Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-558-5 | CAS number: 108-18-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
DIPA is corrosive for the skin and the eye and irritating for the respiratory tract.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 11 - 25 Oct. 1983
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: in house
- Age at study initiation: no data
- Weight at study initiation: 3.4 - 4.0 kg
- Housing: single, air-conditioned
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period:
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 +-2
- Humidity (%): 55 +-10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12
- Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 mL
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 3 min
- Observation period:
- 30 - 60 min, 24, 48, 72 h, 7, and 14 d
- Number of animals:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5cm x 2.5 cm
- Type of wrap if used: adhesive patch + tissue bandage
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): no
- Time after start of exposure: 3 min
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize numerical scoring system.
Calculation of an average score over time (24, 48, and 72 h) and animals from individual effects values of erythema and edema separately as well as combined. - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: mean 24-48-72h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14d
- Remarks on result:
- other: necrosis
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: mean 24-48-72h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14d
- Remarks on result:
- other: necrosis
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: mean 24-48-72h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14d
- Remarks on result:
- other: necrosis
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: mean 24-48-72h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14d
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: mean 24-48-72h
- Score:
- 0.67
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14d
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: mean 24-48-72h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14d
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Clear evidence of necrosis:
Brown-red and brown-green discoloration of treated skin sites within 24 h, followed by dry and rough over time, associated with desquamation and/or open wound that ended in scar formation. The skin tissue became irreversibly damaged in total thickness. - Interpretation of results:
- Category 1A (corrosive)
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: REGULATION (EC) No 1272/2008 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 December 2008
- Conclusions:
- DIPA is considered as corrosive to rabbit skin.
- Executive summary:
The acute dermal irritation of Diisopropylamine (DIPA) was evaluated in rabbits according to OECD 404 guideline and in compliance with the Good Laboratory Principles. DIPA was applied undiluted to the skin of 3 New-Zealand White albino rabbits and held in contact for 3 minutes by means of a semi-occlusive dressing. Animals were then observed daily until day 14.
Clear evidence of necrosis was observed within 24 h (brown-red and brown-green discoloration of treated skin sites), followed by dry and rough over time, associated with desquamation and/or open wound that ended in scar formation. The skin tissue became irreversibly damaged in total thickness.
Erythema mean scores over 24, 48 and 72 hours were 2, 3 and 3 for animals 1, 2 and 3 respectively.
Oedema mean scores over 24, 48 and 72 hours were 1, 0.67 and 1 for animals 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Skin damages were not reversible within the observation period.
Under these experimental conditions, DIPA is considered as corrosive to rabbit skin.
Reference
Time | 0,5 - 1h | 24h | 48h | 72h | 7d | 14d | ||||||||||||
Animal | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Erythema | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | * | * | * |
Oedema | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | * | * | * |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (corrosive)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Acceptable study report which meets generally accepted scientific principles. Study is well documented, before OECD TG and GLP existed. The study is fully sufficient for endpoint evaluation.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- ; observation period was 8 days (OECD: 21)
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- ; GLP was not compulsory at the time the study was conducted
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Vienna White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 3.10 kg, 3.44 kg, 3.3 kg - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: the second eye of the same rabbit was untreated and served as control.
- Amount / concentration applied:
- undiluted
Amount applied: 0.1 ml - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 h; the substance was not washed out
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 8 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 animals (2 males and 1 female)
- Details on study design:
- 100 µl of the undiluted test substance was applied to the right conjuntival sac of one male and one female Vienna White rabbit. The left eye was left untreated and served as a control. The substance was not washed out.
Ocular reactions were recorded after 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours, as well as 6 and 8 days after instillation using a BASF-scoring system, which is convertible into the current OECD Draize scheme. For the evaluation, the BASF scores given in the raw data were converted to Draize scores. The reading time points used for assessment were 24, 48 and 72 hours after application. - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24-48-72 h
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 d
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24-48-72 h
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 d
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 24-48-72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 d
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24-48-72 h
- Max. score:
- 2
- Remarks on result:
- other: Not readable
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24-48-72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 d
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 24-48-72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 d
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24-48-72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 d
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24-48-72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 d
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 24-48-72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 d
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24-48-72 h
- Score:
- 2.66
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 d
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24-48-72 h
- Score:
- 2.66
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 d
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 24-48-72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 d
- Other effects:
- Autopsy revealed the following findings: infestation with parasites in the liver and sanious rhinitis.
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye)
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: REGULATION (EC) No 1272/2008 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 December 2008
- Executive summary:
The potential of Diisopropylamine (DIPA) to induce ocular irritation was evaluated in rabbits according to a protocol similar to OECD 405 guideline. Hundred µl of the undiluted DIPA was applied to the right conjuntival sac to 3 Vienna White rabbits (2 males and 1 female) for 24 h; the substance was not washed out and the animals were observed during 8 days.
