Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

In a study (Chung 1981), being reliable with restrictions, conducted similar to OECD test guideline 471, the registered substance was negative, This result is supported by a second study (Chung 1978).

In a GLP-study according to OECD test guideline 473, the registered substance was negative as it did not induce chromosomal aberrations.

In a GLP-study according to OECD test guideline 476, the registered substance was negative as it did not induce biologically relevant mutations.

These negtive results are supported by an in vivo study:

FD & C Yellow No. 6, which is rapidly and almost completely metabolised in the gut inter alia to sulphanilic acid, i.e. the registered substance, gave a negative result in both rat and mouse bone marrow micronucleus tests after a single oral dose of up to 2000 mg/kg.

In summary, the registered substance is considered not be genetically toxic.


Short description of key information:
Bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames): negative
Chromosomal aberration: negative
HPRT: negative

Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on in vitro and in vivo data, the registered substance has not to be classified for genetic toxicity and mutagenicity.