Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 620-539-0 | CAS number: 1218787-30-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 04 Feb 2021 to 15 Jun 2021
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 021
- Report date:
- 2021
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2,2'-(C16-18 (evennumbered) alkyl imino) diethanol
- EC Number:
- 620-539-0
- Cas Number:
- 1218787-30-4
- Molecular formula:
- No molecular formula
- IUPAC Name:
- 2,2'-(C16-18 (evennumbered) alkyl imino) diethanol
- Test material form:
- solid
- Details on test material:
- - Chemical names: N,N-bis-2-(hydroxyethyl)-alkyl-(C16-C18)-amine
2,2'-(C16-18 (evennumbered) alkyl imino) diethanol
- CAS number: 1218787-30-4
- EC number: 620-539-0
- slightly yellow solid
Based on the qualitative and quantitative information on the composition, the sample used is representative of the boundary composition shared and agreed by each registrant.
1
Method
- Target gene:
- Point mutations which involve substitution, addition or deletion of one or a few DNA base pairs.
All Salmonella: rfa, uvrB genes
E. coli: trp, uvrA
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: The strain is deficient in the DNA nucleotide excision repair system.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9: liver, rat
- method of preparation of S9 mix: according to Ames et al.
- final culture medium final concentrations in the S9 mix of:
8 mM MgCl2
33 mM KCl
5 mM glucose-6-phosphate
4 mM NADP
This solution was mixed with the liver 9000 x g supernatant fluid in the following proportion:
co-factor solution 9.5 parts
liver preparation 0.5 parts
- quality controls of S9 (e.g., enzymatic activity, sterility, metabolic capability)
a) Alkoxyresorufin-O-dealkylase activities
b) Test for the presence of adventitious agents
c) Promutagen activation (including biological activity in the Salmonella typhimurium assay
using 2-aminoanthracene and benzo[a]pyrene) - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Tester strains of TA98 and TA100 were subjected to the test item in the pre-experiment at the following concentrations: 3.16, 10.0, 31.6, 100, 316, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate.
The test item concentrations to be applied in the main experiments were chosen according to the
results of the pre-experiment. 5000 µg/plate was selected as the
maximum concentration. The concentration range covered two logarithmic decades. Two independent
experiments were performed at the following concentrations:
Experiment I:
3.16, 10.0, 31.6, 100, 316 and 1000 µg/plate
(TA1535 and TA1537 (without metabolic activation))
3.16, 10.0, 31.6, 100, 316, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate
(TA98, TA100 and E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101), TA1535 and TA1537
(with metabolic activation))
Experiment II:
0.316, 1.0, 3.16, 10.0, 31.6, 100, 316 and 1000 µg/plate
(TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101)
(without metabolic activation))
3.16, 10.0, 31.6, 100, 316, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate
(TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101)
(with metabolic activation)) - Vehicle / solvent:
- Negative controls (A. dest., Eurofins Munich, Lot No. 210219, 210319, 210409) and solvent controls (DMSO, AppliChem Lot No. 0001926479) were treated in the same way as all dose groups.
The S9 mix substitution buffer was used in the study as a replacement for S9 mix, without metabolic
activation (-S9).
Phosphate-buffer (0.2 M) contains per litre of purified water:
0.2 M NaH2PO4 x H2O 120 mL
0.2 M Na2HPO4 880 mL
The two solutions were mixed and the pH was adjusted to 7.4. Sterilisation was performed for 20 min
at 121 °C in an autoclave.
This 0.2 M phosphate-buffer was mixed with 0.15 M KCl solution (sterile) in the following proportion:
0.2 M phosphate-buffer 9.5 parts
0.15 M KCl solution 0.5 parts
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other:
- Remarks:
- 2.5 µg/plate for TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537; 10 µg/plate for E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101); with metabolic activation for all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101); without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other:
- Remarks:
- TA98, TA1537; Without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- TA100, TA1535; Without metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Replicatoins: In triplicate
- Number of independent experiments: 2
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable): 109 cells/mL
- Test substance dissolved in DMSO and diluted prior to treatment
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Preincubation period, if applicable: For the pre-incubation method 100 µL of the test item-preparation is pre-incubated with the tester strains (100 µL) and sterile buffer or the metabolic activation system (500 µL) for 60 min at 37 °C prior to adding the overlay agar (2000 µL) and pouring onto the surface of a minimal agar plate.
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: After solidification the plates were inverted and incubated at 37 °C for at least 48 h in the dark
MUTAGENICITY:
- The Mutation Factor is calculated by dividing the mean value of the revertant counts by the mean values of the solvent control (the exact and not the rounded values are used for calculation).
A test item is considered as mutagenic if:- a clear and dose-related increase in the number of revertants occurs and/or- a biologically relevant positive response for at least one of the dose groups occurs in at least one tester strain with or without metabolic activation.
