Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 233-828-8 | CAS number: 10377-66-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to soil microorganisms
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil microorganisms
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted on read-across material
- Remarks:
- Study performed to an ISO guideline and to GLP. The read-across from MnCl2 to Mn(NO3)2 is justified on the following basis: both substances are very soluble in water hence bioavailable and both will release Mn2+ ions. Therefore, from an ecotoxicity standpoint, the chloride or nitrate anions are not considered to have any influence on the effective toxicity of Mn2+ or any toxicity in their own right, so the anions can be disregarded. Therefore any effect will be related to the Mn2+ cation, and the data from MnCl2 ecotoxicity tests is regarded as a suitable surrogate for read-across
- Justification for type of information:
- See the read-across report attached in Section 13.
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- other: Read-across target
Reference
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil microorganisms
- Type of information:
- read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted on read-across material
- Justification for type of information:
- See the read-across report attached in Section 13.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 207 g/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- other: Mn2+
- Basis for effect:
- nitrate formation rate
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 009
- Report date:
- 2009
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- ISO 14238
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- An extra endpoint was included in this study compared to the ISO test as substrate (ammonia) may be exhausted after 28 days.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The test performed in this study is the ISO 14238 soil quality test in which ammonium is added to the soil before incubation. The percentage nitrate, relative to the added ammonium, is measured after 28 days incubation. The endpoint is called Substrate Induced Nitrification (SIN). An extra endpoint was included in this study compared to the ISO test as substrate (ammonia) may be exhausted after 28 days. The potential Nitrification Rate (PNR), which is the nitrification rate at unlimited substrate (NH4+) availability, was measured within 9 days incubation. This adjustment in incubation time obtains a larger sensitivity to added metals (Smolders et al., 2001).
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Remarks:
- K.U.Leuven
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- manganese chloride
- IUPAC Name:
- manganese chloride
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Manganese chloride
- Analytical purity: Not reported
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): Not reported
- Composition of test material, percentage of components:Not reported
- Storage condition of test material:Not reported
- Other: MnCl2 was supplied by the Manganese Reach Administration Association.
Constituent 1
Sampling and analysis
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Sampling method: Total metal concentrations in soil were determined after the post-spiking incubation time for both spiked and control soils.
Test substrate
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
- AMENDMENT OF SOIL
- Other: MnCl2 spiked soils were equilibrated for 7 days. Afterwards, soils were amended with 100 mg NH4-N/kg fresh soil using a stock solution containing 80 mg (NH4)2SO4/mL (Smolders et al., 2001).
APPLICATION OF TEST SUBSTANCE TO SOIL
- Method: All soils were air dried at 25°C and sieved to <4mm. Soil samples were pre-incubated at a moisture content equivalent to 50% of pF2 for 7 days at 20°.Uncontaminated soils were spiked with MnCl2 to seven concentrations (control plus six treatments; 0, 0.01, 0.032, 0.1, 0.32, 1 and 3.2 x CEC;). Added Mn concentrations in corresponding treatments differ between the 3 soils as their CEC values increase from 6 to 21 cmolc/kg. Additional deionised water was added together with the spike solution to adjust the soil moisture content to 75% of pF2.0. All soils were thoroughly mixed after amendments using laboratory spoons. These spiked and pre-incubated soils was used for all microbial assays.
Test organisms
- Test organisms (inoculum):
- soil
Study design
- Total exposure duration:
- 28 d
Test conditions
- Test temperature:
- 20°c
- Moisture:
- Deionised water was added together with the spike solution to adjust the soil moisture content to 75% of pF 2.0.
