Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-327-1 | CAS number: 119-47-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
The data evaluation revealed that the test substance
6,6’-di-tert-butyl-2,2’-methylendi-p-cresol (DBMC) caused adverse
effects on male reproductive organs and on fertility in rats.
A slight decrease in fertility was noted in a Reproduction/Developmental
Toxicity Screening Test (OECD TG 421) (MHWJ 1999) shown by a slight
decrease of the number of pups born. This observation was accompanied by
effects on the sperm quality and was related to a decrease in the number
of corpora lutea and number of implantation scars. Adverse effects like
atrophy of the testis and epididymides, decrease in the total sperm
number etc. were noted in male rats in a Reproduction/Developmental
Toxicity Screening Test (MHWJ 1999). The adverse effects on the testis
were confirmed by the findings of the repeated dose studies performed
independently in different laboratories. Based on the findings of the
Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test and the findings from
the repeated dose toxicity studies it is likely that the test substance
in rats is toxic to reproduction at doses that lead to some but not
overt toxicity.
Based on the information received by ECHA (communication number: TPE-C-2114485558-31-01/F) ECHA considers that further testing for fertility is not necessary. As a result, the testing proposal process is terminated.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Remarks:
- based on test type
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP and OECD Guideline study (TG 421), acceptable documented (abstract and result tables in English, publication in Japanese)
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 421 (Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Crj: CD(SD)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Weight at study initiation: (P) Males: 332-383 g; Females: 206-238 g
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: in 5% gum arabic
- Details on exposure:
- oral (gavage)
- Details on mating procedure:
- Male/female percage: 171, length of cohabitation: at the most 14 d, until proof of pregnancy (formation of vaginal closing or sperm detection in vagina)
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- male: 50-52 d, female: 40-48 d (from 14 days before mating to the day 3 of lactation)
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Details on study schedule:
- age at study initiation was 10 wk old (332-383 g for male, 206-238 g for female)
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 12.5, 50, 200, 800 mg/kg bw and day
Basis:
other: nominal - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 12/per dose group/sex
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control:
- none
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- clinical observations: general appearance twice a day, organ weights: testis, epididymis, cauda epididymis, ovary, microscopic evalauations:( control and all teatment groups): testis, caput epididymis, (control and 800 mg/kg group): seminal vesicle, ovary
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- Parameters examined in male parental generations:
testis weight, epididymis weight, sperm count in testes, sperm count in epididymides, sperm motility, viability, sperm morphology - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- SACRIFICE
- Male animals: All surviving animals
- Maternal animals: All surviving animals - Statistics:
- Dunnett's or Scheffe's test for continuous data and Chi square test for quantal data
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Other effects:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 12.5 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no adverse effects
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Giant cell formation in the testes, decreases in sperm motility ratio and number of sperms in the epididymis cauda, increase in abnormal sperm ratio
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no adverse effects
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 200 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: decreased body weight gain, lower food consumption, dreased number of corpora lutea, decreased number of implantation scars and number of pup born
- Clinical signs:
- not specified
- Mortality / viability:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Sexual maturation:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- not specified
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Pups (200 mg/kg bw): Pup numbers on day 0 and 4 of lactation were decreased
- Remarks on result:
- other: Pups (800 mg/kg bw): the number of pups on day 0 and 4 of lactation, live birth index, and body weights of both sexes on day 4 of lactation were decreased, and the number of stillbirths was increased
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
- Executive summary:
In a reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test (OECD Guideline 421) with rats toxic effects of the test substance Vulcanox BKF were seen. Male and females Crj:CD rates were treated with 0, 12.5, 50, 200 and 800 mg/kg bw/day test substance. In males food consumption was decreased transiently in the 800 mg/kg bw/day group. An atrophy of the testes and epididymides was noted at 200 mg/kg bw/ day and higher. In addition, atrophy of the seminal vesicles was found at 800 mg/kg bw/day. Moreover a decrease in the absolute and relative testis and epididymis weights were noted at 200 and 800 mg/kg bw/ day. A decrease in the sperm motility ratio, sperm viability ratio, sperm survivability ratio, and number of sperm in the epididymis cauda was indicated at concentration of 50 and 200 mg/kg bw/day; in addition, an increase in the abnormal sperm ratio was seen at these concentrations. At the highest dose group (800 mg/kg bw/day), no motile sperm were evident and the number of abnormal sperm tended to increase. Moreover, the total number of sperm was decreased. Histological examinations revelated giant cell formation in the testes at 50 mg/kg bw/day and higher. Atrophy and degeneration of the seminiferous tubules were noted at 200 mg/kg bw/day and at 800 mg/kg bw/day an atrophy of seminiferous tubules was found. In female rats a suppression of the body weight gain was noted in the 200 mg/kg bw/day treatment group during the lactation period. In the highest dose group (800 mg/kg bw/day) a suppression of body weight gain was seen during the pregnancy and lactation periods. Lower food consumption was noted in the 200 and 800 mg/kg bw/day groups during pre-mating, pregnancy, and lactating periods. Decreases in the number of corpora lutea, number of implantation scars, and number of pups born were noted at 200 and 800 mg/kg bw/day. In addition, 1 dam was unable to deliver pups, and 1 dam lost all their pups during the lactation period at 800 mg/kg bw/day. Based on the findings of this study, the NOAEL for reproductive toxicity is assessed to be 50 mg/kg bw/day for females and 12.5 mg/kg bw/day for males. The NOAEL for pup development is considered to be 50 mg/kg bw/day (MHWJ 1999).
