Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 260-616-2 | CAS number: 57206-81-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2021
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 021
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- nitroreductase-deficient strains TA98NR and TA100NR
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of test item to induce reverse mutations in histidine-requiring strains of Salmonella typhimurium in the absence and presence of a reductive hamster liver metabolising system (S-9). By assessing the mutagenicity of test item in nitroreductase deficient strains (TA98NR and TA100NR) alongside parent nitroreductase competent strains (TA98 and TA100), the role of nitroreduction in any test article related mutagenic activity could be determined.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Acid Black 63:2
- IUPAC Name:
- Acid Black 63:2
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- nitroreductase deficient
- Remarks:
- TA98NR and TA100NR
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- The mammalian liver post-mitochondrial fraction (S-9) used for metabolic activation was obtained from Molecular Toxicology Incorporated, USA; where it was prepared from uninduced male Golden Syrian hamsters. The S-9 was stored frozen at <-50°C, and thawed prior to use. Each batch was checked by the manufacturer for sterility, protein content, ability to convert ethidium bromide and cyclophosphamide to bacterial mutagens, and cytochrome P 450-catalysed enzyme activities (alkoxyresorufin-O-dealkylase activities).
Treatments were carried out both in the absence and presence of S-9 by addition of either buffer solution or 30% reductive (Prival) S-9 mix respectively.
Final Content per mL in 30% reductive S9 mix:
- Sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.4 = 100 µmoles;
- Glucose-6-phosphate (disodium) = 20 µmoles;
- NADP (disodium) = 4 µmoles;
- NADH = 2 µmoles;
- Flavin mononucleotide (FMN) = 2 µmoles;
- Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase = 30 units;
- Magnesium chloride = 8 µmoles;
- Potassium chloride = 33 µmoles;
- Water = To volume;
- S-9 = 300 µL
Final Content per mL in Buffer Solution:
- Sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.4 = 100 µmoles;
- Glucose-6-phosphate (disodium) = x
- NADP (disodium) = x
- NADH = x
- Flavin mononucleotide (FMN) = x
- Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase = x
- Magnesium chloride = x
- Potassium chloride = x
- Water = To volume;
- S-9 = x - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Mutation experiment:
2.5, 8, 25, 80, 250, 800 and 2500 µg/plate in the presence of a modified (reductive) S 9 mix
0.125, 0.4, 1.25, 4, 12.5. 40, 125, 400 and 1250 µg/plate in the absence of S-9.
The maximum treatment concentrations were limited by solubility of the test article in the primary vehicle, DMSO, and in the absence of S-9 also by the maximum volume additions that could be employed due to apparent vehicle-related toxicity. Following these treatments, evidence of toxicity was observed in all strains in the absence and presence of S-9. These toxic effects were observed at the highest treatment concentration of 1250 µg/plate in all strains except TA102 in the absence of S-9, and in strain TA102 and all strains in the presence of S-9 the toxic effects extended down to differing concentrations in each case that were between 8 and 800 µg/plate. The most extensive toxicity was observed in strains TA1535 and TA1537 in the presence of S-9, where only one or two non-toxic treatment concentrations remained. As mutation data were therefore available from fewer than 5 analysable concentrations for these strain treatments, these were repeated to provide a more thorough and robust assessment of the mutagenicity of the test article in this assay system - Vehicle / solvent:
- anydrous analytical grade DMSO
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- benzo(a)pyrene
- congo red
- mitomycin C
- other: Metronidazole, 2-aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Test substance added in a pre-incubation methodology.
- the experiment is performed in triplicate.
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Preincubation period, if applicable: 30 minutes.
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 3 days, plasted inverted and protected from light.
Treatments were performed using a pre-incubation methodology in the absence and presence of a modified (reductive) S-9 mix. These platings were achieved by the following sequence of additions to sterile pre incubation tubes:
• 0.1 mL of bacterial culture.
• 0.1 mL of test article formulation/vehicle control or 0.05 mL of positive control.
• 0.5 mL of 30% reductive S-9 mix or buffer solution.
