Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-227-5 | CAS number: 104-68-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 27 Sep 2005 - 07 Oct 2005
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study, GLP
- Justification for type of information:
- Read Across to an analogue based on structural similarity. An analogue justification is attached to section 13 of the dataset.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 006
- Report date:
- 2006
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.3700 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.31 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Landesamt für Umwelt, Wasserwirtschaft und Gewerbeaufsicht; Experimental Toxicology and Ecology BASF Aktiengesellschaft
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-phenoxyethanol
- EC Number:
- 204-589-7
- EC Name:
- 2-phenoxyethanol
- Cas Number:
- 122-99-6
- Molecular formula:
- C8H10O2
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-phenoxyethanol
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): 2-Phenoxyethanol
- Physical state: Liquid/colorless
- Analytical purity: >99.9 core peak-area %
- Lot/batch No.: 41183068E0
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 23 Jul 2006
- Stability under test conditions: The stability of the test substance under storage
conditions over the test period was guaranteed by
the sponsor.
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature, under N2 conditions, exclusion
of light
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories, Research Models and Services, Germany GmbH [former: Charles River Laboratories, Germany]
- Age at study initiation: 11 to 13 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 144.9 – 185.3 g
- Housing: Rats were housed singly from day 0-20 p.c. in type DK III stainless steel wire mesh cages.
- Diet (ad libitum): Ground Kliba maintenance diet mouse/rat "GLP"
- Water (ad libitum): tap water
- Acclimation period: 6 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-24
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12
IN-LIFE DATES: 1st cohort From: 27 Sep 2005 To: 17 Oct 2005; 2nd cohort From: 28 Sep 2005 To: 18 Oct 2005
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: tap water and a few drops Tween 80
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The test substance emulsions were prepared at the beginning of the administration period and thereafter at intervals, which took into account the analytical results of the stability verification. For the preparation of the emulsions, appropriate amounts of the test substance were weighed into calibrated beakers and were topped up with tap water and a few drops Tween 80 (as emulsifier). Afterwards they were intensely mixed with a magnetic stirrer. A magnetic stirrer was used to keep the emulsions homogeneous during the procedure of dosing the animals. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Analytical verifications of the stability of the test substance in demineralized water for a period of at least 96 hours at room temperature were carried out before the study was initiated (in a similar batch). Samples of the test substance emulsions were sent to the analytical laboratory twice during the study period (at the beginning and towards the end) for verification of the concentrations. The samples, which were taken for the first concentration control analyses at the beginning of the administration period, were also used to verify the homogeneity for the samples of the low and the high concentrations (100 and 1,000 mg/kg body weight/day). Three samples (one from the top, middle and bottom in each case) were taken for each of these
concentrations from the beaker with a magnetic stirrer running. - Details on mating procedure:
- The animals were paired by the breeder and supplied on day 0 post coitum (= detection of vaginal plug / sperm).
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- gestation day 6-19 (post mating)
- Frequency of treatment:
- once daily
- Duration of test:
- 28 days
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 25
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
Animals were checked from day 0 to 20 p.c. at least once daily for clinical symptoms whereas check for mortality was conducted twice a day on working days, and once a day during weekend or public holidays.
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Body weights were recorded on days 0, 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 13, 15, 17, 19 and 20 post mating (p.c.).
FOOD CONSUMPTION was recorded on days 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 13, 15, 17, 19 and 20 p.c..
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day # 20
The scope of examinations exceeded the respective test guideline requirements. It was enhanced by clinical pathology examinations (hematology and clinical chemistry). For this purpose, blood samples were collected from the retroorbital venus plexus at study termination.