Reference
NOAEL: male reproductive toxicity: 12.5 mg/kg bw/day
NOAEL developmental toxicity: 50 mg/kg bw/day
Parental animals:
Males and females: no mortality and clinical signs recorded.
Males (50 mg/kg bw): Giant cell formation in the testes, decreases in sperm motility ratio and number of sperms in the epididymis cauda, and an increase in abnormal sperm ratio
Males (200 mg/kg bw): Atrophy of the testes and epididymides, decreases in the absolute and relative testis and epidymis weights, atrophy of seminiferous tubules, degeneration of seminiferous tubules, a decrease in sperm in the epididymis cauda and giant cell formation were noted in the testes, a decrease in the sperm motility ratio and an increase in the abnormal sperm ratio
Males (800 mg/kg bw): A transient decrease in food consumption, atrophy of the testes, epididymides and seminal vesicles, decreases in the absolute and relative testis and epididymis weights, atrophy of seminiferous tubules in the testes, on sperm examination: no motile sperm werenoted, the number of abnormal sperm tended to increase, and the number of sperm in the epididymis cauda were decreased
Females (200 mg/kg bw): Supression of body weight gain during the lactation period, lower food consumption was evident during the pre-mating, pregnancy and lactation periods, decrease in the number of corpora lutea, decrease in number of implantation scars and number of pups born, 1 dam was unable to deliver pups, and 1 dam lost all their pups during the lactation period
Females (800 mg/kg bw): Supression of body weight gain was noted during the pregnancy and lactation periods, lower food consumption was noted during the pre-mating, pregnancy and lactation periods; decrease in the number of corpora lutea, decrease in number of implantation scars and number of pups born, 1 dam was unable to deliver pups, and 1 dam lost all their pups during the lactation period
Offspring:
Pups (200 mg/kg bw): Pup numbers on day 0 and 4 of lactation were decreased
Pups (800 mg/kg bw): the number of pups on day 0 and 4 of lactation, live birth index, and body weights of both sexes on day 4 of lactation were decreased, and the number of stillbirths was increased
Table body weights parental animals
Male (number) | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Dose level (mg/kg/day) | 0 | 12.5 | 50 | 200 | 800 |
Body weight (g) | 535.8 ± 41.7 | 536.5 ± 33.5 | 544.3 ± 31.4 | 539.7 ± 35.7 | 514 ± 34.4 |
Female (number) | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Body weight (g) | 310.4 ± 12.3 | 312.2 ± 18.9 | 310.7 ± 17.2 | 287.4 ± 13.3** | 281.9 ± 22.9** |
Significantly different from control (**:p<0.01)
Testis and epididymis weights in male
Male (number) | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Dose level (mg/kg/day) | 0 | 12.5 | 50 | 200 | 800 |
Testis absolute wt. (g, Mean ± SD) | 3.550 ± 0.333 | 3.598 ± 0.320 | 3.558 ± 0.302 | 2.983 ± 0.767* | 1.736 ± 0.263** |
Testis relative wt. (g%, Mean ± SD) | 0.666 ± 0.082 | 0.674± 0.072 | 0.655 ± 0.046 | 0.557 ± 0.157* | 0.338 ± 0.050** |
Epididymis absolute wt. (g, Mean ± SD) | 1.255 ± 0.143 | 1.343 ± 0.118 | 1.196 ± 0.113 | 1.108 ± 0.125* | 0.924 ± 0.100** |
Epididymis relative wt. (g%, Mean ± SD) | 0.235 ± 0.034 | 0.250± 0.024 | 0.220 ± 0.018 | 0.205 ± 0.027* | 0.180 ± 0.020** |
(* p<0.05, **p<0.01)
Histopathological changes in testis and epididymis male
Dose level (mg/kg/day) | 0 | 12.5 | 50 | 200 | 800 |
Testis | |||||
Atrophy, seminiferous tuble | 0/12 | 0/12 | 0/12 | 6/12** | 12/12** |
Degeneration, seminiferous tuble | 0/12 | 0/12 | 0/12 | 1/12 | 0/12 |
Decrease, sperm | 0/12 | 0/12 | 0/12 | 1/12 | 0/12 |
