Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 271-756-9 | CAS number: 68607-24-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2007
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 007
- Report date:
- 2007
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD 487, Draft Version 1
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- OECD Guideline Draft Proposal for a new Guideline No. 487, Version 1
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Quaternary ammonium compounds, C20-22-alkyltrimethyl, chlorides
- EC Number:
- 271-756-9
- EC Name:
- Quaternary ammonium compounds, C20-22-alkyltrimethyl, chlorides
- Cas Number:
- 68607-24-9
- Molecular formula:
- The substance is a quarternary ammonium chloride derived from fatty alcohol. The general chemical structure is R-N(Me)3+ Cl-, whereas the alkylrest R is variable for the main components C20 and C22 but also shorter and longer C-Chains (in smaller amounts)
- IUPAC Name:
- N,N,N-trimethyl-C20-22-(even numbered)-alkyl-1-aminium chloride
- Test material form:
- solid
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Thawed stock cultures were propagated at 37 °C in 80 cm2 plastic flasks (Greiner,
72632 Frickenhausen, Germany). About 5 x 105 cells per flask were seeded in 15 mL of MEM (minimal essential medium; Seromed, 12247 Berlin, Germany) supplemented with 10 % fetal calf serum (FCS; PAA Laboratories GmbH, 35091 Cölbe, Germany). The cells were subcultured twice weekly. The cell cultures were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 1.5 % carbon dioxide (98.5% air).
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Exp. I: with and without S9 mix: 0.8, 1.6, 3.1, 6.3, 12.5, 25.0, 50.0, 100.0, 200.0, and 400.0 µg/mL
Exp. IIA: with and without S9 mix: 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 3.1, 6.3, 12.5, and 25.0 µg/mL
Exp. IIB: without S9 mix: 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 10.0, 12.5, and 15.0 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: solubility
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- water
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- and colcemid and cyclophosphamide
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Two independent experiments were performed. In Experiment I the exposure period was 4 hours with and without metabolic activation. In Experiment II the exposure period was 20 hours without S9 mix and 4 hours with metabolic activation. The cells were prepared 24 hours (48 hours for Exp. II with S9 mix) after start of treatment with the test item.
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in minimal essential medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 and 24 hours
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 24 hours
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 24 hours (48 hours for Exp. II with S9 mix)
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays):
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): May Gruenwald and Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 1.5 - 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 2000
EVALUATION: Evaluation of the cultures was performed manually using NIKON microscopes with 40 x oil immersion objectives. The micronuclei were counted in cells showing a clearly visible cytoplasm area. The criteria for the evaluation of micronuclei are described in the publication of Countryman and Heddle (1976). The micronuclei were stained in the same way as the main nucleus. The area of the micronucleus did not extend the third part of the area of the main nucleus. 2000 cells were scored per test group. The frequency of micronucleated cells was reported as % micronucleated cells.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Proliferation Index
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Evaluation criteria:
- A test item can be classified as mutagenic if:
- the number of micronucleated cells is not in the range of the historical control data (0.0-2.0% micronucleated cells), and
- either a concentration-related increase in three test groups or a significant increase of micronucleated cells in at least one test group is observed.
A test item can be classified as non-mutagenic if:
- the number of micronucleated cells in all evaluated test groups is in the range of the historical control data (0.0-2.0% micronucleated cells), and/or
- no concentration-related increase in the number of micronucleated cells is observed.
Statistical significance can be confirmed by means of the Chi square test. However, both biological and statistical significance should be considered together. If the criteria above mentioned for the test item are not clearly met, the classification with regard to the historical data and the biological relevance is discussed and/or a confirmatory experiment is performed. - Statistics:
- Statistical significance can be confirmed by means of the Chi square test.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- see textbelow
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- The test item Behentrimonium chloride, suspended (Experiment I) or dissolved (Experiments IIA and llB) in deionised water, was assessed for its potential to induce micronuclei in Chinese hamster V79 cells in vifro in the absence and the presence of metabolic activation by S9 mix.
