Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 941-174-6 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1992-10-09 to 1992-11-21
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 997
- Report date:
- 1997
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1-Propanaminium, 2-hydroxy-N-(2-hydroxypropyl)-N,N-dimethyl-, esters with fatty acids, C16-18 (even numbered) and C18 unsatd., Me sulfates (salts)
- Cas Number:
- 1079184-43-2
- Molecular formula:
- n.a. (UVCB)
- IUPAC Name:
- 1-Propanaminium, 2-hydroxy-N-(2-hydroxypropyl)-N,N-dimethyl-, esters with fatty acids, C16-18 (even numbered) and C18 unsatd., Me sulfates (salts)
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): E 4429.03
- N,N-dimethyl-2-(stearoyloxy)-N-[2-(stearoyloxy)ethyl]ethanaminium chloride
- Molecular formula (if other than submission substance): N/A
- Molecular weight (if other than submission substance): N/A
- Smiles notation (if other than submission substance): N/A
- InChl (if other than submission substance): N/A
- Structural formula attached as image file (if other than submission substance): N/A
- Substance type: active
- Physical state: liquid
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Rat WIST HanIbm: WIST (SPF)
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: BRL, Biological Research Laboratories Ltd.
- Age at study initiation: No data. (Age at pairing: 12 weeks, minimum).
- Weight at study initiation: No data. (189-228 g at day 0 post coitum).
- Fasting period before study: N/A.
- Housing: individually in Makrolon cages (type-3) with wire mesh tops and standarized granulated softwood bedding (Lignocel, Schill AG, CH 4132 Muttenz/Switzerland).
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): pelleted standard Kilba 343 rat/mouse maintenance diet ("Kilba", Klingentalmuehle AG, CH 4303 Kaiseraugust/Switzerland) ad libitum. (Batch no. 65-92).
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water in bottles ad libitum.
- Acclimation period: 10 days (minimum).
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 3 (air-conditioned).
- Humidity (%): 40-70.
- Air changes (per hr): 10-15.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12-hrs artificial fluorescent light/12 hours dark.
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 1992-10-09 To: 1992-11-21
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: NOAEL emBe-distelled water, previously adjusted with hydrochloric acid to pH 2.5-2.6
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: The mixtures of the test substance and vehicle were prepared daily before administration. The test substance was weighed into a glass beaker on a tared precision balance (Mettler PE 360) and the vehicle added (w/v). The mixtures were prepared using a homogenizer. During the daily administration period, homogeneity was maintained using a magnetic stirrer. All animals received a dose volume of 10 ml/kg bw with a daily adjustment of the individual volume to the actual body weight.
DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): N/A.
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): N/A.
- Storage temperature of food: N/A.
VEHICLE: Bi-distilled water (previously adjusted with hydrochloric acid to pH 2.5-2.6).
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): N/A.
- Concentration in vehicle: N/A.
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 10 ml/kg.
- Lot/batch no. (if required): N/A.
- Purity: N/A. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Samples of the test substance/vehicle dilutions were taken on two occasions during the dosing period of the study and sent to the Sponsor for analysis (concentration, homogeneity and stability over 2-hrs).
- Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohabitation.
- If cohoused:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1:1.
- Length of cohabitation: overnight
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: no data.
- Verification of same strain and source of both sexes: no data. (The male rats used for mating were in the possession of the testing laboratory. The fertility of these males was proved and was continuously controlled).
- Proof of pregnancy: sperm in vaginal smear/vaginal plug referred to as day 0 post coitum.
- Any other deviations from standard protocol: After mating, female rats were removed and allocated to the test groups. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Day 6 through 15 post coitum.
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once daily in the morning.
- Duration of test:
- Females were sacrificed on day 21 post coitum.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0 mg/kg bw/day (vehicle control)
Basis:
actual ingested
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
50 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
actual ingested
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
250 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
actual ingested
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
1000 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
actual ingested
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 25/group.
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: Dosages were based on the results of the dose range-finding sudy (RCC Project 326158--see cross reference section).
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): Mated rats were assigned to the different groups using a computer-generated random algorithm.
- Rationale for method of administration: International guidelines recognize the efficacy of oral administration.
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes.
- Time schedule: The animals were checked at least twice daily for any mortalities. The animals were observed at least twice daily for signs of reaction to treatment and/or symptoms of ill health.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: No
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Body weights were recordered daily, from day 0 until day 21 post coitum.
- Body weight gains from days 0-6 p.c., 6-9 p.c., 9-12 p.c., 12-16 p.c., 6-16 p.c., 16-21 p.c., and 6-21 p.c. were calculated.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Yes. Food consumption was recorded for the following periods: days 0-6, 6-9, 9-12, 12-16, and 16-21 post coitum.
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food consumed per period/days per period: Yes.
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes. Any female sacrificed or found dead during the study was subjected to gross macroscopic examination of all internal organs.