Giant cell formation | 0/12 | 0/12 | 2/12 | 2/12 | 0/12 |
Epididymis | |||||
Decrease, sperm | 0/12 | 0/12 | 0/12 | 9/12** | 12/12** |
( * p<0.05, ** p<0.01)
Sperm abnormality in male
Dose level (mg/kg/day) | 0 | 12.5 | 50 | 200 | 800 |
Sperm motion parameters | |||||
After 30 min. incubation | |||||
Motility ratio (%) | 71.96 ±9.69 | 74.92 ± 7.81 | 60.42± 10.26** | 14.50 ± 21.75** | 0.00 ± 0.00** |
Curvilinear velocity (um/s) | 348.95 ±20.87 | 369.08 ± 16.17* | 364.94± 18.14 | 301.08 ± 104.59 | - |
Bear cross frequency (Hz) | 30.64 ±1.77 | 30.16 ± 1.59 | 32.91± 1.70** | 29.98 ± 10.51* | - |
Morphology of sperm | |||||
Abnormal ratio (%) | 1.55 ±3.63 | 0.55 ± 0.55 | 8.11± 6.33** | 56.33 ± 29.03** | - |
Viabity (%) | 98.57 ±2.04 | 99.56 ± 0.47 | 89.19± 11.47** | 71.68 ± 9.31** | - |
Survivability (%) | 83.29 ±6.87 | 86.44 ± 3.27 | 66.03± 17.79** | 39.03 ± 15.16** | - |
Number of sperms (left epididymis cauda x106) | 207.41 ±60.16 | 222.42 ± 49.26 | 128.00± 39.88** | 60.73 ± 29.17* | - |
Number of sperms/g (left epididymis cauda x106) | 707.41±153.02 | 704.85 ± 154.64 | 503.29± 159.44** | 238.88 ± 102.42** | - |
(*p <0.05, **p<0.01)
Table: Organ weights of female rats
Dose level (mg/kg/day) | 0 | 12.5 | 50 | 200 | 800 |
Number of dams | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Ovaries (mg) | 94.50 ± 12.06 | 91.43 ± 10.00 | 89.88 ± 8.77 | 89.69 ± 16.74 | 88.78 ± 14.65 |
Ovaries (mg%) | 30.51 ± 4.20 | 29.36 ± 3.40 | 28.90 ± 1.90 | 31.23 ± 5.75 | 31.44 ± 3.93 |
Number of estrous cases and reproductive performance
Dose (mg/kg) | 0 | 12.5 | 50 | 200 | 800 |
Number of females | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Number of estrous cases before mating (14 days) | 3.3 ± 0.5 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 3.7 ± 0.5 | 3.2 ± 0.6 |
Fertility index (%) | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 91.7 | 100.0 |
number of pregnant females with live pups | 12 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 10 |
Fertility/Developmental toxicity
Dose level (mg/kg day) | 0 | 12.5 | 50 | 200 | 800 |
No. of pairs mated |
12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
No. of pregnant females | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Corpora lutea | 16.4 ± 3.0 | 16.4 ± 2.6 | 16.3 ± 1.5 | 15.1 ± 1.4 | 14.1 ± 1.6* |
Implantation scars | 14.3 ± 3.0 | 14.7 ± 1.1 | 15.2 ± 1.3 | 13.5 ± 1.4 | 13.1 ± 1.5* |
Pups born | 13.5 ± 3.3 | 13.5 ± 1.0 | 14.8 ± 1.3 | 11.7 ± 1.4** | 12.2 ± 1.8* |
Delivery Index (%) | 93.5 ± 8.9 | 92.2 ± 5.2 | 97.3 ± 3.3 | 87.2 ± 10.5* | 92.8 ± 5.7 |
Live pups | 13.1 ± 3.2 | 13.3 ± 0.8 | 14.3 ±1.4 | 11.4± 1.0** | 12.4 ± 1.8 |
Dead pups on day 0 of lactation | 0.4 ± 0.7 | 0.2 ± 0.4 | 0.4 ± 0.5 | 0.2 ± 0.6 | 0.9 ± 2.7 |
Live birth index (%) | 97.1 ± 4.6 | 98.9 ± 2.5 | 97.2 ± 3.5 | 98.8 ± 3.9 | 89.9 ± 3.0 |
Live pups on day 4 of lactation | 13.1 ± 3.2 | 13.3 ± 0.8 | 14.3 ±1.4 | 11.4 ± 1.0** | 12.4 ± 1.8 |
Body weight of live pups (g) on day 0 Males | 6.78 ± 0.40 | 6.81 ± 0.23 | 6.90 ± 0.50 | 7.60 ± 0.52** | 6.97 ± 0.71 |
Body weight of live pups (g) on day 0 Females | 6.43 ± 0.37 | 6.40 ± 0.17 | 6.53 ± 0.44 | 7.25 ± 0.49** | 6.61 ± 0.66 |
Body weight of live pups (g) on day 4 Males | 11.02± 0.83 | 11.05 ± 0.77 | 10.58 ± 1.11 | 11.29 ± 1.14 | 9.68 ± 1.72* |
Body weight of live pups (g) on day 4 Females | 10.33 ± 0.81 | 10.36 ± 0.67 | 10.20 ± 1.15 | 10.77 ± 1.04 | 9.30 ± 1.64 |
* p<0.05, ** p<0.01)
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 12.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subchronic
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- OECD TG 421
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
