Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-545-9 | CAS number: 84-61-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Published literature fulfilled basically scientific principles.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 009
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- No declaration of guideline compliance in the article, but it seems the method was similar to the OECD guideline 414.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- Publication
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Dicyclohexyl phthalate
- EC Number:
- 201-545-9
- EC Name:
- Dicyclohexyl phthalate
- Cas Number:
- 84-61-7
- Molecular formula:
- C20H26O4
- IUPAC Name:
- 1,2-dicyclohexyl benzene-1,2-dicarboxylate
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Sprague–Dawley rats were supplied by Charles River Laboratories (Saint-Germain-sur-l’Arbresle, France).
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- olive oil
- Details on exposure:
- Pregnant females were administered DnHP or DCHP, by gavage, at 0, 250, 500 or 750 mg/kg per day. Dosing occurred once daily, in the morning, on gestational days (GD) 6-20. The dosing volume was 5 ml/kg for DnHP, and 10 ml/kg for DCHP because of its limited solubility in oil. Initial doses were based on GD 6 weight and adjusted every 3 days throughout the treatment period.
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Dosing solutions were formulated in olive oil as vehicle. Olive oil complied with the quality standards of the European Pharmacopoeia. Analysis by gas chromatography indicated that the formulations were stable for up to 14 days, when stored in a dark place at room temperature.
- Details on mating procedure:
- After 1-2 weeks of acclimatization, primiparous female (180-200 g) Sprague-Dawley rats supplied by Charles River Laboratories (Saint-Germain-sur-l’Arbresle, France) were housed overnight with adult males from the same strain and supplier. The day sperm was detected in the vaginal smear was considered to be day 0 of gestation.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- GD 6–20; Total 15 days.
- Frequency of treatment:
- Dosing occurred once daily, in the morning.
- Duration of test:
- 20 days
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Control group; olive oil only
- Dose / conc.:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Remarks:
- analytical conc.
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Remarks:
- analytical conc.
- Dose / conc.:
- 750 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Remarks:
- analytical conc.
mg/kg per day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Group size ranged from 24 or 25 time-mated rats (20–25 pregnant).
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- The day sperm was detected in the vaginal smear was considered to be day 0 of gestation. Mated females were singly housed in clear polycarbonate cages with stainless steel wire lids and corn cob granules as bedding. Food pellets (UAR Alimentation Villemoisson, France) and filtered tap water were available ad libitum. Animal rooms were maintained at 21 ± 2 °C, a relative humidity of 50 ± 5% and a 12 h light–dark photocycle. Mated females were randomly assigned to treatment groups by stratified randomization so that mean body weights on GD 0 did not differ among treatment groups.
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- All females were observed daily for clinical signs of toxicity. Food consumption was measured at three day intervals starting on GD 6. Maternal body weights were recorded on GD 0, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 21. On GD 21, the females were killed by an intrapulmonary injection of T61® (Intervet International, GmbH, Unterschleissheim, Germany) and the uterus removed and weighed.
Satellite experiments were included to better evaluate the effects of DnHP and DCHP on the liver of the dams since it is a potential target organ. Groups of six to nine pregnant rats were given the chemicals under the same experimental conditions as in the main studies. Early on GD 21, dams were euthanized. The livers were immediately removed and weighted. The left lobe was stored in 10% neutral buffered formaldehyde for further histological examination. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- Uterine contents were examined to determine the number of implantation sites, resorptions and dead and live fetuses. The number of corpora lutea in each ovary was recorded. Uteri which had no visible implantation sites were stained with ammonium sulfide (10%) to detect very early resorptions.
- Fetal examinations:
- Live fetuses were weighed, sexed and examined for external anomalies including those of the oral cavity. Anogenital distance (AGD) was measured using a dissecting microscope with a micrometer eyepiece. Half of the live fetuses from each litter was preserved in Bouin’s solution and examined for internal soft tissue changes. The other half were fixed in ethanol (70%), eviscerated and then processed for skeletal staining with alizarin red S for subsequent skeletal examination. The sex of all fetuses was determined by internal examination of the gonads. The degree of trans-abdominal testicular migration (TTM) was determined by measuring the distance from the bladder neck to the lower pole of the testes using a micrometer eyepiece (X10). The measurements were standardized by defining the distance between the bladder neck and the lower pole of the kidney as 100 U.
