Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 218-645-3 | CAS number: 2210-79-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Additional information
Short description of key information:
Within the confines of this study, 600 mg/kg bw/day delivered the
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) as demonstrated by the clinical
observations and effects on body weight and the gross pathology
observations at necropsy. The 300 mg/kg bw/day dose was considered to
be the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for the pregnant female
rat based on clinical signs, intermittent reduced body weight gain and
food consumption. The NOAEL for the in utero growth, survival and
morphological development of the conceptus was considered >600 mg/kg
bw/day.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Species: Rat
Strain: Sprague-Dawley
Sub-strain: Crl:CD®(SD) lOS BR
Source of supply: Charles River (UK) Limited, Kent, UK
Number: 96
Sex: Time-mated females
Age: Young adult animals
Temperature: 22 ± 3 °C
Humidity: 30 to 70%
Lighting: Twelve hours of continuous artificial light in each twenty-four hour period
Ventilation: At least fifteen air changes per hour
Animals are housed in accordance with the 'Code of Practice for the Housing and Care of Animals Used in Scientific Procedures' and in alignment with the United Kingdom Home Office recommendations and requirements. - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- polyethylene glycol
- Details on exposure:
- Time-mated females were dosed once daily by gavage, from Day 5 (post-implantation) to Day 19 of gestation (the day prior to necropsy). The volume of test and control item administered to each animal was based on the most recent scheduled body weight and adjusted accordingly.
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The dosing formulations were sampled on two occasions during the study and analyzed for concentration by Envigo Research Ltd., Shardlow, UK Analytical Services. Stability.
- Details on mating procedure:
- Females were time-mated with sexually mature proven males of the same strain by the animal supplier. The day of observation of positive evidence of mating was designated
Day 0 of gestation. The animal supplier identified mated females and provided identification details of their respective mating partners. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Day 5 to Day 19 of gestation.
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once per day
- Duration of test:
- 20 days
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 600 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 24 females
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- Serial Observations
1 GeneralObservationslMeasurements
1.1 Morbidity/Mortality Inspection
Twice daily, early and late during the working period.
1.2 Clinical Observations
Once daily during the gestation period. During the dosing period, individual clinical observations were performed immediately before dosing, up to 30 minutes after dosing and one hour after dosing.
1.3 Body Weights
Individual body weights were recorded on Day 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 14, 17 and 20 of gestation.
1.4 Food Consumption
Dietary intake was recorded for individual animals on Day 3, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17 and 20 of gestation.
1.5 Water Consumption
Monitored daily by visual inspection of water bottles. - Maternal examinations:
- Terminal investigations
1 Necropsy
Post mortem procedures were performed on all animals including any animal found dead or killed in extremis during the study. Animals were killed by carbon dioxide asphyxiation followed by cervical dislocation on Day 20 of presumed gestation.
1.1 Gross Examination
Full external and internal macroscopic examination of adult females. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The uterus of any apparently non-pregnant female was immersed in 0.5% ammonium polysulfide solution to reveal evidence of implantation.
The uterus of each adult female was examined and the following recorded;
i. Pregnancy status
ii. Number of corpora lutea
iii. Gravid uterus weight
iv. Number, status (Live fetus, dead fetus, late intra-uterine death or early intra-uterine death) and intra-uterine position of implantations - Fetal examinations:
- Fetuses will be removed and live fetuses were weighed before subcutaneous overdose of a barbiturate agent.
For fetuses from decedent females prior to Day 20 of gestation, examination of the fetuses was restricted to external appearance. Each individual fetus from all litters at Day 20 of gestation were examined and the following was recorded:
i. External fetal findings
ii. Fetal weight
iii. Fetal sex
iv. Placental weight
v. Skeletal and visceral fetal findings
After external examination, approximately half of each litter was fixed in 70% Industrial Methylated Spirit (lMS), processed for skeletal evaluation and finally stored in 50% glycerol. The remainder of each litter was fixed in bouins fluid for visceral evaluation by microdissection and finally stored in 10% neutral buffered formalin. - Statistics:
- Quantitative data was subjected to statistical analysis to detect the significance of intergroup differences from control; statistical significance was achieved at a level of p<0.05. Analysis was performed on the following parameters:
Body weight and body weight change (including adjustment for the contribution of the gravid uterus), food consumption, gravid uterus weight, litter data and fetal litter and placental weights.