In a reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test (OECD Guideline 421) with rats toxic effects of the test substance 6,6’-di-tert-butyl-2,2’-methylendi-p-cresol (DBMC) were seen. Male and females Sprague-Dawley rats were treated per gavage with 0, 12.5, 50, 200 and 800 mg/kg bw/day test substance. No mortality and clinical signs were noted. In males food consumption was decreased transiently in the 800 mg/kg bw/day group. An atrophy of the testes and epididymides was noted at 200 mg/kg bw/ day and higher. In addition, an atrophy of the seminal vesicles was found at 800 mg/kg bw/day. Moreover a decrease in the absolute and relative testis and epididymis weights were noted at 200 and 800 mg/kg bw/ day. A decrease in the sperm motility ratio, sperm viability ratio, sperm survivability ratio, and number of sperm in the epididymis cauda was indicated at concentration of 50 and 200 mg/kg bw/day; in addition, an increase in the abnormal sperm ratio was seen at these concentrations. At the highest dose group (800 mg/kg bw/day), no motile sperm was evident and the number of abnormal sperm tended to increase. Moreover, the total number of sperm was decreased. Histological examinations revealed giant cell formation in the testes at 50 mg/kg bw/day and higher. Atrophy and degeneration of the seminiferous tubules were noted at 200 mg/kg bw/day and at 800 mg/kg bw/day an atrophy of seminiferous tubules was found. In female rats a suppression of the body weight gain was noted in the 200 mg/kg bw/day treatment group during the lactation period. In the highest dose group (800 mg/kg bw/day) a suppression of body weight gain was seen during the pregnancy and lactation periods. Lower food consumption was noted in the 200 and 800 mg/kg bw/day groups during pre-mating, pregnancy, and lactating period. A slight decrease in the number of corpora lutea (200 mg/kg: 15.1 ± 1.4, 800 mg/kg: 14.1 ±1.6, control: 16.4 ± 3.0), number of implantation scars (200 mg/kg bw:13.5 ± 1.4, 800 mg/kg 13.1 ± 1.5, control: 14.3 ± 3.0), and number of pups born (200 mg/kg bw: 11.7 ± 1.4, 800 mg/kg: 12.2 ± 1.8, control: 13.5 ± 3.3) were noted at 200 and 800 mg/kg bw/day. In addition, 1 dam was unable to deliver pups, and 1 dam lost all their pups during the lactation period at 800 mg/kg bw/day (MHWJ 1999). Based on the findings of this study, the NOAEL for systemic and reproductive toxicity is assessed to be 50 mg/kg bw/day for females and 12.5 mg/kg bw/day for males.
In a two month feeding study with male Fischer rats the test substance 6,6’-di-tert-butyl-2,2’-methylendi-p-cresol (DBMC) induced toxic effects in the testis. Animals feed with 0.06% test substance (approx. 40 to 60 mg/kg/day) showed a decrease in relative testicular and epidididymal weights and histopathological changes like vacuolisation of Sertoli cells, disappearance of basement membrane and degeneration of spermatids. Moreover, the daily sperm production (DSP) was significant decreased in treated animals; whereas the serum testosterone levels were not significant changed in treated animals compared to control. In addition, no estrogenic activity of the test substance was noted in an in vitro ERa-binding assay (Takahashi 2006).
This working group (Takahashi et al.) also evaluated mice in a two months feeding study. Male Crj:CD-1 (ICR) mice were feed with 0.25% test substance (approx. 414 mg/kg bw/day). No significant changes in absolute organ weights (testes, accessory organ weights, liver and kidney) were found after treatment with the test substance in male mice. However, treated animals showed histopathological changes like giant cells (6/8) and Leidig cell vacuolization (2/8) (Takahashi 2006).
