Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Upon contact with water or moisture (e.g. within mucous membranes) aluminium tri-isopropanolate hydrolyses immediately to isopropanol and aluminium 3+ cations (as hydroxide and oxyhydroxide). Hence, toxicity is determined by the toxicity of these two species.

The oral acute toxicity of aluminium tri-isopropanolate reported as LD50 was found to be 11.3 g/kg bw (Smyth 1969).

The acute oral toxicity has of isopropanol has been determined being LD50 (rat) = 5.84 g/kg bw, (Smyth 1948). No data for aluminium are available.

Inhalation exposure of male and female rats to 5000 and 10000 ppm isopropanol produces transient concentration-related narcosis and/or central nervous system sedation (Gill 1991). However, as no mortality was observed at the highest tested dose of 10000 ppm the LC50 was set to > 10000 ppm. The inhalation LC50 for aluminium flakes was 888 mg/m3 (Korsak 1994, Reynolds 1986).

Isopropanol has a very low acute dermal toxicity that has been determined being LD50 (dermal, rat) = 16.4 ml/kg bw = 12880 mg/kg bw.
Aluminium species (hydroxide or oxide) that may be formed during hydrolysis are not classified for acute toxicity. These species are insoluble in water and thus absorption via the skin is expected to be low (see also Flarend (2001)).

In several inhalation studies (not reported here) isopropanol showed transient effects on the CNS (drowsiness and dizziness) and is therefore classified as STOT SE 3, H336 (according to Annex VI of Regulation EC 1272/2008).

Aluminium species (hydroxide or oxide) that may be formed during hydrolysis are not classified for acute toxicity.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1969
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Limited documentation on the study, however, basic information is given. From the available information, similar procedure to acute oral toxicity guideline followed.
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
GLP compliance:
no
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
other: Carworth-Wistar
Sex:
male
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: inhouse
- Age at study initiation: 4-5 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 90-120g
- Fasting period before study: not fasted
- Diet: Rockland rat diet
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
other: suspended in 0.25% agar
Doses:
Logarithmic series, differing by a factor of 2
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5 animals per dose
Control animals:
not specified
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
Statistics:
LD50 and fiducial range estimated by the method described by Thomson (Thomson, W.R., Bacteriol. Rev., 1947, 11, 115) and Weil (Weil, C.S., Biometrics, 1952, 8, 249).
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
11 300 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
95% CL:
7 000 - 18 300
Remarks on result:
other: concentration intubated 0.2 g/ml

Confidence interval reported 7 - 18.3 g/kg bw.

Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The oral acute toxicity reported as LD50 in this study was found to be 11.3 g/kg bw (i.e. 11'300 mg/kg bw)
Executive summary:

The work of this group pre-dates range finding toxicity guidelines and provided much of the basis for their development. Their results are cited by many subsequent authoritative review bodies and are often found in SIDS and SIAR documents via secondary references. Therefore, these results (LD50 (oral, rat) = 11300 mg/kg bw) are deemed reliable.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Value:
11 300 mg/kg bw
Quality of whole database:
The study is supported by studies on the cation (Al3+) and the alcohol (isopropanol), justified by immediate hydrolysis of the organic metal salt aluminium triisopropylate

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: inhalation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
1991
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Well documented, according to accepted guidelines
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 403 (Acute Inhalation Toxicity)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
6 hr exposure period instead of 4 hr, 14-day observation period was not clearly stated
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
Fischer 344
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Spague-Dawley, Inc. (Indianapolis, IN)
- Age at study initiation: 9 to 11 weeks
- Housing: individually in stainless stell wire mesh cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Ground Purina Certified Rodent Chow ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: approximately one week


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18 to 25
- Humidity (%): 40 to 70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12


Route of administration:
inhalation: vapour
Type of inhalation exposure:
whole body
Vehicle:
other: unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on inhalation exposure:
GENERATION OF TEST ATMOSPHERE / CHAMBER DESCRIPTION
- Exposure apparatus: stainless steel chambers with glass doors and windows
- Exposure chamber volume: Four approximately 1330-liter and one approximately 900-liter
- Source and rate of air: filtered air at a flow rate of approximately 14 air changes per hour
- Temperature, humidity in air chamber: recorded approximately 12 times during each exposure

TEST ATMOSPHERE
- Brief description of analytical method used: flame ionization gas chromatographic (GC) technique
- Samples taken from breathing zone: yes



Analytical verification of test atmosphere concentrations:
yes
Duration of exposure:
ca. 6 h
Concentrations:
500, 1500, 5000, 10000 ppm
No. of animals per sex per dose:
25 animals/sex/dose
Control animals:
yes
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: twice daily, beginning on the day of after exposure and continuing until sacrifice
- Frequency of observations and weighing: body weights were recored prior to exposure and during each test session
- Necropsy of survivors performed: no
Statistics:
The data for continuous, parametric variables were intercompared for the dose and control groups by use of Levene’s test for homogeneity of variances,by analysis of variance, and by pooled variance t-tests. The t-tests were used, if the analysis of variance was significant (P
Intra-session motor activity data was analyzed using a repeated measures analysis with dose as grouping factor and session time as the within subject factor. Group comparisons at each reporting epoch were made (as described above) if significant dose effects or time by dose interactions were observed.
The epsilon-adjustment procedure (Greenhouse-Geisser correction) was used in repeated measures analysis of motor activity data.
Frequency data from FOB tests was evaluated using Fisher’s exact
probability test.