The data were first assessed using Shapiro-Wilk test for normality and Bartlett's test for homogeneity of variance. If the data are considered to be normal and homogeneous, parametric assessment, one way analysis of variance and, if significant, Dunnett's multiple comparison test was employed. Where the data are considered not to be normal or non homogeneous, non-parametric assessment, Kruskal-Wallis and, if significant, pairwise analysis of control values against treated values using the Mann-Whitney 'U' test wsd used. - Indices:
- All scheduled data was summarized in tabular form; additionally calculated data (i.e. body weight gain, adjusted body weights) was presented. Unscheduled data (i.e. arrival body weight, additional health monitoring body weights) was reported where this information is of assistance in the interpretation of the scientific outcome of the study. As the litter is the standard unit of assessment, mean values and incidences were calculated first within each litter and then group mean values calculated from these litter values.
Group mean values were calculated from all females with a live litter at Day 20 of gestation. Reproductive indices were calculated for all females/litters at Day 20 of gestation. For decedent animals, calculation of reproductive indices was restricted to pre-implantation loss. Non-pregnant animals are defined as having no implantations; corpora lutea for these animals are considered not to be associated with mating/pregnancy and therefore are not reported as part of the litter data. - Description (incidence and severity):
- Treatment at 600 mg/kg bw/day was associated with a number of notable clinical signs with ataxia and hunched posture being observed for all animals and a much lower incidence of prostration and noisy respiration also being apparent. Increased post-dosing salivation was also observed for approximately half the animals at this dosage.
Treatment at 300 mg/kg bw/day was associated with noisy respiration in ten females during the study; the incidence of this finding was higher than that observed at 600 mg/kg bw/day. Increased post-dosing salivation was also observed for two animals at 300 mg/kg bw/day.
Treatment at 100 mg/kg bw/day was associated with noisy respiration in two females during the study and hunched posture in one animal. Noisy respiration was also apparent for one control animal. - Description (incidence):
- There were two unscheduled deaths on the study.
Female 75, receiving 600 mg/kg bw/day, showed noisy respiration on Day 5 of gestation and noisy respiration, ataxia and hunched posture on Day 6. Decreased, laboured and noisy respiration, ataxia and hunched posture and staining of the snout was apparent on Day 7 and the animal was killed for animal welfare considerations. Necropsy revealed a clear fluid-filled mass between the left side of the chest cavity and skin (under the left forelimb). This is considered to have been a result of accidental trauma during the dosing procedure and, as such, this death was considered to be unrelated to treatment.
Female 66, receiving 300 mg/kg bw/day, was found dead on Day 19 of gestation. No clinical signs had been apparent prior to this death and, other than the uterus only containing dead implantations, there was no findings apparent at macroscopic necropsy examination. Although the cause of this death is unknown, in view of the absence of any treatment deaths at 600 mg/kg bw/day, it was considered to be incidental and unrelated to treatment. - Description (incidence and severity):
- At 600 mg/kg bw/day, initial mean body weight gain appeared lower than control until Day 8 of gestation, thereafter there was no obvious effect on body weight gain during gestation. Overall body weight gain during gestation, including when adjusted for the contribution of the gravid uterus, was similar to control
At 100 and 300 mg/kg bw/day, there was no obvious effect on body weight gain during gestation, including overall body weight gain when adjusted for the contribution of the gravid uterus. - Description (incidence and severity):
- At 600 mg/kg bw/day, initial mean food consumption appeared lower than control until Day 8 of gestation, thereafter there was no obvious effect on food intake during gestation. The lower initial food intake was consistent with the lower initial body weight at this dosage.