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- No. of replicates per concentration: 3
- No. of replicates per control: 3
SOURCE AND PROPERTIES OF SUBSTRATE (if soil)
- Geographical reference of sampling site : Soil 1: Kasterlee (Belgium), Soil 2: Ter Munck (Belgium), Soil 3: Nagyhorcsok (Hungary)
- Depth of sampling: Not reported
- Soil texture
- % sand: Soil 1- 79%, Soil 2- 8%, Soil 3- 13%
- % silt: Soil 1- 9%, Soil 2- 70%, Soil 3- 54%
- % clay: Soil 1- 2%, Soil 2- 12%, Soil 3- 18%
- Initial nitrate concentration for nitrogen transformation test (mg nitrate/kg dry weight):
- Maximum water holding capacity (in % dry weight):Soil 1 - pF0 -47%, pF1.8 -31, pF2- 27. Soil 2- pF0 -43%, pF1.8 -34, pF2-34. Soil 3-pF0 -48%, pF1.8 -35, pF2- 34
- Cation exchange capacity (mmol/kg): Soil 1-6.3, Soil 2-12.2 , Soil 3-24.8
- Storage : Air dry, sieved soils were stored in 60 litre plastic drums.
DETAILS OF PREINCUBATION OF SOIL (if any):
MnCl2 spiked soils were equilibrated for 7 days. Afterwards, soils were amended with 100 mg NH4 -N/kg fresh soil were thoroughly mixed, and incubated at 20°c in dark
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
The percentage nitrate, relative to the added ammonium, was measured after 28 days incubation. The endpoint is called the Substrate Induced Nitrification (SIN). The potential Nitrification Rate(PNR), which is the nitrification rate at unlimited substrate (NH4+) availability, was measured within 9 days incubation.
VEHICLE CONTROL PERFORMED: no
RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Range finding study
- Test concentrations: Uncontaminated soils were spiked with MnCl2 to seven concentrations (control plus six treatments; 0, 0.01, 0.032, 0.1, 0.32, 1 and 3.2 x CEC;). Added Mn concentrations in corresponding treatments differ between the 3 soils as their CEC values increase from 6 to 21 cmolc/kg
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: The rationale behind this spiking procedure (Mn addition as a fraction of the CEC) was based on previous research on metal toxicity in the lab showing strong positive correlations between metal toxicity (ECx values) and soil CEC i.e. soils with high CEC generally have higher ECx values than soil with low CEC. Therefore it was postulated that higher Mn additions were required in soil with high CEC compared to soil with low CEC to have a similar ECx values. - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal Concentration
Soil 1- 0, 17, 55, 170, 545, 1703, 5450 mg/kg
Soil 2- 0, 34, 107, 335, 1072, 3351, 10724 mg/kg
Soil 3- 0, 68, 218, 681, 2180, 6813, 21800 mg/kg - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
Results and discussion
Effect concentrations
- Duration:
- 28 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 207 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- other: Mn2+
- Basis for effect:
- nitrate formation rate
- Details on results:
- Not reported
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Not reported
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Statistical Data Analysis
Dose-response curves were fitted by a log-logistic model (Doelman and Haanstra, 1989) using the Maquardt Method (proc NLIN, SAS® 9.1; Cary, NC, USA):
Y = c/[1 + exp(b(x-a))]
With y = response variable, c= response in the control treatment, b= slope parameter, x= logarithm of the added Mn concentration and a = logarithm of the EC50 value. The model was adjusted to account for hormesis effects (Schabenberger et al., 1999; Van Ewijk and Hoekstra, 1993). The ‘dose’ in this model is the added Mn concentration (nominal concentration); with the dose in the control soil attributed a very small value (e.g. 0.001 mg Mn/kg). The EC50 values and their 95% confidence interval, expressed as added Mo, are predicted from the appropriate parameters of the curve. The EC50 values, expressed as ‘total Mn’, are calculated from the sum of background Mn concentration of a soil and corresponding EC50 (expressed as added Mn). No observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) are the highest Mn concentration in the soil at which no significant adverse effects on plant/ microbial assay were observed compared to the control soil (P> 0.05), and Lowest Observed Effect Concentrations (LOEC) are the lowest Mn concentration in the soil at which a significant adverse effect on plant/ microbial assay were observed compared to the control soil (P<0.05). Significant effects were determined by ANOVA (Dennett’s test). The threshold values (NOEC, LOEC and EC50) were determined in terms of soil Mn (mg/kg).