A biologically relevant increase is described as follows:- if in tester strains TA98, TA100 and E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101) the number of reversions is at least twice as high- if in tester strains TA1535 and TA1537 the number of reversions is at least three times higher as compared to the reversion rate of the solvent control
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Cytotoxicity can be detected by a clearing or rather diminution of the background lawn (indicated as "N" or “B”, respectively in the result tables) or a reduction in the number of revertants down to a mutation factor of approximately ≤ 0.5 in relation to the solvent control.
- CRITERIA OF VALIDITY:
A test is considered acceptable if for each strain:
- the bacteria demonstrate their typical responses to ampicillin (TA98, TA100, E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101))
- the negative control plates (A. dest.) with and without S9 mix are within the following ranges (mean values of the spontaneous reversion frequency are within the historical control data range (2017 – 2019 for all tester strains, except for E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101). For this tester strain the period was December 2019 to May 2020)):
- S9 + S9
STRAIN|- S9 min | - S9 max | + S9 min | + S9 max
TA98 14 61 15 60
TA100 44 143 60 154
TA1535 5 35 4 37
TA1537 3 35 5 41
E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101) 110 315 142 381
- corresponding background growth on both negative control and test plates is observed.
- the positive controls show a distinct enhancement of revertant rates over the control plate
- at least five different concentrations of each tester strain are analysable. - Evaluation criteria:
- MUTAGENICITY:
- The Mutation Factor is calculated by dividing the mean value of the revertant counts by the mean values of the solvent control (the exact and not the rounded values are used for calculation).
A test item is considered as mutagenic if:- a clear and dose-related increase in the number of revertants occurs and/or- a biologically relevant positive response for at least one of the dose groups occurs in at least one tester strain with or without metabolic activation.
A biologically relevant increase is described as follows:- if in tester strains TA98, TA100 and E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101) the number of reversions is at least twice as high- if in tester strains TA1535 and TA1537 the number of reversions is at least three times higher as compared to the reversion rate of the solvent control
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Cytotoxicity can be detected by a clearing or rather diminution of the background lawn (indicated as "N" or “B”, respectively in the result tables) or a reduction in the number of revertants down to a mutation factor of approximately ≤ 0.5 in relation to the solvent control.
- CRITERIA OF VALIDITY:
A test is considered acceptable if for each strain:
- the bacteria demonstrate their typical responses to ampicillin (TA98, TA100, E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101))
- the negative control plates (A. dest.) with and without S9 mix are within the following ranges (mean values of the spontaneous reversion frequency are within the historical control data range (2017 – 2019 for all tester strains, except for E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101). For this tester strain the period was December 2019 to May 2020)):
- S9 + S9
STRAIN|- S9 min | - S9 max | + S9 min | + S9 max
TA98 14 61 15 60
TA100 44 143 60 154
TA1535 5 35 4 37
TA1537 3 35 5 41
E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101) 110 315 142 381
- corresponding background growth on both negative control and test plates is observed.
- the positive controls show a distinct enhancement of
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
No known confounding factors were present in the test substance.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES (if applicable):
pre-experiment at the following concentrations:
3.16, 10.0, 31.6, 100, 316, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate
STUDY RESULTS
- Concurrent vehicle negative and positive control data
All controls resulted in values within acceptable limits.
For all test methods and criteria for data analysis and interpretation:
- No concentration-response relationship is presented
- Statistical analysis; According to the OECD guidelines, the biological relevance of the results is the criterion for the interpretation of results, a statistical evaluation of the results is not regarded as necessary.
Ames test:
- Signs of toxicity: cyto toxicity observed with increasing concentration both with and without S9 mix
- Mean number of revertant colonies per plate and standard deviation: Both values are presented in the study for all strains used. An additional Mutation Factor has been calculated by dividing the mean revertants of the test item with the mean revertants of the vehicle control. Cytotoxicity may result in decrease in revertants seen with increasing concentration.
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation, and 95% control limits for the distribution as well as the number of data)
Positive Historical Control without S9
TA98 TA100 TA1535 TA1537 WP2 uvrA (pKM101)
Substance 4-NOPD NaN3 NaN3 4-NOPD MMS
Conc./plate 10 µg 10 µg 10 µg 40 µg 1 µL
Mean 443.2 614.2 826.2 123.3 1702.7
SD 168.7 208.2 362.2 49.4 551.4
Min 89 166 28 33 831
Max 2013 2493 1863 570 3391
RSD [%] 38.1 33.9 43.8 40 32.4
n 985 1034 935 934 89
Negative Historical Control without S9
TA98 TA100 TA1535 TA1537 WP2 uvrA (pKM101)
Mean 28.4 95.4 15.6 15.6 181.5
SD 8 16.3 5.9 6.1 42.7
Min 14 44 5 3 110
Max 61 143 35 35 315
RSD [%] 28.2 17 37.8 39.2 23.5
n 976 1023 926 927 87
Positive Historical Control with S9
TA98 TA100 TA1535 TA1537 WP2 uvrA (pKM101)
Substance 2-AA 2-AA 2-AA 2-AA 2-AA
Conc./plate 2.5 µg 2.5 µg 2.5 µg 2.5 µg 10 µg
Mean 1305.9 1054.5 185.7 187.3 708.4
SD 792.7 611 130.1 104 153.5
Min 70 119 19 23 424
Max 3609 2920 1856 1476 1138
RSD [%] 60.7 57.9 70.1 55.5 21.7
n 976 1026 929 929 89
Negative Historical Control with S9
TA98 TA100 TA1535 TA1537 WP2 uvrA (pKM101)
Mean 29.9 92.7 14.1 16.2 219.4
SD 7.3 14 5.3 6.3 48.6
Min 15 60 4 5 142
Max 60 154 37 41 381
RSD [%] 24.5 15.1 37.5 38.8 22.2
n 974 1020 923 924 87
Any other information on results incl. tables
Precipitation of the test item was observed in all tester strains used in experiment I and II. In experiment I, precipitation was noted at concentrations of 316 µg/plate and higher (with and without metabolic activation). In experiment II, precipitation was observed at concentrations of 1000 µg/plate (without and with metabolic activation). The observed precipitation did not interfere with the scoring and thus it did not impact the results.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, CAS 1218787-30-4 did not cause gene mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the tester strains used.
