Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-259-7 | CAS number: 93-58-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Ames test (according and equivalent to OECD 471): negative (±S9 mix)
HPRT test (according to OECD 476): negative (±S9 mix)
MNT test (according to OECD 487): negative (± S9 mix)
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- from 2012-09-25 to 2013-
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD 487
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- To get proper responses of statistical significance when using the specified positive controls the test design, specifically for the treatment, the expression phase and harvest time, was slightly modified compared to the OECD Guideline 487.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: human
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: DMEM:F12 (Dulbecco's modified eagle medium/Ham's F12 medium, mixture 1:1) supplemented with 200 mM GlutaMax
- Properly maintained: yes - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Mammalian Microsomal Fraction S9 Mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- pre-test on cytotoxicity: up to 1360.0 µg/mL (approx. 10 mM)
Further concentrations please see Table 1 - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO; final concentration of DMSO in the culture medium was 0.5 % (v/v)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The solvent was chosen due to its solubility properties and its relative non-toxicity to the cell cultures. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- other: Demecolcin
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 48 h
- Exposure duration: 4 h with and without S9 mix (experiment I) or 4 h with S9 mix and 20 h without S9 mix (see Table 1)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): cells exposed for 4 h have 16 h recovery period before fixation (expression phase), no recovery period for 20 h exposure cells
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 20 h with Cytochalasin B (4 µg/mL)
- Cells were prepared 40 h after start of the exposure
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): Cytochalasin B (4 µg/mL)
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED:
cytotoxic effect the CBPI: ca 500 cells per culture and cytotoxicity is expressed as % cytostasis
micronuclei effects: at least 1000 binucleate cells per culture were scored for cytogenetic damage on coded slides. The frequency of micronucleated cells was reported as % micronucleated cells
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- percentages of reduction in the CBPI (cytokinesis-block proliferating index) in comparison with the controls (% cytostasis) by counting 500 cells per culture in duplicate - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item can be classified as non-clastogenic and non-aneugenic if:
- the number of micronucleated cells in all evaluated dose groups is in the range of the laboratory historical control data and/or
- no statistically significant or concentration-related increase in the number of micronucleated cells is observed.
A test item can be classified as clastogenic or aneugenic if:
- the number of micronucleated cells is not in the range of the historical laboratory control data and
- either a concentration-related increase of micronucleated cells in three test groups or a statistically significant increase of the number of micronucleated cells is observed. - Statistics:
- Statistical significance was confirmed by means of the Chi square test.
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: human
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: no
- Effects of osmolality: no
- Evaporation from medium: no data
- Water solubility: Phase separation was observed in Experiment I at 1360.0 µg/mL in the absence and at 444.1 µg/mL and above in the presence of S9 mix and in Experiment II at 777.1 µg/mL and above in the presence of S9 mix.
- Precipitation: was observed in Experiment II at 777.1 µg/mL and above following 20 h exposure in the absence of S9 mix
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: yes
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: yes - Conclusions:
- Under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce micronuclei as determined by the in vitro micronucleus test in human lymphocytes. Therefore, Methyl Benzoate is considered to be non-clastogenic and non-aneugenic in this in vitro micronucleus test, when tested up to the highest required concentration.