Three independent experiments were performed. In Experiment I, the exposure period was 4 hours with and without metabolic activation. In Experiment IIA and IIB, the exposure period was 20 hrs without S9 mix and in Experiment 11, the exposure period was 4 hours with metabolic activation. The cells were prepared 24 hours (Exp. I, IIA and llB) and 48 hrs (Exp. IIA) after start of treatment with the test item.
In each experimental group two parallel cultures were set up. Per culture 1000 cells were scored for micronuclei.
Evaluated experimental points after treatment with Behentrimonium chloride:
Exp I: 3.1, 6.3 and 12.5 µg/ml, without S9 mix, 4 hrs exposure, 24 hrs preparation interval
Exp IIA: 3.1, 6.3 and 12.5 µg/ml, without S9 mix, 20 hrs exposure, 24 hrs preparation interval
Exp IIB: 5.0, 6.0, and 7.0 µg/ml, without S9 mix, 20 hrs exposure, 24 hrs preparation interval
Exp I: 6.3, 12.5 and 25.0 µg/ml, with S9 mix, 4 hrs exposure, 24 hrs preparation interval
Exp IIA: 3.1, 6.3 and 12.5 µg/ml, with S9 mix, 4 hrs exposure, 48 hrs preparation interval
In Experiment I, no relevant increase of the pH value or osmolarity was observed (solvent control 271 mOsm, pH 7.3 versus 288 mOsm and pH 7.4 at 400.0 µg/mL). Test item precipitation was observed at a concentration of 50.0 µg/mL and above in the absence of S9 mix and at 25.0 µg/mL and above in the presence of S9 mix. Clear toxic effects indicated by reduced cell numbers were observed after treatment with 12.5 µg/mL (11.3 % of control) and above in the absence of S9 mix. In the presence of S9 mix, concentrations showing clear cytotoxicity were not scorable for cytogenetic damage.
In the absence and presence of S9 mix, no biologically relevant increase in the percentage of micronucleated cells was observed up to the highest scorable concentration. The rates of micronucleated cells after treatment with the test item in the absence of S9 mix (0.95 - 1.55 %) and in the presence of S9 mix (0.85 - 1.55 %) were below the corresponding solvent control values (2.00 and 1.70 %, respectively) and within the range the laboratory's historical control data: 0.0 - 2.0 % micronucleated cells.
In Experiment IIA, test item precipitation was observed at a concentration of 6.3 µg/mL and above in the absence of S9 mix and at 25.0 µg/mL and above in the presence of S9 mix. Clear cytototoxicity (indicated by reduced cell numbers when compared to control values) of about 60% or above were observed after treatment with 12.5 µg/mL (70 % cytotoxicity) and above in the absence of S9 mix, and with 12.5 µg/mL (58 % cytotoxicity) and above in the presence of S9 mix.
In the presence of S9 mix, no biologically relevant increase in the percentage of micronucleated cells was observed up to the highest evaluated concentration of 12.5 µg/mL. The rates of micronucleated cells after treatment with the test item (0.60 - 1.00%) were close to the corresponding solvent control value (0.55 %) and within the range of our historical control data: 0.0 - 2.0 % micronucleated cells. In the absence of S9 mix, dose-related increases in the percentage of micronucleated cells (1 -65 %, 1.75 %, and 2.40 %) were observed at the three evaluated concentrations (3.1, 6.3, and 12.5 µg/mL, respectively). Although all three values were statistically significantly increased compared to the corresponding solvent control value (0.85%), the percentages of micronucleated cells at 3.1 and 6.3 µg/mL (1.65 % and 1.75 %, respectively) were within the laboratorie's historical control data range (0.0 - 2.0 % micronucleated cells), and these increases have to be regarded as biologically irrelevant. At the highest concentration evaluated (12.5µg/mL), given the high cytotoxicity observed (70%), the biological relevance of the increased incidence of micronucleated cells remained ambiguous.
Accordingly, two repeat experiments (Experiment IIB) within a narrow concentration range were performed, in order to verify the observation in Experiment IIA.