In additions, in a subacute feeding study with Sprague-Dawley rat (MHWJ 1996) adverse effects on the testis of treated males were noted. Male and female Sprague Dawley rats (six per dose and sex) were treated per gavage for 28 days with the test substance at concentration of 0, 50, 200, 800 mg/kg bw/day. A 14-day recovery group was also included (control and high dose animals). No mortality, clinical signs were indicated. No effects on body weights were observed. Changes in liver weights were seen in treated males and females in all treatment groups. In addition changes in hematology were seen in all males at 50 mg/kgbw and higher and in females at 200 mg/kg bw and day. Mild changes in liver histology were observed in males and females of the mid and high dose groups. Histopathological changes in testis were noted in males treated with the test substance. Sperm rention was noted in males of the mid (6/6 mild) and high dose group (6/6 moderate) and in high dose males of the recovery group (5/6 moderate). Degeneration of step 19 spermatids were seen in males of the low (3/6 mild), mid (6/6 mild) and high (6/6 moderate) dose group and males of the high dose recovery group (5/6 moderate). Giant cell formation was seen in high dose males of the recovery group (4/6 moderate to market). In these males nuclear vacuolation of spermatids were found (4/6 mild to moderate). Moreover in the high dose males of the recovery group a decrease in germ cells were indicated (2/6 mild to marked). Whereas the effects seen in liver and hematology tend to be reversible, the adverse effects seen in the testis seems to be permanent or even more severe. Based on the findings of this study a LOAEL of 50 mg/kg bw and day is suggested for reproduction toxicity.
Adverse effects on testis were also noted in a subchronic toxicity study and a chronic feeding study in Wistar rats (Takagi 1994). In the subchronic feeding study the rats were fed with 0, 1200, 6000, 30000 ppm in the diet (for more details see chapter repeated dose toxicity). In males histological changes in the testis and a dose-dependent decrease in testis weights were noted in all treatment groups. At week 12 testicular atrophy was pronounced and was observed in all treated males. Decrease of spermatogenesis was evident in all treated males at week 4 and thereafter. Interstitial edema in the testis was also apparent in all treated rats at week 12. At week 4 and 12, epididymis atrophy and hypospermia was observed in high dose males and atrophy of the seminal vesicles and prostate in mid and high dose males. In females atrophy of the ovaries and uterus were apparent in mid and high dose females. Based on the findings of this study a LOAEL of 1200 ppm, according to 88 mg/kg bw/d is suggested for males, which based on the adverse effects on testis and spermatogenesis. For females a NOAEL of 1200 ppm, according to 104 mg/kg bw and day is suggested, which based on the effects on ovaries and uterus noted at 618 mg/kg bw and day.
In the chronic study Wistar rats were feed for 18 months with the test substance (for more details see chapter repeated dose toxicity). In males a decrease of the absolute and relative testes weights were observed at 1000 ppm. Several histopathological changes of the testis were noted in treated males. Testis tubules atrophy was observed (control 2/19, low: 4/19, mid: 1/18, high 19/19). Spermatogenic arrest were seen in male rats (control 2/19, low 1/19, mid: 1/8, high 19/19). In addition epididymis hypospermia was observed (control 2/19, low: 1/19, mid: 1/18, high: 19/19). The severity ranged from marked in the control males to severe in the treated animals. In females no significant changes were noted in ovaries. Based on the changes seen in male reproduction organs a NOAEL of 12.7 mg/kg bw/day for toxicity to reproduction is suggested for males and a NOAEL of 54.2 for females.
In a subchronic feeding study with Wistar rats (for more details see chapter repeated dose toxicity) adverse effects on reproduction organs were noted in treated animals (BAYER AG 1982). Males administered 1000 ppm and 3000 ppm (ca. 76 and 282 mg/kg bw/day) showed a significant reduction of testes weights and a severe atrophy of the testes. In addition, at the highest dose group (3000 ppm) a reduction of the epididymis was found. In females an atrophy of both uterus horns were seen at 3000 ppm (4/10). Based on the findings of this study a NOAEL for toxicity to reproduction of 24.91 for males and 113.16 for females is suggested.
In conclusion:
The data evaluation revealed that the test substance 6,6’-di-tert-butyl-2,2’-methylendi-p-cresol (DBMC) caused adverse effects on male reproductive organs and on fertility in rats (see discussion above).
A slight decrease in fertility was noted in a Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test (OECD TG 421, MHWJ 1999) shown by a slight decrease of the number of pups born. This observation was accompanied by effects on the sperm quality and was related to a decrease in the number of corpora lutea and number of implantation scars (see discussion above).
