Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 308-760-8 | CAS number: 98246-87-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 27 April - 18 May 2001
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- No phys-chem data, analytical method validation is lacking. Actual conc measurements day 3-5 unreliable, however, the final conclusion is not influenced and therefore is valid. Use of vehicle requires caution to extrapolate end-point to actual situation without vehicle. Identity and composition data given in appendix but batch no. not the same as the one of the supplier.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Aquapel 364
The test substance, AQUAPEL 364, was supplied by CTL, Syngenta, on behalf of Global
Producers of AKD.
The test substance was received at Brixham Environmental Laboratory on
24 January 2001 and assigned the Brixham test substance number AJOO19. The test
substance (Batch Sample Ref Y09622/002/00 1) was supplied as a white waxy solid. A
technical service report stated the sample had an AKD content of 90.1% w/w by
FT-IR.
The sample was stored at ambient temperature, in the dark, in the container in which it
was received until required for testing, when appropriate subsamples were provided for
the test operators. - Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- On seven test solution renewal occasions samples of each new test solution were analysed for the concentration of Aquapel 364. samples from the corresponding old test solutions (one replicate) were analysed on the following renewal day.
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on test solutions:
- Vehicle was actone.
The study was run with a dilution water and solvent control together with nominal
Aquapel 364 concentrations of 0.056, 0.1, 0.32, 0.56 and 1.0 mg/L
A primary stock suspension, prepared by dispersing 0.1 g of Aquapel 364 in 10 ml
acetone, was used to prepare the test solutions. These suspensions were prepared on each
test solution renewal occasion and were observed to be cloudy white homogeneous
suspensions.
On each test solution renewal day, the test solutions were prepared by the addition of
appropriate aliquots of the primary stock to dilution water. The dilution water control,
solvent control and test solutions were observed to be clear and colourless. - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- The test species was the freshwater crustacean, Daphnia magna, obtained from continuous laboratory cultures.
The stock cultures of Daphnia were maintained in a reconstituted water medium, identical to the test dIlution water, at a temperature of 20 ± 1DC for a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the start of the study. The cultures were maintained in 2 L glass vessels with a working volume of 1.5 L. A photoperiod of 16 hours light8 hours dark, with 20 minute transition periods was provided. The Daphnia cultures were fed a defined diet of algae ChIorella vulgaris, strain CCAP 211/12 and a commercially available microencapsulated diet "Frippak Booster®". Culture conditions were such that the Daphnia reproduction was by diploid parthenogenesis. The Daphnia cultures were fed daily ad libitum depending on age and density of the culture.
Daphnia <24 hours old (first instar), obtained from a single culture vessel, were used for testing. The parent animals were 17 ± 1 days old and had been maintained with a twice weekly renewal of reconstituted water medium, since birth. The test organisms and the culture from which they were obtained showed no evidence of disease before the test period.
The test Daphnia were fed daily with cultured algae (Chlorella vulgaris), strain CCAP 211/12 and a commercially available microencapsulated diet "Frippak Booster®". The algal cultures were harvested and centrifuged and the algal cells resuspended in Daphnia culture medium (reconstituted water). The algal stocks were measured for cell density using a Coulter Counter Model ZB, stored in a refrigerator, in the dark, and used within 1 week. The algal stocks were also analysed for total organic carbon content. A suspension of "Frippak Booster®" was prepared every Monday, Wednesday and
Friday by dispersing 0.1 g in 100 ml of test dilution water and was stored in a refrigerator. Each test vessel received 3.0 X 10^7 algal cells and 57 ug of "Frippak Booster®" (as a suspension) per day. - Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 21 d
- Hardness:
- as CaCO3 210-218.7mg/L
- Test temperature:
- 19.6-20.9 C
- pH:
- new solutions: 8.0 - 8.3
old solutions: 7.6 - 8.2 - Dissolved oxygen:
- new solutions: 8.8-9.4 mg/L
old solutions: 7.8-9.4 - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- nominal: 0.056, 0.10, 0.32, 0.56, 1.0 mg/L
mean measured new: 0.076, 0.11, 0.28, 0.49, 0.88 mg/L
mean measured old: <0.071, 0.12, 0.26, 0.44, 0.72 mg/L - Details on test conditions:
- Borosilicate glass beakers were used as test vessels, with 10 replicates per exposure concentration, each containing 80 ml of test solution providing a depth of 47 mm. The beakers were covered with loose fitting lids.