- Statistics:
- Whenever possible, the data were presented as means ± SD. The number of corpora lutea, implantation sites and live fetuses, various organ and body weights, serum clinical chemistry parameters and AGD were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance, followed by Dunnett’s test if differences were found. The frequency of post-implantation loss, dead fetuses, resorptions and alterations among litters was evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Mann-Whitney test where appropriate. Rates of pregnancy and of litters with dead fetuses or resorptions, and incidences of fetal alterations per dose were analyzed using Fisher’s test. Where applicable, least-squares analysis was carried out. The reported level of statistical significance was P < 0.05. The litter was used as the basis for the analysis of fetal variables.
- Indices:
- no data
- Historical control data:
- no data
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:yes
Details on maternal toxic effects:
The corrected weight gain was lower than control at 500 mg/kg per day (although not significantly), and was significantly reduced at 750 mg/kg per day. The mean body weight change for GD 6–21, which spans the entire treatment period, was also reduced in these groups. Maternal body weight and food intake were not affected at 250 mg/kg per day. The relative liver weights were significantly different from control at 500 and 750 mg/kg per day. DCHP induced a mild elevation of hepatic peroxisomal b oxidation activity at all doses (1.7-2.1 fold, compared with the concurrent control). Histological examination of the liver did not reveal changes attributable to DCHP (data not shown).
Effect levels (maternal animals)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity
Results (fetuses)
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects: yes. Remark: Absolute AGD was significantly reduced in male fetuses at all doses. It was still significantly lower than control when fetal body weight was used as covariate for analysis, or after normalizing with the cubic root of body weight.
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
No significant effects of DCHP were found on the number of implantations or live fetuses, on the incidence of post-implantation loss and resorptions, and on the sex ratio. There was a dose-related decrease in fetal body weight (all, males and females). It amounted to 2-3% at 500 mg/kg and reached 10-11% at the highest dose, compared with the concurrent control. Fetal weight was significantly lower than control at 750 mg kg/per day. Absolute AGD was significantly reduced in male fetuses at all doses. It was still significantly lower than control when fetal body weight was used as covariate for analysis, or after normalizing with the cubic root of body weight. This decrease was dose-related and averaged 17% at 750 mg/kg per day. AGD of female fetuses were comparable across groups. Morphological examination of fetuses revealed only few cases of malformations. Diaphragmatic hernia was seen in one control fetus. At 750 mg/kg per day, three fetuses from three different litters were malformed: one fetus had omphalocele, another had diaphragmatic hernia and a third had a thoracic vertebra malformation. These isolated findings were considered incidental and unrelated to treatment. There was no statistically significant increase in the incidence of any external, soft tissue, and skeletal variations compared to control.
Effect levels (fetuses)
- Remarks on result:
- other: here was no statistically significant increase in the incidence of any external, soft tissue, and skeletal variations compared to control.
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, the lowest-observable-adverse-effect-level for developmental toxicity was judged to be 250 mg/kg per day.
- Executive summary:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the developmental toxic potential of dicyclohexyl phthalate (DCHP) in rats. Pregnant Sprague–Dawley rats were exposed to DCHP at doses of 0 (olive oil), 250, 500 and 750 mg kg-1 per day, by gavage, on gestational days (GD) 6–20. Maternal food consumption and body weight gain were significantly reduced at 500 and 750 mg kg-1 per day of DCHP. Slight changes in liver weight associated with peroxisomal enzyme induction were seen in dams treated with DCHP. DCHP produced fetal growth retardation at 750 mg kg-1 per day, as evidenced by significant reduction of fetal weight. DCHP induced a significant and dose-related decrease in the anogenital distance of male fetuses at all doses. In conclusion, DCHP showed no clear embryolethality and teratogenicity. However, as Absolute AGD was significantly reduced in male fetuses at all doses, the lowest-observable-adverse-effect-level for developmental toxicity was judged to be 250 mg kg-1 per day.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.