The first repeat experiment could not be evaluated, since only two concentrations were available for cytogenetic evaluation, which is not in compliance with the guideline recommendations. In both experiments, concentrations of 7.5 µg/mL and 8.0 µg/mL and above were not scorable for cytogenetic damage due to strong test item induced cytotoxicity.
In the second repeat experiment, test item precipitation was observed at a concentration of 6.0 µglmL and above in the absence of S9 mix. Clear toxic effects indicated by reduced cell numbers were observed after treatment with 7.0 µg/mL (62 % cytotoxicity). No biologically relevant increase in the percentage of micronucleated cells was observed up to the highest scorable concentration. The rates of micronucleated cells after treatment with the test item (0.05 - 1.05 %) were close to the corresponding solvent control values (0.55 %) and within the range of our historical control data: 0.0 - 2.0 % micronucleated cells. Accordingly, the increased incidence of micronucleated cells observed at a concentration associated with high cytotoxicity
(Experiment IIA in the absence of S9 mix) could not be reproduced, and this finding was considered to bear no biological significance.
In Experiment IIB, test item precipitation was observed at a concentration of 6.0 µg/mL and above in the absence of S9 mix. Clear toxic effects indicated by reduced cell numbers were observed after treatment with 7.0 µg/mL.
Colcemid (25 ng/mL to 10 µg/mL), Mitomycin C (0.03 or 0.1 µg/mL) or CPA (2.5 to 25 µg/mL) were evaluated as positive controls and showed a distinct increase in the percentage of micronucleated cells.
In conclusion, it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported, the test item Behentrimonium chloride did not induce micronuclei in V79 cells (Chinese hamster cell line) in vitro in the absence and the presence of metabolic activation.
Therefore, Behentrimonium chloride has to be considered as non-mutagenic in this in vitro test system, when tested up to cytotoxic test item concentrations (Experiment I, with metabolic activation, Experiment IIA with and without metabolic activation, and Experiment IlB, without metabolic activation) or the highest scorable concentration (Experiment I, with metabolic activation). - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'. Remarks: V79
Any other information on results incl. tables
Dose selection
Dose selection was performed following the current OECD Guideline for in vitro chromosome aberration studies (OECD Guideline no. 473). The highest concentration chosen for the evaluation of genotoxicity should produce clear toxicity with reduced cell growth, determined by the mean of the cell count prior to cell seeding on slides, by > 60 % and/or the occurrence of precipitation. In case of nontoxicity the maximum concentration should be 5 mg/mL, 5 µL/mL or 10 mM, whichever is the lowest, if formulability in an appropriate solvent is possible.
With respect to the molecular weight of the test item, 5000.0 µg/mL of Behentrimonium chloride (approx. 9.7 mM) were applied as top concentration in Experiment I. Test item concentrations between 9.8 and 5000.0 µg/mL (with and without S9 mix) were chosen for the treatment of the cultures. Due to strong toxic effects indicated by reduced cell numbers at test item concentrations of 9.8 µg/mL and above in the absence and presence of metabolic activation, Experiment I was repeated with test item concentrations between 0.8 and 400.0 µg/mL (with and without S9 mix). With regard to the purity of the test item, the corresponding amount of the active substance in the respective test item concentrations was 78.8 %.
In Experiment I, precipitation of the test item in culture medium was observed with 50.0 µg/mL and above in the absence of S9 mix, and with 25.0 µg/mL and above in the presence of S9 mix. Using reduced cell numbers of about 40 % of control or below as an indicator for toxicity in Experiment I, clear toxic effects were observed after 4 hrs treatment with 12.5 µg/mL and above in the absence of S9 mix, and with 50.0 µg/mL and above in the presence of S9 mix. With respect to the results obtained in Experiment I, 25.0 µg/mL was chosen as top concentration for Experiment IIA in the absence and presence of S9 mix. In a confirmatory experiment, designated Experiment llB, concentrations between 2.5 and 20.0 µg/mL, in the absence of S9 mix, were chosen in order to verify the results obtained in Experiment IIA. Due to strong test item induced cytotoxicity at concentrations of 7.5 µg/mL and above, only two concentrations were scorable for cytogenetic damage. Therefore, this experimental part was repeated with test item concentrations between 0.5 and 15.0 µg/mL.