- Executive summary:
The study was conducted according to OECD Guideline 487. The expression phase and harvest time were slightly modified compared to the OECD Guideline 487. The test item Methyl Benzoate, dissolved in DMSO, was assessed for its potential to induce micronuclei in human lymphocytes in vitro in two independent experiments. The following study design was performed:
Without S9-Mix
With S9-Mix
Exp. I
Exp. II
Exp. I and II
Exposure period
4 hrs
20 hrs
4 hrs
Recovery
16 hrs
-
16 hrs
Cytochalasin B exposure
20 hrs
20 hrs
20 hrs
Preparation interval
40 hrs
40 hrs
40 hrs
Total culture period
88 hrs
88 hrs
88 hrs
In each experimental group two parallel cultures were analysed. 1000 binucleate cells per culture were evaluated for cytogenetic damage. The highest applied concentration in this study (1360.0 µg/mL of the test item, approx. 10 mM) was chosen with regard to the molecular weight of the test item and with respect to the guideline. Dose selection of the cytogenetic experiment was performed considering the toxicity data and the occurrence of test item precipitation in accordance with OECD Guideline 487. The evaluated experimental points and the results are summarised in Table 2 (see Attached document). In both cytogenetic experiments, in the absence and presence of S9 mix, no cytotoxicity indicated as cytostasis was observed up to the highest applied concentration. In both independent experiments, neither a statistically significant nor a biologically relevant increase in the number of micronucleated cells was observed after treatment with the test item. Appropriate mutagens were used as positive controls. They induced statistically significant increases in cells with micronuclei. It can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce micronuclei as determined by the in vitro micronucleus test in human lymphocytes. Therefore, Methyl Benzoate is considered to be non-clastogenic and non-aneugenic in this in vitro micronucleus test, when tested up to the highest required concentration.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- from 2013-01-11 to 2013
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Deviations are considered to have no impact on the purpose or integrity of the study.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Deviations are considered to have no impact on the purpose or integrity of the study.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Deviations are considered to have no impact on the purpose or integrity of the study.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: Minimal Essential Medium (MEM) supplemented with 10 % foetal bovine serum
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 4- or 24-hour exposure group (-S9 mix): 85, 170, 340, 680, 906.67, 1133.33, 1360
4-hour exposure group (+S9 mix, 2 %): 85, 170, 340, 680, 906.67, 1133.33, 1360
4-hour exposure group (+S9 mix, 1 %): 42.5, 85, 170, 340, 680, 1020, 1360 - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: no data - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- without S9 mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
- Remarks:
- with S9 mix
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: no data
- Exposure duration: 4 h (±S9 mix), 24 h (-S9 mix)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 7 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 7 days
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 6 or 7 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 6-Thioguanine
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): not applicable
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 2x10^5
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency - Evaluation criteria:
- The test item is classified as mutagenic if there is a reproducible dose-related increase in the mutation frequency where at least a threefold increase in the mutant frequency over the vehicle control value is observed. Such evaluation may be considered also in the case that a threefold increase of the mutant frequency is not observed.
A test item producing neither a dose-related increase of the mutant frequency nor a reproducible positive response at any of the test points is considered to be non-mutagenic in this system.
A single dose level that meets the minimum criterion for a positive response within a range of assayed concentrations is not sufficient to evaluate the test item as a mutagen. - Statistics:
- If a test item gives a marked and dose-related increase in the mutant frequency over the vehicle controls it will be designated as mutagenic and statistical analysis will not be required. However, if weaker responses are observed then statistical analysis will be performed using the SPSS program or a suitable alternative.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at and above 1133.33 µg/mL and precipitate at and above 906.67 µg/mL
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 1360 µg/mL and precipitate at and above 680 µg/mL
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at and above 906.67 µg/mL and precipitate at and above 680 µg/mL
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at and above 680 µg/mL and precipitate at and above 340 µg/mL
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: no
- Effects of osmolality: no
- Evaporation from medium: no data
- Water solubility: no data
- Precipitation: at and above 906.67 µg/mL (4-hour exposure, -S9 mix), at and above 680 µg/mL (4-hour exposure, +S9 mix 2% and 24-hour exposure, -S9 mix), at and above 340 µg/mL (4-hour exposure, +S9 mix 1 %)
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: yes
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: yes - Conclusions:
- The test item was shown to be non-mutagenic to V79 cells at the HPRT locus under the conditions of the test.
- Executive summary:
The purpose of this study is to assess the potential mutagenicity of a test item on the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT) locus of the V79 cell line. The test methods described are designed to be compatible with the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No. 476 "In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Tests", Method B17 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 and US EPA OPPTS 870.5300 Guideline.
