Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-327-1 | CAS number: 119-47-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Carcinogenicity
Administrative data
Description of key information
No evidence of pre-neoplastic lesions nor neoplastic was found in a chronic (18 months) feeding study with male and female Wistar rats (Takagi 1994). However the study is reviewed as not qualified to be regarded as a carcinogenicity study; and thus no concluding conclusion could be reached. Nevertheless, the test substance 6,6'-di-tert-butyl-2,2'-methylenedi-p-cresol reveals no genotoxic activities in vitro.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Carcinogenicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- carcinogenicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- acceptable, well-documented publication which meets basic scientific principles; however the study is reviewed as not qualified to be regarded as a carcinogenicity study (OECD SIDS 2003); ((limitations: no data to test substance homogeneity and stability given, small number of animals evaluated at study termination)
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- other: chronic oral toxicity study
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- the animals were maintained at temperature of 24 +/- 1°C and 55 +/- 5% humidity with a 12 h light/dark cycle; rats were housed in plastic cages (5 rats/cage)
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- other: test substance contained in diet
- Details on exposure:
- pellets of diet containing the substance; stored at 4°C until use
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 18 months
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Post exposure period:
- no
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 0.01%, 0.03%, 0.1%
Basis:
nominal in diet - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 30 per dose and sex
- Control animals:
- yes
- Details on study design:
- Age at study initiation: 5 weeks old for both sexes; weight at study initiation: 393 +/- 21 g male, 230 +/- 15 g for female; no. of animals per sex and per dose: 30 (5 animals/group were sacrified after 6 and 12 months for hematological serum biochemical examinations)
- Positive control:
- no data
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- Clinical observations performed and frequency: general conditions were observed daily; body weight and food consumption were determined monthly; hematological and serum biochemical examination were performed for 5 animals/sex/dose group at 6, 12, 18 months
Organs examined at necropsy:
Organ weight: brain, heart, lungs, liver, kidney, spleen, adrenals, testes, ovaries, pituitary and thyroid glands
Microscopic evaluation /all groups: brain, heart, lungs, liver, kidney, spleen, adrenals, testes, ovaries, pituitary and thyroid glands, salivary glands, esophagus, stomach, small and large intestine, pancreas, urinary bladder, seminal vesicles, epididymis, ischiac nerve, uterus, prostate, mesenteric lymph nodes, thymus, spinal cord, skeletal muscle, bone marrow - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes - Statistics:
- Analysis of variance (ANOVA) techniques with Dunnett's or Scheffe's test for continous data and Chi square test for analysis of categorical data
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 12.7 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: slight increase in relative liver weights
- Remarks on result:
- other: Effect type: toxicity (migrated information)
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 42.3 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: decreased body weights, increased absolute and relative liver weights, decreased absolute and rel. testis weights, atrophy of testicular tubules and spermatogenic arrest and epididymis, hypospermia
- Remarks on result:
- other: Effect type: toxicity (migrated information)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 15.1 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no adverse effects
- Remarks on result:
- other: Effect type: toxicity (migrated information)
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 54.2 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: decreased body weights, increased absolute and relative liver weights
- Remarks on result:
- other: Effect type: toxicity (migrated information)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 42.3 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no interstitial cell tumors were apparent (no additional data given) (highest dose tested)
- Remarks on result:
- other: Effect type: carcinogenicity (migrated information)
- Executive summary:
No tumors were observed in a 18 -months chronic feeding study with rats up to 1000 ppm; however in the OECD SIDS (2003) the study is reviewed as not qualified to be regarded as a carcinogenicity study; and thus no conclusion could be reached on the carcinogenicity (OECD SIDS 2003).
Reference
NOAELsystemic Male:300 ppm (12.7 mg/kg/day), Female: 300 ppm (15.1 mg/kg/day)
LOAEL systemic Male: 1000 ppm (42.3 mg/kg/day), Female: 1000 ppm (54.2 mg/kg/day)
Body weight: Significant suppression of body weight gain was observed from the month 6 in the male group at 1000 ppm and from the month 1 in the female group at 1000 ppm.
Food/water consumption: No significant effect was observed.
Table: effects seen after 18 months
Males |
Females |
|||||||
Diet level (ppm) | 0 | 100 | 300 | 1000 | 0 | 100 | 300 | 1000 |
Final mean body weight (g) |
545 | 528 | 520 | 498* | 375 | 368 | 353 | 278* |
Mean food intake (g/rat/day) | 16.6 | 16.7 | 16.6 | 16.2 | 12.2 | 12.7 | 12.2 | 11.5 |
(* significant: not specified the degree)
Haematology: In the hematological and serum biochemical analysis, several parameters demonstrated significant alternation. However, none appeared to be of biological significance, since they did not show the same tendency throughout the experimental period and/or the degrees of change were very small.