At 100 and 300 mg/kg bw/day, there was no obvious effect on food consumption during gestation. - Description (incidence and severity):
- At 600 mg/kg bw/day, necropsy examination of the adult females revealed a number of macroscopic stomach findings, including thickened non-glandular region, sloughing of the non-glandular region and raised white patches on the non-glandular region. There was also a low incidence of raised white patches on the glandular region and raised limiting ridge.
At 100 and 300 mg/kg bw/day, the incidence of stomach findings at necropsy was much lower and restricted to low incidences of yellow stomach contents, sloughing of the non-glandular region, raised white patches on the glandular region and raised limiting ridge. Additionally one female also showed gaseous distension of the caecum.
At 100, a low incidence of stomach findings persisted but was restricted to yellow stomach contents, thickened non-glandular region and raised white patches on the glandular region. Additionally one female also showed gaseous distension of the caecum.
Collectively these findings for treated animals suggest that the test item is irritant in nature, although sloughing of the glandular region of the stomach was also observed for one control female. - Number of abortions:
- no effects observed
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- no effects observed
- Total litter losses by resorption:
- no effects observed
- Early or late resorptions:
- no effects observed
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Migrated Data from removed field(s)
Field "Effects on pregnancy duration" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsMaternalAnimals.MaternalDevelopmentalToxicity.EffectsOnPregnancyDuration): no effects observed - Changes in number of pregnant:
- no effects observed
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- gross pathology
- Fetal body weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Migrated Data from removed field(s)
Field "Fetal/pup body weight changes" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsFetuses.FetalPupBodyWeightChanges): no effects observed - Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- no effects observed
- Changes in postnatal survival:
- no effects observed
- External malformations:
- no effects observed
- Skeletal malformations:
- no effects observed
- Visceral malformations:
- no effects observed
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 600 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no effects observed
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- Within the confines of this study, 600 mg/kg bw/day delivered the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) as demonstrated by the clinical observations and effects on body weight and the gross pathology observations at necropsy. The 300 mg/kg bw/day dose was considered to be the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for the pregnant female rat based on clinical signs, intermittent reduced body weight gain and food consumption. The NOAEL for the in utero growth, survival and morphological development of the conceptus was considered >600 mg/kg bw/day.
- Executive summary:
Introduction
The study was performed to investigate the effects of the test item on embryonic and fetal development following repeated administration by gavage to the pregnant female during gestation including the period of organogenesis. The study was designed to comply with the following guidelines:
US EPA Health Effects Test Guideline OPPTS 870.3700, ‘Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study’ (August 1998)
Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Testing guidelines for Toxicology studies, 12 NohSan No 8147, (24 November 2000)
OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, No 414, ‘Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study’ (adopted 22 January 2001)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 test methods pursuant to Regulations (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)
Methods
The test item was administered by gavage to three groups each of twenty-four time mated Sprague-Dawley Crl:CD® (SD) IGS BR strain rats, between Days 3 and 19 of gestation inclusive at dose levels 100, 300, and 600 mg/kg bw/day (employing a dose volume of 4 mL/kg bw). A further group of twenty-four time mated females was exposed to the vehicle (Polyethylene glycol 400) only over the same treatment period to serve as a control.
Clinical signs, body weight change, food and water consumptions were monitored during the study.
All females were terminated on Day 20 of gestation and subjected to gross necropsy including examination of the uterine contents. The number of corpora lutea, number, position and type of implantation, placental weights, fetal weight, sex and external and internal macroscopic appearance were recorded. Half of each litter were examined for detailed skeletal development and the remaining half were subjected to detailed visceral examination.
Results
Mortality
There were two unscheduled deaths on the study.
At 600 mg/kg bw/day, Female 75 showed adverse clinical signs on Days 6 and 7 and was killed for animal welfare considerations. Necropsy findings indicated that this death was a result of accidental trauma during the dosing procedure and this death was considered to be unrelated to treatment.