Chinese hamster (V79) cells were treated with the test item at up to seven dose levels, in duplicate, together with vehicle (solvent) and positive controls in the presence and absence of an S9 metabolic activation system. Four treatment conditions were used for the test, i.e. In Experiment 1, a 4-hour exposure in the presence of an induced rat liver homogenate metabolizing system (S9), at a 2% final concentration and a 4-hour exposure in the absence of metabolic activation (S9). In Experiment 2, the 4-hour exposure with addition of S9 was repeated (using a 1% final S9 concentration); whilst in the absence of metabolic activation the exposure time was increased to 24 hours. The dose range of the test item was selected based on the results of a preliminary cytotoxicity test and were as follows:
Exposure Group
Final concentration of test item (µg/mL)
4-hour
(-S9 mix)
85
170
340
680
906.67
1133.33
1360
4-hour (+S9mix, 2 %)
85
170
340
680
906.67
1133.33
1360
24-hour (-S9 mix)
85
170
340
680
906.67
1133.33
1360
4-hour (+S9mix, 1 %)
42.5
85
170
340
680
1020
1360
The vehicle (solvent) controls gave mutant frequencies within the range expected of V79 cells at the HPRT locus. The positive control treatments, both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation, gave significant increases in the mutant frequency indicating the satisfactory performance of the test and of the metabolizing system. The test item demonstrated no significant increases in mutant frequency at any dose level, either with or without metabolic activation, in either the first or second experiment. The test item was shown to be non-mutagenic to V79 cells at the HPRT locus under the conditions of the test.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 2022-03-04 to 2022-03-21
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- June 26, 2020
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- dated May 30, 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Trp
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: deficiency in the DNA repair process (excision repair damage)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9: Phenobarbital/Beta-naphthoflavone induced rat liver
- method of preparation of S9 mix: An appropriate quantity of S9 supernatant was thawed and mixed with S9 cofactor solution, to result in a final concentration of approx. 10% (v/v) in the S9 mix. Cofactors were added to the S9 mix to reach the following concentrations in the S9 mix: 8 mM MgCl2, 33 mM KCl, 5 mM glucose-6-phosphate, 4 mM NADP in 100 mM sodium-ortho-phosphate-buffer, pH 7.4. During the experiment, the S9 mix was stored in an ice bath. The S9 mix preparation was performed according to Ames et al. (1977).
- volume concentration of S9 mix and S9 in the final agar mixture: 10% (v/v) S9 mix at volume of 500 µL
- quality controls of S9: Each batch of S9 was routinely tested for its capability to activate the known mutagens benzo[a]pyrene and 2-aminoanthracene in the Ames test. - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Pre-Experiment/Experiment I: 3; 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate
Experiment II: 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate
(top concentration according to OECD TG 471) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle/solvent used:
DMSO for test item and 2-aminoanthracene, 2-AA
Deionised water for methyl methane sulfonate, MMS
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The solvents were chosen because of their solubility properties and its relative nontoxicity to bacteria. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: 2-aminoanthracene, 2-AA
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: triplicate
- Number of independent experiments: 2
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Cell density at seeding: 10E8-10E9 cells/mL
- Test substance added in agar (plate incorporation, preincubation)
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Preincubation period, if applicable: 60 min
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 48 hours at 37°C ± 1.5°C in the dark
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: background growth inhibition
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENTS OF GENOTOXICITY
The colonies were counted using a validated computer system and compared to the spontaneous reversion rates.
ACCEPTABILITY CRITERIA
The Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
• regular background growth in the negative and solvent control;
• the spontaneous reversion rates in the negative and solvent control are in the range of our historical data;
• the positive control substances should produce an increase above the threshold of twofold the colony count of the corresponding solvent control;
• a minimum of five analysable dose levels should be present with at least three dose levels showing no signs of toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants below the indication factor of 0.5. - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is considered as a mutagen if a biologically relevant increase in the number of revertants of twofold or above the spontaneous mutation rate of the corresponding solvent control is observed.
A dose dependent increase is considered biologically relevant if the threshold is reached or exceeded at more than one concentration.
An increase of revertant colonies equal or above the threshold at only one concentration is judged as biologically relevant if reproduced in an independent second experiment.
A dose dependent increase in the number of revertant colonies below the threshold is regarded as an indication of a mutagenic potential if reproduced in an independent second experiment. However, whenever the colony counts remain within the historical range of negative and solvent controls such an increase is not considered biologically relevant. - Statistics:
- According to the OECD TG 471, a statistical analysis of the data is not mandatory.
