Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-473-0 | CAS number: 96-05-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
skin:
- rabbit (24 h, semiocclusive): not irritating
- rabbit (24 h, occlusive): not irritating (according to Draize; reevaluated according to OECD 404)
eye:
- rabbit: not irritating
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 1984-03-27 to 1984-03-30
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Remarks:
- Equivalent or similar to OECD guideline, GLP, observation period only 72 h.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- observation period only 72 h
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The study was based on that described in the Journal Officiel de la Republique Francaise, 21 February 1982. Six male New Zealand White rabbits were treated with the undiluted test substance for 24 h under semiocclusive conditions to examine the skin irritating potential of the test substance.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Nottingham University, School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Leics & Rosemead Rabbits Ltd., Lea Valley, Essex
- Age at study initiation: approximately 12 - 16 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.78 - 3.10 kg
- Housing: individually
- Diet: free access to a standard laboratory diet (Rabbit Diet, A.W. Tindall Limited, Holbeach, Lincolnshire)
- Water: free access to tapwater
- Acclimation period: a minimum period of five days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17 - 22
- Humidity (%): Humidity was not controlled but remained within a range of 52 - 58% RH recorded daily on a wet and dry bulb hygrometer.
- Air changes (per hr): approximately 10 changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12 - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: intact and abraded
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 0.5 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 h
- Observation period:
- 72 h
- Number of animals:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Type of wrap if used: The test material was introduced under a composite patch which consisted of a 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm square of absorbant lint BPC backed by a 4.0 cm x 4.0 cm square of absorbant lint BPC with a final backing of a 3.0 cm x 3.0 cm square of polythene. The patches were applied to the abraded and intact test sites of each animal and held securely in position by two lengths of Sleek adhesive strapping (Smith & Nephew Limited) in the form of a cross. An elasticated corset was then applied (Seton's Tubigrip) to prevent interference with the patches.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: Any residual test material was removed by gentle swabbing with cotton wool soaked in lukewarm water or other suitable solvent.
- Time after start of exposure: 24 h
SCORING SYSTEM: according to Draize J.H (1959): Association of Food & Drug Officials of the USA, Austin, Texas, "The Appraisal of the Safety of Chemieals in Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics" - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #4
- Remarks:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.5
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- probability of mild irritation
- Remarks:
- 24 hours exposure. Only time point 24 and 72 hours were observed.
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: #3, #6
- Remarks:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- probability of mild irritation
- Remarks:
- 24 hours exposure. Only time point 24 and 72 hours were observed.
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: #2
- Remarks:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.5
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- probability of mild irritation
- Remarks:
- 24 hours exposure. Only time point 24 and 72 hours were observed.
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: #5
- Remarks:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- probability of mild irritation
- Remarks:
- 24 hours exposure. Only time point 24 and 72 hours were observed.
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #3, #6
- Remarks:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- Only time point 24 and 72 hours were observed.
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: #2, #4
- Remarks:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.5
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- probability of weak irritation
- Remarks:
- Only time point 24 and 72 hours were observed.
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #5
- Remarks:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- probability of weak irritation
- Remarks:
- Only time point 24 and 72 hours were observed.
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The test material produced slight or well-defined cutaneous irritation in 6/6 rabbits. Very slight to moderate erythema, with or without very slight oedema was observed at the intact and abraded sites of all six rabbits at the 24 hours reading. The reactions had ameliorated completely in one rabbit by the 72 hours observation when very slight to well-defined erythema, with or without very slight oedema persisted at the intact and abraded sites of four rabbits and the abraded site only of the remaining rabbit.
No data is available on reversibility after 72 h. As most of the 72 h scores were lower compared to the 24 h scores, a full reversibility is expected after at least 21 days. - Other effects:
- no
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- In this primary dermal irritation study in rabbit, Allyl methacrylate was slightly irritating.
- Executive summary:
In a primary dermal irritation study similar to OECD 404 6 rabbits were dermally exposed to 0.5 mL of undiluted Allyl methacrylate to approximately 2.5 cm² skin area. Two application sites per animal were treated, one site was left intact, the other was abraded. Test sites were covered with an semi-occlusive dressing for 24 hours. Animals were observed for 72 hours. Irritation was scored according to Draize J.H (1959): Association of Food & Drug Officials of the USA, Austin, Texas, "The Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics". In this study, Allyl methacrylate was slightly irritating and is not a dermal irritant.. Study performance does not comply with requirements of the relevant recent EU and OECD guidelines, where a less vigorous application regime with an exposure period of 4 hours, treatment of only intact skin is stipulated.
