Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (sensitising)
Additional information:

The substance was tested in a Guinea-Pig Maximisation Test, which employs intradermal injection and use of adjuvant. Upon challenge with 0.5% test substance (the highest non-irritating concentration), six of the 20 animals treated with the test substance at induction showed Grade 1 erythema at the 24-hour observation, and four animals showed Grade 1 erythema at the 48-hour observation. The control animals showed no response to challenge. Upon rechallenge with 0.2% test substance, no responses were seen in either treatment or control animals. The substance was concluded to be a weak sensitiser in this test.


Migrated from Short description of key information:
The substance was concluded to be a weak sensitiser in a guinea-pig maximisation test.

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Additional information:
Migrated from Short description of key information:
No suitable data are available.

Justification for classification or non-classification

The substance was tested in a Guinea-Pig Maximisation Test, which employs intradermal injection and use of adjuvant. Upon challenge application, six of the 20 animals treated with the test substance showed slight and patchy erythema; the control animals showed no response to challenge. Therefore the substance was concluded to be a weak sensitiser in this test. In accordance with CLP, when an adjuvant type guinea pig test is used, a response of at least 30% of the animals (equivalent to six out of 20 animals) is considered as positive. Therefore, the substance is classified as a skin sensitiser (Category 1) under CLP.

There are no human or suitable animal data regarding the respiratory sensitisation potential of the substance. As the substance is only a borderline skin sensitiser according to CLP criteria, and as the potential for inhalation exposure to the substance will be negligible, no classification is proposed for respiratory sensitisation.