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- not applicable
- Genotoxicity:
- not determined
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not examined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- not examined
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- not applicable
- Genotoxicity:
- not determined
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not examined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- not examined
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- not applicable
- Genotoxicity:
- not determined
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not examined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- not examined
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- not applicable
- Genotoxicity:
- not determined
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not examined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- not examined
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
In the pre-experiment the concentration range of the test item was 3 – 5000 µg/plate. The pre-experiment is reported as experiment I. Since minor toxic effects were observed in experiment I, seven concentrations were tested in experiment II. 5000 µg/plate were chosen as maximal concentration. The concentration range included two logarithmic decades.
The following concentrations were tested in experiment II: 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA
Please refer to Table 3 in "Any other information on results incl. tables"
MAIN STUDY
The test item precipitated in the overlay agar in the test tubes in experiment I at 5000 µg/plate in the presence of S9 mix only and in experiment II at 5000 µg/plate in the presence and absence of S9 mix. Precipitation of the test item in the overlay agar on the incubated agar plates was observed in experiment I at 5000 µg/plate in the presence and absence of S9 mix and in experiment II at 5000 µg/plate in the absence of S9 mix and from 2500 to 5000 µg/plate in the presence of S9 mix. The undissolved particles had no influence on the data recording.
The plates incubated with the test item showed reduced background growth at the following concentrations (µg/plate):
Experiment I Experiment II
without S9 mix with S9 mix without S9 mix with S9 mix
/ 5000 5000 2500 – 5000
/ = normal background growth
Toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants (below the induction factor of 0.5), were observed at the following concentrations (µg/plate):
Experiment I Experiment II
without S9 mix with S9 mix without S9 mix with S9 mix
5000 5000 5000 2500 – 5000
No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers was observed following treatment with Methyl Benzoate at any concentration level, neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance.
Appropriate reference mutagens were used as positive controls. They showed a distinct in-crease in induced revertant colonies.- Conclusions:
- In the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes in the genome of the Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA.
Therefore, the test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in this bacterial reverse mutation assay. - Executive summary:
This study was performed to investigate the potential of the test item to induce gene mutations according to the plate incorporation test (experiment I) and the pre-incubation test (experiment II) using the Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA.
The assay was performed in two independent experiments both with and without liver microsomal activation. Each concentration, including the controls, was tested in triplicate. The test item was tested at the following concentrations:
Pre-Experiment/Experiment I: 3; 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate
Experiment II: 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate
The test item precipitated in the overlay agar in the test tubes in experiment I at 5000 µg/plate in the presence of S9 mix only and in experiment II at 5000 µg/plate in the presence and absence of S9 mix. Precipitation of the test item in the overlay agar on the incubated agar plates was observed in experiment I at 5000 µg/plate in the presence and absence of S9 mix and in experiment II at 5000 µg/plate in the absence of S9 mix and from 2500 to 5000 µg/plate in the presence of S9 mix. The undissolved particles had no influence on the data recording.
The plates incubated with the test item showed reduced background growth in experiment I in the presence of S9 mix only and in experiment II in the presence and absence of S9 mix.
Toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants (below the indication factor of 0.5), occurred in the presence and absence of S9 mix in both experiments.
No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers strains was observed following treatment with the test item at any dose level, neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance.
Appropriate reference mutagens were used as positive controls and showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies.
In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes in the genome of the Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA.