The nominal test solution temperature was 20 ± 1 C and a photoperiod of 16 hours light: 8 hours dark with 20 minute transition periods. Light intensity was measured once during the study, and was taken at the surface of the test solutions. The test solutions were not aerated.
The positions of the grouped test treatments were randomly allocated within the test area.
At the start of the test, one Daphnia was randomly selected and added to each test vessel in sequence across the treatments. These Daphnia were termed the Po generation. Mortality of the Po generation was recorded daily for each test vessel. Mortality was defined as absence of any movement by the organism, when examined by eye, for a period of 15 seconds (after gentle agitation of the container if necessary). Observations were made at the same time for any other symptoms of toxicity. Observations were made daily from day 4 for the presence of live and dead offspring (termed F1 generation) in each vessel.
The test solutions were prepared on the day of use and were renewed every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. On each renewal day, new test solutions were dispensed to a second set of test vessels. The surviving Po generation were transferred to the new solutions, using a wide bore pipette, minimising transfer of medium. The old solutions were sampled, as appropriate, for physical and chemical analyses and the P1 generation removed from each vessel and counted. The numbers of live and dead P1 were recorded. The duration of the test was 21 days.
Daphnia was measured, using a microscope with an eyepiece graticule previously calibrated with a stage micrometer. The median lethal effect concentration (LC50) was defined as the concentration resulting in 50% mortality of the Daphnia in the time period specified.
The reproduction data for each individual Po generation daphnid were entered into electronic data files and analysed using statistical procedures. The data were tested for normality and if the distribution was normal, Bartlett's test for homogeneity of variance was applied. If the data had a normal distribution and the variance was homogeneous then the data were analysed using a parametric statistical procedure such as Dunnett's T test following analysis of variance. If the data were not normal or failed Bartlett's test for homogeneity of variance, then the data were analysed using a non-parametric statistical procedure such as Wilcoxon's Rank Sum Test. - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 0.8 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 0.8 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 0.8 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Details on results:
- An adjustment was made for mortality in the statistical analyses by only including Po Daphnia surviving to the end of the study.
In the dilution water and solvent controls and all nominal test concentrations up to and including 1.0 mg/L all Po Daphnia had released their first offspring on day 10 and had completed at least 4 broods by the end of the study.
Compared to the pooled dilution water and solvent controls there was no significant decrease (P=0.05) in the numbers of live offspring (F1 ) produced in any of the nominal test concentrations.
Therefore, the no observed effect concentration (NOEC) for reproduction was 0.8 mg/L and the lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC) was >0.8 mg/L. The EC50 was estimated to be >0.8 mg/L
Measurements at day 3 -5 from the new solutions are less compared to the old solutions.
The pH min-max range is higher than 1.5 and the maximum pH (9.4) exceeds the limit in the guideline of 9.
Possible contamination of samples durig preparation of samples for analysis.
Mean measured concentrations in new test solutions ranged from 88 to 136%, but individual data indicate a range 57-290% - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- The reproduction data were not normally distributed, therefore, a non parametric statistical procedure, Wilcoxon's Rank Sum Test, was used to analyse the data.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- CoA does not match batch no. provided by supplier. No phys-chem data. Analyses day 3-5 are questionable, some contamination of samples, analytical method validation is lacking. Due to lack of effects wrt growth or reproduction, the data can still be used, however the use of vehicle implies caution as to extrapolate to normal conditions.
therefore valid - Executive summary:
The chronic toxicity of Aquapel 364 has been determined for Daphnia magna according to the OECD guideline (211). The test substance was solved using a vehicle (acetone) and the test was semi static. 10 daphnids were used per concentration level, each housed individually.
Concentrations tested ranged from nominally 0.056 - 1.0 mg/L, however actual concentrations varied from 57%-290% of nominal. Some mortality (up to 20%) was observed, but not dose-dependent. No significant effects were determined for reproduction or length. The overall no observed effect concentration was > = 0.8 mg/L and the overall lowest observed effect concentration was > 0.8 mg/L based on mean measured concentrations.