Therefore, CAS 1218787-30-4 is considered to be non-mutagenic in this bacterial reverse mutation assay. - Executive summary:
The test item, CAS 1218787-30-4, was investigated for its potential to induce gene mutations according to the plate incorporation test (experiment I) and the pre-incubation test (experiment II) using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and tester strain E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101).
In two independent experiments several concentrations of the test item were used. Each assay was conducted with and without metabolic activation. The concentrations, including the controls, were tested in triplicate. The following concentrations of the test item were prepared and used in the experiments:
Experiment I:
3.16, 10.0, 31.6, 100, 316 and 1000 µg/plate
(TA1535 and TA1537 (without metabolic activation))
3.16, 10.0, 31.6, 100, 316, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate
(TA98, TA100 and E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101), TA1535 and TA1537
(with metabolic activation))
Experiment II:
0.316, 1.0, 3.16, 10.0, 31.6, 100, 316 and 1000 µg/plate
(TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101)
(without metabolic activation))
3.16, 10.0, 31.6, 100, 316, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate
(TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101)
(with metabolic activation))Precipitation of the test item was observed in all tester strains used in experiment I and II. In experiment I, precipitation was noted at concentrations of 316 µg/plate and higher (with and without metabolic activation). In experiment II, precipitation was observed at concentrations of 1000 µg/plate (without and with metabolic activation). The observed precipitation did not interfere with the scoring; thus it did not impact the results.
The microbial contamination observed in a few plates in experiment I at concentrations of
5000 µg/plate did not affect the quality or integrity of the results as the microbial contamination could be clearly distinguished from the Salmonella revertants and thus did not affect the evaluation.Toxic effects of the test item were noted in all tester strains evaluated in experiment I and II.
In experiment I toxic effects of the test item were observed in tester strains TA98 and TA100 at concentrations of 100 µg/plate and higher (without metabolic activation) and at concentrations of 1000 µg/plate and higher (with metabolic activation). Toxic effects of the test item were also noted in tester strain TA1535 concentrations of 100 µg/plate and higher (without metabolic activation) and at concentrations of 316 µg/plate and higher (with metabolic activation). In tester strain TA1537, toxic effects of the test item were noted at concentrations of 316 µg/plate and higher (without metabolic activation) and at concentrations of 1000 µg/plate (with metabolic activation). Toxic effects of the test item were also observed in tester strain E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101) at concentrations of 316 µg/plate and higher (without metabolic activation) and at concentrations of 2500 µg/plate and higher (with metabolic activation).
In experiment II toxic effects of the test item were noted in tester strain TA98 at concentrations of 3.16 µg/plate and higher (without metabolic activation) and at concentrations of 316 µg/plate and higher (with metabolic activation). In tester strain TA100, toxic effects of the test item were noted at concentrations of 31.6 µg/plate and higher (without metabolic activation) and at concentrations of1000 µg/plate and higher (with metabolic activation). Toxic effects of the test item were also observed in tester strain TA1535 at concentrations of 10.0 µg/plate and higher (without metabolic activation)
and at concentrations of 1000 µg/plate and higher (with metabolic activation). In tester strain TA1537, toxic effects of the test item were noted at concentrations of 31.6 µg/plate and higher (without metabolic activation) and at concentrations of 316 µg/plate and higher (with metabolic activation).Toxic effects of the test item were also observed in tester strain E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101) at concentrations of 100 µg/plate and higher (without metabolic activation) and at concentrations of 1000 µg/plate and higher (with metabolic activation). The reduction in the number of revertants down to a mutation factor of ≤ 0.5 found in tester strain TA1537 at a concentration of 3.16 µg/plate (without metabolic activation) was regarded as not biologically relevant due to lack of a dose-response relationship and lack of concomitant clearing of the background lawn.
No biologically relevant increases in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester strains were observed following treatment with the test item at any concentration level, neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation in experiment I and II. In addition all validity crierion were met.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.