Adverse effects like atrophy of the testis and epididymides, decrease in the total sperm number etc. were noted in male rats in a Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test (OECD TG 421, MHWJ 1999). The adverse effects on the testis were confirmed by the findings of the repeated dose studies performed independently in different laboratories (see discussion above). As discussed and confirmed by recent literature (Mangelsdorf et al. 2003, Ulbrich & Palmer 1995, Janer et al. 2007, Dent 2007, Sanuissho et al. 2008) histopathological examination of reproductive tissues in repeated dose toxicity studies in rodents is of high value and sensitivity for evaluation of reproductive toxicity in males and females. Histopathological changes on the reproductive organs in repeated dose toxicity studies are indicative of effects on fertility. With this respect repeated dose toxicity studies should be considered sensitive and reliable information to evaluate toxicity on fertility if histological examination of the reproductive organs is covered.
Based on the above discussed findings on fertility and reproductive organs demonstrated in a Reproduction/ Developmental Toxicity Screening Test (OECD TG 421) and in repeated dose toxicity studies it is likely that the test substance in rats is toxic to reproduction at doses that lead to some but not overt toxicity. A generation reproductive toxicity study is not available.
Based on the information received by ECHA (communication number: TPE-C-2114485558-31-01/F) ECHA considers that further testing for fertility is not necessary. As a result, the testing proposal process is terminated.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
There is no evidence of a specific developmental toxicity based on a
reproductive screening assay and a developmental toxicity study. The
NOAEL for maternal toxicity was assessed to be 50 mg/kg bw/ day and the
NOAEL for pup development is considered to be 50 mg/kg bw/day based on
the results from the OECD Guideline study 421(MHWJ 1999). Based on the
developmental toxicity study (Tanaka 1990) the NOAELs were considered to
be 93.5 mg/kg bw/day for maternal toxicity and 187 mg/kg bw/day for
foetal toxicity.
Based on the data from the TG 421 a NOAEL developmental toxcity of 50
mg/kg bw and day is suggested.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP and OECD Guideline study (TG 421), acceptable documented (abstract and result tables in English, publication in Japanese)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline 421 (Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Crj: CD(SD)
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Weight at study initiation: (P) Males: 332-383 g; Females: 206-238 g
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: in 5% gum arabic
- Details on mating procedure:
- Male/female per cage: 171, length of cohabitation: at the most 14 d, until proof of pregnancy (formation of vaginal closing or sperm detection in vagina)
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- male: 50-52 d, female: 40-48 d (from 14 days before mating to the day 3 of lactation)
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Duration of test:
- male: 50-52 d, female: 40-48 d (from 14 days before mating to the day 3 of lactation)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 12/per dose group/sex
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- clinical observations: general appearance twice a day, organ weights: testis, epididymis, cauda epididymis, ovary, microscopic evalauations:( control and all teatment groups): testis, caput epididymis, (control and 800 mg/kg group): seminal vesicle, ovary
- Maternal examinations:
- BODY WEIGHT: Yes,
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Ovaries and uterine content:
- lengh of gestation, corporal lutea, implantation scars, implantation index, gestation index, pups born, delivery index, live pups born, sex ratio at birth. birth index,
- Fetal examinations:
- Dead pups on day 0 of lactation, live birth index, live pups on day 4 of lactation, viability index, external anomalies, body weights of pups
- Statistics:
- Dunnett's or Scheffe's test for continuous data and Chi square test for quantal data
- Indices:
- live birth index, viability index, implantation index, gestation index, delivery index
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:yes
Details on maternal toxic effects:
decrease in body weight gain, - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 200 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 200 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Pups (200 mg/kg bw): Pup numbers on day 0 and 4 of lactation were decreased
- Remarks on result:
- other: Pups (200 mg/kg bw): Pup numbers on day 0 and 4 of lactation were decreased
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
- Executive summary:
In a reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test (OECD Guideline 421) with rats toxic effects of the test substance Vulcanox BKF were seen. In dams suppression of the body weight gain was noted in the 200 mg/kg bw/day treatment group during the lactation period. In the highest dose group (800 mg/kg bw/day) a suppression of body weight gain was seen during the pregnancy and lactation periods. Lower food consumption was noted in the 200 and 800 mg/kg bw/day groups during pre-mating, pregnancy, and lactating periods. Decreases in the number of corpora lutea, number of implantation scars, and number of pups born were noted at 200 and 800 mg/kg bw/day. In addition, 1 dam was unable to deliver pups, and 1 dam lost all their pups during the lactation period at 800 mg/kg bw/day. No external anomalies were found in any of the pups evaluated
The maternal NOAEL for developmental toxicity was assessed to be 50 mg/kg bw/ day and the NOAEL for pup development is considered to be 50 mg/kg bw/day (MHWJ 1999).
