Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 429-530-4 | CAS number: 96662-24-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 09 November 1998 to 14 December 1998
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 999
- Report date:
- 1999
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test EEC Directive 87/302, L133, pp. 61 - 63, March 1987
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell transformation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- -
- EC Number:
- 429-530-4
- EC Name:
- -
- Cas Number:
- 96662-24-7
- Molecular formula:
- Hill formula: C22H19N5O2 CAS formula: C22H19N5O2
- IUPAC Name:
- 3-[benzyl({4-[2-(4-nitrophenyl)diazen-1-yl]phenyl})amino]propanenitrile
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Details on test material:
- Disperse Orange 288
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- HPRT (hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase) locus
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Cell culture medium: MEM (minimal essential medium) with Hanks-salts and 25 mM Hepes-buffer
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9-mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- The compound was suspended in DMSO and tested at the following concentrations:
without S9-mix; 5.0, 7.5, 12.5, 25.0, 50.0, 75.0. 125.0, 250.0, 500.0, 750.0 and 1285.0 μg/ml (main mutation experiment)
50.0, 75.0, 125.0, 250.0, 500.0, 750.0, 1000.0 and 1285.0 μg/ml (repeat mutation experiment)
with S9-mix: 5.0, 7.5, 12.5, 25.0, 50.0, 75.0, 125.0, 250.0, 500.0, 750.0 and 1285.0 μg/ml (main mutation experiment)
50.0, 75.0, 125.0, 250.0, 500.0, 750.0, 1000.0 and 1285.0 μg/ml (repeat mutation experiment) - Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: without metabolic activation: EMS (Ethyl methane sulfonate), with metabolic activation: DMBA (9,10-dimethyl-1 ,2-benzanthracene)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Reference Compounds
Without metabolic activation
Name or number of compound (I.N.N. orU.SAN): ethyl methane sulfonate
Synonyms: EMS
Formula of the compound: C3Ha03S
CAS-Register number: 62-50-0
Product number / Code: 820774
Supplier of reference compound: Dr. Theodor Schuchardt & Co. Chemische Fabrik, Germany
Batch number: 40606721
Certificate of analysis: certificated by the supplier, Analytical Department, Dr. Bolkart dated December 18th, 1995
With metabolic activation
Name or number of compound (I.N.N. orU.S.A.N): 9,10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene
Synonyms: DMBA
Chemical name: 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene
CAS-Register number: 57-97-6
Product number / Code: 21,626-7
Supplier of reference compound: Fa. Aldhch – Chemie, Germany
Batch number: TL 1825LL
Certificate of analysis: certificated by the supplier, Aldrich chemical company, David Swessel, dated April 3rd, 1996
Test system
Test groups
with and without metabolic activation: 5.0, 7.5, 12.5, 25.0, 50.0, 75.0, 125.0, 250.0, 500.0, 750.0 and 1285.0 μg/ml (main mutation experiment)
50.0, 75.0, 125.0, 250.0, 500.0, 750.0, 1000.0 and 1285.0 μg/ml (repeat mutation experiment)
Control groups
negative controls: untreated control & cultures treated with the solvent
positive controls:
without metabolic activation: EMS (Ethyl methane sulfonate)
with metabolic activation: DMBA (9,10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene)
Formulation of test compounds: suspended in DMSO at appropriate concentrations immediately before use.
Formulation of reference compounds: EMS dissolved in cell culture medium on the day of treatment, final concentration: 1.0 mg/ml = 8 mM.