Any other information on results incl. tables
Potential Nitrification Rate (PNR) in freshly Mn spiked soils:
The PNR, measured from the increase in nitrate over time, was between 3.8 and 12.2 mg NO3- N/kg soil/d for the control soils, and decreased significantly with increasing MnCl2. The nitrification rate in the water soils was positively correlated with soil pH. Indeed, it has frequently been shown that the soil nitrification process is sensitive to soil pH ( Dancer et al., 1973; Smolders et al., 2001), suggesting that other factors besides the Mn concentration are also influential (e.g. soil pH, soil ionic strength (Sindhu and Cornfield 1967). Nevertheless, pH only slightly decreases upon MnCl2 addition to soil (Table 7 ). As a result, the inhibition of the soil nitrification process with increasing MnCl2 additions cannot be attributed to pH effects.
Substrate Induced Nitrification (SIN) in freshly Mn spiked soils:
After 28 days incubation the % age added ammonia that was nitrified (SIN), was measured. Almost all ammonia was nitrified in the control and low Mn contaminated treatments of the three soils. A significant hormesis effect was observed in the soil 3. Toxic effects of Mn were significant at added Mn concentrations of 0.32xCEC for the three soils. The confidence intervals for the EC10 and EC50 values are large. This is due to the steep decrease of the SIN with increasing Mn doses. At added Mn concentrations of 0.1xCEC, the SIN was 100% for the 3 soils, while at added Mn concentrations of 0.32xCEC the response was reduced by 50% in soil 1 and by almost 100% in soil 2. For the soil 3, no confidence intervals was derived due to the continuous increase of the SIN to the 0.32x CEC treatment at which no SIN was observed anymore.
Table 8. Soil Mn toxicity threshold for PNR in freshly spiked soils. Thresholds are expressed as added + background Mn and the Confidence Intervals (CI) of EC10 and EC50 are given.
Soil |
Background Mn Conc. (mg/kg) |
PNR (mg N/kg/d) |
NOEC (mg/kg) |
EC10 (mg/kg) |
95% CI |
EC50 (mg/kg) |
95% CI |
1 |
152 |
5.4 |
207 |
232 |
185-348 |
360 |
294-456 |
2 |
461 |
8.0 |
796 |
757 |
462->11185 |
812 |
502-3456 |
3 |
722 |
9.2 |
790 |
739 |
724-855 |
927 |
798-1278 |
Table 9. Soil Mn toxicity thresholds for Substrate Induced Nitrification (SIN, %) in freshly spiked soils. Thresholds are expressed as added + background Mn and the Confidence Intervals (CI) of EC10 and EC50 are given
Soil |
Background Mn Conc. (mg/kg) |
SIN (% substr. Used) |
NOEC (mg/kg) |
EC10 (mg/kg) |
95% CI |
EC50 (mg/kg) |
95% CI |
||||||||
1 |
152 |
92 |
322 |
281 |
190-588 |
647 |
441-1000 |
||||||||
2 |
461 |
93 |
796 |
1108 |
461->11185 |
1188 |
461->11185 |
||||||||
3 |
722 |
74 |
1403 |
2571 |
nd |
2593 |
nd |
Table 10. Potential Nitrification Rate Calculated between 0-7 days after (NH4)2SO4application in Mn freshly spiked soils.