All statistical tests were performed using BMDPm Statistical Software (Dixon, 1985 or Dixon, 1988). The fiducial limit of 0.05 was used as the critical level of significance for all tests.

Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
other: transient, concentration-related narcosis and/or central nervous system sedation
Effect level:
ca. 5 000 ppm
Exp. duration:
6 h
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
other: transient, concentration-related narcosis and/or central nervous system sedation
Effect level:
ca. 10 000 ppm
Exp. duration:
6 h
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect level:
> 10 000 ppm
Exp. duration:
6 h
Mortality:
none
Clinical signs:
other: In the 10000 ppm group, prostration, severe ataxia, decreased arousal, slowed or labored respiration, decreased neuromuscular tone, hypothermia, and loss of reflex function was observed 1 and 6 hours after exposure. Concentration-related decreases in mean
Body weight:
Body weight was measured at the time of behavioral testing so that any possible confounding effect that body weight might have on behavior could be assessed. Mean body weights for the five exposure groups were not statistically significantly different at any time during the study. Mean body weight tended to be lower for animals in the 10000 ppm exposure group assigned to FOB testing at the 6-hour and 24-hour post-exposure evaluations. This decrease is considered to reflect decreased food consumption during the time period when prostration and narcosis were observed.

Gross pathology:
none
Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: CLP (EC 1278/2008)
Conclusions:
LC50 > 10000 ppm
Executive summary:

Due to transient concentration-related narcosis and central nervous system sedation effects, the substance should be classified under STOT single exposure category 3, H336 - may cause drowsiness or dizziness, according to CLP classification criteria

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Value:
24 500 mg/m³ air
Quality of whole database:
Based on the available study on the most volatile hydrolysis product isopropanol

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1948
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study without detailed documentation.
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Lack of methodological details
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
study pre-dates GLP requirements
Test type:
other: Not reported
Limit test:
no
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
not specified
Sex:
not specified
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Not reported
- Age at study initiation: Not reported
- Weight at study initiation: Not reported
- Fasting period before study: Not reported
- Housing:Not reported
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Not reported
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):Not reported
- Acclimation period:Not reported


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): Not reported
- Humidity (%): Not reported
- Air changes (per hr): Not reported
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):Not reported


IN-LIFE DATES: Not reported
Type of coverage:
other: rubber cuff
Vehicle:
other: carbitol
Details on dermal exposure:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: Not reported
- % coverage: Not reported
- Type of wrap if used: rubber cuff


REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Not reported
- Time after start of exposure:Not reported


TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): Not reported, the authors stated that dosages as great as 20 ml/kg can be retained by the cuff.



VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): Not reported
Duration of exposure:
24 hours
Doses:
Not reported, the authors stated that dosages as great as 20 ml/kg can be retained by the cuff.
No. of animals per sex per dose:
It is reported that the number of animals used are similar to those given oral dosages. The oral LD50 section reports groups of 6 rats.
Control animals:
not specified
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days (or other?); Not reported
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Not reported
- Necropsy of survivors performed: Not reported
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight,organ weights, histopathology, other: Not reported
Statistics:
Not reported
Preliminary study:
NA
Sex:
not specified
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
16.4 mL/kg bw
Mortality:
Not reported
Clinical signs:
other: Not reported
Gross pathology:
Not reported
Other findings:
Not reported
Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: CLP (EC 1272/2008)
Conclusions:
LD50 (dermal, rabbit) = 16.4 ml/kg bw = 12880 mg/kg bw
Executive summary:

The work of this group pre-dates range finding toxicity guidelines and provided much of the basis for their development. Their results are cited by many subsequent authoritative review bodies and are often found in SIDS and SIAR documents via secondary references. Therefore, these results (LD50 (dermal, rabbitt) = 16.4 ml/kg bw = 12880 mg/kg bw) are deemed reliable.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Value:
12 880 mg/kg bw
Quality of whole database:
Aluminium hydroxide, aluminium oxide, aluminium oxyhydroxide are insoluble in water. Due to their insolubility it can be assumed that the absorption of these aluminium compounds via the skin will be limited. Therefore the LD50 is based on the other hydrolysis product isopropanol

Additional information

Upon contact with water or moisture (e.g. within mucous membranes) aluminium tri-isopropanolate hydrolyses immediately to isopropanol and aluminium 3+ cations (as hydroxide and oxyhydroxide). Hence, toxicity is determined by the toxicity of these two species.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Upon contact with water or moisture (e.g. within mucous membranes) aluminium triisopropylate hydrolyses immediately to isopropanol and aluminium 3+ cations (as hydroxide and oxyhydroxide). Hence, toxicity is determined by the toxicity of these two species and both when tested do not require classification for acute toxicity via oral, dermal or inhalation exposure. However, as isopropanol showed effects of transient concentration-related narcosis and central nervous system sedation, observed during exposure, the substance should be classified STOT SE 3, H336 May cause drowsiness or dizziness according to CLP (Regulation EC 1272/2008).