Mortality and time to death: Survival rates in all treated groups were comparable to those of control.
Gross pathology incidence and severity: Organ weight changes:
Male: Increase in liver weight at 300 ppm (absolute (p<0.05) and relative (p<0.01)); decrease in testis weight at 1000 ppm (absolute and relative) (p<0.01)
Female: Increase in liver weight at 1000 ppm (relative) (p<0.01). no changes in ovary weights were observed in any of the treated females. no changes in other organs were observed in any treated groups for males and females.
Effects seen after 18 months
Males |
Females |
||||
Diet level (ppm) | 0 | 300 | 1000 | 0 | 1000 |
Absolute weight | |||||
Liver (g, Mean ± SD) | 12.28 ± 0.93 | 12.59 | 14.19 ± 1.35* | 7.60 ± 0.88 | 7.39 ± 0.83 |
Testis (g, Mean ± SD) | 3.28 ± 0.48 | 0.82 ± 10.18** | |||
Relative weight | |||||
Liver (g%, Mean ± SD) | 2.37 ± 0.16 | 2.58 ± 0.16** | 3.00 ± 0.13** | 2.08 ± 0.15 | 2.79 ± 0.35** |
Testis (g%, Mean ± SD) | 0.63 ± 0.10 | 0.82 ± 0.11 | 0.17 ± 0.05* |
increase in rel. liver weight 109% compared to control, absolute liver weight increase: 103% compared to control
Histopathology (incidence and severity):
Histopathological lesions were only observed in the testis and epididymis of males.
However, no interstitial cell tumors were apparent (no additional data given). In the other organs of males, no changes induced by the test substance were observed and no changes in any organs were apparent in females. No neoplastic lesions which could be attributed to MBMBP were observed in any organs of males and females.
Male: Atrophy of testicular tubules and spermatogenic arrest and epididymis
hypospermia were observed in the 1000 ppm group.
Female: No significant effect was observed.
Table: Effects seen after 18 months
Diet level (ppm) | degree* | 0 | 100 | 300 | 1000 |
No. of animals | 19 | 19 | 18 | 19 | |
Testis, tubules Atrophy |
± | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
+ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
++ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
+++ | 0 | 3 | 1 | 19 | |
Spermatogenic arrest | ++ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
+++ | 0 | 1 | 1 | 19 | |
Epididymis Hypospermia | ++ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
+++ | 0 | 1 | 1 | 19 | |
interstitum | |||||
interstitial cell tumor | 15 | 11 | 15 | 0 | |
interstitial cell hyperplasia | + | 3 | 7 | 2 | 0 |
CONCLUSIONS: Toxic effects in this study are suppression of body weight gain, increase in liver weight, decrease in testis weight, and histopathological lesions in the testis and the epididymis.
The NOAELs systemic are 12.7 mg/kg/day (300 ppm for male and 15.1 mg/kg/day (300 ppm) for female.
No interstitial cell tumors were apparent in any of the treated animals.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 42.3 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- chronic
- Species:
- rat
Carcinogenicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Carcinogenicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification is not required based on the classification criteria 67/548/EWG and regulation no. 1272/2008 (GHS).
Additional information
Carcinogenicity: oral
In a chronic feeding study (18 months) male and female Wistar rats were administered with 0, 100, 300 and 1000 ppm test substance 6,6’-di-tert-butyl-2,2’-methylendi-p-cresol in the diet (more more details see chapter repeated dose toxicity). No signs of toxicity were indicated related to test substance treatment. In addition, survival rats of treated rats were comparable to control animals. A suppression of the body weight gain was noted at 1000 ppm (corresponding to 42.3 mg/kg bw/d for males and 54.2 mg/kg bw/d for females). An increase in the relative liver weight was found at 300 ppm and 1000 ppm for males and 1000 ppm for females. In males a decrease of the absolute and relative testes weights and atrophy of testicular tubules were observed at 1000 ppm. In addition a spermatogenic arrest and epididymis hypospermia were noted at this concentration. No neoplastic lesion attributable to the substance was observed in any organs evaluated of either sex. The NOAELs for systemic effects are considered to be 12.7 mg/kg/day (300 ppm) for male and 15.1 mg/kg/day (300 ppm) for female (Takagi 1994).
In conclusion, no evidence of pre-neoplastic lesions or neoplastic lesions was found in a chronic (18 months) feeding study with male and female Wistar rats (Takagi 1994). However in the OECD SIDS (2003) the study is reviewed as not qualified to be regarded as a carcinogenicity study; and thus no concluding conclusion could be reached
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.