Corneal scores were 4, 4, 2 for animals 1, 2 and 3. Iris scores were 0 and 1 for animals 2 and 3 (animal 1 was unreadable). Conjunctivae scores were 2, 2, 2 for animals 1, 2 and 3. Chemosis scores were 2.66, 2.66, 2 for animals 1, 2 and 3.
Under these experimental conditions, DIPA was corrosive when administered by ocular route to rabbits.
Reference
Individual scores for eye irritation of the animals treated with the test material for 24 h
|
24 h |
48 h |
||||
Rabbit No. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Cornea |
4 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
Iris |
- |
0 |
1 |
- |
0 |
1 |
Conjunctiva redness |
2 Na |
2 |
2 Na |
2 Na |
2 Na |
2 Na |
Conjunctiva chemosis |
2 B |
2 B |
2 B |
3 B |
3 |
2 B |
|
72 h |
8 d |
||||
Rabbit No. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Cornea |
4 |
4 |
2 |
- |
4 |
2 |
Iris |
- |
0 |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
Conjunctiva redness |
2 Na |
2 Na |
2 Na |
- |
- |
2 Na |
Conjunctiva chemosis |
3 B |
3 |
2 B |
2 |
3 |
2 |
Na = cicatrice
B = blood
Discharge was seen at any reading time point.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Additional information
Skin irritation
The acute dermal irritation of Diisopropylamine (DIPA) was evaluated in rabbits according to OECD 404 guideline and in compliance with the Good Laboratory Principles (Weigand and Rupprich, 1983). DIPA was applied undiluted to the skin of 3 New-Zealand White albino rabbits and held in contact for 3 minutes by means of a semi-occlusive dressing. Animals were then observed daily until day 14. Clear evidence of necrosis was observed within 24 h (brown-red and brown-green discoloration of treated skin sites), followed by dry and rough over time, associated with desquamation and/or open wound that ended in scar formation. The skin tissue became irreversibly damaged in total thickness. Erythema mean scores over 24, 48 and 72 hours were 2, 3 and 3 for animals 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Oedema mean scores over 24, 48 and 72 hours were 1, 0.67 and 1 for animals 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Skin damages were not reversible within the observation period. Under these experimental conditions, DIPA is considered as corrosive to rabbit skin.
In a BASF study (1977), diisopropylamine (DIPA) was evaluated in rabbits according to OECD 404 guideline with some deviations. DIPA (1 ml) was applied undiluted to the skin of 2 New-Zealand White albino rabbits and held in contact for 5 min, 2 h and 4 h by means of a semi-occlusive dressing. Animals were observed for 8 days. At 24 and 48 hours, both animals showed maximal erythema severe oedema scores (4/4 and 2/4 respectively) that were not fully reversible within 8 days for every exposure time. DIPA caused severe irreversible damage on the treated sites of the animals after an application time of 5 min, 2 hours as well as of 4 hours.
Eye irritation
The potential of Diisopropylamine (DIPA) to induce ocular irritation was evaluated in rabbits according to a protocol similar to OECD 405 guideline (BASF, 1977). Hundred µl of the undiluted DIPA was applied to the right conjuntival sac to 3 Vienna White rabbits (2 males and 1 female) for 24 h; the substance was not washed out and the animals were observed during 8 days. Corneal scores were 4, 4, 2 for animals 1, 2 and 3. Iris scores were 0 and 1 for animals 2 and 3 (animal 1 was unreadable). Conjunctivae scores were 2, 2, 2 for animals 1, 2 and 3. Chemosis scores were 2.66, 2.66, 2 for animals 1, 2 and 3.DIPA was corrosive when administered by ocular route to rabbits.
Respiratory irritation
Clinical and/or histological signs of respiratory tract irritation were observed in acute inhalation toxicity studies (BASF AG; 1979, Price et al., 1979; Gagnaire et al., 1989) and in repeated dose inhalation toxicity studies (Val Roloff, 1987; Zissu, 1995).
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
Key study
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
Key study
Effects on skin irritation/corrosion: corrosive
Effects on eye irritation: corrosive
Effects on respiratory irritation: irritating
Justification for classification or non-classification
Skin irritation:
DIPA is corrosive to the rabbit skin after a 3-min exposure. On this basis and in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 DIPA was classified as corrosive to the skin category 1A (H314) and in accordance of Annex VI of Commission Directive 2001/59/EC, DIPA was classified corrosive to the skin (C, R35).
Eye irritation:
DIPA is corrosive to the rabbit eye. On the basis of this study and in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 DIPA was classified as irritating to eyes category 1 (H318).
Respiratory tract irritation:
Clinical and/or histological signs of respiratory tract irritation were observed in acute inhalation toxicity studies and in repeated dose inhalation toxicity studies. In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 DIPA was classified as Specific Target Organ Toxicity (STOT) Single Exposure (SE) Category 3 (H335) and in accordance with Annex VI of Commission Directive 2001/59/EC, DIPA was classified as irritant with the symbol Xi and the phrase R37 "irritating to the respiratory tract".
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