Therefore, the test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in this bacterial reverse mutation assay.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1 Summary of Experiment I
Metabolic Activation | Test Group | Dose Level (per plate) |
| Revertant Colony Counts (Mean ±SD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| WP2 uvrA |
|
|
|
|
|
Without Activation | DMSO |
|
| 50 ± 2 |
Untreated |
|
| 51 ± 15 | |
Methyl Benzoate | 3 µg |
| 48 ± 6 | |
| 10 µg |
| 52 ± 8 | |
| 33 µg |
| 49 ± 5 | |
| 100 µg |
| 50 ± 7 | |
| 333 µg |
| 50 ± 6 | |
| 1000 µg |
| 49 ± 5 | |
| 2500 µg |
| 31 ± 1 | |
| 5000 µg |
| 22 ± 1 P | |
MMS | 2.0 µL |
| 971 ± 43 | |
|
|
|
|
|
With Activation | DMSO |
|
| 62 ± 7 |
Untreated |
|
| 64 ± 5 | |
Methyl Benzoate | 3 µg |
| 62 ± 3 | |
| 10 µg |
| 56 ± 3 | |
| 33 µg |
| 54 ± 13 | |
| 100 µg |
| 61 ± 2 | |
| 333 µg |
| 65 ± 2 | |
| 1000 µg |
| 58 ± 4 | |
| 2500 µg |
| 33 ± 8 | |
| 5000 µg |
| 18 ± 3 P R | |
2-AA | 10.0 µg |
| 375 ± 54 | |
|
|
|
|
|
Key to Positive Controls | Key to Plate Postfix Codes | ||
|
| ||
MMS 2-AA | methyl methane sulfonate 2-aminoanthracene | P R | Precipitate Reduced background growth |
Table 2 Summary of Experiment II
Metabolic Activation | Test Group | Dose Level (per plate) |
| Revertant Colony Counts (Mean ±SD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| WP2 uvrA |
|
|
|
|
|
Without Activation | DMSO |
|
| 51 ± 2 |
Untreated |
|
| 43 ± 3 | |
Methyl Benzoate | 10 µg |
| 50 ± 10 | |
| 33 µg |
| 43 ± 1 | |
| 100 µg |
| 55 ± 8 | |
| 333 µg |
| 53 ± 4 | |
| 1000 µg |
| 37 ± 3 | |
| 2500 µg |
| 23 ± 4 | |
| 5000 µg |
| 18 ± 5 P R | |
MMS | 2.0 µL |
| 690 ± 71 | |
|
|
|
|
|
With Activation | DMSO |
|
| 56 ± 4 |
Untreated |
|
| 52 ± 8 | |
Methyl Benzoate | 10 µg |
| 50 ± 10 | |
| 33 µg |
| 52 ± 7 | |
| 100 µg |
| 46 ± 5 | |
| 333 µg |
| 60 ± 14 | |
| 1000 µg |
| 44 ± 6 | |
| 2500 µg |
| 19 ± 2 P R | |
| 5000 µg |
| 3 ± 1 P R | |
2-AA | 10.0 µg |
| 258 ± 26 | |
|
|
|
|
|
Key to Positive Controls | Key to Plate Postfix Codes | ||
|
| ||
MMS 2-AA | methyl methane sulfonate 2-aminoanthracene | P R | Precipitate Reduced background growth |
Table 3 Historical Data
These data represent the laboratory´s historical control data from February 2020 until February 2022 representing approx. 600 experiments (WP2 uvrA the historical data are based on approx. 300 experiments).
Strain |
| without S9 mix | with S9 mix | ||||||
|
| Mean | SD | Min | Max | Mean | SD | Min | Max |
| Solvent control | 12 | 2.3 | 7 | 21 | 12 | 2.3 | 7 | 23 |
TA 1535 | Untreated control | 12 | 2.8 | 7 | 21 | 12 | 2.6 | 7 | 22 |
| Positive control | 1130 | 127.7 | 356 | 1612 | 288 | 49.7 | 166 | 428 |
| Solvent control | 12 | 2.3 | 7 | 20 | 14 | 2.9 | 7 | 27 |
TA 1537 | Untreated control | 12 | 2.7 | 6 | 21 | 14 | 3.0 | 7 | 28 |
| Positive control | 90 | 22.0 | 52 | 400 | 363 | 82.7 | 145 | 589 |
| Solvent control | 28 | 4.8 | 17 | 49 | 38 | 7.1 | 19 | 62 |
TA 98 | Untreated control | 30 | 4.7 | 15 | 47 | 40 | 7.1 | 19 | 64 |
| Positive control | 554 | 228.5 | 217 | 1277 | 3092 | 659.3 | 364 | 5290 |
| Solvent control | 115 | 19.0 | 72 | 212 | 116 | 21.1 | 73 | 213 |
TA 100 | Untreated control | 120 | 20.8 | 66 | 225 | 121 | 23.8 | 68 | 211 |
| Positive control | 1736 | 234.4 | 542 | 2437 | 3541 | 795.0 | 1092 | 5335 |
| Solvent control | 45 | 6.7 | 28 | 63 | 51 | 7.8 | 30 | 71 |
WP2 uvrA | Untreated control | 46 | 6.4 | 27 | 66 | 54 | 7.7 | 28 | 72 |
| Positive control | 858 | 163.7 | 382 | 1279 | 298 | 84.5 | 177 | 985 |
Mean = mean value of revertants/plate
SD = standard deviation
Min = minimal value
Max = maximal value
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
- AMES (gene mutation in bacteria)
- HPRT (gene mutation in mammalian cells)
- MNT (chromosome aberration)
Genetic toxicity in-vitro
Five genetic toxicity in-vitro assays were conducted with the test substance covering different modes of action for genetic toxicity.
