Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 939-524-8 | CAS number: 71949-28-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
In a subchronic oral toxicity study in rats, the local NOAEL was 25 mg/kg bw/day (based on caecitis accompanied by colitis or proctitis in the large intestine in males and females) and the systemic NOAEL was 250 mg/kg bw/day (an increase in hyaline droplet accumulation in the proximal tubular epithelium of the kidney in females) for ZPS.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
Additional information
In a subchronic (13 weeks) GLP compliant study performed according to a protocol similar to OECD guideline 408, Crl:CD (SD)BR rats (n=10/sex/dose) were exposed via dietary administration to dose levels of 0, 25, 250 and 2500 mg/kg bw/day of the substance (Hazleton UK, 1990). Male and female animals treated at 2500 mg/kg bw/day gained less weight than the control animals: male animals consumed slightly more food than the control animals. At week 1 the concentration of the test article (as supplied) in the high dose diet was about 7 to 8%, the concentration increased so that by week 13 it was about 11 to 14%. At such high test article concentrations it is possible that the nutritional quality of the diet is impaired resulting in an effect on the body weight of the animals. The effect on body weight at 2500 mg/kg bw/day may therefore be a result of nutritional imbalance rather than toxicity due to ZPS administration. In males treated at 2500 mg/kg bw/day there was an increase in mean cell haemoglobin concentration and slight decreases in red blood cell count and haemoglobin concentration. This may be reflection of poor nutrition in these animals. Plasma urea levels were elevated in male animals treated at 2500 mg/kg bw/day. In the absence of any histopathological findings in the kidneys other than hyaline droplets, this change may also reflect the poor nutrition of these animals. There were changes in prothrombin and activated partial thromboplastin times in animals, males in particular. The significance of these changes is uncertain and it is possible that the green discoloration of the plasma may be affecting the analyses. Meaningful interpretation of some of the clinical chemistry parameters was prevented by test article in the plasma interfering with some of the analyses at a dose level of 2500 mg/kg bw/day. It is possible that the analyses may have been affected at 25 and 250 mg/kg bw/day, however, since mean values were similar to control values it is considered unlikely that there was interference at these dose levels.
Histopathologically, the main effect of treatment was caecitis accompanied by colitis or proctitis in the large intestine of animals treated at 250 and 2500 mg/kg bw/day and squamous hyperplasia of the limiting ridge of the forestomach in animals treated at 2500 mg/kg bw/day (effects in the forestomach are not relevant for humans). The significance of these changes in animals fed at 2500 mg/kg bw/day of the substance in the diet is uncertain. The changes may represent a low-grade mucosal irritation or be secondary to nutritional imbalance, accumulation of test substance in diet or to a disturbance of the normal luminal flora. In females treated at 2500 mg/kg bw/day there was an increase in hyaline droplet accumulation in the kidney proximal tubular epithelium. This probably reflects changes associated with excretion of the test article.
In conclusion, 25 mg/kg bw/day is considered the local NOAEL (based on caecitis accompanied by colitis or proctitis in the large intestine of animals treated at 250 mg/kg bw/day, the significance of these changes in animals fed at 2500 mg/kg bw/day of the substance in the diet is uncertain) and 250 mg/kg bw/day is considered the systemic NOAEL (based on an increase in hyaline droplet accumulation in the proximal tubular epithelium of the kidney in females).
Adult female Sprague-Dawley rats were dosed daily by gavage for 14 days (range finding study) at levels of 200, 500, 750, 1500, 2500 mg/kg bw/day (n=5 females/dose) and then killed by CO2 asphyxiation and necropsied (The Procter & Gamble Company, 1986). No overt toxicity was observed and neither body weight nor food consumption were significantly reduced over control values. Blue discolouration of viscera was observed with doses as low as 200 mg/kg bw/day and the number of organs discoloured as well as the intensity of blue colour increased with increasing dose levels. Results of this dose range finding study suggest that levels as high as 2500 mg/kg bw/day could be used in a teratologic evaluation of this substance and that blue discolouration of maternal tissue is expected with dose levels as low as 200 mg/kg bw/day.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the results of the oral repeated dose toxicity study ZPS does not need to be classified according to Directive 67/548/EEC and according to the EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.