Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Environmental fate & pathways

Biodegradation in water: screening tests

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Description of key information

Readily biodegradable, but failing 10-day window

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Biodegradation in water:
readily biodegradable

Additional information

The biodegradability of the test compound (EC no. 204 -614 -1) was assessed in a Modified Sturm Test (OECD 301 B; Ciba 1989). The lower concentration resulted in 25 % degradation and the higher concentration in 57 %. Additionally, the results of an 28 d OECD 301 C (MITI 1) test are available. This test used a concentration of 100 mg/L test substance and 30 mg/L sludge and resulted in 82 % degradation based on BOD and 97 % degradation based on HPLC analysis.

In addition to these tests, an analogue substance (EC no. 211 -750 -5) was assessed. This substance only differs in the length of the aklyl side chains (C18H37 instead of C12H25). Due to the fact that the analogue substance has a longer alkyl chain length this is regarded as worst case scenario. The degradability of the analogue substance was object of several studies.

(1) An OECD 301 B (modified Sturm test) resulted in a mineralization of 2 % in 28 days using a test concentration of 23.9 mg/l and activated sludge as an inoculum (Ciba 1989). Another available record on an OECD 301 B –test reports a mineralization of 15 % in 28 days. In this test a test concentration of 11.3 mg/l and activated sludge were employed (Ciba 1989).

(2) The degradability of the analogue substance was studied by Akzo Nobel (2006) in a closed bottle test according to OECD 301 D with slight modifications using test concentrations of 2mg/l. Test substance dissolved in dichloromethane was added to 250-300 ml BOD bottles. Thereafter, the dichloromethane was evaporated during 24 hours on a roller bank before adding mineral medium and inoculum. The concentration of inoculum (secondary activated sludge derived from a municipal STP) was 2 mg dw/l. The test bottles were placed on magnetic stirrers and were incubated in the dark at 19-21 °C for 28 days. Two duplicate bottles were withdrawn for analyses of dissolved oxygen at days 7, 14, 21 and 28. The biodegradation of the compound was 71% in 28 days based on the BOD/ThOD-ratio. It reaches the pass level of 60% biodegradation in 21 days.

The modified OECD 301 D test result (71 % in 28 days) is considered to reflect more appropriately the biodegradation potential of the substance than the results of two OECD 301 B –tests (2 % in 28 days and 15 % in 28 days) as these tests were performed in exceedance of the water solubility and limited availabilty for biodegradation can be assumed.

Based on the modified OECD 301 D test result using lower concentrations of the substance, the substance is considered as readily biodegradable without meeting the 10-day window.

(3) This conclusion is supported by an 14 d OECD 301C (MITI 1) test (JETOC 1992), using 100 mg/l test substance and 30 mg/l sludge concentration,resulting in 51% degradation based ob BOD and 74% degradation based on HPLC analysis.

In conclusion, supported by the analogue substance (EC no. 211 -750 -5) which is regarded as worst case scenario due to longer alkyl side chain length, the compound (EC no. 204 -614 -1) is regarded as readily biodegradable without meeting the 10 day window.