At 300 mg/kg bw/day, Female 66 was found dead on Day 19 of gestation. The only clinical sign apparent for this animal was increased salivation post-dosing and necropsy findings did not reveal any obvious cause of this death. Whilst the aetiology of this death is unknown, the absence of any treatment-related deaths at 600 mg/kg bw/day indicated that this death was incidental and unrelated to treatment.
Clinical Observations
Treatment at 600 mg/kg bw/day was associated with a number of notable clinical signs with ataxia and hunched posture being observed for all animals and prostration, noisy respiration, tiptoe gait, piloerection, generalized fur loss and increased pre-dosing salivation also being apparent at a lower incidence. Increased post-dosing salivation was also observed for approximately half the animals at this dosage.
At 100 and 300 mg/kg bw/day, noisy respiration was observed for two and ten females respectively and increased salivation was evident at a lower incidence but these were considered to reflect difficulties in dosing particular animals with the test item formulation rather than any treatment-related effect.
Body Weight
At 600 mg/kg bw/day, lower body weight gains were apparent during Days 3 to 4 and 5 to 8 of gestation, but thereafter mean body weight gains were similar, or slightly superior to control to termination. Cumulative body weight gain from the start of treatment was lower than control until Day 11 of gestation, but overall body weight gain during gestation, including when adjusted for the contribution of the gravid uterus, was similar to control.
At 100 and 300 mg/kg bw/day, there was no obvious effect on body weight gain during gestation.
Food Consumption
At 600 mg/kg bw/day, lower mean food consumption, compared to control, was apparent to Day 8 of gestation, thereafter food intake was similar to control.
At 100 and 300 mg/kg bw/day, there was no obvious effect on food consumption during gestation.
Water Consumption
Visual inspection of water bottles during gestation did not indicate any obvious effect of treatment at 100, 300 or 600 mg/kg bw/day.
Post Mortem Studies
At 600 mg/kg bw/day, necropsy revealed a number of macroscopic stomach findings, including thickened non-glandular region, sloughing of the non-glandular region, raised white patches/white patches on the non-glandular region and, at a lower incidence, raised white patches on the glandular region and raised limiting ridge.
At 300 mg/kg bw/day, stomach findings at necropsy was restricted to low incidences of yellow stomach contents, sloughing of the non-glandular region, raised white patches/white patches on the glandular region and raised limiting ridge. One female also showed gaseous distension of the cecum.
At 100 mg/kg bw/day, stomach findings at necropsy was restricted to yellow stomach contents, thickened non-glandular region, sloughing of the glandular region and raised white patches/white patches on the glandular region. One female also showed gaseous distension of the cecum.
Litter Responses
Litter Data
There was no effect of maternal treatment on litter data, as assessed by preimplantation loss, number of implantations, subsequent embryofetal survival, live litter size and sex ratio on Day 20 of gestation at 100, 300 or 600 mg/kg bw/day.
Litter, Placental and Fetal Weights
There was no effect of maternal treatment on mean fetal, placental and litter weight on Day 20 of gestation at 100, 300 or 600 mg/kg bw/day.
External Fetal Examination
The incidence and distribution of external findings on Day 20 of gestation did not indicate effects on fetal development at 100, 300 or 600 mg/kg bw/day.
Detailed Visceral Examinations
Neither the type, incidence nor distribution of findings apparent during detailed visceral examination of fetuses indicated effects of maternal treatment on fetal development at 100, 300 or 600 mg/kg bw/day.
Detailed Skeletal Examinations
Neither the type, incidence nor distribution of findings apparent during detailed skeletal examination of fetuses indicated effects of maternal treatment on fetal development at 100, 300 or 600 mg/kg bw/day.
Conclusion
Within the confines of this study, 600 mg/kg bw/day delivered the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) as demonstrated by the clinical observations and effects on body weight and the gross pathology observations at necropsy. The 300 mg/kg bw/day dose was considered to be the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for the pregnant female rat based on clinical signs, intermittent reduced body weight gain and food consumption. The NOAEL for the in utero growth, survival and morphological development of the conceptus was considered >600 mg/kg bw/day.
Reference
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
Justification for classification or non-classification
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.