Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 223-055-4 | CAS number: 3710-84-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Diethylhydroxylamine is slightly irritating to rabbit skin and eyes and irritating to the respiratory tract.
Skin irritation
The skin irritation potential of diethylhydroxylamine was evaluated in 3 pre-guideline studies. In 2 studies, no signs of skin irritancy were observed in 6 rabbits following a 4-hour or a 24-hour skin contact with diethylhydroxylamine (Latven, 1975a, 1977d). In the third one (Latven, 1980b), moderate skin irritation without skin corrosion was observed after that 0.5 ml diethylhydroxylamine was applied for 24 hours to the intact and abraded skin of 6 rabbits. Skin thickening and exfoliation of the epidermis persisted longer than the erythema but did not involve the dermis. Therefore, on a weight of evidence basis, diethylhydroxylamine, is considered to be at most a slight skin irritant.
Eye irritation
In 2 pre-guideline studies (Latven, 1975b and 1977e), one-tenth ml of diethylhydroxylamine was placed in the conjunctival sac of one eye of each of six albino rabbits. The resulting irritant reactions were scored periodically until recovery. Diethylhydroxylamine, was slightly irritating to the conjunctivae but does not affect the iris or cornea. Therefore, on a weight of evidence basis, diethylhydroxylamine is concluded to be a slight eye irritant.
Respiratory tract irritation
An acute inhalation toxicity study indicated clinical signs of irritation of the mucosa of the respiratory tract (Terrill, 1986) and in a 28-day inhalation repeated dose toxicity study (Naas, 1996) microscopic changes were noted in the nasal passages of rats.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Pre-guideline study with limited details
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Draize Test
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- other: Albino
- Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: shaved and abraded
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.5 ml
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hour(s)
- Observation period:
- 3 days
- Number of animals:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- One-half ml was applied to one intact and abraded skin site under standard gauze patches on each of six albino rabbits. The entire fur-clipped trunk of each animal was then covered with an impervious sleeve for a skin-contact period of 24 hours.
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: #1 to 6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: #1 to 6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- No signs of irritation were discernible at any of the twelve treated skin sites.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Pre guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: 49 CFR 173.240
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- other: Albino
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- No data
- Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- no data
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hour(s)
- Observation period:
- 3 days
- Number of animals:
- 6
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: #1 to 6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: #1 to 6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- No signs of skin irritancy were evident in any of the six animals following treatment.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Draize Test
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- other: Albino
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- No data available
- Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: Shaved and abraded
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.5 ml
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hour(s)
- Observation period:
- daily for 11 days
- Number of animals:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- One-half ml of the sample was applied to one intact and one abraded skin site under standard gauze patches on each of six albino rabbits. The entire fur-clipped trunk of each animal was then covered with an impervious sleeve for a skin-contact period of 24 hours. Exposures were terminated by removing the dressings and gently cleansing the treated sites with acetone and water. The animals were then examined daily for eleven days.
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: # 1 to 6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- < 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Mild erythema (scores 1 or 2) and exfoliation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: # 1 to 6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- INTACT SKIN:
Each of the treated sites was pale gray when exposures were terminated. Mild erythema (scores 1 or 2) appeared on the second day and the surface of the skin became abnormally dry. The erythema gradually waned and flake formation of the surface horny layer began. Gross exfoliation began about seven days after treatment; this extended well beyond the treated site.
ABRADED SKIN:
Additional effects were superimposed upon the basic skin reaction described above; these were as follows. (1) The initial gray discoloration persisted for many days and its appearance varied with the degree of secondary erythema. (2) The sites also thickened (hypertrophy, not edema) and (3) became moderately indurated about the third or fourth day. (Flexibility was retained and no signs of corrosivity were discernible at any time). Incisions through these lesions on the eleventh day revealed the dermis to be viable and intact. - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Executive summary:
Moderate skin irritation without skin corrosion was observed after that 0.5 ml DEHA was applied for 24 hours to the intact and abraded skin of 6 rabbits. Skin thickening and exfoliation of the epidermis persisted longer than the erythema but did not involve the dermis.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Preguideline study with limited documentation
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Draize Test
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- other: Albino
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- No data available
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.1 ml
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- not rinsed
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 72h
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- One-tenth ml was placed in the conjunctival sac of one eye of each of six albino rabbits. The resulting reactions were scored periodically until recovery.
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal: #animal 1 to 6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.66
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72h
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal: #animal 1 to 6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal: #animal 1 to 6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal: #animal 1 to 6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The reaction was confined to moderate conjunctival inflammation which dissipated completely within 72 hours. None of the scores was positive at 24 or 48 hours and neither the cornea nor the iris was effected.
- Interpretation of results:
- slightly irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information not classified Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Preguideline study with limited documentation
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Draize Test
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- other: Albino
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- No data
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.1 ml
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Not rinsed
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 72 h
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- One-tenth ML was placed in the conjunctival sac of one eye of each of six albino rabbits. The resulting irritant reactions were scored periodically until recovery.
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal: # 1 to 5
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal: #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72h
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal: # 1 to 6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal: #l 1 to 6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal: #l 1 to 6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Although all instillations evoked intense pain, the irritant reaction was limited to mild conjunctival inflammation without chemosis; most of the treated animals recovered within 24 hours. Neither the cornea nor iris was effected.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
Referenceopen allclose all
Average scores were as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------
time cornea iris conjunctival
----------------------
redness chemosis
----------------------------------------------------------
10 mins 0 0 >1 1
1 hr 0 0 2 2
2 hrs 0 0 2 >2
3 hrs 0 0 2 >2
4 hrs 0 0 2 2
24 hrs 0 0 1 0
48 hrs 0 0 1 0
72 hrs 0 0 0 0
----------------------------------------------------------
Individual conjunctival redness scores were as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------
Rabbit
Time
----------------------------------------------------------
#1 #1 #3 #4 #5 #6
10 min >1 >1 >1 >1 >1 >1
1 hr >1 >1 >1 >1 >1 2
2 hrs 1 1 1 >1 >1 2
3 hrs 1 1 1 >1 <2 2
4 hrs 1 1 1 1 <2 2
24 hrs 0 0 0 0 0 1
48 hrs 1
72 hrs 0
----------------------------------------------------------
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
No classification for skin irritation and eye irritation according to CLP and GHS criteria.
Skin irritation:
On a weight of evidence approach, DEHA is considered to be at most a slight skin irritant. On this basis and in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, DEHA does not merit classification as skin irritant.
Eye irritation:
On a weight of evidence basis, DEHA is concluded to be a slight eye irritant. On this basis and in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, DEHA does not merit classification as eye irritant.
Respiratory tract irritation:
Clinical signs of irritation of the mucosa of the respiratory tract were seen in an acute inhalation study and microscopic changes in the nasal passages of rats were observed in a 28-day inhalation repeated dose toxicity study. On this basis and in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, DEHA was classified as Specific Target Organ Toxicity (STOT) Single Exposure (SE) Category 3 "irritating to the respiratory tract".
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.