Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 214-946-9 | CAS number: 1222-05-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
The substance is negative in the Ames test (OECD TG 471)
The substance is negative in the L5178Y TK +/- Mouse Lymphoma Assay (OECD TG 490)
The substance is negative in the Chromosome Aberration test (OECD TG 473)
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
The substance is negative in the micronucleus cytogenetic assay (OECD TG 474)
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Ames-Genetic toxicity in vitro, OECD TG 471, RIFM, 1994
Test material (>99% pure) in acetone was tested in the Ames test (OECD TG 471, RIFM, 1994) in accordance with GLP in absence or presence of Aroclor-induced rat liver S9 at doses 0, 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000 and 5000 mg/plate using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, TA1538 and Escherichia Coli strain WP2 UVRA and appropriate positive controls in triplicate. The doses were based on a preliminary assay. Results: Slight precipitation was seen at the three highest doses (≥333 µg/plate) but no cytotoxicity was not observed. All positive controls gave positive responses to the systems within acceptable ranges. No significant increase in the number of revertant colonies was observed at any dose with any of the six strains with or without activation. Based on this the substance is not mutagenic in this test.
Genetic toxicity in vitro, Chromosomal aberrations, OECD TG 473, RIFM 1995
The substance (purity >99%) is tested in a cytogenetic assay with Chinese Hamster ovary cells (CHO-K1) in the OECD TG 473 and in accordance with GLP (RIFM, 1995). Concentrations of 5, 10 and 20 μg test item/ml were used without metabolic activation, using 4/20, 20/20 and 44/44 hr exposure/harvest periods. In the study with metabolic activation (S9 from rat liver induced by Aroclor 1254), dose levels of 8.7, 17.3 and 34.5 μg HHCB/ml were tested for the 4-hr period with a 20-hr harvest time and dose levels of 22.6, 28.2 and 30.0 μg/ml for the 4-hr period with a 44-hr harvest time. At the 20 and 44-hr harvest times, the cells were assessed for structural chromosome aberrations, and at the 44-hr harvest time, also for numerical chromosome aberrations. Results: The mitotic index was significantly lowered at the highest dose in all cases. N-methyl-N’-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine was used as a positive control in the non-activated study and benzo(a)pyrene in the activated study. Positive controls (N-methyl-N’-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine without S9 and benzo(a)pyrene with S9) were included and caused increases in structural (significantly) aberrations in all cases. Cytotoxicity was observed at 20 μg/ml after 20 and 44 hours of treatment without activation and at 30 and 34.5 μg/ml after 4 hours of activation. No significant increase in structural or numerical chromosome aberrations was observed with or without activation with the test item at any dose. HHCB was concluded to be negative for chromosome aberrations in this test. Based on this the substance is not cytogenetic in this test.
Genetic toxicity in vitro - MLA, OECD TG 490, IFF, 2020
A study was conducted in order to assess the potential mutagenicity of the test item on the thymidine kinase, TK +/-, locus of the L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell line (OECD TG 490, GLP). One main Mutagenicity Test was performed. In this main test, L5178Y TK +/- 3.7.2c mouse lymphoma cells (heterozygous at the thymidine kinase locus) were treated with the test item at 9 dose levels (without S9: 0,1,2,4,8,16,20,24,28,32μg/mL and with S9: 0,2,4,8,16,32,48,56,64,72μg/mL) in duplicate, together with solvent (DMSO), and positive controls using 4 hour exposure groups both in the absence and presence of metabolic activation (2% S9). The dose range of test item used in the main test was selected following the results of a preliminary toxicity test. The maximum dose level used was limited by test item-induced toxicity, the 32 μg/mL (+S9) and 64 and 72 μg/mL (-S9) doses were not plated. Results: A precipitate of test item was not observed in the main test. The solvent control cultures had mutant frequency values that were acceptable for the L5178Y cell line at the TK +/- locus. The positive control substances methyl methane sulfonate and cyclophosphamide induced marked increases in the mutant frequency, sufficient to indicate the satisfactory performance of the test and of the activity of the metabolizing system. The test item did not induce any increases in the mutant frequency at the TK +/- locus in L5178Y cells that exceeded the GEF, consequently it is considered to be non-mutagenic in this assay.
