Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Eye and skin data is available for isobutyric anhydride, but it is lacking in several areas.  Primarily, the studies were conducted in 1978, were not done to today's guidelines, and are lacking in detail.   Read-across to the acid hydrolysis products is available, but excess water is required for complete acid production, and such an environment was not present in these studies.  Also, there was no attempt made to quantitate hydrolysis.  Thus, data from the acid, while relevant, should be a worst case situation.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1978
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Basic data given: according to an acceptable internal BASF method
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Internal method (BASF test): Two animals were treated for 5 and 15 min, 2 and 20 hours using occlusive conditions. An application site of 2.5 x 2.5 cm was covered with the liquid test substance. In addition skin tissue from the ear was tested by wrapping the ear. These results from the ear, however, would not be taken into account for evaluation as they do not represent testing of the dorsal/lateral flank of the back. After the application time the skin was washed. The animals were observed 8 days and the skin changes were recorded on working days.
GLP compliance:
no
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
Vienna White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: mean: 2.82 kg
Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not required
Duration of treatment / exposure:
5 and 15, 2 and 20 hours
Observation period:
24 and 48 hours and 8 days
Number of animals:
2 male rabbits
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5 x 2.5 cm of the back per treating time point

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): yes
- Time after start of exposure: 5 and 15 min, 2 and 20 hours, respectively

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize (data were re-evaluated according to the scoring system of Draize, as recommended by the actual guideline requirements)
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24 and 48 hours
Score:
3
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 8 days
Remarks on result:
other: after 2 hours of treatment
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24 and 48 hours
Score:
3
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 8 days
Remarks on result:
other: after 2 hours of treatment

 

 

Exposure period: 5 min

Exposure period: 15 min

Exposure period: 2 h

Exposure period: 20 h

Readings

Animal

Erythema

Edema

Additional findings

Erythema

Edema

Additional findings

Erythema

Edema

Additional findings

Erythema

Edema

Additional findings

24 h

1

2

0

c

2

2

c

3

3

c

3

3

 

2

2

0

c

2

2

c

3

3

c

3

3

 

48 h

1

1

0

 

1

0

 

3

3

c

3

3

c

2

2

1

c

2

1

c

3

3

c

3

3

 

8 d

1

0

0

d

0

0

d

2

1

d

4

2

Np

2

0

0

d

0

0

d

2

2

d

4

2

Np

Mean 24 - 48 h

1

1.5

0.0

 

1.5

1.0

 

3.0

3.0

 

3.0

3.0

 

2

2.0

0.5

 

2.0

1.5

 

3.0

3.0

 

3.0

3.0

 

Mean

1.8

0.3

 

1.8

1.3

 

3.0

3.0

 

3.0

3.0

 

c: comprehensive; d: desquamation; N: necrosis; p: parchmenty

Interpretation of results:
irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (corrosive)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1978
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Basic data given: comparable to guidelines/standards
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
only 2 animals tested; 50µl instead of 100µl instilled; no observation point after 72 hours, Maximum observation time was 8 days
GLP compliance:
no
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
Vienna White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: mean: 3.08 kg
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: treatment of the control eye with physiol. saline
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 50 µl
- Concentration (if solution): unchanged

Duration of treatment / exposure:
not washed out
Observation period (in vivo):
1, 24, 48 hours and after 8 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
2 male rabbits
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): no

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize (re-evaluation according to the scoring system of Draize as recommended by the actual guideline requirements
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
all animals
Time point:
other: 24 and 48 hours
Score:
1.8
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 8 days
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
all animals
Time point:
other: 24 and 48 hours
Score:
0.5
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 8 days
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
all animals
Time point:
other: 24 and 48 hours
Score:
1.8
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 8 days
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
all animals
Time point:
other: 24 and 48 hours
Score:
2
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 8 days

Table 1: Individual results:

Readings

Animal

Cornea

Iris

conjunctiva

Symptoms

opacity

redness

swelling

discharge

1 h

1

1

0

2

2

2

 

2

1

0

2

2

2

 

24 h

1

1

0

1

2

1

 

2

2

0

2

2

1

 

48 h

1

2

1

2

2

3

 

2

2

1

2

2

3

Na

8d

1

1

0

1

0

1

 

2

1

0

1

0

0

Na

mean 24 - 48 h

1

1.5

0.5

1.5

2.0

2.0

 

2

2.0

0.5

2.0

2.0

2.0

 

mean

 

1.8

0.5

1.8

2.0

2.0

 

Na: Scar

Interpretation of results:
irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

For both eye and skin studies, toxicity data has been used from isobutyric anhydride studies, and from read-across to the corresponding acid. The hydrolysis of the anhydride in water is rapid, and thus the read-across is valid. A hydrolysis study is presented in section 5.1.2 of this dossier, and illustrates that at physiological pH the half life is between 5 and 10 minutes. This indicates that read-across to isobutyric acid is appropriate for all studies where water is present, as the anhydride will quickly hydrolyze to the acid. The lead registrant believes that the study results tend to underestimate the potential toxicity of the anhydride. Since the studies are normally conducted under carefully controlled conditions, with highly pure test article, and with test subjects (rabbits) that don't sweat, the corrosive properties may be minimized. In the "real" world, high humidity, workers that are perspiring and test article that may have been exposed to moisture (thus generating acid) will produce a "worst case" for the anhydride that controlled testing may understate. Thus, a classification of "corrosive" is used to reflect a more realistic classification and promote worker safety.

 

.


Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
Only one study for the anhydride is available. Isobutyric acid data is included as the anhydride will hydrolyze to the acid in aqueous conditions. Note that the acid generally produces more severe results than the anhydride due to incomplete hydrolysis in eye and skin studies ( as water is not freely available).

In the key study, the result was "irritating". We are calling this "corrosive" to account for the greater likelihood that under normal conditions of use, greater ambient amounts of water will be available, which would result in a greater extent of hydrolysis and a greater extent of irritation/corrosion.

Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
Only one study for the anhydride is available. Isobutyric acid data is included as the anhydride will hydrolyze to the acid in aqueous conditions. Note that the acid generally produces more severe results than the anhydride due to incomplete hydrolysis in eye and skin studies ( as water is not freely available).

In the key study, the result was "irritating". We are calling this "corrosive" to account for the greater likelihood that under normal conditions of use, greater ambient amounts of water will be available, which would result in a greater extent of hydrolysis and a greater extent of irritation/corrosion.

Effects on skin irritation/corrosion: corrosive

Effects on eye irritation: corrosive

Justification for classification or non-classification

Isobutyric anhydride is classified for skin and eye corrosion based on experimental results.

Isobutyric anhydride is classified as a CLP category 1, even though the experimental evidence suggests that category 2 may be more appropriate. The reason for this deviation is that in our experience, hazard warnings for many anhydrides are potentially understated. Most experiments are carried out using fresh test article under ideal conditions in the laboratory. However, in the real world, exposure of the anhydride to water and/or very humid atmospheres can result in significant amounts of acid being present in the anhydride. As the manufacturer has no control over the use and storage of the product, it seems prudent to assume that at some point in the life cycle of the anhydride that some acid may form after exposure to water, and as such, the higher skin and eye classification is warranted.