Thus, it can be assumed, that a substance which shows no irritating activity under the application regime of Association of Food & Drug Officials of the USA, Austin, Texas, "The Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics" will also be non irritating under the application regimes of the relevant recent EU and OECD guidelines. Therefore the study is adequate for C&L purposes.
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- October 1977
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Guideline study; No GLP.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Appraisal of the safety of chemicals in foods, drugs and cosmetics, FDA, according Draize; reevaluated according OECD 404
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- not specified
- Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not specified
- Amount / concentration applied:
- no data
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 h
- Observation period:
- no data
- Number of animals:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- no data
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: #2, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- 24 hours exposure
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #4
- Time point:
- 24 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- no data
- Remarks:
- No data in respect to reversibility for times after exposure > 72h. Only data of shaved skin have been used, data of shaved and scarified skin have not been used.
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- 24 hours exposure
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: #2, #4, #5, #6
- Remarks:
- mean
- Time point:
- 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- 24 hours exposure
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #3
- Remarks:
- mean
- Time point:
- 72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- 24 hours exposure
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Remarks:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Remarks:
- mean
- Time point:
- 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not relevant
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- 24 hours exposure
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- no data
- Other effects:
- no data
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: CLP, EU GHS (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008)
- Conclusions:
- In this primary dermal irritation study in rabbit, Allyl methacrylate was slightly irritating.
- Executive summary:
In a primary dermal irritation study similar to US FHSA Federal regulation: 16 CFR 1500.41, 6 rabbits were dermally exposed to 0.5 mL of undiluted Allyl methacrylate to approximately 2.5 cm² skin area. Two application sites per animal were treated, one site was left intact, the other was abraded. Test sites were covered with an occlusive dressing for 24 hours. Animals were observed for 72 hours. Irritation was scored similar to FHSA Federal guideline 16 CFR 1500.41. This scoring system is similar to OECD guideline 404. No dermal irritation response was observed, neither at the intact nor at the abraded application sites. In this study, Allyl methacrylate was slightly irritating and is not a dermal irritant.. Study performance does not comply with requirements of the relevant recent EU and OECD guidelines, where a less vigorous application regime with semi-occlusive dressing, an exposure period of 4 hours, treatment of only intact skin is stipulated.
Thus, it can be assumed, that a substance which shows no irritating activity under the application regime of guideline US FHSA Federal regulation: 16 CFR 1500.41 will also be non irritating under the application regimes of the relevant recent EU and OECD guidelines. Therefore the study is adequate for C&L purposes.
Referenceopen allclose all
Exposition: | 24 h | ||
Animal | Reading | Erythema | Edema |
1 | 24 h | 1 | 0 |
2 | 24 h | 2 | 1 |
3 | 24 h | 1 | 0 |
4 | 24 h | 1 | 1 |
5 | 24 h | 2 | 1 |
6 | 24 h | 1 | 0 |
1 | 72 h | 0 | 0 |
2 | 72 h | 1 | 0 |
3 | 72 h | 1 | 0 |
4 | 72 h | 0 | 0 |
5 | 72 h | 2 | 1 |
6 | 72 h | 1 | 0 |
1 | 24 - 72 h | 0.5 | 0 |
2 | 24 - 72 h | 1.5 | 0.5 |
3 | 24 - 72 h | 1 | 0 |
4 | 24 - 72 h | 0.5 | 0.5 |
5 | 24 - 72 h | 2 | 1 |
6 | 24 - 72 h | 1 | 0 |
mean (animal 1-6) | 24 - 72 h | 1.1 | 0.3 |
The test material produced a Primary Cutaneous Irritation Index of 1.5 and was classified as a slight irritant to the skin.
|
Remarks concerning the study result: The study for acute skin irritation/
corrosion was performed before OECD 404 came into force. For this reason the
test values were reevaluated according to OECD criteria and test scores
(erythema, oedema) obtained for the scarified skin were regarded as irrelevant.
