Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 229-194-7 | CAS number: 6425-39-4
Toxicological information
Skin sensitisation
Currently viewing:
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2012-06-19 to 2012-07-19
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- Well documented GLP study performed according to OECD Guideline 406 with some minor deviations (temperature and relative humidity levels) that no impact the outcome of the study.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
- Report date:
- 2012
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Temperature and relative humidity ranges were broader than indicated by the OECD Guideline, however there was no impact on study outcome; timing of scoring, however no impact on the study
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- Buehler test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- The Buehler test method is the non-adjuvant test given preference over other non-adjuvant methods in the OECD 406 guideline.
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2,2'-dimorpholinyldiethyl ether
- EC Number:
- 229-194-7
- EC Name:
- 2,2'-dimorpholinyldiethyl ether
- Cas Number:
- 6425-39-4
- Molecular formula:
- C12H24N2O3
- IUPAC Name:
- 4-{2-[2-(morpholin-4-yl)ethoxy]ethyl}morpholine
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Details on test material:
- - State of aggregation : liquid
- Appearance : colourless to yellow brown
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: 1J513
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: 0.08 wt % water
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature: 15-30°C
OTHER SPECIFICS:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): JEFFCAT DMDEE
- Substance type: Colorless to yellow liquid
- Physical state: Liquid
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Hartley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Elm Hill Breeding Laboratories
- Age at study initiation: 6 weeks (dose range); 7 weeks at start of dosing (day 1) of the main study
- Weight at study initiation: 343-373 grams (dose range); 336-458 grams at the outset (day 1) of the main study
- Housing: Animals were individually housed upon receipt. No other species were kept in the same room.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitium
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: Study animals were acclimated to their housing for a minimum of 5 and 7 days respectively for the dose range and main assay prior to their first day of dosing.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 16 to 26°C
- Humidity (%): 25 to 97%
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours light/12 hours dark
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Inductionopen allclose all
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: induction: ethanol; challenge: acetone
- Concentration / amount:
- Dose-range-finding study (primary irritation screen): four concentrations were dosed on four separate sites: 10%, 25%, 50% or 100%
Main assay: Based on the results of the dose-range-finding study, an induction dose and challenge dose of 100% (test item as received) was chosen for this study.
Challengeopen allclose all
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: induction: ethanol; challenge: acetone
- Concentration / amount:
- Dose-range-finding study (primary irritation screen): four concentrations were dosed on four separate sites: 10%, 25%, 50% or 100%
Main assay: Based on the results of the dose-range-finding study, an induction dose and challenge dose of 100% (test item as received) was chosen for this study.
- No. of animals per dose:
- Total number:
Dose range primary irritation: 4 (2 male/2 female)
Test article group: 20 (10 male/10 female)
Vehicle control group: 10 (5 male/5 female)
Positive control group: 6 (3 male/3 female) - Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS: Initially, a dose range was performed in four naive animals with the test article JEFFCAT DMDEE at 10%, 25%, 50% and 100% (as received). Based on these results, an induction dose and challenge dose of 100% (as received) was chosen for this study.
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
For the induction phase of this study, twenty guinea pigs (10/sex) in the test article group were induced with three six-hour occluded dermal applications of JEFFCAT DMDEE (as received). A vehicle group of ten animals (5/sex) was induced in the same manner with 0.9% sodium chloride (saline). A positive control group of six animals (3/sex) was induced in the same manner as above with a known dermal sensitizer: 0.3 % 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (DNCB) in 80% ethanol.
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
Fourteen days after the last induction, all animals were dermally challenged with occluded applications at naive test sites. Animals in the test article and vehicle control group were challenged with JEFFCAT DMDEE (as received) and 0.9% sodium chloride (saline), respectively. One the day following the challenge, animals were depilated and approximately three hours later were scored for dermal irritation (24 hour). Scoring was repeated approximately 24 hours later for the 48 hour score. - Challenge controls:
- Animals in the positive control group were challenged with 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (DNCB) at 0.2% in acetone.
- Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- The positive control group, induced and challenged with DNCB, exhibited the anticipated positive responses at challenge, indicating that the methods employed in this study were valid.
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- Jeffcat DMDEE at 100%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- No signs of systemic toxicity and all animals gained weight during the main study
- Remarks on result:
- other: see Remark
- Remarks:
- Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: Jeffcat DMDEE at 100%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: No signs of systemic toxicity and all animals gained weight during the main study.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- Saline
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- No signs of systemic toxicity and all animals gained weight during the main study
- Remarks on result:
- other: see Remark
- Remarks:
- Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: Saline. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: No signs of systemic toxicity and all animals gained weight during the main study.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- Jeffcat DMDEE at 100%
- No. with + reactions:
- 1
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- No signs of systemic toxicity and all animals gained weight during the main study
- Remarks on result:
- other: see Remark
- Remarks:
- Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: Jeffcat DMDEE at 100%. No with. + reactions: 1.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: No signs of systemic toxicity and all animals gained weight during the main study.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- Saline
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- No signs of systemic toxicity and all animals gained weight during the main study
- Remarks on result:
- other: see Remark
- Remarks:
- Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: Saline. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: No signs of systemic toxicity and all animals gained weight during the main study.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- positive control
- Dose level:
- 0.2% DNCB in Acetone
- No. with + reactions:
- 6
- Total no. in group:
- 6
- Clinical observations:
- 1/6 with score 1, 5/6 with score 2; No signs of systemic toxicity and all animals gained weight during the main study
- Remarks on result:
- other: see Remark
- Remarks:
- Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: positive control. Dose level: 0.2% DNCB in Acetone. No with. + reactions: 6.0. Total no. in groups: 6.0. Clinical observations: 1/6 with score 1, 5/6 with score 2; No signs of systemic toxicity and all animals gained weight during the main study.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- positive control
- Dose level:
- 0.2% DNCB in acetone
- No. with + reactions:
- 6
- Total no. in group:
- 6
- Clinical observations:
- 1/6 with score 1, 5/6 with score 2; No signs of systemic toxicity and all animals gained weight during the main study
- Remarks on result:
- other: see Remark
- Remarks:
- Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: positive control. Dose level: 0.2% DNCB in acetone. No with. + reactions: 6.0. Total no. in groups: 6.0. Clinical observations: 1/6 with score 1, 5/6 with score 2; No signs of systemic toxicity and all animals gained weight during the main study.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Clinical observations:
There were no signs of systemic toxicity and all animals gained weight during the main study.
Challenge phase:
The positive control group, induced and challenged with DNCB, exhibited the anticipated positive responses at challenge, indicating that the methods employed in this study were valid.
All dermal irritation scores at the 24- and 48 -hour observations were zero for the vehicle control animals challenged with the test article and the vehicle (saline).
A single score of ± was recorded in the test article group at the test article site at 24 hours. All dermal irritation scores at the 48 -hour observations were zero for the test article group challenged with the test article and the vehicle (saline).
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this study, induction with the test substance as received did not elicit a delayed contact hypersensitivity response in guinea pigs when challenged as received.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