Hematology
The following parameters were determined in blood:
• leukocytes
• erythrocytes
• hemoglobin
• hematocrit
• mean corpuscular volume
• mean corpuscular hemoglobin
• mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration
• platelets
• differential blood count
• reticulocytes
• prothrombin time (Hepato Quick's test)
Clinical chemistry
An automatic analyzer was used to examine following clinical chemical parameters:
• alanine aminotransferase
• aspartate aminotransferase
• alkaline phosphatase
• γ-glutamyltransferase
• sodium
• potassium
• chloride
• inorganic phosphate
• calcium
• urea
• creatinine
• glucose
• total bilirubin
• total protein
• albumin
• globulins
• triglycerides
• cholesterol
• magnesium
- Ovaries and uterine content:
- At study termination and following blood samples collection, the animals were sacrificed. The sacrificed animals as well as the one animal of the 1,000mg/kg bw/day group that was prematurely killed because of moribund state were subjected to necropsy and gross pathology, and the ovaries and uterus were removed for following examination:
Gravid uterine weight (excepted for the prematurely sacrificed animal)
Number of corpora lutea
Number of implantations (implantation sites, live/dead implantations)
The conception rates, as well as the pre- and post-implantation losses, were calculated. - Fetal examinations:
- Litter size, number of dead fetuses, fetal weight, sex ratio, external alterations. Furthermore, the viability of the fetuses and the condition of the placentae, the umbilical cords, the fetal membranes, and fluids were examined. Individual placental weights were recorded.
Following sacrifice, 50% of the fetuses were prepared for the purpose of skeletal examination.
The remaining half of the sacrificed fetuses was prepared for the purpose of visceral examination. - Statistics:
- Simultaneous comparison of all dose groups with the control group using the DUNNETT-test (two-sided) for the hypothesis of equal means.
Pairwise comparison of each dose group with the control group using FISHER'S EXACT-test (one-sided) for the hypothesis of equal proportions.
Pairwise comparison of each dose group with the control group using the WILCOXON-test (one-sided) for the hypothesis of equal medians.
Non-parametric one-way analysis using KRUSKAL-WALLIS-test (two-sided). If the resulting p-value was equal or less than 0.05, a pair-wise comparison of each dose group with the control group was performed using Wilcoxon-test (two-sided) for the equal medians.
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:yes
Details on maternal toxic effects:
Test group 3 (1,000 mg/kg b.w./day):
• one high dose female was sacrificed in moribund condition, preterminally, lateral position, unsteady gait, vaginal hemorrhage, salivation and respiratory sounds were observed
• all dams at least once showed unsteady gait (from day 6 p.c. onwards) and transient salivation (from day 8 p.c. onwards), although not all animals exhibited these findings on any one day, those findings persisted for a short time (up to 3.5 hours) after the dosing
• individual dams were found in lateral position shortly after treatment (5/25), had vaginal hemorrhage (2/25) and/or urine smeared fur (2/25) on several occasions during dosing
• mean food consumption was statistically significantly reduced (at maximum 10 % below control) on days 6 - 13 p.c., if calculated for the entire treatment period (days 6 - 19 p.c.), the food intake was about 6 % below control
• mean body weights were slightly, but statistically significantly below control on days 8 – 20 p.c., on day 20 p.c. mean body weight was about 4 % below control
• statistically significantly lower body weight gain was noted after initiation of treatment (days 6 - 8 p.c., about 44 % below control), average weight gain during entire treatment period (days 6 - 19 p.c.) was statistically significantly below control (about 12 %)
• net maternal body weight was about 4 % below control, net maternal body weight gain was about 14 % below control
No test substance-related adverse effects on dams in test group 1 (100 mg/kg bw/day) and test group 2 (300 mg/kg bw/day).
Effect levels (maternal animals)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- ca. 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- ca. 300 mg/kg bw/day
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- > 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Basis for effect level:
- other: other:
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- ca. 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Basis for effect level:
- other: other:
Results (fetuses)
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
Gestational parameters:
At terminal sacrifice 22 - 25 females/group had implantation sites.
2-phenoxyethanol had no influence on gestational parameters up to and including the limit dose of 1,000 mg/kg bw/day.