Classification criteria according to the different classification systems:
EU-GHS:
Category 1:Corrosive subcategories
Corrosive in >= 1 of 3 animals
(applies to authorities not using subcategories): Corrosive
(only applies to some authorities)
Subcategory Exposure Observation
------------------------------------------------------------
1A <= 3 minutes <= 1 hour
1B > 3 minutes to <= 1 hour <= 14 days
1C > 1 hour to <= 4 hours <= 14 days
A: Single harmonized corrosion category, using the results of animal testing.
A: Corrosive is a test substance that produces destruction of skin tissue, namely,
visible necrosis through the epidermis and into the dermis, in at least 1 of 3
tested animals after exposure up to 4 hours duration. Corrosive reactions are
typified by ulcers, bleeding, bloody scrabs and, by the end of observation at 14
days, by discoloration due to bleaching of the skin, complete areas of alopecia
and scars. Histopathologic determinations should be consided evaluate questionable
lesions.
Substances and/or mixtures are considered corrosive (Skin categorry 1) if it has
a pH of 2 or less or a pH of 11.5 or greater. If consideration of alkali/acid
reserve suggests the substance or prepatration may not be corrosive despite the
low or high pH value, then further testing needs to be carried out to confirm
this, preferably by use of an appropriate validated in vitro test.
Category 2:
(1) Mean value of >= 2.3 to < 4.0 for erythem/eschar or for oedema in at least 2
of 3 animals from gradings at 24, 48 and 72 hours after patch removal or, if
reactions are delayed, from grades on 3 consecutive days after the onset of
skin reactions, or
(2) Inflammation that persits to the end of the observation period normally 14
days in at least 2 animals, particularly taking into account alopecia
(limited area), hyperkeratosis, hyperplasia, and scalling, or
(3) In some cases where there is pronounced variability of response amoung
animals, with very definite positive effects related to chemical exposure
in a single animal but less than the criteria above.
UN-GHS (additional category 3):
Category 3:Mild irritant (Applies to only some authorities for e.g. UN-GHS)
Mean value of >= 1.5 to < 2.3 for erythem/eschar or for oedema from gradings
in at least 2 of 3 tested animals from grades at 24, 48 and 72 hours or, if
reactions are delayed, from grades on 3 consecutive days after the onset of
skin reactions (when not included in the irritant category above).
According to the results of this dermal irritation study n-Decylmethacrylate
has to be classified as follows:
According to GefStoffV:slightly below the irritancy threshold (non-irritant,
but 24 hour exposition, no wash off the test substance)
According to EU-GHS (CLP):Hazard category: None(effects < 2.3 both erythem
and oedema)
According to UN-GHS:Hazard category: 3(Erythem > 1.5 but < 2.3, 24 hour
exposition, no wash off the test substance)
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 1984-04-09 to 1984-04-16
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Equivalent or similar to OECD guideline, GLP
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The study was based on the method described in the Journal Officiel de la Republique Francaise 21 April 1971 and 5 June 1973. The eyes of six New Zealand White rabbits were treated with the undiluted test substance to examine the eye irritating potential of the test substance.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Nottingham University, School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington,Leics, and Rosemead Rabbits Ltd., Lea Valley, Essex
- Age at study initiation: approximately 12-16 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.47 - 2.71 kg
- Housing: individually
- Diet: standard laboratory diet (Rabbit Diet, A.W. Tindall Limited, Holbeach, Lincolnshire) ad libitum
- Water: free access to tap water
- Acclimation period: for a minimum period of five days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17 - 25
- Humidity (%):Humidity was not controlled but remained within a range of 55-65 % RH recorded daily on a wet and dry bulb hygrometer.
- Air changes (per hr): approximately 10 changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single treatment (no washing out conducted)
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 7 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: no washing conducted
SCORING SYSTEM: according to Draize J.H. 1959, Assoc. of Food and Drug Officials of the USA, Austin, Texas, "The Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics"
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: Examination of the eye was facilitated by the use of a standard ophthalmoscope (Keeler). Observation of corneal opacity may be carried out under ultra-violet illumination (Mineralight UVSL-58) preceded by the instillation into the eye of 0.05 mL of fluorescein. - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5,
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #4
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 4 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal: #2, #3, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.7
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 4 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 4 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #5
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 4.0
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #4
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The test material produced slight ocular irritation in 6/6 rabbits. A dulling of the normal lustre of the cornea was observed in two rabbits on Day 1 only. Iritis was observed in one rabbit on Day 1 only. Mild inflammation or a diffuse crimson-red colouration of the conjunctivae, with or without slight swelling was observed in all six rabbits on Day 1. The reactions had ameliorated in one rabbit by Day 2, in three further rabbits by Day 3 and in the two remaining rabbits by Day 4.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Allymethacrylate was not irritating according to EU-criteria in this eye irritation study.