DMBA dissolved in DMSO and frozen in small portions. Aliquot thawed on the day of treatment, final concentration in cell culture medium: 7.7 μg/ml = 30 μM
Source of biological material: cell bank of "Genetic Toxicology", HMR Deutschland GmbH, ProTox
Test organism: cell line V79 of Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts
Cell culture medium: MEM (minimal essential medium) with Hanks-salts and 25 mM Hepes-buffer
Experimental conditions in vitro: approx. 37 °C and approx. 4 % CO2 in plastic flasks
Observations and Measurements
Preparation and storage of a liver homogenate fraction (S9)
The S9 fraction was prepared by the testing facility according to Ames et. al (1975). Male Sprague Dawley rats (200-300 g), supplied by Harlan Winkelmann, Gartenstrasse 27, 33178 Borchen, Germany, received a single intraperitoneal injection of Aroclor 1254 (500 mg/kg body weight) 5 days before killing. The livers were removed from at least 5-6 animals at approx. 0 to 4 °C using cold sterile solutions and glassware, and were then pooled and washed in approx. 150 mM KCI (approximately 1 ml/g wet liver). The washed livers were cut into small pieces and homogenized in three volumes of KCI. The homogenate was cenfrifuged at approx. 9000g for 10 minutes. The supernatant, the S9 fraction, was divided into small portions, rapidly frozen and stored at approx. - 80 °C for not longer than six months. The protein content was determined for every batch. Also for every batch of S9 an independent validation was performed with a minimum of two different mutagens, e.g., 2-aminoanthracene and dimethylbenzanthracene to confirm metabolic activation by microsomal enzymes.
Preparation of S9-mix
Sufficient S9 fraction was thawed to room temperature immediately before each test. An appropriate quantity of S9 fraction (batch no. 98/1 for both mutation experiments, protein concentration 51.8 g/l) was mixed with S9 cofactor solution to yield a final protein concentration of 0.3 mg/ml in the cultures which was kept on ice until used. This preparation is termed S9-mix. The concentrations of the different components of the S9-mix were:
8 mM MgCI3
33 mM KCI
5 mM glucose-6-phosphate
5 mM NADP
100 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.4
Cell culture
Large stocks of the mycoplasma-free V79 cell line are stored in liquid nitrogen in the cell bank of "Genetic Toxicology", thus permitting repeated use of the same cell culture batch for numerous experiments. The identical characteristics of the cells ensure comparability of the experimental parameters.
Thawed stock cultures were kept at approx. 37 °C and approx. 4 % C03 in 175 cm2 plastic flasks. About 5 x 105 to 1 x 106 cells were seeded into each flask in 30 ml of MEM-medium supplement with approx. 10 % (v/v) FCS (fetal calf serum) containing approx. 2 mM L-glutamine and approx. 0.1 % (w/v) neomycinsulfate. The cells were subcultured twice a week.
For the selection of mutants the medium was supplemented with approx. 11 μg/ml thioguanine.
Toxicity experiments and dose range finding
A preliminary toxicity test was undertaken in order to select appropriate dose levels for the mutation assay. In this test a wide range of dose levels of test compound was used. Cell cultures were subjected to the same treatment conditions as in mutation assays, and the survival of the cells was subsequently determined.
The test included the following treatments:
Solvent control : the maximum final concentration of organic solvents will not exceed approx. 1 % (v/v).
Test compound : the highest dose level for the preliminary toxicity test was determined by the solubility of the test compound up to the maximum of 10 mM or 5000 μg/ml.
Treatments were performed both in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system using a single cell culture at each test point.
Test procedure
In preliminary toxicity experiments approximately 4500 cells were seeded in each well of a microliter plate, allowed to attach overnight and then exposed to the test and control compound for four hours.
For each concentration at least 6 wells were used. Approx. 24 hours after treatment, the cells were fixed and stained with crystal violet.
Survival was determined by measurement of the crystal violet extinction.
In the main mutation experiments the cultures for assessing toxicity were prepared and treated with the test compound in the same way as for the preliminary experiment. 24 hours after seeding of approx. 4500 cells per well in a microtiter plate, the medium was replaced with serum-reduced (5 % v/v) medium containing the test compound to which either buffer or S9-mix was added as appropriate. After 4 hours the treatment medium was replaced with normal medium after rinsing twice with this. The cultures were stained with crystal violet and survival was determined after an incubation period of approx. 24 hours.
Rationale for dose selection
For non-toxic, freely soluble test compounds, the top dose should be 10 mM or 5000 ug/ml according to international testing guidelines.
For non-toxic, poorly soluble test compounds, the top dose should be the highest evaluable dose.
For toxic compounds the percentage survival relative to the solvent control should be calculated for each treatment. The dose level which resulted in a predicted survival of less than 30 % should be chosen as the highest dose level. At least eight respectively seven lower dose levels should be also included in each experiment.
Mutagenicity test
Two independent mutation tests were performed.