Reference
Dams:
Females (200 mg/kg bw):Suppression of body weight gain during the lactation period, lower food consumption was evident during the pre-mating, pregnancy and lactation periods, decrease in the number of corpora lutea, decrease in number of implantation scars and number of pups born
Females (800 mg/kg bw):Supression of body weight gain was noted during the pregnancy and lactation periods, lower food consumption was noted during the pre-mating, pregnancy and lactation periods; decrease in the number of corpora lutea, decrease in number of implantation scars and number of pups born, 1 dam was unable to deliver pups, and 1 dam lost all their pups during the lactation period
Offspring:
Pups (200 mg/kg bw): Pup numbers on day 0 and 4 of lactation were decreased
Pups (800 mg/kg bw): the number of pups on day 0 and 4 of lactation, live birth index, and body weights of both sexes on day 4 of lactation were decreased, and the number of stillbirths was increased
Organ weight of female rats
Dose (mg/kg) | 0 | 12.5 | 50 | 200 | 800 |
number of dams | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Body weight (g) | 310.4 ± 12.3 | 312.2 ± 18.9 | 310.7 ± 17.2 | 287. 4± 13.3** | 281.9 ± 22.9** |
Ovaries (mg) | 94.50 ± 12.06 | 91.43 ± 10.00 | 89.88 ± 8.77 | 89.69 ± 16.74 | 88.78 ± 14.65 |
significantly different from control (**p<0.01)
Number of estrous cases and reproductive performance
Dose (mg/kg) | 0 | 12.5 | 50 | 200 | 800 |
Number of females | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Number of estrous cases before mating (14 days) | 3.3 ± 0.5 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 3.7 ± 0.5 | 3.2 ± 0.6 |
Fertility index (%) | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 91.7 | 100.0 |
number of pregnant females with live pups | 12 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 10 |
Observation of pups
Dose (mg/kg) | 0 | 12.5 | 50 | 200 | 800 |
Number of dams | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Lengh of gestation (days) | 22.08 ± 0.29 | 22.00 ± 0.00 | 22.33 ± 0.49 | 22.45 ± 0.52 | 22.27 ± 0.65 |
Corpa lutea | 16.4 ± 3.0 | 16.4 ± 2.6 | 16.3 ± 1.5 | 15.1 ± 1.4 | 14.1 ± 1.6* |
Implantation scars | 14.3 ± 3.0 | 14.7 ± 1.1 | 15.2 ± 1.3 | 13.5 ± 1.4 | 13.1 ± 1.5* |
Implantation index | 86.9 ± 14.7 | 91.0 ± 12.8 | 93.6 ± 7.4 | 90.1 ± 8.5 | 93.1 ± 7.2 |
Gestation index (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 83.3 |
Pups born | 13.5 ± 3.3 | 13.5 ± 1.0 | 14.8 ± 1.3 | 11.7 ± 1.4** | 12.2 ± 1.8* |
Live pups born | 13.1 ± 3.2 | 13.3 ± 0.8 | 14.3 ± 1.3 | 11.5 ± 1.0** | 11.3 ± 4.1 |
Birth index (%) | 90.7 ± 9.4 | 91.2 ± 4.8 | 94.7 ± 4.4 | 86.0 ± 9.6 | 83.8 ± 28.8 |
Dead pups on day 0 of lactation | 0.4 ± 0.7 | 0.2 ± 0.4 | 0.4 ± 0.5 | 0.2 ± 0.6 | 0.9 ± 2.7 |
Live birth index (%) | 97.1 ± 4.6 | 98.9 ± 2.5 | 97.2 ± 3.5 | 98.8 ± 3.9 | 89.9 ± 30.0 |
Live pups on day 4 of lactation | 13.1 ± 3.2 | 13.3 ± 0.8 | 14.3± 1.4 | 11.4 ± 1.0** | 12.4 ± 1.8 |
Viability index (%) | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 99.4 ± 2.0 | 98.5 ± 3.4 | 100.0 ± 0.0 |
External anomalies (%) | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 |
Body weight of pups | |||||
Male Day 0 | 6.78 ± 0.40 | 6.81 ± 0.23 | 6.90 ± 0.50 | 7.60 ± 0.52** | 6.97 ± 0.71 |
Male Day 4 | 11.02 ± 0.83 | 11.05 ± 0.77 | 10.58 ± 1.11 | 11.29 ± 1.14 | 9.68 ± 1.72* |
Female Day 0 | 6.43 ± 0.37 | 6.40 ± 0.17 | 6.53 ± 0.44 | 7.25 ± 0.49** | 6.61 ± 0.66 |
Female Day 4 | 10.33 ± 0.81 | 10.36 ± 0.67 | 10.20 ± 1.15 | 10.77 ± 1.04 | 9.30 ± 1.64 |
Significantly different from control (*p<0.05, **p<0.01)
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 50 mg/kg bw/day
- Species:
- rat
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
In the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test (OECD TG 421) with Sprague-Dawley rats (described above) toxic effects of the test substance 6,6’-di-tert-butyl-2,2’-methylendi-p-cresol (DBMC) were noted in treated dams and their pups. In these dams a suppression of the body weight gain was found in the 200 mg/kg bw/day treatment group during the lactation period. In the highest dose group (800 mg/kg bw/day) a suppression of body weight gain was seen during the pregnancy and lactation periods. Lower food consumption was noted in the 200 and 800 mg/kg bw/day groups during pre-mating, pregnancy, and lactating periods. Decreases in the number of corpora lutea, number of implantation scars, and number of pups born were noted at 200 and 800 mg/kg bw/day. In addition, 1 dam was unable to deliver pups, and 1 dam lost all their pups during the lactation period at 800 mg/kg bw/day. The number of live pups born and live pups on day 4 of lactation was slightly decreased compared to the corresponding control. Moreover, pups of the 800 mg/kg bw/day dose group showed a decrease in body weights compared to the control. However, no external anomalies were found in any of the pups evaluated. The authors concluded that the maternal and foetal NOAEL for developmental toxicity is 50 mg/kg bw/ day (MHWJ 1999).