- Executive summary:
Allymethacrylate was not irritating according to EU-criteria in this eye irritation study.
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 1978
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study, No GLP
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Appraisal of the safety of chemicals in food, drugs and cosmetics, FDA, according Draize
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Controls:
- other: the untreated right eye conducted as control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 0.1 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single treatment (no washing out conducted)
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 days after instillation
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: no washing conducted - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: observation time: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Remarks on result:
- other: observation time: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #4, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Remarks on result:
- other: observation time: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 72h
- Remarks on result:
- other: observation time: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #5
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 4 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: observation time: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: observation time: 7 days
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- not irritating
- Irreversible damage to cornea, iris, conjunctiva 21 days after exposure in at least one animal
- Mean Draize score in 2 of 3 animals:
- Reversible adverse effects on cornea, iris, conjunctiva
- Mean Draize score in 2 of 3 animals:
- Reversible in 21 days
- Reversible in 7 days
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: CLP, EU GHS (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008)
- Conclusions:
- In this primary eye irritation study Allyl methacrylate is not an eye irritant.
- Executive summary:
In a primary eye irritation study similar to US FHSA Federal regulation: 16 CFR 1500.42 (similar to OECD guideline 405),
0.1 mL of Allyl methacrylate (typical purity: 99 %) was instilled into the conjunctival sac of the left eye of 6 New Zealand White rabbits without removing the test substance. Animals then were observed for 7 days. Irritation was scored by the method of Draize.
Transient conjunctival irritating effects were seen for two respectively three days after application in 2/6 animals. All effects were completely reversible at day 4. From day 4 onward all scores were zero.
In this study, Allyl methacrylate is not an eye irritant.
NOTE: Any of data in this dataset are disseminated by the European Union on a right-to-know basis and this is not a publication in the same sense as a book or an article in a journal. The right of ownership in any part of this information is reserved by the data owner(s). The use of this information for any other, e.g. commercial purpose is strictly reserved to the data owners and those persons or legal entities having paid the respective access fee for the intended purpose.
Referenceopen allclose all
Cornea | Iris | Conjunctiva | |||||
Animal | Reading | Opacity | Area involved | Redness | Chemosis | Discharge | |
1 | 24 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
2 | 24 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
3 | 24 hrs | D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
4 | 24 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
5 | 24 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
6 | 24 hrs | D | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
1 | 48 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 48 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
3 | 48 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 48 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5 | 48 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
6 | 48 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 72 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 72 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 72 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 72 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5 | 72 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
6 | 72 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 4 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 4 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 4 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 4 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5 | 4 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6 | 4 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 7 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 7 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 7 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 7 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5 | 7 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6 | 7 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 24/48/72 hrs | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.3 | ||
2 | 24/48/72 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | ||
3 | 24/48/72 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | ||
4 | 24/48/72 hrs | 0 | 0 | 0.3 | 0 | ||
5 | 24/48/72 hrs | 0 | 0 | 1.3 | 0.3 | ||
6 | 24/48/72 hrs | 0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | ||
mean animal 1-3 | 24/48/72 hrs | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.3 | ||
D = Dulling of the cornea |
The test material produced a Maximum Mean Score of 5.8
Classification of eye irritation studies according GHS-criteria
Substance:Allyl methacrylate AMA CAS:96-05-9
Internal No.:UNTER 78-014
Date/Expert:06-12-15/Am
Animal No. |
Corneal opacity/Hornhauttrübung[Scores]
|
Mean Draize score |
Reversibility [scores] |
Hazard category |
|||
after 24 h |
after 48 h |
after 72 h |
in 7 days |
in 21 days |
|
||
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Animal No. |
Iritis/Regenbogenhautentzündung[Scores]
|
Mean Draize score |
Reversibility [scores] |
Hazard category |
|||
after 24 h |
after 48 h |
after 72 h |
in 7 days |
in 21 days |
|
||
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Animal No. |
Conjunctiva redness (erythem) /Bindehautrötung[Scores]
|
Mean Draize score |
Reversibility [scores] |
Hazard category |
|||
after 24 h |
after 48 h |
after 72 h |
in 7 days |
in 21 days |
|
||
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
5 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1,33 |
0 |
|
|
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
Animal No. |
Conjunctiva chemosis /Bindehautödem[Scores]
|
Mean Draize score |
Reversibility [scores] |
Hazard category |
|||
after 24 h |
after 48 h |
after 72 h |
in 7 days |
in 21 days |
|
||
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
Classification: Hazard Category |
none |
n.d. = no data
Classification Criteria for serious Eye Damage/Eye Irritation
Category 1
corneal opacity≥ 3
iritis ≥ 1,5
Category 2
corneal opacity≥1
iritis≥1
redness≥2
chemosis≥2
Subcategory 2A
Subcategory 2B
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin:
In the study of Safepharm (1984) six male New Zealand White rabbits were treated with the undiluted test substance for 24 h under semiocclusive conditions to examine the skin irritating potential of the test substance. The study was based on that described in the Journal Officiel de la Republique Francaise, 21 February 1982 equivalent or similar to OECD guidelines and was conducted in compliance with GLP conditions.
