 |
|
R2 |
0.076 |
|
l.16E+06 |
|
|
R3 |
0.073 |
|
9.57E+05 |
|
|
R4 |
0.077 |
- |
l.26E+06 |
- |
|
R5 |
0.075 |
|
l.10E+06 |
|
|
R6 |
0.074 |
|
l.05E+06 |
|
|
Mean |
0.075 |
|
l.12E+06 |
|
|
SD |
0.001 |
|
1.06E+05 |
|
|
100 |
R1 |
0.076 |
[1] |
l.18E+06 |
|
R2 |
0.076 |
[1] |
l.19E+06 |
|
|
R3 |
0.078 |
[4] |
1.34E+06 |
|
|
R4 |
0.075 |
0 |
l.07E+06 |
|
|
R5 |
0.074 |
1 |
l.02E+06 |
|
|
R6 |
0.076 |
[1] |
l.16E+06 |
|
|
Mean |
0.076 |
[1] |
l.16E+06 |
[4] |
|
SD |
0.001 |
|
l.11E+05 |
|
*In accordance with the OECD test guideline only the mean value for yield is calculated
R1 - 6 = Replicates 1 to 6
SD = Standard Deviation
Vortex Depth Measurements at the Start and End of the Mixing Period
|
Nominal Loading Rate (mg/L) |
|||
Control |
100 |
|||
* |
+ |
* |
+ |
|
Height of Media Column (cm) |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
Depth of Vortex (cm) |
-0.2 |
-0.2 |
-0.2 |
-0.2 |
Observation of Vortex |
Dimple present |
Dimple present |
Dimple present |
Dimple present |
* = Start of mixing period
+= End of mixingperiod
Table #1: Cell density data:
concentration [mg/L] |
cell number (x 10E4 cells/mL) after | |||
0 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | |
control | 2 | 13 | 28 | 88 |
0.24 | 2 | 13 | 34 | 100 |
0.39 | 2 | 13 | 33 | 98 |
0.67 | 2 | 13 | 32 | 97 |
1.2 | 2 | 13 | 35 | 109 |
2.0 | 2 | 13 | 34 | 104 |
3.5 | 2 | 14 | 38 | 117 |
Table #2: Growth curves:
concentration [mg/L] | biomass (area under the growth curve) | inhibition of biomass [%] | growth rate µ (0 - 72 h) | inhibition of growth rate [%] |
control | 80 | - | 1.261 | - |
0.24 | 92 | -15 | 1.304 | -3.4 |
0.39 | 90 | -12.5 | 1.297 | -2.9 |
0.67 | 88.5 | -10.6 | 1.294 | -2.6 |
1.2 | 97.5 | -21.9 | 1.333 | -5.7 |
2.0 | 94 | -17.5 | 1.317 | -4.4 |
3.5 | 105.5 | -31.9 | 1.356 | -7.5 |
negative values indicating an activation of growth
Description of key information
In both available studies the test substance was not toxic under test conditions in the range of water solubility.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
In the key study the inhibitory effect of 1,2,4-Benzenetricarboxylic acid, mixed decyl and octyl triesters on the growth of the green alga Scenedesmus subspicatus, strain CHODAT (86.81 SAG) had been tested in accordance with OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No.201 and EEC Methods for Determination of Ecotoxicity, Annex to Directive 92/69/EEC.
The test algae were exposed to 6 concentrations of 1,2,4-Benzenetricarboxylic acid, mixed decyl and octyl triesters, ranging from 0.24 to 3.5 mg/L. As the test substance was poorly soluble in water, a 1 g/L mixture with deionised water was prepared. This mixture was stirred for 18 hours and filtrated afterwards. The filtrate was analysed and showed an initial content of 3.9 mg/L DOC and was used as stock solution. The cultures were incubated on sterile ventilated Erlenmeyer flasks on light tables at 24±2 °C. Growth was monitored by determining the cell number photometrically at a wave length of 685 nm after 24, 48 and 72 hours. No inhibitory effects on the growth of the green alga were observed.
On the basis of cell growth, a mean effective concentration was calculated to be EbC50 (72 h) > 3.5 mg/L.
On the basis of the growth rate, a mean effective concentration was calculated to be ErC50 (0 -72 h) > 3.5 mg/L.
The NOEC value was 3.5 mg/L (on basis of cell growth at the highest concentration achievable).
In a supporting study the effect of the test item on the growth of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata has been investigated and gave EL50 values of > 100 mg/L loading rate WAF. The No Observed Effect Loading Rate was 100 mg/L loading rate WAF (highest loading rate tested).
Therefore in both tests the test substance was not toxic under test conditions in the range of water solubility.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.