Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 939-464-2 | CAS number: 121617-08-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Gentoxicity data is provided for both LAS TEA and for two analogues. Bacterial mutation data is available for all three substances but the chromosome aberration and mammalian gene mutation endpoints rely on read across data from the analogues.
LAS TEA:
In an Ames test, strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA1538 of S. typhimurium were exposed to LAS TEA at concentrations of 0, 8.4, 43, 217, 1090, and 5430 µg/plate in the presence and absence of mammalian metabolic activation according to the direct plate incorporation method and 0, 68, 136, 272, 543, and 1090 µg/plate in the presence and absence of mammalian metabolic activation according to the preincubation method. There was no evidence of induced mutant colonies over background and hence, LAS TEA was not mutagenic under the conditions of this test.
In an additional Ames test using strain TA102 of S. typhimurium the substance was also not mutagenic.
The other in vitro genotoxicity endpoints for LAS TEA are addressed using data for LAS Na and TEA.
TEA:
TEA was tested in the Ames reverse mutation assay using S. typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 97, TA 98 and TA 100 at a concentration up to 10000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation. Treatment with TEA was not associated with reverse mutations in any of the strains tested (Mortelmans, 1986).
Triethanolamine was tested in cultured Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells for induction of chromosomal abberations, both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation.The results revealed no induction of chromosomal abberations with or without S9 (Galloway, 1987). The same study also investigated the potential for Sister Chromatid Exchange and found negative results.
In a mammalian cell gene mutation assay (L5178Y TK+/-), mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells cultured in vitro were exposed to triethanolamine in distilled water at concentrations of 0, 50, 100, 250, 500, 1000 and 1500 µg/ml in the presence and absence of mammalian metabolic activation. There was no evidence or a concentration related positive response of induced mutant colonies over background (Dow Chemical Company, 2010).
LAS Na:
LAS Na was not mutagenic in the Ames test.
The potential of the test substance LAS Na to cause chromosomal aberrations in mammalian cells was examined. Chinese hamster ovary cells were exposed to concentrations of 0.32 to 78 ug/ml with S9, and 1.25 to 156 ug/ml without S9. Positive responses were seen at cytotoxic concentrations only in the presence of S9. Concentrations below the level of cytotoxicty with S9 did not show positive results. The test substance is not clastogenic in the absence of metabolic activation, or with metabolic activation below cytotoxic concentrations. Chromosomal abberations seen at cytotoxicity levels can be considered as a secondary effect. The result suggests that LAS is not clastogenic (Murrie & Innes, 1997).
In a mammalian cell gene mutation study, Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells were exposed to concentrations of 0, 0.6, 1, 1.8, 3, and 6 ug/ml without S9, and 0, 6, 10, 18, 30, and 60 ug/ml with S9. Preliminary tests show the test substance was cytogenic at concentrations of 50 ug/ml or greater with metabolic activation, and 100 ug/ml or above without metabolic activation. There was no biologically significant increase in mutation frequency in the treated groups and hence, LAS is considered not mutagenic to CHO cells both in the presence and absence of S9 (ANON, 1995).
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
An in vivo genotoxicity study conducted on the structural analogue showed that there was no significant increases in the number of polychromatic erythrocytes with micronuclei.The substance was negative for genotoxicity in the in vivo mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Read-across to K1 study therefore K2 is the maximum Klimisch value.
- Justification for type of information:
- Read-across approach - see read-across justification in section 13
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Strain NMRI. Animals were approximately 22-26 g (male) and 20-25 g (female) and acclimated for 1 week to the test conditions (20 =/- 3 degrees C, 30-70% relative humidity, 12 hour light/dark cycle). Food was given daily and water was ad libitum. All animals were healthy at the time of test initiation.
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- NaCl
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 72 hours
- Frequency of treatment:
- single dose
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 122 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 40 males and 40 females per dose
- Control animals:
- yes
- Positive control(s):
- Endoxan (cyclophosphamid)
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Cells were taken from the thigh.
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- Cells were mixed with cattle serum and suspended, then centrifuged. The sediment was then resuspended. The suspension was seperated in a cellulose chromatography column. This was centrifuged, and mixed with fetal calf serum and EDTA. This was air-dried for 24 hrs and stained with Giemsa.
- Evaluation criteria:
- number of polychromatid erythrocytes (PCE)
ratio of PCE to normochromatid erythrocytes (NCE)
number of cells with micronucleus - Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- The substance was negative for genotoxicity in the in vivo mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test.
- Executive summary:
There was no significant increases in the number of polychromatic erythrocytes with micronuclei. The substance was negative for genotoxicity in the in vivo mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test.
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP laboratory study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Strain NMRI. Animals were approximately 22-26 g (male) and 20-25 g (female) and acclimated for 1 week to the test conditions (20 =/- 3 degrees C, 30-70% relative humidity, 12 hour light/dark cycle). Food was given daily and water was ad libitum. All animals were healthy at the time of test initiation.
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- NaCl
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 72 hours
- Frequency of treatment:
- single dose
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 122 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 40 males and 40 females per dose
- Control animals:
- yes
- Positive control(s):
- Endoxan (cyclophosphamid)
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Cells were taken from the thigh.
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- Cells were mixed with cattle serum and suspended, then centrifuged. The sediment was then resuspended. The suspension was seperated in a cellulose chromatography column. This was centrifuged, and mixed with fetal calf serum and EDTA. This was air-dried for 24 hrs and stained with Giemsa.
- Evaluation criteria:
- number of polychromatid erythrocytes (PCE)
ratio of PCE to normochromatid erythrocytes (NCE)
number of cells with micronucleus - Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- The substance was negative for genotoxicity in the in vivo mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test.
- Executive summary:
There was no significant increases in the number of polychromatic erythrocytes with micronuclei.The substance was negative for genotoxicity in the in vivo mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test.
Referenceopen allclose all
No significant increases in the number of polychromatic erythrocytes with micronuclei were observed.
No significant increases in the number of polychromatic erythrocytes with micronuclei were observed.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the results of a selection of in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicity studies for different endpoints, conducted on both the substance and structural analogues, there is no evidence of gentoxicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.