Allyl methacrylate produced slight or well-defined cutaneous irritation in 6/6 rabbits. Very slight to moderate erythema, with or without very slight edema was observed at the intact and abraded sites of all six rabbits at the 24 hours reading. The reactions had ameliorated completely in one rabbit by the 72 hours observation when very slight to well-defined erythema, with or without very slight edema persisted at the intact and abraded sites of four rabbits and the abraded site only of the remaining rabbit. The mean scores of the six animals (24 and 72 h values) for erythema and edema were 1.1 and 0.3, respectively. No data is available on reversibility after 72 h. As most of the 72 h scores were lower compared to the 24 h scores, a full reversibility is expected after at least 21 days.
In the second study from Evonik Industries similar to US FHSA Federal regulation: 16 CFR 1500.41, 6 rabbits were dermally exposed to 0.5 mL of undiluted Allyl methacrylate to approximately 2.5 cm² skin area. Two application sites per animal were treated, one site was left intact, the other was abraded. Test sites were covered with an occlusive dressing for 24 hours. Animals were observed for 72 hours. Irritation was scored similar to FHSA Federal guideline 16 CFR 1500.41. This scoring system is similar to OECD guideline 404. No dermal irritation response was observed, neither at the intact nor at the abraded application sites. In this study, Allyl methacrylate was slightly irritating and is not a dermal irritant.. Study performance does not comply with requirements of the relevant recent EU and OECD guidelines, where a less vigorous application regime with semi-occlusive dressing, an exposure period of 4 hours, treatment of only intact skin is stipulated.
Thus, it can be assumed, that a substance which shows no irritating activity under the application regime of guideline US FHSA Federal regulation: 16 CFR 1500.41 will also be non irritating under the application regimes of the relevant recent EU and OECD guidelines.
Eye:
In the study of Safepharm (1984) the eyes of six male New Zealand White rabbits were treated with the undiluted test substance to examine the eye irritating potential of the test substance. The study was based on that described in the Journal Officiel de la Republique Francaise, 21 February 1982 , equivalent or similar to OECD guideline and was conducted in compliance with GLP conditions. The eyes were not rinsed and the observation period was 7 days. Allyl methacrylate produced slight ocular irritation in 6/6 rabbits. A dulling of the normal lustre of the cornea was observed in two rabbits on Day 1 only. Iritis was observed in one rabbit on Day 1 only. Mild inflammation or a diffuse crimson-red colouration of the conjunctivae, with or without slight swelling was observed in all six rabbits on Day 1. The reactions had ameliorated in one rabbit by Day 2, in three further rabbits by Day 3 and in the two remaining rabbits by Day 4. The mean scores of the six animals (24, 48 and 72 h values) for corneal opacity, iritis, conjunctival redness and chemosis were 0, 0.1, 0.8, and 0.3, respectively.
In the second study IBR, International Bioresearch, Inc. (1978) . 0.1 mL of allyl methacrylate were instilled into rabbits’ eyes (6 animals). The eyes were not rinsed and the observation period was 7 days. The study was conducted according to Draize but before GLP was established. Slight erythema was observed in 2/6 animals which was reversible within 7 days.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Due to the results of the studies no classification concerning skin or eye irritation according to Regulation (EC) no 1272/2008 (GHS) criteria is required.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.