Quantities of test article formulation or control solution, bacteria and S-9 mix or buffer solution detailed above, plus an additional 0.5 mL of 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), were mixed together and placed in an orbital incubator set to either 37°C (for the treatments in the absence of S-9) or 30°C (for treatments in the presence of S 9) for 30 minutes, before the addition of 2 mL of supplemented molten agar at 45±1°C followed by rapid mixing and pouring on to Vogel-Bonner E agar plates.
When set, the plates were inverted and incubated protected from light for 3 days in an incubator set to 37°C. Following incubation, these plates were examined for evidence of toxicity to the background lawn, and where possible revertant colonies were counted
The addition of 0.5 mL of 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) to these Mutation Experiment treatments was employed to reduce the solvent concentration during the pre-incubation period. DMSO, and some other organic solvents, are known to be near to toxic levels when added at volumes of 0.1 mL in this assay system when employing the pre-incubation methodology. By employing the modification indicated, the DMSO concentration in the pre-incubation mix was decreased, in an attempt to minimise or eliminate any toxic effects of the solvent that may have otherwise occurred. In order to ‘correct’ for the additional volume in the pre-incubation mix, these were plated out using 2 mL of 1.125% top agar (rather than the 0.9% top agar used for ‘standard’ pre incubation treatments), therefore the additions to each plate were comparable to that of the other pre-incubation treatments.
It should be noted that data from the initial treatments of all the tester strains in the absence and presence of S-9 were invalidated, as the plates demonstrated evidence of vehicle-related toxicity, and toxic effects extended over almost all treatment concentrations (considered to have been exacerbated by the vehicle-related toxicity). Repeat treatments were performed (using the treatment methodology described above) with all strains in the absence and presence of S-9. The data from these repeat treatments in the presence of S-9 were considered acceptable (and are those presented as the Mutation Experiment data for each strain in the presence of S-9), but the data from the test article treatments in the absence of S-9 were again invalidated, due to toxic effects extending over almost all treatment concentrations, and evidence of vehicle-related toxicity.
Further repeat treatments of all strains in the absence of S-9 were therefore performed. The methodology was amended slightly in order to address the apparent vehicle-related toxicity. Vehicle and test article treatments were performed using volume additions reduced to 0.05 mL, and the further 0.5 mL addition of 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) was therefore not required, and consequently following the pre-incubation period, these treatments were mixed with 2 mL of supplemented 0.9% molten (top) agar and poured onto Vogel-Bonner E agar plates. These plates were then incubated and scored as indicated above.
Due to data from fewer than 5 analysable concentrations being available from the first repeat treatments of strains TA1535 and TA1537 in the presence of S-9, further treatments of these strains were also performed alongside the further repeat treatments in the absence of S-9, and employed the same modified treatment methodology (0.05 mL volume additions, no additional 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) added and plate out using 0.9% molten top agar). The results from these treatments are reported as the Mutation Experiment further treatments data.
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: background growth inhibition.
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENTS OF GENOTOXICIY
Revertant colonies were counted electronically using a Sorcerer Colony Counter (Perceptive Instruments) or manually where confounding factors such as intensely coloured agar or bubbles or splits in the agar affected the accuracy of the automated counter. - Rationale for test conditions:
- The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of test item to induce reverse mutations in histidine-requiring strains of Salmonella typhimurium in the absence and presence of a reductive hamster liver metabolising system (S-9). By assessing the mutagenicity of test item in nitroreductase deficient strains (TA98NR and TA100NR, the tow commercially available at the time of testing) alongside parent nitroreductase competent strains (TA98 and TA100), the role of nitroreduction in any test article related mutagenic activity could be determined. As the test substance is an azo compound, testing in the presence of S-9 in this study was performed using a modified reductive (Prival) S-9 pre-incubation methodology, as it is known that azo compounds can be reduced to free aromatic amines, which can be mutagenic.
- Evaluation criteria:
- For valid data, the test article was considered to be mutagenic if:
1. A concentration related increase in revertant numbers was ≥1.5-fold (in strain TA102), ≥2-fold (in strains TA98, TA98NR, TA100 or TA100NR) or ≥3-fold (in strains TA1535 or TA1537) the concurrent vehicle control values
The test article was considered positive in this assay if the above criterion was met.