- Sacrifice on day # 21 post coitum by CO2 asphyxiation. Fetuses were removed by Caesarean section.
- Organs examined: Emphasis on the uterus and its contents, position of the fetuses in the uterus, and number of corpora lutea.
- Specimens of abnormal tissue were fixed in neutral phosphate buffered 4% formaldehyde solution.
- Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes.
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes. (The uteri (and contents) of all females with live fetuses were weighed at necropsy on day 21 post coitum to enable the calculation of the corrected body weight gain).
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes.
- Number of implantations: Yes. If no implantation sites were evident, the uterus was placed in an aqueous solution of ammonium sulfide to accentuate possible haemorrhagic areas of implantation sites.
- Number of early resorptions: Yes.
- Number of late resorptions: Yes.
- Other: position of the fetuses was recordered. - Fetal examinations:
- The fetuses were removed from the uterus, sexed, weighed individually, examnined for gross external abnormalities and allocated to one of the following procedures: Wilson's slicing technique or skeletal examination.
- External examinations: Yes: all per litter.
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: half per litter. Wilson's slicing technique for examination of the viscera and brain. One half of the live fetuses from each litter were fixed in a mixture of ethyl alcohol, formol and acetic acid. After examination, the sections were preserved in a solution of ethyl alcohol and glycerine (one fetus/container).
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: half per litter. Fetuses were placed in a solution of potassium hydroxide for clearing and stained with alizarin red S (modified technique). The skeletons were examined and all abnormalities were recordered. The specimens were preserved individually in plastic bags.
- Head examinations: No data. - Statistics:
- The following statistical methods were used to analyze body weights, food consumption, reproduction and skeletal examination data: means and standard deviations, univariate one-way analysis of variance, Dunnett-test, Steel-test, Fisher's Exact test for 2x2 tables. Individual values, means, standard deviations and t-statistics were rounded off before printing.
- Indices:
- N/A.
- Historical control data:
- N/A.
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:no effects
Details on maternal toxic effects:
MORTALITY: No test substance related deaths were noted. One female in group 2 (50 mg/kg), was found dead in the evening of day 10 post coitum. At first daily inspection in the morning, this female had ruffled fur, ataxia, tremor and bleeding from the vagina. This single finding in the low dose
group was considered to be incidental.
CLINICAL SIGNS OF REACTION TO TREATMENT: In group 4 (1000 mg/kg), one female had bleeding from the vagina on days 15-16 post coitum. At scheduled Caesarean section, this female had one empty implantation site, only. No abnormal findings were noted in the dams of groups 1 (0 mg/kg), 2 (50 mg/kg), or 3 (250 mg/kg) with the exception of the dam in group 2 (50 mg/kg) mentioned above.
FOOD CONSUMPTION: Up to and including the highest dose level of 1000 mg/kg, food consumption of the dams was similar in all groups. No test substance related effects were noted.
BODY WEIGHTS: The differences in mean body weights between the control group and any dose group did not reveal any test substance related effect. In all groups the body weight gain and the corrected body weight gain (corrected for uterus weight) were similar. The dams of group 4 (1000 mg/kg), had statistically significantly increased mean body weights on day 5, between days 7-13 and on day 15 post coitum. These findings were considered to be a consequence of the slightly increased initial mean body weight: 213 g compared to 207 g in the control group, on day 0 post coitum.
REPRODUCTION DATA: Values for post-implantation loss were: 4.8 and 8.7 in groups 1 (0 mg/kg) and 4 (1000 mg/kg), respectively. The latter value attained statistical significance. Although the post-implantation losses were within the normal range of the historical control data of this strain of animals, two additional females (which were not included in the statistical analysis) had total post-implantation losses (i.e. implantation sites, only). Therefore, the increased post-implantation loss in group 4 (1000 mg/kg) was considered to be a slight effect of treatment with the test substance. In groups 2 (50 mg/kg) and 3 (250 mg/kg), none of the reproduction parameters as assessed by the mean number per dam of corpora lutea and implantation sites, pre- or post-implantation losses, and mean number of fetuses per dam were adversely affected by treatment with the test substance.
NECROPSY FINDINGS: No test substance related abnormal findings were noted at terminal necropsy of the dams in any group. One female in group 2 (50 mg/kg) which was found dead on day 10 post coitum had reddish lungs with dark red foci, reduced right kidney and enlarged left kidney with nodules and calcus in pelvis (both kidneys with pelvic dilation) and in the urinary badder dark red discoloration of the mucosa and urine with hemorrhagic contents were noted. No abnormal findings were noted in the dams of groups 1 (0 mg/kg), 3 (250 mg/kg), or 4 (1000 mg/kg).