A weight-of-evidence approach was carried out for the assessment of gene mutation in bacterial cells using three AMES tests in different Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium strains.
Szybalski, 1958
The in-vitro genotoxicity of the test substance methyl benzoate was studied in a non-GLP study in a bacterial reverse mutation assay using Escherichia coli. Assays were conducted by a paper-disk method in which filter paper disks saturated with the test substance (0.01 to 0.025 mL) were placed on the surface of streptomycin-free nutrient agar seeded with a streptomycin-dependent parental population. This population consisted of E. coli strain Sd-4 -73 grown overnight at 36 °C in aerated nutrient broth containing excess streptomycin. Cultures were then centrifuged, washed and re-suspended to obtain cultures with an initial cell density of 10E09 cells/mL, or diluted suspensions (one-fifth or one twenty-fifth of the initial cell concentration). Aliquots of 0.1 mL of the cell suspensions were mixed with streptomycin-free agar before the experiments. The increase in the frequency of reversion from streptomycin dependence to independence in E. coli strain Sd-4-73 was used as a measure of mutagenicity. Mutagenicity was manifested as a zone of streptomycin-independent mutant, colonies around the filter paper disk saturated with the test substance. No such zones were found in the experiments conducted with methyl benzoate and the substance was considered non-mutagenic under the conditions of the test.
US National Toxicology Programm, 1987 (Zeiger et al. 1992)
The genotoxic potential of the test substance methyl benzoate was studied in a bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames test) under GLP and according to principles similar to those of OECD TG 471. Five bacterial strains (Salmonella typhimurium) including TA 97, TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537 were tested. However, the study deviated from the guideline in that TA 102 or one other bacterial strain (e.g. Escherichia coli, strain WP2 uvrA) was not included and thus certain mutagen detection possibilities were omitted. The tests were conducted in the absence and presence of a metabolic activation system (S9 mix containing 10% or 30% metabolic activation enzymes and cofactors from Aroclor 1254-induced male Sprague-Dawley rat or Syrian hamster liver). In each test, a tube containing a suspension of one bacterial strain plus S9 mix or plain buffer without S9 mix was incubated for 20 minutes at 37 °C with the test substance. Control cultures, with all the ingredients except the test substance, were also incubated. Additionally, positive control cultures were prepared containing a known potent mutagen. After the pre-incubation period, agar was added to the cultures and the contents of the tubes were mixed and poured onto the surface of Petri dishes containing standard bacterial culture medium. The plates were then further incubated and colonies were usually counted after two days. The substance methyl benzoate did not induce increases in the number of revertant colonies in the absence or presence of the S9 mix in any of the tester strains. It was concluded that the substance was non-genotoxic under the conditions of this test.
Chang, 2022
This study was performed to investigate the potential of the test item to induce gene mutations according to the plate incorporation test (experiment I) and the pre-incubation test (experiment II) using the Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA. The assay was performed in two independent experiments both with and without liver microsomal activation. Each concentration, including the controls, was tested in triplicate. The test item was tested at the following concentrations: Pre-Experiment/Experiment I: 3; 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate; Experiment II: 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate.