In a developmental toxicity study with Wistar rats maternal toxic effects of the test substance 6,6’-di-tert-butyl-2,2’-methylendi-p-cresol were observed. The maternal toxic effects determined were suppression of body weight gain, decrease in food consumption and toxic signs such as diarrhoea at concentrations of 187 and 375 mg/kg bw and day. In addition, foetal toxicity was seen at 375 mg/kg bw and day indicated by an increase in foetal death. No teratogenic effects were found in external, visceral and skeletal observations (Tanaka 1990). The NOAELs were considered to be 93.5 mg/kg for maternal toxicity and 187 mg/kg/day for foetal development.
According to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 in Annex X a pre-natal developmental toxicity study 2nd species is required.
However, the studies do not need to be conducted if a substance is known to cause developmental toxicity, meeting the criteria for classification as toxic for reproduction category 1A or 1B: May damage the unborn child (H360D), and he available data are adequate to support a robust risk assessment, then no further testing for developmental toxicity will be necessary.
At present 6,6'-Di-tert-butyl-2,2'-methylenedi-p-cresol (CAS 119-47-1) is self-classified as Repr. 2; H3612 f (Suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child).
6,6'-Di-tert-butyl-2,2'-methylenedi-p-cresol (CAS 119-47-1) was selected for the CoRAP. A harmonised classification for Reproduction category 1B was submitted by the Danish authority. RAC concluded that DBMC should be classified as Repr. 1B; H360F for adverse effects on fertility. Concerning developmental toxicity RAC concluded: "Overall, RAC concludes that the decrease in the number of liveborn foetuses/pups reported are secondary non-specific consequences of maternal toxicity following exposure to DBMC, and agrees with the DS that no classification for developmental toxicity is warranted” (CLH-O-0000001412-86-288/F).
Based on the RAC opinion no further testing on developmental toxicity is warranted.
As soon as the decision on the classification into Reproduction category is published in the ATP of the CLP Regulation LANXESS will adapt his classification into Reprotox Cat.1B; classification is presumed to be included in the 17th ATP of the CLP Regulation.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the findings from the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test and the repeated dose toxicity studies provisionally the test substance is classified as Repr. 2 (H361: Suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child) according to regulation (EG) 1272/2008 CLP).
According to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 in Annex X a pre-natal developmental toxicity study 2nd species is required.
However, the studies do not need to be conducted if a substance is known to cause developmental toxicity, meeting the criteria for classification as toxic for reproduction category 1A or 1B: May damage the unborn child (H360D), and the available data are adequate to support a robust risk assessment, then no further testing for developmental toxicity will be necessary.
At present 6,6'-Di-tert-butyl-2,2'-methylenedi-p-cresol (CAS 119-47-1) is self-classified as Repr. 2; H3612 f (Suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child).
6,6'-Di-tert-butyl-2,2'-methylenedi-p-cresol (CAS 119-47-1) was selected for the CoRAP. A harmonised classification for Reproduction category 1B was submitted by the Danish authority. RAC concluded that DBMC should be classified as Repr. 1B; H360F for adverse effects on fertility. Concerning developmental toxicity RAC concluded: "Overall, RAC concludes that the decrease in the number of liveborn foetuses/pups reported are secondary non-specific consequences of maternal toxicity following exposure to DBMC, and agrees with the DS that no classification for developmental toxicity is warranted” (CLH-O-0000001412-86-288/F).
Based on the RAC opinion no further testing on developmental toxicity is warranted.
As soon as the decision on the classification into Reproduction category is published in the ATP of the CLP Regulation LANXESS will adapt his classification into Reprotox Cat.1B; classification is presumed to be included in the 17th ATP of the CLP Regulation.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.