Two-day old, exponentially growing cultures which were more than 50 % confluent were trypsinated and a single cell suspension was prepared. The trypsin concentration was approx. 0.25 % (v/v) in Ca-Mg-free salt solution. The Ca-Mg-free salt solution was prepared as follows (per liter): NaCI 6.8 g; Ka 0.4 g; glucose 1 g; NaHC03 2.2 g; phenol red 5 mg; trypsin 2.5 g.
Subsequently the cells were replated to determine the mutation frequency and plating efficiency.
The treatment schedule of the mutagenicity test is described below:
Day 1: Subculturing of an exponentially growing culture
a) Approx. 4500 cells in each well of a microtiter plate for determination of the plating efficiency.
b) 6x 105 - 1 x 106 cells in 175 cm2 flasks with 30 ml medium for the mutagenicity test, one flask per experimental point.
Day 2: Treatment of a) and b) with the test compound in the presence and absence of S9-mix (final protein concentration: approx. 0.3 mg/ml) for 4 hours.
Day 3: Fixation and staining of the cells in a) for the determination of the plating efficiency.
Day 5: Subculturing of b) in 175 cm2 flasks
Day 9: Subculturing of b) in five 75 cm1 flasks with culture medium containing 6-thioguanine:
Mutant selection (about 300 000 cells/flask);
subculturing of b) in two 25 cm2 flasks for plating efficiency (about 400 cells per flask)
Day 16: Fixation and staining of colonies of b) - from subcultures seeded on day 9.
All incubations were carried out at approx. 37 °C and 4 % CO2.
Staining was performed with approx. 10 % (v/v) methylene blue in approx. 0.01 % (w/v) KOH solution.
Only colonies with more than 50 cells were counted. - Evaluation criteria:
- Evaluation of data
Criteria for a valid assay
The assay is considered valid if the following criteria are met:
the solvent control data are within the laboratory's normal control range for the spontaneous mutant frequency
the positive controls induced increases in the mutation frequency which were both statistically significant and within the laboratory's normal range
the plating efficacy for the solvent control was greater than 50 %
Criteria for a positive response
The test compound is classified as mutagenic if:
it reproducibly induces with one of the test compound concentrations a mutation frequency that is three times higher than the spontaneous mutant frequency in this experiment
there is a reproducible dose-related increase in the mutation frequency. Such an evaluation may be considered independently from the number induced mutants
survival of the responding dose group is at least 30 %
However, in a case by case evaluation both decisions depend on the level of the corresponding negative control data. - Statistics:
- The biometry of the results for the test compound is performed off-line with the MANN-WHITNEY-U-TEST
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Solubility and toxicity
T-9601 was suspended in DMSO.
Evaluation of the solubility of that suspension in cell culture medium showed that 1285.0 μg/ml was the highest practicable concentration and produced precipitate.
Accordingly, the preliminary toxicity study was carried out using a maximum concentration of 1285.0 μg/ml and a range of lower dose levels down to 10.0 pg/ml.
Following treatment in the absence of S9 metabolic activation, several toxicity was observed. Survival declined in a dose-related manner reaching 23.0 % of the solvent control value at the concentration of 750 μg/ml.
In the presence of S9 metabolic activation survival declined steeply up to the concentration of 500.0 μg/ml where survival was reduced to 64.8 % of the solvent control value.
Based on these results 1285 μg/ml was selected as the maximum dose level for the main mutation experiments in both the absence and in the presence of S9-mix. Ten lower concentrations down to 5 μg/ml were included in the main mutation experiment and seven lower concentrations down to 50 μg/ml in the repeat mutation experiment.
Mutagenicity
Experimental design
Two independent mutation assays to examine resistance to 6-thioguanine were performed.
In the absence and in the presence of S9 metabolic activation dose levels of 5.0, 7.5, 12.5, 25.0, 50.0, 75.0,125.0, 250.0, 500.0, 750.0 and 1285.0 μg/ml were used in the main mutation experiment, For the repeat mutation experiment a dose range of 50.0, 75.0, 125.0, 250.0, 500.0, 750.0, 1000.0 and 1285.0 μg/ml was selected in the absence and in the presence of S9-mix.
Before treatment, the pH values and osmolality of the treatment media were determined. The addition of test compound solutions did not have any effect on these parameters.
