Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-870-9 | CAS number: 100-61-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 4 May 2011
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 011
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD guideline no. 438: “Isolated Chicken Eye Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants”, adopted on 7 September 2009.
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- N-methylaniline
- EC Number:
- 202-870-9
- EC Name:
- N-methylaniline
- Cas Number:
- 100-61-8
- Molecular formula:
- C7H9N
- IUPAC Name:
- N-methylaniline
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- other: In vitro test with chicken eyes.
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Approximately 7 weeks old, male or female chickens (ROSS, spring chickens), body weight range approximately 1.5 2.5 kg, were used as eye donors. Heads of these animals were obtained from a poultry slaughterhouse in the Netherlands. Heads of the animals were cut off immediately after sedation of the animals by electric shock and incision of the neck for bleeding. The heads were placed in small plastic boxes on a bedding of paper tissues moistened with isotonic saline. Next, they were transported to the testing facility. During transportation, the heads were kept at ambient temperature.
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: Negative control - 1 eye
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 30 μL undiluted.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 10 seconds
- Observation period (in vivo):
- Eyes were examined at approximately 0, 30, 75, 120, 180 and 240 minutes after treatment
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Negative control - 1 eye
Positive control - 3 eyes
Test group - 3 eyes - Details on study design:
- Within 2 hours after kill, eyes were carefully dissected and the eye lids were carefully removed without damaging the cornea. Next, the head with the fluorescein treated cornea was examined to ensure that the cornea is not damaged. If undamaged, the eye was further dissected from the head without damaging the eye or cornea. The enucleated eye was placed in a stainless steel clamp with the cornea positioned vertically and transferred to a chamber of the superfusion apparatus. The clamp holding the eye was positioned in such a way that the entire cornea was supplied with isotonic saline from a bent, stainless steel tube, at a target rate of 0.10 - 0.15 mL/min (temperature controlled at approximately 32˚C). Corneal thickness was measured using the Depth Measuring Attachment No. I for the Haag Streit slit lamp microscope. An accurate measurement was taken at the corneal apex of each eye. Eyes with a corneal thickness deviating more than 10% of the average corneal thickness of the eyes, eyes that show opacity (score higher than 0.5), or are unacceptably stained with fluorescein (score higher than 0.5) indicating the cornea to be permeable, or eyes that show any other signs of damage, was rejected as test eyes and replaced. Each eye provided its own baseline values for corneal swelling, corneal opacity and fluorescein retention. For that purpose, after an equilibration period of 45 - 60 minutes, the corneal thickness of the eyes was measured again to determine the zero reference value for corneal swelling calculations.
Results and discussion
In vitro
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Value:
- 1
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Fluorescein retention. Positive control: 3.0
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Value:
- 1.6
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Positive control: score of 3 (Severe loosening of epithelium)
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Value:
- 9
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Swelling %. Positive control: 27%
- Irritation parameter:
- other: overall irritation score
- Value:
- 65
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Irritation Index = maximum mean corneal swelling + maximum mean opacity (x 20) + mean fluorescein score (x 20)
Any other information on results incl. tables
Mean valuesand irritancy categories: N-methylaniline:
Time intervals [min]
|
Swelling % |
Opacity |
Fluorescein |
30 |
2 |
1.0 |
1.01 |
75 |
4 |
1.0 |
|
120 |
7 |
1.5 |
|
180 |
8 |
1.5 |
|
240 |
9 |
1.8 |
|
Parameter
|
Maximum score |
Irritancy category |
Swelling % |
9 |
II |
Opacity |
1.8 |
III |
Fluorescein retention |
1.0 |
II |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Category 2 (irritating to eyes)
- Conclusions:
- The test substance caused slight corneal swelling, slight to moderate opacity, and slight fluorescein retention. The calculated Irritation Index was 65 (max possible score is 200).
- Executive summary:
A sample of test substance_EC 202-870-9 was evaluated neat for eye irritation potential in the Isolated Chicken Eye (ICE) test. In addition, the test included one negative control (saline) eye and three positive control eyes (BAC 5%). Chicken eyes were obtained from slaughter animals used for human consumption. The isolated chicken eyes were exposed to a single application of 30 µL of the test sample for 10 seconds followed by a 20 ml saline rinse. Three main parameters were measured to disclose possible adverse eye effects: corneal thickness (expressed as corneal swelling), corneal opacity and fluorescein retention of damaged epithelial cells.
Test substance_EC 202-870-9 caused slight corneal swelling, slight to moderate opacity, and slight fluorescein retention.The calculated Irritation Index was 65 (max possible score is 200).
The negative control (saline) caused no corneal effects.
The positive control BAC 5% caused moderate corneal swelling, severe opacity and severe fluorescein retention. The calculated Irritation Index was 147.
According to CLP classification schemes of the ICE, test substance_EC 202-870-9 is considered to be Category 2: “Irritating to eyes” (EU-CLPclassification).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.