Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 603-373-3 | CAS number: 129909-90-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
7.5.1 Repeated dose toxicity: oral:
KS - 90d rat. Whale & Christenson, 1997. KL.1. NOAEL M: 32.9, F: 38 mg/kg/day;
KS - 1yr rat. Wahle, 1999. KL.1. NOAEL M: 2.3 F: 2.7 mg/kg/.day;
SS - 90d dog. Sheets, 2001. KL.2. NOAEL M: 6.74 F: 6.28 mg/kg/day;
SS - 1yr dog. Wahle, 1999. KL.2. NOAEL M: 2.5 F: 2.3 mg/kg/day.
7.5.2 Repeated dose toxicity: dermal:
KS - 21d rat. Sheet & Gastner, 1998. KL.1. NOAEL 1000 mg/kg/day
7.5.3 Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation:
No available studies
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 2.3 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- chronic
- Species:
- rat
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subchronic
- Species:
- rat
Additional information
Repeat oral toxicity
In the sub-chronic key rat study (Wahle and Christenson, 1997) slight effects on the thyroid gland which included increases in T3 levels and follicular cell hyperplasia were observed. Mechanistic studies (refer to Section 7.9.3) in rats were performed to better characterise these effects. These studies showed that there were no treatment related effects on thyroid weight or microscopic changes in the thyroid at any dose. Thyroid to blood ratios of 125I in treated groups were comparable to negative controls, indicating that the increase in thyroid hormones was mostly likely not due to increased synthesis. It would appear that amicarbazone is conjugated by liver UDP-GT enzyme, which subsequently is the same enzyme used for both T3 and T4 conjugation. Amicarbazone appears to compete with T3 / T4 for this enzyme, therefore thyroid homeostasis is affected as T3 / T4 levels rise due to lack of conjugation in the liver. Increased liver weights were also observed in the sub-chronic rat study. As the liver is implicated as the extra-thyroidal site and also where UDP-glucuronosyltransferase activity is greatest, this provides an explanation for the increased liver weights observed (hence cytomegaly and enlarged cells with granular eosinophilic vacuolated cytoplasm). In this study NOAEL of 32.9 and 38 mg/kg/day were established for males and females respectively, based on the effects observed (discussed above at LOAEL of 67.2/77.7 mg/kg/day [M/F]).
In the chronic key rat study (Wahle, 1999) similar effects as to those already discussed were observed. Due to the doses selected, the NOAEL was established at 2.3 and 2.7 mg/kg/day in males and females, respectively (the lowest dose tested), with LOAEL of 25 and 30 mg/kg/day for male and females, respectively. These data would suggest that the true NOAEL for the chronic study may lie closer to 25 mg/kg/day based on both the dose level intervals from the chronic and sub-chronic studies with similar effects reported, which did not progress over an extended period of testing.
The two supporting dog studies (Sheets, 2001 [sub-chronic] and Jones, 1999 [chronic]) reported similar effects to the rodent study. The 90-day study reported NOAEL of 6.74 and 6.28 mg/kg/day for males and females, respectively (LOAEL M: 27 and F: 25 mg/kg/day). The 1 year study reported NOAEL of 2.5 and 2.3 mg/kg/day for males and females, respectively (LOAEL M: 8.9 and F: 8.7 mg/kg/day).
Repeat dermal toxicity
In the key study (Sheet and Gastner, 1998) no systemic effects or treatment related signs of dermal irritation were observed when animals were exposed to a maximum recommended dose of 1000 mg/kg/day for 21 days. Whilst no dermal absorption data is available, both the acute and sub-acute dermal toxicity data suggest that dermal absorption is minimal with no evidence of local or systemic toxicity compared to the acute oral toxicity study where the NOEL was ~100 mg/kg. Irrespective of the duration of the study the available data suggest that local and systemic toxicity are not likely to markedly increase in severity.
Repeat inhalation toxicity
No toxicological studies have been submitted to support this toxicological endpoint. In accordance with the guidance from ECHA (2008) route to route extrapolation will be undertaken, extrapolating from the oral route to the inhalatory route to provide a repeat dose dermal systemic DNEL. Further testing is not justified and therefore a waiver is requested for this endpoint.Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects (target organ) digestive: liver; glandular: thyroids
Justification for classification or non-classification
Amicarbazone is not genotoxic, and therefore classification is not required.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.