Survival after treatment
In the absence of S9 metabolic activation in both mutation experiments a dose-related decrease in survival was observed reaching 53.2 % respectively 39.4 % of the solvent control value in the microtiter plates at the highest dose level tested, 1285.0 μg/ml.
In the presence of S9 metabolic activation survival decreased in a dose-related manner reaching approximately 45.3 % respectively 53.8 % of the solvent control value in the microtiter plates after treatment at the highest dose level, 1285.0 μg/ml.
Mutation results
The test compound T-9601 was assessed for its mutagenic potential in vitro in the HPRT-test in two independent experiments without metabolic activation and two independent experiments with metabolic activation.
In the presence of metabolic activation a statistically significant increase of the mutation frequency was observed only at a concentration of 7.5 μg/ml. This effect was not dose-dependent and not three fold higher than the corresponding controls and therefore of no biological relevance.
No relevant reproducible increases in the mutant colonies or mutant frequency over the range of the solvent control was found with any of the concentrations used, either with or without metabolic activation by S9-mix.
The sensitivity of the test system and efficacy of the S9-mix was demonstrated by the enhanced mutation frequency in the cell cultures treated with the positive control compounds. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Toxicity Data (Main mutation experiment)
|
Dose μg/ml |
S9-mix |
Extinction in microwell plates mean less blank values |
Standard deviation |
Relative survival* |
Negative control |
0.0 |
- |
0.572 |
0.02 |
121.5 |
+ |
0.451 |
0.05 |
125.3 |
||
Solvent control |
0.0 |
- |
0.471 |
0.04 |
100.0 |
- |
0.424 |
0.06 |
100.0 |
||
+ |
0.360 |
0.06 |
100.0 |
||
+ |
0.411 |
0.08 |
100.0 |
||
Positive control |
1000.0 |
- |
0.504 |
0.01 |
107.0 |
7.7 |
+ |
0.361 |
0.04 |
100.3 |
|
T-9601 |
5.0 |
- |
0.499 |
0.02 |
105.9 |
+ |
0.461 |
0.03 |
128.0 |
||
7.5 |
- |
0.529 |
0.08 |
112.3 |
|
+ |
0.462 |
0.03 |
128.3 |
||
12.5 |
- |
0.495 |
0.02 |
105.0 |
|
+ |
0.448 |
0.04 |
124.4 |
||
25.0 |
- |
0.440 |
0.01 |
93.5 |
|
+ |
0.437 |
0.03 |
121.4 |
||
50.0 |
- |
0.420 |
0.02 |
89.1 # |
|
+ |
0.378 |
0.03 |
105.2 # |
||
75.0 |
- |
0.398 |
0.02 |
84.1 # |
|
+ |
0.413 |
0.03 |
114.7 # |
||
125.0 |
- |
0.483 |
0.10 |
113.9 # |
|
+ |
0.387 |
0.03 |
94.2 # |
||
250.0 |
- |
0.319 |
0.02 |
75.2 #§ |
|
+ |
0.418 |
0.05 |
101.8 #§ |
||
500.0 |
- |
0.253 |
0.02 |
59.6 #§ |
|
+ |
0.325 |
0.05 |
79.1 #§ |
||
750.0 |
- |
0.276 |
0.02 |
65.2 #§ |
|
+ |
0.256 |
0.05 |
62.3 #§ |
||
1285.0 |
- |
0.226 |
0.03 |
63.2 #§ |
|
+ |
0.186 |
0.04 |
45.3 #§ |
# microscopical visible precipitation
§ macroscopical visible precipitation
* relative survival (mean value / mean value corresponding control x 100)
Solvent = DMSO
Positive control without S9-mix = EMS
Positive control with S9-mix = DMBA
Mutagenicity Data – Part 1 (Main experiment)
|
