Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
06 Dec - 13 Dec 1985
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study under GLP conditions with acceptable restrictions (purity of test substance not given, no reading at 72 hours (full reversibility at 48 h))

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1986
Report date:
1986

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
adopted in 1981
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
purity of test substance not given, no reading at 72 hours (full reversibility at 48 h)
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
69275-01-0
Cas Number:
69275-01-0
IUPAC Name:
69275-01-0
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Di-(2-octyl-dodecyl)-sebacate
- Physical state: colorless liquid
- Analytical purity: no data

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: Kleinrusse Chbb: HM
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Fa. Thomae, Biberach, Germany
- Weight at study initiation: 2360 g
- Housing: one animal per cage in cages of Fa. Heinkel, 7343 Kuchen, Germany
- Diet: Altromin diet 2023, ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 1 month

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 21
- Humidity (%): 45 - 55
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: the untreated eye served as control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL
- Concentration (if solution): undiluted
Duration of treatment / exposure:
single application without washing
Observation period (in vivo):
48 hours
reading time points at 1, 6, 24 and 48 hours
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
4
Details on study design:
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize Scoring system

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: fluorescein

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: mean over 24 and 48 hours
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: reversibility: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: mean over 24 and 48 hours
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: reversibility: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: mean over 24 and 48 hours
Score:
0.25
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 hours
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: mean over 24 and 48 hours
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: reversibility: not applicable
Irritant / corrosive response data:
From 1 hour up to 6 hours after application one animal showed slight, the three others distinct redness of the conjunctiva. 24 hours after application 2 animals were without any reactions, the other two were without effects 48 hours after application.
Other effects:
One animal showed slight, the other three strong exsudation from 1 hour up to 6 hours after application. 2 animals did not show exsudation any more 24 hours after application. For the other two animals exsudation was only slight at 24 hours and completely gone after 48 hours.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
DSD: not classified
CLP: not classified