The test article was considered negative in this assay if the above criterion was not met.
Results which only partially satisfied the above criteria were dealt with on a case-by-case basis. Biological relevance was taken into account, for example consistency of response within and between concentrations.
Data from strain TA98 were compared (non-statistically) with that from TA98NR, and data from strain TA100 were compared with that from TA100NR. Where a mutagenic response was seen in one or both parent strains but was absent or much reduced in the corresponding NR variant strain(s), this was considered to be indicative that bacterial nitroreduction enzymes play a significant role in the mutagenicity of the test compound as observed in this study. - Statistics:
- Individual plate counts were recorded separately and the mean and standard deviation of the plate counts for each treatment were determined. Control counts were compared with the laboratory’s historical control ranges (see Attachments).
The presence or otherwise of a concentration response was checked by non-statistical analysis, up to limiting levels (for example cytotoxicity, precipitation or 5000 μg/plate). However, adequate interpretation of biological relevance was of
critical importance.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- bacteria, other: S. typhimurium TA98 NR
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- bacteria, other: S. typhimurium TA 100NR
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- bacteria, other: S. typhimurium TA 100NR
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The substance was tested for gene mutation in bacteria following OECD TG 471 with nitroreductase deficinet strains. It was concluded that the test substance induced mutation in histidine-requiring strains TA98 and TA98NR of Salmonella typhimurium when tested in the absence and in the presence of a reductive (Prival) hamster liver metabolic activation system (S-9) under the conditions of this study, and also in Salmonella typhimurium strain TA1537 in the absence of S-9 and Salmonella typhimurium strains TA100, TA100NR and TA102 in the presence of S-9.
- Executive summary:
Acid Black 63:2 was assayed for mutation in seven histidine-requiring strains (TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, TA102, TA98NR and TA100NR) of Salmonella typhimurium, both in the absence and in the presence of a reductive hamster liver metabolising system (S-9) in a single experiment.
All Acid Black 63:2 treatments in this study were performed using formulations prepared in anhydrous analytical grade dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO). As Acid Black 63:2 is an azo compound, testing in the presence of S-9 in this study was performed using a modified reductive (Prival) S-9 pre-incubation methodology, as it is known that azo compounds can be reduced to free aromatic amines, which can be mutagenic.
Mutation Experiment treatments of the tester strains were performed using a pre-incubation methodology using final concentrations of Acid Black 63:2 at 2.5, 8, 25, 80, 250, 800 and 2500 μg/plate in the presence of a modified (reductive) S-9 mix or at 0.125, 0.4, 1.25, 4, 12.5. 40, 125, 400 and 1250 μg/plate in the absence of S-9. The maximum treatment concentrations were limited by solubility of the test article in the primary vehicle, DMSO, and in the absence of S-9 also by the maximum volume additions that could be employed due to apparent vehicle-related toxicity. Following these treatments, evidence of toxicity was observed in all strains in the absence and presence of S-9. These toxic effects were observed at the highest treatment concentration of 1250 μg/plate in all strains except TA102 in the absence of S-9, and in strain TA102 and all strains in the presence of S-9 the toxic effects extended down to differing concentrations in each case that were between 8 and 800 μg/plate. The most extensive toxicity was observed in strains TA1535 and TA1537 in the presence of S-9, where only one or two non-toxic treatment concentrations remained. As mutation data were therefore available from fewer than 5 analysable concentrations for these strain treatments, these were repeated to provide a more thorough and robust assessment of the mutagenicity of the test article in this assay system.
The Mutation Experiment further treatments of strains TA1535 and TA1537 in the presence of a modified (reductive) S-9 mix were performed using final concentrations of Acid Black 63:2 at 0.125, 0.4, 1.25, 4, 12.5, 40, 125, 400 and 1250 μg/plate. Although the treatment concentrations were not markedly reduced compared to those previously described, a slightly modified methodology was employed (as was used for the treatments used to provide the Mutation Experiment data for all strains in the absence of S-9), whereby the test article and vehicle volume additions were reduced, as it was considered that a vehicle-related effect was exacerbating the observed test article-related toxicity. Following these treatments, no clear evidence of toxicity was observed.
