Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

In vitro tests:

Aminoguanidinium hydrogen carbonate was tested in the Ames test in 1982 (according to Ames et al. 1973 Proc nat Acac Sci (USA) 70, 2281-2285; Ames et al. 1975 Mutation Res 31, 347-364) using Samonella typhimurium TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA1537 in the presence and in the absence of a metabolic activation system.

The applied concentrations are 0 (negative controls), 20,100, 500, 2500 and 12500 µg/plate. There were no indications of a mutagenic effect of aminoguanidinium hydrogen carbonate up to the highest test dose.

 

In 1988, aminoguanidinium hydrogen carbonate was tested again in the Ames test according to OECD TG 471 and GLP using preincubation methodology using S. typhimurium TA 98, TA100, TA1535, TA 1537 in the presence and in the absence of a metabolic activation system and concentrations of the test item up to 14000 µg/plate.

Only S typhimurium TA 1535 showed mutagen activity in the absence of the activation system from 8000 µg/plate onwards, thus in concentrations which exceed the requirements of the guideline.

 

In a recently performed Ames test (JETOC 2000) aminoguanidinium hydrogen carbonate was tested according to the OECD TG 471 and GLP using Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, and E. coli WP2uvrA/pKM101 in the presence and absence of S9-mix and preincubation methodology. The concentrations used ranged from 0 (solvent control) up to 5000 µg/plate according to the requirement to the guideline.

 

Aminoguanidinium hydrogen carbonate did not show mutagenic activity in any of the strains used. The positive controls were functional.

In a mammalian cell gene mutation assay, mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells cultured in vitro exposed to Aminoguanidinium hydrogen carbonate, at concentrations of 43.75, 87.50, 175.00, 350.00, 700.00, 1400.00 µg/ml for 4 hours with and without S9 -mix and 24 hours with S9 mix and concentrations of 65.63, 131.25, 262.50, 525.00, 1050.00, 1400.00 µg/ml with S9 mix for 4 hour exposure were not genotoxic under the conditions of the test. The positive controls induced the appropriate response. There was no evidence of induced mutant colonies over background.

 

In vivo tests:

Four micronucleus are available.

 

Employing the micronucleus test according to OECD TG 474, aminoguanidinium hydrogen carbonate was investigated in male and female mice for a possible clastogenic effect on the chromosomes of bone marrow erythroblasts. 24, 48 or 72 hours after the single oral application by gavage of 0 or 7500 mg/kg bw, the animals were sacrificed.

An additional group of 20 females received a single dose of 5000 mg/kg bw.

The animals treated with aminoguanidinium hydrogen carbonate showed lasting symptoms of toxicity after the administration and in all treatment groups animals died indicating that the MTD was exceeded in this test.

The ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes was altered, but not to a statistically significant degree. No indication of a clastogenic effect was observed in any group or gender. However, in the 72 hour interval, the males showed an increased ratio of polychromatic erythrocytes with micronuclei. This increase, however, was not statistically significant.

 

In a second micronucleus test aminoguanidinium hydrogen carbonate was investigated in male mice for a possible clastogenic effect on the chromosomes of bone marrow erythroblasts.

72 hours after the single oral application by gavage of 0, 5000, 6000, 7000 mg/kg bw the animals were sacrificed. The animals treated with aminoguanidinium hydrogen carbonate showed lasting symptoms of toxicity after the administration. In all treatment groups animals died, indicating that the MTD was exceeded in this test.

In contrast to the first experiment the ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes was not altered. Due to the high level of acute toxicity seen in this study slight clastogenic effects observed at doses with high mortality were attributed to cytotoxicity rather than to mutagenicity.

 

In a third micronucleus test aminoguanidinium hydrogen carbonate was investigated in female mice for a possible clastogenic effect on the chromosomes of bone marrow erythroblasts.

72 hours after the single oral application by gavage of 0, 500, 1000, 2000 mg/kg bw the animals were sacrificed.

The 500 mg/kg group tolerated the treatment without any symptoms. From 1000 mg/kg bw onwards animals showed apathy and suffered from diarrhoe.3 animals of the high dose group died. The ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes was not altered. No indication of a clastogenic effect of aminoguanidinium hydrogen carbonate was found after a single treatment with up to 2000 mg/kg. The ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes was not altered.

 

An unscheduled DNA Synthesis (UDS) Assay was employed to investigate aminoguanidinium hydrogen carbonate in vivo in male rats for a possible genotoxic effect on the DNA of liver cells.

Animals received aminoguanidinium hydrogen carbonate in a single oral dose of 1000 mg/kg and 2500 mg/kg, respectively.

The males treated with aminoguanidinium hydrogen carbonate showed symptoms of toxicity after administration, starting at 1000 mg/kg. 1 of 5 animals died before the end of the test due to the acute oral toxicity of aminoguanidinium hydrogen carbonate at a dose of 2500 mg/kg.

The liver cells of groups treated with aminoguanidinium hydrogen carbonate and of the negative controls were prepared 4 and 16 hours after administration No cytotoxicity was observed in isolated hepatocytes of exposed animals.

No indications of UDS-induction by Aminoguanidinium hydrogen carbonate were found after a single oral treatment with 1000 mg/kg and 2500 mg/kg.

 

Overall:

Aminoguanidinium hydrogen carbonate is not considered to be mutagenic or clastogenic.


Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
No endpoint study record is chosen because there are several Ames tests, an in vitro gene mutation test, an unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS), and several micronucleus assays to evaluate genotoxicity.
All available studies are performed in accordance with the current guidelines and are evaluated with Klimisch score 1 or 2. Based on the results of these studies, aminoguanidinium hydrogen carbonate is evaluated to be not mutagenic.

Short description of key information:
Based on the available results aminoguanidinium hydrogen carbonate is evaluated not to be mutagenic.

Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the available data no classification or labelling is required.