Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 221-486-2 | CAS number: 3115-49-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- January 7, 1985 - May 6, 1985
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Non-GLP study with sufficient details acceptable for assessment.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 985
- Report date:
- 1985
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 1000 instead of 2000 cells scored per animal
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Treatment consisted of one daily dose (gavage) of 1000, 2000 or 4000 mg/kg on each of two consecutive days. The animals were sacrificed 24 h after the second application. From the bone marrow smears were made and interphase cells were analyzed for nucleus anomalies resulting from chromosomal damage.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- (4-nonylphenoxy)acetic acid
- EC Number:
- 221-486-2
- EC Name:
- (4-nonylphenoxy)acetic acid
- Cas Number:
- 3115-49-9
- Molecular formula:
- C17H26O3
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-(4-nonylphenoxy)acetic acid
- Details on test material:
- - Purity: Commercial grade
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- hamster, Chinese
- Strain:
- other: random outbred
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: CIBA-GEIGY Tierfarm, Sisseln.
- Weight at study initiation: females: 20-34 g, males: 22-34 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: [no/yes, under following basis: ]
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Standard diet; NAFAG No.924.
- Water: Tap water ad libitum.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22-23
- Humidity (%): 42-44
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle used: 0.5% aqueous solution of sodium carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage or dermal): 20 ml/kg - Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: No details.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Treatment consisted of one daily dose on each of two consecutive days.
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once/day
- Post exposure period:
- 24 h after the second application, the animals were sacrificed by dislocation of the cervical vertebrae.
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
1000, 2000, 4000 mg/kg bw
Basis:
actual ingested
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- - In the tolerability test: 2
- in the mutagenicity test: 6 - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- cyclophosphamide
- Route of administration: oral/gavage
- Doses / concentrations: 128 mg/kg in 20 ml/kg bw 0.5% CMC
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow was harvested from the shafts bf both femurs.
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION:
A preliminary test was performed to determine the highest dosage of the test substance to be applied in the mutagenicity assay. In this experiment the dose of 4000 mg/kg was determined as the highest applicable in the mutagenicity assay,, together with further two doses, diminishing by a factor of 0.5.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
Bone marrow was harvested from the shafts bf both femurs. In a sicliconized pipette filled with approx. 0.5 µl rat serum the bone marrow was drawn up. In order to receive a homogenous suspension the content of pipette was aspirated gently about three times. Small drops of the mixture were transferred on the end of a slide, spread out by pulling it behind a polishedcover glass and the preparations were air-dried. Three hours later, the slides were stained in undiluted May-Grünwald solution for 2 min then in May-Grünwald solution/water 1/1 for 2 min and then in Giemsa's, 40% for 20 min. After being rinsed in methanol 55% for 5-8 sec and washed off twice in water, they were left immersed in water for approx. 2 min. After rinsing with distilled water and air-drying, the slides were cleared in Xylene and mounted in Eukitt. - Evaluation criteria:
- The slides of three female and three male animals each of the negative control group, the positive control group and of the groups treated with various doses were examined. 1000 bone marrow cells each were scored per animal and the following anomalies were registered: a) Single Jolly bodies,
b) fragments of nuclei in erythrocytes, c) micronuclei in erythroblasts, d) micronuclei in leucopoietic cells, e) polyploid cells. - Statistics:
- The significance of difference was assessed by chi-square test.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- One male animal of the 4000 mg/kg-dose group died in the course of the experiment.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- In all dosage groups the percentage of cells displaying anomalies of nuclei did not differ significantly from the negative control. By contrast, the positive control (cyclophosphamide, 128 mg/kg) yielded a marked increase of the percentage of cells with anomalies. Here the mean percentage of anomalies was 8.12, whereas the negative control yielded a percentage of 0.03. The difference is highly significant (p< 0.05),
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Percent of cells with anomalies of nuclei, 24 h after second application of test substance.
|
Number of animal |
Sex of animals |
Single Jolly-Bodies |
Fragments of nuclei in erythrocytes |
Micronuclei in erythroblasts |
Micronuclei in leucopoietic cells |
Polyploid cells |
Totals |
|
Vehicle control |
1 |
F |
0.0 |
||||||
|
2 |
F |
0.0 |
||||||
|
3 |
F |
0.0 |
||||||
|
4 |
M |
0.2 |
|
0.2 |
||||
|
5 |
M |
0.0 |
||||||
|
6 |
M |
0.0 |
||||||
Cyclophosphamide, 128 mg/kg bw |
1 |
F |
3.7 |
1.4 |
1.8 |
0.1 |
7.0 |
||
|
2 |
F |
6.8 |
1.2 |
0.8 |
8.8 |
|||
|
3 |
F |
5.1 |
2.3 |
1.9 |
0.1 |
9.4 |
||
|
4 |
M |
8.6 |
1.2 |
2.0 |
0.3 |
12.1 |
||
|
5 |
M |
4.4 |
0.7 |
1.1 |
0.1 |
6.3 |
||
|
6 |
M |
3.7 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
5.1 |
|
Test substance, 1000 mg/kg bw |
1 |
F |
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
||||
|
2 |
F |
|
0.0 |
|||||
|
3 |
F |
|
0.0 |
|||||
|
4 |
M |
0.1 |
0.0 |
|||||
|
5 |
M |
|
0.0 |
|||||
|
6 |
M |
|
0.0 |
|||||
Test substance, 2000 mg/kg bw | 1 | F | 0.1 | ||||||
2 | F | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||
3 | F | 0.0 | |||||||
4 | M | 0.0 | |||||||
5 | M | 0.0 | |||||||
6 | M | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||
Test substance, 4000 mg/kg bw | 1 | F | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||||
2 | F | 0.2 | 0.2 | ||||||
3 | F | 0.2 | 0.2 | ||||||
4 | M | 0.2 | 0.2 | ||||||
5 | M | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||
6 | M | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
Under the conditions of this experiment, no evidence of mutagenic effects were noted in Chinese hamsters treated with the test substance. - Executive summary:
The test substance was evaluated for mutagenicity in a Micronucleus test in Chinese hamsters. Treatment consisted of one daily dose of 1000, 2000 or 4000 mg/kg on each of two consecutive days. The test substance was applied orally by stomach tube. The animals were sacrificed 24 h after the second application and bone marrow smears prepared. The bone marrow smears from animals treated with the various doses of the test substance showed no significant difference from the control. The incidence of bone marrow cells with anomalies of nuclei corresponds to the frequency observed in the control group. By contrast, a "positive control" experiment with cyclophosphamide (128 mg/kg) yielded 8.12% cells with anomalies of nuclei. This is significantly different from the controls (0.03%) treated with the vehicle (0.5% CMC) alone. Therefore, the test substance was considered to be not mutagenic under the presented experimental conditions.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.