Precipitation of test article was observed on all of the test plates treated at 250 μg/plate and above in each experiment.
Vehicle and positive control treatments were included for all strains in each experiment. The mean numbers of revertant colonies fell within acceptable ranges for vehicle control treatments, and were elevated by positive control treatments.Following Acid Black 63:2 treatments of all the test strains in the absence and presence of S-9, clear and concentration-related (in some cases up to the toxicity and/or precipitating range) increases in revertant numbers were observed in strains TA98 and TA98NR in the absence and presence of S-9, in strain TA1537 in the absence of S-9, and in strains TA100, TA100NR and TA102 in the presence of S-9. In each case, these increases were ≥1.5-fold (in strain TA102), ≥2-fold (in strains TA98, TA98NR, TA100 or TA100NR) or ≥3-fold (in strain TA1537) the concurrent vehicle control values, although it should be noted that in strains TA100 and TA100NR in the presence of S-9, the 2 fold threshold level was only achieved at the maximum treatment concentration of 2500 μg/plate. These increases were all sufficient to be considered as evidence of Acid Black 63:2 mutagenic activity in this assay system. A small (maximum 1.8-fold) increase in revertant numbers in the absence of S-9 in strain TA100 was also observed and was concentration-related, and was therefore considered to be further evidence of this Acid Black 63:2 mutagenic activity.
The mutagenic response in the nitroreductase deficient strain TA98NR in the absence of S-9 was reduced in magnitude compared to that with the corresponding treatments in the parent (nitroreductase proficent) strain TA98. Comparison of the magnitude of responses in these two strains in the presence of S-9 suggested that they were comparable, when assessed in terms of fold increase compared to the concurrent control level. However, the vehicle control counts in strain TA98NR were much smaller (mean of 19.3 revertants/plate) compared to that in strain TA98 (mean of 53.3 revertants/plate). Although the vehicle counts in each strain were considered acceptable, the much smaller vehicle control counts in strain TA98NR served to exaggerate the relative Acid Black 63:2 response when assessed in terms of fold increase. When the mean number of induced revertants/plate were assessed, the largest increase in strain TA98 was 176 revertants/plate (229.3 – 53.3), as compared to the largest increase in strain TA98NR of just 79 revertants/plate (98.3 – 19.3), which indicated a reduced mutagenic response in the nitroreductase deficient strain TA98NR. When the mutagenicity in strains TA100 and TA100NR were compared, there were similar mutagenic responses observed in both strains in the presence of S-9, but in the absence of S-9 there was no response seen in strain TA100NR compared to a weak mutagenic response observed in strain TA100. Although less clear than the differential between strains TA98 and TA98NR, and only apparent for the treatments in the absence of S-9, these data indicated a reduced mutagenic response in the nitroreductase deficient strain TA100NR. Overall, the data from strains TA98, TA98NR, TA100 and TA100NR were considered to indicate that nitroreduction does play a significant role in the mutagenic activity of Acid Black 63:2 seen in this study.
It was concluded that Acid Black 63:2 induced mutation in histidine-requiring strains TA98 and TA98NR of Salmonella typhimurium when tested in the absence and in the presence of a reductive (Prival) hamster liver metabolic activation system (S-9) under the conditions of this study, and also in Salmonella typhimurium strain TA1537 in the absence of S-9 and Salmonella typhimurium strains TA100, TA100NR and TA102 in the presence of S-9. The conditions employed in this study included treatments at concentrations up to either 1250 μg/plate (in the absence of S-9) or 2500 μg/plate (in the presence of S-9), which were the maximum achievable concentrations due to solubility limitations, but that were precipitating and toxic concentrations. Small, but concentration-related increases in revertant numbers in strain TA100 in the absence of S-9 were considered to be further evidence of Acid Black 63:2 mutagenic activity.
The relative mutagenic responses between the nitroreductase proficient and nitroreductase deficient strains used in this study indicated that nitroreduction plays a significant role in the observed mutagenic activity of Acid Black 63:2.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.