Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 300-227-8 | CAS number: 93924-33-5 A distillate obtained from the redistillation of a complex combination of hydrocarbons obtained by the distillation of the effluents from a severe catalytic hydrotreatment of paraffins. It boils in the range of approximately 190°C to 330°C (374°F to 594°F).
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1988 to 1991
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: This study is classified as reliable with restrictions because it is an acceptable and a well-documented study report.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 991
- Report date:
- 1991
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Modifications of the standard Ames assay include:
1. DMSO extractions of the test material dissolved in cyclohexane were used as opposed to the neat or solvent-diluted sample.
2. an eight-fold higher concentration of liver S-9 fraction from hamster rather than rat was used.
3. The NADP cofactor was increased from 4 to 8 mm. - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Straight run hydrodesulfurised gas oil (CAS# 64742-80-9)
- IUPAC Name:
- Straight run hydrodesulfurised gas oil (CAS# 64742-80-9)
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Straight run hydrodesulfurised gas oil (MD 57379, MD 57381, and MD 57385)
- Substance type: petroleum-derived middle distillate
- Physical state: liquid
- Analytical purity: not provided
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): not provided
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: not provided
- Isomers composition: not provided
- Purity test date: not provided
- Lot/batch No.: sample code- 57379
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: not provided
- Stability under test conditions: not provided
- Storage condition of test material: stored indoors in stainless steel containers at 18°C
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Straight run hydrodesulfurised gas oil (MD 57381)
- Substance type: petroleum-derived middle distillate
- Physical state: liquid
- Analytical purity: not provided
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): not provided
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: not provided
- Isomers composition: not provided
- Purity test date: not provided
- Lot/batch No.: sample code- 57381
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: not provided
- Stability under test conditions: not provided
- Storage condition of test material: stored indoors in stainless steel containers at 18°C
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Straight run hydrodesulfurised gas oil (MD 57385)
- Substance type: petroleum-derived middle distillate
- Physical state: liquid
- Analytical purity: not provided
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): not provided
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: not provided
- Isomers composition: not provided
- Purity test date: not provided
- Lot/batch No.: sample code- 57385
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: not provided
- Stability under test conditions: not provided
- Storage condition of test material: stored indoors in stainless steel containers at 18°C
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- gene for histadine synthesis
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: Oxoid 32 medium
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: not reported
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: not reported
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: not reported - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S-9 mix prepared with the livers of Syrian-Golden hamsters
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, 25, 40, 40, 50, 60 µl/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- cyclohaxane and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- not specified
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: benzo(a)pyrene 2-aminoanthracene and 2-nitrofluoren
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: not reported
- Exposure duration: 48 hours
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 hours
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): not reported
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 48 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: not reported
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: not reported
- Evaluation criteria:
- Spontaneous and solvent control reversion rates for TA98 should fall between 30 and 55 revertants/plate for the assay to be considered acceptable.
The single dose of Stock 642-100'' CNN (standard reference material) at 50 µl must fall between 100-200 revertants/plate. - Statistics:
- The mean number of revertants/plate for each dose was calculated. The Student-Newman Keuls Test was preformed if a dose-related doubling relative to the mean solvent control was not reached. Nonlinear regression, using the SAS NLIN procedure of Myers et al. was used to determine the slope of the dose response curve, if a doubling was reached.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- not specified
- Genotoxicity:
- other: marginally mutagenic; mutagenicity index (MI) - 1.0
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- not specified
- Genotoxicity:
- other: marginally mutagenic; MI- 0.7
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- not specified
- Genotoxicity:
- other: marginally mutagenic; MI-1.4
- Remarks on result:
- other: other: Straight run hydrodesulfurised gas oil (MD 57379)
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
A marginal dose-related increase in revertants compared to the mean solvent control value occurred for all the test materials [straight run hydrodesulfurised gas oils (MD 57379, 57381, and 57385)].The mutagenicity indexes ranged from 0.7 to 1.4.
Table 1. Mutagenicity Indices of Test Materials |
||
Test Material Type |
Sample Number |
Mutagenicity Index |
Straight run hydrodesulfurised gas oil |
MD 57379 |
1.0 |
Straight run hydrodesulfurised gas oil |
MD 57381 |
0.7 |
Straight run hydrodesulfurised gas oil |
MD 57385 |
1.4 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
other: marginally mutagenic
The three straight run hydrodesulfurised gas oils (MD 57379, 57381, and 57385) showed marginally mutagenic results in the modified Ames test. - Executive summary:
In a genetic toxicity study, an Ames test was conducted using three different types of petroleum-derived middle distillate test substances [straight run hydrodesulfurised gas oils (MD 57379, 57381, and 57385)]. DMSO test article extracts were applied mixed with phosphate buffer (non-activating) or S-9 mix (activating) andSalmonella typhimuriumbroth culture, using the preincubation method. The pre-incubated mixture was overlayed on toVogel-Bonner Minimal E medium plus 1.5% bacteriological grade agar and 2% glucose in Nunc Petri plates. The plates were allowed to incubate for 48 hours. After the incubation period, colonies of histidine protrophs in test and control plates were enumerated on a Artek automatic colony counter. The condition of the background lawn of bacterial growth was confirmed by visual observation with a Zeiss stereozoom microscope. The same procedures were used for the positive controls (2 -aminoanthracene, benzo (a) pyrene, and 2 -nitrofluorene).
A marginal dose-related increase in revertants compared to the mean solvent control value occurred for all the test materials [straight run hydrodesulfurised gas oils (MD 57379, 57381, and 57385)].The mutagenicity indexes ranged from 0.7 to 1.4. These test materials are classified as marginaly mutagenic.
This study received a Klimisch score of 2. It is classified as reliable with restrictions because it is an acceptable and a well-documented study report.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.