Potential Nitrification Rate (PNR) in mg NO3- N/kg/day |
|||||
Added Mn (mg/kg) |
Soil 1 |
Added Mn (mg/kg) |
Soil 2 |
Added Mn (mg/kg) |
Soil 3 |
0 |
3.79 |
0 |
8.54 |
0 |
9.88 |
0 |
5.46 |
0 |
9.62 |
0 |
5.54 |
0 |
6.94 |
0 |
5.91 |
0 |
12.17 |
17 |
4.97 |
34 |
8.42 |
68 |
7.38 |
17 |
3.35 |
34 |
1.20 |
68 |
5.48 |
17 |
4.19 |
34 |
8.27 |
68 |
11.12 |
55 |
4.27 |
107 |
13.88 |
218 |
1.99 |
55 |
5.43 |
107 |
10.69 |
218 |
2.74 |
55 |
4.88 |
107 |
7.31 |
218 |
2.45 |
170 |
1.67 |
335 |
6.78 |
681 |
4.13 |
170 |
3.63 |
335 |
3.83 |
681 |
5.57 |
170 |
3.55 |
335 |
5.28 |
681 |
3.38 |
545 |
0.78 |
1072 |
<0.10 |
2180 |
0.57 |
545 |
<0.10 |
1072 |
<0.10 |
2180 |
0.99 |
545 |
0.62 |
1072 |
<0.10 |
2180 |
0.40 |
1703 |
<0.10 |
3351 |
<0.10 |
6813 |
<0.10 |
1703 |
<0.10 |
3351 |
<0.10 |
6813 |
<0.10 |
1703 |
<0.10 |
3351 |
<0.10 |
6813 |
<0.10 |
5450 |
<0.10 |
10724 |
<0.10 |
21800 |
<0.10 |
5450 |
<0.10 |
10724 |
<0.10 |
21800 |
<0.10 |
5450 |
<0.10 |
10724 |
<0.10 |
21800 |
<0.10 |
Table 11. Substrate Induced Nitrification calculated between 0-28 days after (NH4)2SO4application in Mn spiked soils.
Potential Nitrification Rate (PNR) in mg NO3- N/kg/day |
|||||
Added Mn (mg/kg) |
Soil 1 |
Added Mn (mg/kg) |
Soil 2 |
Added Mn (mg/kg) |
Soil 3 |
0 |
70.08 |
0 |
67.68 |
0 |
63.41 |
0 |
106.85 |
0 |
124.70 |
0 |
82.37 |
0 |
100.13 |
0 |
87.12 |
0 |
77.09 |
17 |
86.16 |
34 |
97.30 |
68 |
97.39 |
17 |
118.13 |
34 |
100.61 |
68 |
65.90 |
17 |
114.29 |
34 |
116.83 |
68 |
58.51 |
55 |
95.38 |
107 |
84.67 |
218 |
110.21 |
55 |
109.58 |
107 |
118.13 |
218 |
56.69 |
55 |
119.95 |
107 |
97.10 |
218 |
58.56 |
170 |
66.72 |
335 |
106.18 |
681 |
161.28 |
170 |
58.51 |
335 |
105.12 |
681 |
141.94 |
170 |
86.78 |
335 |
134.78 |
681 |
130.46 |
545 |
46.51 |
1072 |
<0.10 |
2180 |
2.50 |
545 |
75.84 |
1072 |
<0.10 |
2180 |
2.35 |
545 |
50.02 |
1072 |
<0.10 |
2180 |
0.48 |
1703 |
<0.10 |
3351 |
<0.10 |
6813 |
<0.10 |
1703 |
<0.10 |
3351 |
<0.10 |
6813 |
<0.10 |
1703 |
<0.10 |
3351 |
<0.10 |
6813 |
<0.10 |
5450 |
<0.10 |
10724 |
<0.10 |
21800 |
<0.10 |
5450 |
<0.10 |
10724 |
<0.10 |
21800 |
<0.10 |
5450 |
<0.10 |
10724 |
<0.10 |
21800 |
<0.10 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Nitrification rate is significantly affected by MnCl2 spiking. The toxicity thresholds varied between soils and generally increased with an increasing background Mn concentration. The lowest NOEC was 207 mg Mn/kg. The read-across from MnCl2 to Mn(NO3)2 is justified on the following basis: both substances are very soluble in water hence bioavailable and both will release Mn2+ ions. Therefore, from an ecotoxicity standpoint, the chloride or nitrate anions are not considered to have any influence on the effective toxicity of Mn2+ or any toxicity in their own right, so the anions can be disregarded. Therefore any effect will be related to the Mn2+ cation, and the data from MnCl2 ecotoxicity tests is regarded as a suitable surrogate for read-across
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.