Developmental toxicity:
2-phenoxyethanol induced no signs of developmental toxicity.
Fetal external, soft tissue and skeletal observations:
The external and skeletal malformations in one individual fetus from control and in 2 low dose group fetuses (0 and 100 mg/kg bw/day),
Fetal external, soft tissue and skeletal observations:
The external and skeletal malformations in one individual fetus from control and in 2 low dose group fetuses (0 and 100 mg/kg bw/day), which were related to the head/skull and sternebra, are considered to be spontaneous findings.
No soft tissue malformations were recorded at all. If all the different types of malformations are summarized, in total one out of 210 examined control fetuses [= 0.5 %] in one out of 25 litters [= 4.0 %], 2 out of 206 low dose fetuses [= 1.0 %] in 2 out of 25 litters [= 8.0 %], none of the 204 mid dose fetuses (from 23 litters) and none of the 180 high dose fetuses (from 22 litters) showed malformations.
The mean percentages of affected fetuses/litter with total malformations amounted to 0.4, 1.0, 0.0, and 0.0 % at 0, 100, 300 or 1,000 mg/kg bw/day respectively. These low, not dose-related incidences do not suggest any relationship to the test substance.
External variations did not occur in any of the fetuses in this study. Soft tissue variations, in the form of dilated renal pelvis or short innominate occurred in all test groups including the controls without any relation to dosing. The skeletal variations consisted primarily of small disturbances or transient delays of ossification. Most of the skeletal variations were equally distributed among the different test groups including controls, if normal biological variation is taken into account. All fetal and litter incidences for these variations and the corresponding mean percentages of affected fetuses/litter did not show a relation to dosing, were not considered to be of any toxicological relevance and/or can be found at a comparable frequency in the historical control data. If all variations are summarized, in total 119 of the 210 examined control fetuses [= 57 %] in all 25 litters [= 100 %], 107 of the 206examined low dose fetuses [= 52 %] in all 25 litters [= 100 %], 110 out of 204 mid dose fetuses [= 54 %] in all 23 litters [= 100 %] and 104 out of 180 high dose fetuses [= 58 %] in all 22 litters [= 100 %] showed variations. The mean percentages of affected fetuses/litter with total variations amounted to 57.2, 52.3, 54.0, and 58.1 % at 0; 100; 300 or 1,000 mg/kg bw/day, respectively. These overall incidences do not suggest a treatment-relationship, but reflect the usual biological variation inherent in the strain of rats used for this experiment. A spontaneous origin is assumed for the unclassified external and the unclassified cartilage observation, that were recorded for very few fetuses of test groups 0, 1, 2 and 3 (0; 100; 300 or 1,000 mg/kg bw/day). Distribution and type of these findings (i.e. blood coagulum around placenta, bipartite processus xiphoideus, notched cartilage between basisphenoid and basioccipital and notched manubrium) do not suggest any relation to treatment. Thus, the oral administration of phenoxyethanol to pregnant Wistar rats had no effect on development and morphology of offspring at any of the dose levels tested (100, 300 and 1,000 mg/kg bw/day).
Effect levels (fetuses)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: the oral administration of phenoxyethanol to pregnant Wistar rats had no effect on development and morphology of offspring at any of the dose levels tested (100, 300 and 1,000 mg/kg bw/day).
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
Hematology and serum enzyme examinations revealed no treatment-related changes. Clinical chemistry investigations showed decreased concentrations in total bilirubin, total protein, albumin and globulin as well as increased triglyceride values in the serum of the high dose animals (1,000 mg/kg bw/day). Similar effects on clinical chemistry parameters, with somewhat lower severity, were noted in the mid dose animals (300 mg/kg bw/day). All of these findings were rather related to adaptive metabolic changes, than indicative of particular organ toxicity. Although these effects were likely to be caused by the test material, they were not considered as adverse per se.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.