Effect levels (maternal animals)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity
Results (fetuses)
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
EXTERNAL EXAMINATION: No test substance related abnormal findings were noted. Neither the type nor the incidences of the abnormal findings listed below indicated test substance related effects: In each group 1 (0 mg/kg) and 3 (250 mg/kg), one fetus with reduced mouth and shortened and tapering lower jaw was noted. In group 2 (50 mg/kg), one runt (fetal weight < 2.5 g) was noted. In group 4 (1000 mg/kg), one fetus with several abnormal findings--generally oedematous, cranioschisis with excencephaly, protusion of the tongue, eventration and both eyes partially missing--was noted.
SEX RATIOS: In all groups, the sex ratios of the fetuses were not affected by the treatment with the test substance.
BODY WEIGHTS: The mean fetal body weights were similar in all groups. No test substance related effects were evident.
VISCERAL EXAMINATION BY WILSON TECHNIQUE: No test substance related abnormal findings were noted at visceral examination of the fetuses. In group 3 (250 mg/kg), in the fetus which had reduced mouth, shortened and tapering lower jaw at external examination a small palatoschisis was additionally observed at visceral examination. No abnormal findings were noted in groups 1 (0 mg/kg), 2 (50 mg/kg), or 4 (1000 mg/kg).
SKELETAL EXAMINATION: The incidences of abnormal findings at skeletal examination were as following:
2/145 (=1%) fetuses in 2/25 litters in group 1 (0 mg/kg);
10/141 (=7%) fetuses in 6/24 litters in group 2 (50 mg/kg);
4/136 (=3%) fetuses in 4/25 litters in group 3 (250 mg/kg) and
4/116 (=3%) fetuses in 4/21 litters in group 4 (1000 mg/kg).
Mainly: wavy or fused ribs, abnormally or incompletely ossified sternebrae, dumbbell shaped or hemicentric thoracic vertebral body and in two fetuses in group 2 (50 mg/kg) fused os interparietale and occipitale were noted. Neither the type nor the incidences of these abnormal findings indicated test substance related effects. In all groups, the stage of the skeletal development of the fetuses was similar. The few statistically significant differences (on individual basis, only) between the control group and the dose group 4 (1000 mg/kg) in the ossification grade of the phalangeal nuclei did not indicate any test substance related effect. All values evaluated in this study were in the normal range of the historical control data of this strain of animals.
Effect levels (fetuses)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: embryotoxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: fetotoxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: teratogenicity
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
N/A.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- NOAEL = 1000 mg/kg bw/day (general tolerability in the females and for the fetal organism).
NOAEL = 1000 mg/kg bw/day (maternal reproduction).
NOAEL = 1000 mg/kg/day (teratologic effects) - Executive summary:
In the developmental toxicity study (OECD guideline 414), groups of 25 mated female Wistar rats were treated with the test substance MDEA-Esterquat C16-18 and C18 unsatd. orally by gavage once daily from day 6 through 15 post coitum, at dose levels of 0, 50, 250 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day. Females were sacrificed on day 21 post coitum and the fetuses were removed by Caesarean section.
At 50, 250, and 1000 mg/kg, for the dams no test substance-related deaths or clinical signs as were noted as reaction to treatment. Up to and including the highest dose level of 1000 mg/kg, food consumption and body weight development of the dams were not affected by treatment with the test substance. At necropsy, no test substance-related abnormal findings in the dams were noted in any group.
A slight (statistically non significant) decrease in the number of corpora lutea and a slight (statistically non significant) increase in pre-implantation losses were observed in the high dose group (17.4 %) as compared to the controls (12.8 %); however, this is not a substance-related effect, since exposure started at gestation day 6, the day of implantation.
The slightly but statistically significant increased post-implantation losses at the high dose of (8.7 %) as compared to the controls (4.8 %) resulted in a slightly reduced portion of total fetuses per implantation site (91.3%) and in a reduced mean litter size (10.5 fetuses/litter) as compared to the controls (95.2 %; 11.2 fetuses/litter). The values were within the range of historical control values (3.9 % to 11.6 % for post-implantation losses and 10.2 to 12.2 fetuses/litter).
At 1000 mg/kg, two females with total post-implantation losses were noted. One of the two females had bleeding from the vagina on days 15-16 post coitum. However these two animals had only two and one corpora lutea, respectively, and were obviously not fit for reproduction. A small but significant increase in post-implantation losses was noted for the remaining females; however, the increase was within the historical data of the laboratory. These findings were considered by the authors to be a potentially effect of the test substance.
As the values were well within the range of the historical control values recorded at the same laboratory, it is likely that the effects observed are incidental and therefore not treatment related.
At 50 and 250 mg/kg, no test substance-related effects were noted on the maternal reproductive parameters, assessed by the mean number per dam of corpora lutea and implantation sites, pre- or post-implantation losses, and by the mean number of fetuses per dam.
Up to and including the highest dose level of 1000 mg/kg, no adverse effects on the fetal parameters were recorded. No external, skeletal or soft tissue malformations and no external variations were found. Mean fetal body weights and the sex ratios of the fetuses were comparable in all groups.
The maternal NOAEL is 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
The developmental NOAEL is 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.