Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 224-867-1 | CAS number: 4531-49-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The test material was subject to a skin irritation test in the rabbit as described in the "Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics" (1959) of the US Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO). Shaved and both intact and scarified skin sites of six rabbits were exposed to 0.5 g test substance in a 50% polyethylene glycol 400 trituration for 24 hours under occlusive conditions. None of the animals showed any skin reactions immediately and 48 hours after the end of exposure. Therefore, the test item has not to be classified for skin irritation according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
The test material was tested for eye irritancy according to FDA guideline (Fed. Reg., Vol. 37, No. 38, 1972). 0.1 ml test substance was applied to the conjunctival sac of one eye each of eight rabbits (washing after 24 h in 5 animals, group 1, or after 5 minutes in 3 animals, group 2) and eye responses were observed for seven days. Only slight eye responses were noted, fully reversible within 72 h. The test item is not irritating to eyes according to the classification criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1974
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Acceptable, well-documented study report which meets basic scientific principles.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: described in the "Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics" (1959) of the US Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO).
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- other: Russian breed
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 1.5-2 kg
- Housing: individually
- Diet: rabbit food (NAFAG, Gossau SG) ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: shaved and one flank intact, one flank scarified
- Vehicle:
- other: polyethylene glycol 400
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 0.5 g
- Concentration: 50% polyethylene glycol (PEG 400) trituration. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 h
- Observation period:
- 48 h
- Number of animals:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5x2.5 cm² gauze patch.
- Type of wrap if used: plastic film 5x5 cm, fixed with adhesive tape.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Time after start of exposure: 24 h.
SCORING SYSTEM: in accordance with OECD TG 404.
Scores were read 24 and 72 h after start of exposure, which lasted for 24 h. For classification, the readings are stated here as immediately and 48 h after end of exposure. - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 48 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 48 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Erythema score 0 and edema score 0 were noted in every animal immediately and 48 h after exposure.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: CLP regulation
- Conclusions:
- The test material is not irritating to skin under these test conditions. This conclusion is legitimate even though the applied testing regime differs from today's standard methods, as no skin reactions were observed in 6/6 animals immediately and 48 h after the end of exposure, which lasted 20 h longer than required by OECD TG 404.
- Executive summary:
The test material was subject to a skin irritation test in the rabbit as described in the "Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics" (1959) of the US Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO). Shaved and both intact and scarified skin sites of six rabbits were exposed to 0.5 g test substance in a 50% polyethylene glycol 400 trituration for 24 hours under occlusive conditions. None of the animals showed any skin reactions immediately and 48 hours after the end of exposure. Therefore, the test item has not to be classified for skin irritation according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1974
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Acceptable, well-documented study report which meets basic scientific principles.
- Justification for type of information:
- Please see read across document in chapter 13
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: described in the "Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics" (1959) of the US Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO).
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- other: Russian breed
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 1.5-2 kg
- Housing: individually
- Diet: rabbit food (NAFAG, Gossau SG) ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: shaved and one flank intact, one flank scarified
- Vehicle:
- other: polyethylene glycol 400
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 0.5 g
- Concentration: 50% polyethylene glycol (PEG 400) trituration. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 h
- Observation period:
- 48 h
- Number of animals:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5x2.5 cm² gauze patch.
- Type of wrap if used: plastic film 5x5 cm, fixed with adhesive tape.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Time after start of exposure: 24 h.
SCORING SYSTEM: in accordance with OECD TG 404.
Scores were read 24 and 72 h after start of exposure, which lasted for 24 h. For classification, the readings are stated here as immediately and 48 h after end of exposure. - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 48 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 48 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Erythema score 0 and edema score 0 were noted in every animal immediately and 48 h after exposure.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: CLP regulation
- Conclusions:
- The test material is not irritating to skin under these test conditions. This conclusion is legitimate even though the applied testing regime differs from today's standard methods, as no skin reactions were observed in 6/6 animals immediately and 48 h after the end of exposure, which lasted 20 h longer than required by OECD TG 404.
- Executive summary:
The test material was subject to a skin irritation test in the rabbit as described in the "Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics" (1959) of the US Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO). Shaved and both intact and scarified skin sites of six rabbits were exposed to 0.5 g test substance in a 50% polyethylene glycol 400 trituration for 24 hours under occlusive conditions. None of the animals showed any skin reactions immediately and 48 hours after the end of exposure. Therefore, the test item has not to be classified for skin irritation according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 11 FEB 1975 to 18 FEB 1975.
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Acceptable, well-documented study report which meets basic scientific principles.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: FDA guideline (Fed. Reg., Vol. 37, No. 38, 1972)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Himalayan
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 0.1 ml - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 h (5 animals, group 1)
5 min (3 animals, group 2) - Observation period (in vivo):
- 7 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 8
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: with 300 ml water for 2 min
- Time after start of exposure: 24 h (5 animals, group 1) or 5 min (3 animals, group 2)
SCORING SYSTEM: in accordance with OECD TG 405
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: fluorescein, UV light - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal: #1 (group 1)
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h.
- Score:
- 0.67
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks:
- 72 h after application.
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal: #2 - #8
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h.
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: group 1 + group 2
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h.
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Remarks on result:
- other: group 1 + group 2
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal: #2 (group 1)
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h.
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks:
- 72 h after appl.
- Remarks on result:
- other: redness
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #3 (group 1)
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h.
- Score:
- 0.67
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks:
- 72 h after appl.
- Remarks on result:
- other: redness
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal: #4, #5 (group 1)
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h.
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks:
- 48 h after appl.
- Remarks on result:
- other: redness
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal: #6 - #8 (group 2)
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h.
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Remarks on result:
- other: redness
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal: #2 (group 1)
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h.
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks:
- 48 h after appl.
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #3 - #5 (group 1), #6-#8 (group 2)
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h.
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: group 1 + group 2
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Application of test substance resulted in conjunctival redness score 1 for all animals of group 1 for up to 48 hours. Additionally, animal #1 (group 1) showed corneal opacity score 1. The animals of group 2 showed one hour after application conjunctival redness score 1. No other responses were noted. 72 h after application no effects were observed.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: CLP regulation
- Conclusions:
- According to the classification criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 the test material is not irritating to eyes under these test conditions. This conclusion is legitimate as five animals (group 1) were tested basically in accordance with today's standard methods regarding dosing, exposure duration, scoring system, reading time points and the observed eye responses were fully reversible 72 hours after application.
- Executive summary:
The test material was tested for eye irritancy according to FDA guideline (Fed. Reg., Vol. 37, No. 38, 1972). 0.1 ml test substance was applied to the conjunctival sac of one eye each of eight rabbits (washing after 24 h in 5 animals, group 1, or after 5 minutes in 3 animals, group 2) and eye responses were observed for seven days. Only slight eye responses were noted, fully reversible within 72 h. The test item is not irritating to eyes according to the classification criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
No classification
The test item was irritatnt neither to skin nor eyes in vivo
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