The test item precipitated in the overlay agar in the test tubes in experiment I at 5000 µg/plate in the presence of S9 mix only and in experiment II at 5000 µg/plate in the presence and absence of S9 mix. Precipitation of the test item in the overlay agar on the incubated agar plates was observed in experiment I at 5000 µg/plate in the presence and absence of S9 mix and in experiment II at 5000 µg/plate in the absence of S9 mix and from 2500 to 5000 µg/plate in the presence of S9 mix. The undissolved particles did not influence the data recording. The plates incubated with the test item showed reduced background growth in experiment I in the presence of S9 mix only and in experiment II in the presence and absence of S9 mix. Toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants (below the indication factor of 0.5), occurred in the presence and absence of the S9 mix in both experiments.
No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers strains was observed following treatment with the test item at any dose level neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency for higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance. Appropriate reference mutagens were used as positive controls and showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies. In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes in the genome of the Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA. Therefore, the test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in this bacterial reverse mutation assay.
Taken together, the test item did not show mutagenic properties in any of the tested Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium strains with and without metabolic activation. Therefore, Methyl benzoate was considered non-mutagenic in bacterial cells.
Morris, 2013
This study aims to assess the potential mutagenicity of a test item on the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT) locus of the V79 cell line. The test methods described are designed to be compatible with the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No. 476 "In-vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Tests", Method B17 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 and US EPA OPPTS 870.5300 Guideline.
Chinese hamster (V79) cells were treated with the test item at up to seven dose levels, in duplicate, together with vehicle (solvent) and positive controls in the presence and absence of an S9 metabolic activation system. Four treatment conditions were used for the test, i.e. In Experiment 1, a 4-hour exposure in the presence of an induced rat liver homogenate metabolizing system (S9), at a 2% final concentration and a 4-hour exposure in the absence of metabolic activation (S9). In Experiment 2, the 4-hour exposure with the addition of S9 was repeated (using a 1% final S9 concentration); whilst in the absence of metabolic activation the exposure time was increased to 24 hours. The dose range of the test item was selected based on the results of a preliminary cytotoxicity test. The vehicle (solvent) controls gave mutant frequencies within the range expected of V79 cells at the HPRT locus. The positive control treatments, both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation, showed significant increases in the mutant frequency, indicating the satisfactory performance of the test and the metabolizing system. The test item demonstrated no significant increases in mutant frequency at any dose level, either with or without metabolic activation, in either the first or second experiment. The test item was shown to be non-mutagenic to V79 cells at the HPRT locus under the conditions of the test.
Bohnenberger, 2013
The study was conducted according to OECD Guideline 487. The expression phase and harvest time were slightly modified compared to the OECD Guideline 487. The test item Methyl Benzoate, dissolved in DMSO, was assessed for its potential to induce micronuclei in human lymphocytes in-vitro in two independent experiments.
In each experimental group, two parallel cultures were analysed. 1000 binucleate cells per culture were evaluated for cytogenetic damage. The highest applied concentration in this study (1360.0 µg/mL of the test item, approx. 10 mM) was chosen about the molecular weight of the test item and with respect to the guideline. Dose selection of the cytogenetic experiment was performed considering the toxicity data and the occurrence of test item precipitation in accordance with OECD Guideline 487. The evaluated experimental points and the results are summarised in Table 2 (see Attached document). In both cytogenetic experiments, in the absence and presence of the S9 mix, no cytotoxicity was indicated as cytostasis was observed up to the highest applied concentration. In both independent experiments, neither a statistically significant nor a biologically relevant increase in the number of micronucleated cells was observed after treatment with the test item. Appropriate mutagens were used as positive controls. They induced statistically significant increases in cells with micronuclei. The test item did not induce micronuclei as determined by the in-vitro micronucleus test in human lymphocytes under the experimental l conditions reported. Therefore, Methyl Benzoate is considered to be non-clastogenic and non-aneugenic in this in-vitro micronucleus test, when tested up to the highest required concentration.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the test substance did not produce significant genetic toxicity in the reliable bacterial reverse mutation assays with S. Typhimurium and E. coli, in an in-vitro micronucleus assay with human lymphocytes and in an in-vitro Gene Mutation Assay in Chinese Hamster V79 Cells (V79/HPRT). It is therefore concluded that the substance is not genotoxic. Further testing on the genetic toxicity of Methyl benzoate is not required.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the above-stated assessments of genotoxicity, the test substance Methyl benzoate is not considered genotoxic and does not need to be classified according to CLP (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.