Reference
Table 1: P0generation mortalities
Nominal [Aquapel 364] mg/L |
Day of Test |
Number dead per replicate |
% dead |
|||||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|||
Water contr. |
21 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Solvent contr. |
21 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.056 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
10 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
10 |
|
0.10 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.32 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
|
21 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
|
0.56 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
|
1.0 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
Table 2: Reproduction data
Replicate number |
Total of Offspring per parent |
||||||
Nominal concentration of Aquapel 364 mg/L |
|||||||
Water control |
Solvent control |
0.056 |
0.10 |
0.32 |
0.56 |
1.0 |
|
1 |
84 |
86 |
91 |
97 |
90 |
75 |
30 |
2 |
86 |
95 |
94 |
83 |
96 |
85 |
101 |
3 |
89 |
89 |
85 |
90 |
86 |
93 |
90 |
4 |
89 |
93 |
97 |
98 |
102 |
98 |
92 |
5 |
88 |
65 |
84 |
97 |
(0) |
(47) |
88 |
6 |
89 |
83 |
103 |
90 |
94 |
95 |
87 |
7 |
86 |
86 |
64 |
99 |
(0) |
99 |
95 |
8 |
90 |
82 |
100 |
101 |
100 |
91 |
97 |
9 |
84 |
90 |
(33) |
76 |
76 |
72 |
89 |
10 |
62 |
91 |
96 |
100 |
100 |
96 |
91 |
Mean |
85 |
86 |
90* |
94* |
93* |
88* |
86* |
SD |
8.3 |
8.5 |
11.8 |
59 |
8.8 |
10.0 |
20.2 |
CV |
9.8 |
9.9 |
13.1 |
6.3 |
9.5 |
11.4 |
23.5 |
Total |
847 |
857 |
814 |
938 |
774 |
794 |
860 |
% dead |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
* = No significant decrease compared with pooled dilution water and solvent controls
() Values in parenthesis denote offspring from P0 Daphnids that had dies before day 21. these data were not included in the mean, SD and statistical analyses but were included in the total number of offspring.
Table 3: Adult length measurement
Replicate number |
Length in graticule scale divisions (Days 21) |
||||||
Nominal concentration of Aquapel 364 mg/L |
|||||||
Water control |
Solvent control |
0.056 |
0.10 |
0.32 |
0.56 |
1.0 |
|
1 |
55 |
54 |
55 |
54 |
55 |
55 |
55 |
2 |
55 |
57 |
57 |
57 |
56 |
55 |
52 |
3 |
51 |
56 |
55 |
55 |
55 |
57 |
55 |
4 |
53 |
55 |
56 |
55 |
55 |
55 |
55 |
5 |
55 |
59 |
53 |
55 |
- |
- |
55 |
6 |
50 |
56 |
55 |
55 |
55 |
51 |
55 |
7 |
55 |
50 |
54 |
56 |
- |
56 |
54 |
8 |
55 |
60 |
55 |
55 |
56 |
51 |
60 |
9 |
55 |
55 |
- |
56 |
60 |
57 |
57 |
10 |
54 |
55 |
55 |
55 |
56 |
55 |
55 |
Mean |
54 |
55 |
55* |
55* |
56* |
55* |
55* |
SD |
1.9 |
3.1 |
1.2 |
0.8 |
1.7 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
Mean length |
Length in mm (1mm = 12 divisions) |
||||||
4.50 |
4.58 |
4.58 |
4.58 |
4.67 |
4.58 |
4.58 |
*= No significant decrease compared with pooled dilution water and solvent controls
- = mortality before day 21
Description of key information
Key study is Brixham Environmental Laboratory (2001). OECD211, 21day daphnia magna. Vehicle (acetone) used. No statistical significant effects on reproduction
and mortality at highest concentration tested (nominal 1 mg/L, mean measured 0.8 mg/L). Study reliable with restrictions. End-point for derivation of PNEC
should not be concluded on acetone assisted actually measured substance concentration. Under normal conditions acetone will not be present as solvent.
Based on mean measured concentration the NOEC is >= 0.8 mg/L.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect concentration:
- 0.8 mg/L
Additional information
No statistical significant effects on reproduction and mortality at highest concentration tested (nominal 1 mg/L, mean measured 0.8 mg/L). Study reliable with restrictions, identity and composition data given in appendix but batch no. not the same as the one of the supplier. No phys-chem data, analytical method validation is lacking, actual conc measurements day 3-5 unreliable. However, the final conclusion is not influenced and therefore is valid. Use of vehicle requires caution to extrapolate end-point to actual situation without vehicle.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.