Summary of results of the micronucleus test with Behentrimonium chloride
Exp. |
Preparation |
Test item |
Cell number |
Micronucleated |
|
interval |
concentration |
In % |
cells |
|
|
in µg/mL |
of control |
in % |
Exposure period 4 hrs without S9 mix |
||||
I |
24 hrs |
Negative control |
103 |
0.55 |
|
|
Solvent control1 |
100 |
2.00 |
|
|
Positive control2 |
78.9 |
5.1S |
|
|
Positive control3 |
80.2 |
3.25S |
|
|
Positive control4 |
78.1 |
4.70S |
|
|
Positive control5 |
45.8 |
17.95S |
|
|
3.1 |
88.9 |
0.95 |
|
|
6.3 |
62.7 |
1.55 |
|
|
12.5 |
11.3 |
1.15 |
Exposure period 20 hrs without S9 mix |
||||
IIA |
24 hrs |
Negative control |
99.5 |
1.05 |
|
|
Solvent control1 |
100 |
0.85 |
|
|
Positive control2 |
51.8 |
28.3S |
|
|
Positive control3 |
44.4 |
28.80S |
|
|
Positive control4 |
72.3 |
9.45S |
|
|
Positive control5 |
61.4 |
13.85S |
|
|
3.1 |
97.4 |
1.65S |
|
|
6.3 P |
57.5 |
1.75S |
|
|
12.5 P |
29.9 |
2.40S |
Exposure period 20 hrs without S9 mix |
||||
IIB |
24 hrs |
Negative control |
90.0 |
0.30 |
|
|
Solvent control1 |
100 |
0.55 |
|
|
Positive control2 |
40.6 |
66.35S |
|
|
Positive control3 |
33.8 |
50.35S |
|
|
Positive control4 |
64.0 |
6.85S |
|
|
Positive control5 |
69.8 |
6.00S |
|
|
5.0 |
66.4 |
1.05 |
|
|
6.0 P |
47.1 |
0.70 |
|
|
7.0 P |
37.5 |
0.05 |
Exposure period 4 hrs with S9 mix |
||||
I |
24 hrs |
Negative control |
158.3 |
0.90 |
|
|
Solvent control1 |
100 |
1.70 |
|
|
Positive control6 |
49.0 |
8.40S |
|
|
Positive control7 |
41.0 |
5.15S |
|
|
6.3 |
159.4 |
1.55 |
|
|
12.5 |
113.2 |
1.55 |
|
|
25.0 P |
57.4 |
0.85 |
Exposure period 4 hrs with S9 mix |
||||
IIA |
48 hrs |
Negative control |
100.8 |
0.95 |
|
|
Solvent control1 |
100 |
0.55 |
|
|
Positive control8 |
67.7 |
15.55S |
|
|
Positive control9 |
19.9 |
44.70S |
|
|
3.1 |
82.2 |
0.70 |
|
|
6.3 |
80.9 |
1.00 |
|
|
12.5 |
42.4 |
0.60 |
P precipitation occurred
S number of micronucleated cells statistically significant higher than corresponding control values
1 deioinised water 10%(v/v)
2 colcemid 7.5µg/mL
3 colcemid 10.0 µg/mL
4 mitomycin C 0.03 µg/mL
5 mitomycin C 0.1 µg/mL
6 cyclophosphamide 10 µg/mL
7 cyclophosphamide 25 µg/mL
8 cyclophosphamide 2.5 µg/mL
9 cyclophosphamide 5.0 µg/mL
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The genotoxicity of the registration substance was investigated according to the guideline OECD 487. Negative result was obtained.
- Executive summary:
The registration substance was assessed for its clastogenicity according to the guideline OECD 487.
The registration substance did not induce micronuclei in V79 cells (Chinese hamster cell line) in the absence and the presence of metabolic activation at up to the concentration associated with clear cytoxicity. No significant clastogenicity was found.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.