Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 406-940-1 | CAS number: 126019-82-7 DP 211
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The substance did not cause skin sensitization in guinea pigs as tested in a GLP compliant study following OECD testing guideline 406.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- April 11,1989 - May 12, 1989
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- 1981
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (in housing conditions (temperature)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- 1984
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (in housing conditions (temperature)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- The study was conducted in 1989 when the guinea pig maximisation test was an accepted and recommendet method to assess skin sensitization potential. The GPMT is valid and sufficient, no further animal study is necessary.
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature - Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- other: Pirbright White Strain (Tif: DHP)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: CIBA-GEIGY Ltd. Tierfarm, 4332 Stein, Switzerland
- Age at study initiation: approx. 10 wks
- Weight at study initiation: 381-467 g
- Housing: individually in Macrolon cages (type 3)
- Diet: standard guinea pig pellets (NAFAG No. 845, Gossau SG); ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 8 d
All batches of the diet are assayed for nutritive ingredients and contamination level by the manufacturer.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22± 3
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Route:
- intradermal
- Vehicle:
- other: sesame oil
- Concentration / amount:
- 1 %
- Day(s)/duration:
- day 1
- Adequacy of induction:
- highest technically applicable concentration used
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- petrolatum
- Concentration / amount:
- 30 % in vaseline
- Day(s)/duration:
- 1 wk after intradermal induction / 48 h
- Adequacy of induction:
- highest concentration used causing mild-to-moderate skin irritation and well-tolerated systemically
- No.:
- #1
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- petrolatum
- Concentration / amount:
- 10 %
- Day(s)/duration:
- 2 wks after epicuatneous induction / 24 h
- Adequacy of challenge:
- highest non-irritant concentration
- No. of animals per dose:
- Number of animals in test group: 20
Number of animals in negative control group: 20 - Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS:
The following concentrations were examined on separate animals for the evaluation of the primary irritant potential and the maximum subirritant concentration of the test article: 10 and 30 % in vaseline.
Results:the concentration (1 %) for the intradermal injections was selected on account of the solubility of the test article in standard vehicles.
Erythema reactions were observed with 30% in vaseline. 30 % was, therefore, selected for the epidermal induction application and 10 % as maximum subirritant concentration for the epidermal challenge application.
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE (intradermal)
- Test substance group: (cranial) Freund's complete adjuvant (FCA) 1 + 1 (v/v) blended with saline
- Test substance group: (middle) test article in vehicle
- Test substance group: (caudal) test article in Freund's complete adjuvant (FCA)/saline-mixture
- Control group (cranial): Freund's complete adjuvant (FCA) 1 + 1 (v/v) blended with saline
- Control group (middle): vehicle
- Control group (caudal): Freund's complete adjuvant (FCA)/saline-mixture
- Site: interscapular region (2x4 cm)
- Concentrations: 1 %
- Vehicle: sesame oil
- Volume per injection: 0.1 mL
- Evaluation (hr after injection): no data
Epicutaneous induction exposure
- Time schedule: 1 wks after intradermal injection.
- Site: same as intradermal injection
- Method of test substance application: on 2 x 4 cm test patches
- Type of coverage: occlusive
- Concentration: 30 % test article
- Vehicle: vaseline
- Amount applied: approx. 0.4 g per patch
- Duration: 48 h
- Evaluation: (hr after challenge): no data
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- Time schedule: 2 wks after the epidermal induction application
- Site: one flank (test substance and vehicle), other flank (vehicle alone)
- Area of application: 2 x 2 cm
- Concentration: 10 %
- Vehicle: vaseline
- Amount applied: approx. 0.2 g per patch
- Duration: 24 h
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 and 48 hours after termination of exposure according to Draize Scoring Scale - Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- The sensitivity of the strain is checked every six months with Paraphenylene-diamine or Potassium-dichromate.
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 10 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 10 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 10 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 10 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- No animal of the test group was sensitised by the test item under the experimental condition employed.
- Executive summary:
A GLP-compliant guinea pig maximization test was performed following OECD guideline 406. The test was performed on 10 male and 10 female guinea pigs per group. During induction, three pairs of intradermal injections (0.1 ml per injection) were made simultaneously into the shaved neck of the guinea pigs as follows: adjuvant and saline (1:1); test article (1%) in sesame oil; test article (1%) in the adjuvant saline mixture. One week later the test item was incorporated in vaseline (30%) and applied on a filterpaper patch to the neck of the animals (patch 2x4 cm; approx. 0.4 g paste per patch; occluded administration for 4 8 hours). Two weeks after the epidermal induction application the animals were tested on the flank with the test item in vaseline (10%) and the vehicle alone (patch 2x2 cm; approx. 0.2 g paste per patch; occluded administration for 24 hours). A control group was treated with adjuvant and the vehicle during the induction period. During the challenge period the group was treated with the vehicle as well as with the test article (at least 10 animals) to control the maximum subirritant concentration of the test article in adjuvant treated animals. Twenty four hours after removing the dressings, the challenge reactions were graded according to the Draize scoring scale. Under the experimental conditions employed, none of the animals of the test group showed skin reactions 24 and 48 hours after removing the dressings.
Reference
animal weights (g):
males, control group:(at start) 431 ± 18.2; (at end) 674.7 ± 38.0
males, test group: (at start) 430.4 ± 27.0; (at end) 673.8 ± 35.5
females, control group:(at start) 430.1 ± 30.5; (at end) 573.7 ± 43.2
females, test group: (at start) 417.4 ± 20.4; (at end) 552.7 ± 39.1
Local effects (skin) were not documented.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
- Additional information:
Guinea Pig Maximisation Test
In the key dermal sensitization study, the test article in sesame oil for intradermal induction and in vaseline for epidermal treatments, was tested in approx. 10 weeks old Pirbright White Strain guinea pigs (10/sex) using the guinea pig maximisation test (OECD 406; EU-Method B.6). Reactions were graded according to the Draize scoring scale 24 and 48 h after challenge. No mortality or clinical signs occurred during the observation period (ca. 23 days). The positive control substances (paraphenylene-diamine or potassium-dichromate) induced the appropriate responses. In this study, the test article is not a dermal sensitizer.
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification, Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation 1272/2008. As a result the substance is not considered to be classified for skin sensitization under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, as amended for the eighth time in Regulation (EU) No 2016/218.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.