Genetic toxicity in vivo - in vivo micronucleus test, OECD TG 474, RIFM, 1997
In the micronucleus test (OECD TG 474, GLP), groups of 5 male (28.1-37.2 g) and 5 female ICR mice (24.5-31.0 g) were dosed with 0, 376, 750, or 1500 mg/kg bw test item (in corn oil - purity >99%) by intraperitoneal injection at a constant volume of 20 ml/kg bw. The high dose was selected to be approximately 70% of the estimated intraperitoneal LD50 based on a preliminary test. The positive control was cyclophosphamide. Bone marrow was harvested at 24, 48 and 72 hr after dosing and examined for micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE). No mortality was seen. Lethargy was observed in all animals on 1500 mg/kg bw, in 4/15 males and 4/15 females on 750 mg/kg, and 1/15 males and 0/15 females on 376 mg/kg bw. Moderate reductions (up to 25%) in the ratio of PCE to total erythrocytes were observed in groups on 1500 mg/kg bw after 48 and 72 hrs indicating toxicity and bioavailability to the bone marrow target. The positive control induced a significant increase in micronucleated PCE in both male and female mice at 24 hr (the only harvest time for this group). No significant increase in micronucleated PCE in HHCB-treated groups relative to the respective vehicle control group was observed in male or female mice at 24, 48 or 72 hr after dose administration. Based on this the substance is not cytogenetic in this test.
An overview of the available in vitro and in vivo mutagenicity studies is presented in the table below.
Type | Species | Activation | Doses | Results | GLP | OECD TG | Reference |
In vitro Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay | Salmonella typhimurium (TA98, 100, 1535, 1537, 1538) & E. coli (WP2 UVRA) | With and without S9 | 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3333, 5000 µg/plate | Negative | Yes | 471 | Api and San, 1999, San and Sly, 1994 |
In vitro Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay | Salmonella typhimurium (TA97, 98, 100 and 102) | With and without S9 | 5, 16.6, 50, 166.6, or 500 µg/plate | Negative | No |
| Mersch-Sunderman, 1998a |
In vitro SOS induction | E. coli PQ37 | With and without S9 | 0.39, 0.78, 1.56, 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50µg/assay | Negative | No |
| Mersch-Sunderman, 1998b |
In vitro cytogenetic assay | Chinese hamster ovary cells | With and without S9 | 9, 17, 34µg/ml & 23, 28, 30 µg/ml | Negative | Yes | 473 | Api and San, 1999a, Curry and Putman, 1995 |
In vitro micronucleus test | Human lymphocytes |
| 0.05, 0.49, 4.85, 48.5, 97, 194µM (=0.013, 0.13, 1.25, 12.5, 25, 50 µg/ml) | Negative | No |
| Kevekordes et al., 1997 |
In vitro micronucleus test | Human hepatoma cells | None added, some inherent | 0.1, 0.97, 9.7, 97, 194, 387 µM (=0.036, 0.25, 2.5, 25, 50, 100 µg/ml) | Negative | No |
| Kevekordes et al., 1997 |
In vitro sister chromatid exchange test | Human lymphocytes | With and without S9 | 0.025, 0.25, 2.43, 24.25, 48.5, 97µM (= 0.007, 0.07, 0.6, 6, 12.5, 25 µg/ml) | Negative | No |
| Kevekordes et al., 1998 |
In vitro unscheduled DNA synthesis | Primary rat hepatocytes | Inherent | 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50µg/ml | Negative | Yes | 482 | Api and San, 1999, San and Sly, 1994 |
In vivo micronucleus test | Mice |
| 380, 750, 1500 mg/kg bw | Negative | Yes | 474 | Api and San, 1999, Gudi and Ritter, 1997 |
DNA precipitation assay and Micronucleus test | Zebra mussel(Dreissena polymorpha) |
| 100 ng/L, 500 ng/L | Significant increase in DNA fragmentation No significant increases in MN frequency |
|
| Parolini et al., 2015 |
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the results of the gene mutation in bacterial cells (Ames test), in vitro cytogenicity (chromosome aberration), in vitro gene mutation in mammalian cells, and the in vivo cytogenicity test, the substance is not genotoxic and therefore does not have to be classified for genotoxicity in accordance with EU CLP (EC no. 1272/2008 and its amendments).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.