Dose μg/ml |
S9-mix |
Number of cells per flask |
Factor* calculated |
Cells* seeded |
Cells*** survived |
|||
Seeded |
Found |
Mean |
|||||||
I / II |
I |
II |
|||||||
Negative control |
0.0 |
- |
403 |
158.0 |
164.5 |
161.3 |
0.40 |
342900 |
137203 |
+ |
401 |
101.0 |
98.0 |
99.5 |
0.25 |
337500 |
83744 |
||
Solvent control 1 (DMSO) |
0.0 |
- |
398 |
370.5 |
370.0 |
370.3 |
0.93 |
292350 |
271966 |
+ |
399 |
370.0 |
372.0 |
371.0 |
0.93 |
298800 |
277832 |
||
Solvent control 2 (DMSO) |
0.0 |
- |
400 |
313.0 |
323.5 |
318.3 |
0.80 |
291150 |
231646 |
+ |
402 |
201.5 |
200.5 |
201.0 |
0.50 |
287700 |
143850 |
||
Positive control (EMS) |
1000.0 |
- |
400 |
288.0 |
273.5 |
280.8 |
0.70 |
285000 |
200034 |
Positive control (DMBA) |
7.7 |
+ |
398 |
281.0 |
299.0 |
290.0 |
0.73 |
276750 |
201652 |
T-9601 |
5.0 |
- |
399 |
258.5 |
261.0 |
259.8 |
0.65 |
291900 |
190028 |
+ |
400 |
368.0 |
386.5 |
377.3 |
0.94 |
258600 |
243892 |
||
7.5 |
- |
401 |
188.5 |
191.5 |
190.0 |
0.47 |
291000 |
137880 |
|
+ |
401 |
284.0 |
274.0 |
279.0 |
0.70 |
326400 |
227096 |
||
12.5 |
- |
399 |
278.0 |
277.0 |
277.5 |
0.70 |
307800 |
214071 |
|
+ |
394 |
271.0 |
278.5 |
274.8 |
0.70 |
331650 |
231271 |
||
25.0 |
- |
399 |
348.0 |
362.5 |
355.3 |
0.89 |
294300 |
262030 |
|
+ |
402 |
361.5 |
380.0 |
370.8 |
0.92 |
276150 |
254683 |
||
50.0 |
- |
403 |
320.0 |
310.5 |
315.3 |
0.78 |
288150 |
225408 |
|
+ |
402 |
292.5 |
296.0 |
294.3 |
0.73 |
280650 |
205426 |
||
75.0 |
- |
399 |
357.0 |
338.5 |
347.8 |
0.87 |
294300 |
256498 |
|
+ |
405 |
276.5 |
272.5 |
274.5 |
0.68 |
299250 |
202825 |
||
125.0 |
- |
400 |
381.0 |
338.0 |
359.5 |
0.90 |
294300 |
264502 |
|
+ |
399 |
340.0 |
351.0 |
345.5 |
0.87 |
269400 |
233277 |
||
250.0 |
- |
402 |
368.0 |
353.0 |
360.5 |
0.90 |
288750 |
258941 |
|
+ |
401 |
450.5 |
449.0 |
449.8 |
1.12 |
258150 |
289534 |
||
500.0 |
- |
403 |
322.0 |
314.0 |
318.0 |
0.79 |
279750 |
220748 |
|
+ |
402 |
302.0 |
314.5 |
308.3 |
0.77 |
288900 |
221526 |
||
750.0 |
- |
402 |
271.0 |
299.5 |
285.3 |
0.71 |
349200 |
247784 |
|
+ |
399 |
313.0 |
314.0 |
313.5 |
0.79 |
336000 |
264000 |
||
1285.0 |
- |
400 |
156.0 |
144.0 |
150.0 |
0.38 |
337500 |
126563 |
|
+ |
405 |
301.0 |
306.5 |
303.8 |
0.75 |
347250 |
260438 |
* Factor calculated: mean value / number of cells per flask seeded
** Cells seeded in 6-thioguanine (TG) containing medium
*** Cells survived after plating in (TG) containing medium (cells seeded x factor calculated)
Mutagenicity Data – Part 2 (Main experiment)
|
Dose μg/ml |
S9-mix |
Number of mutant colonies |
Standard deviation |
Mutation frequency |
Stat. sig. |
|||||
I |
II |
III |
IV |
V |
Mean |
||||||
Negative control |
0.0 |
- |
1 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
2.2 |
1.30 |
16.0 |
|
+ |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
1.6 |
1.14 |
19.1 |
|
||
Solvent control 1 (DMSO) |
0.0 |
- |
3 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2.0 |
1.00 |
7.4 |
|
+ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
1.4 |
0.89 |
5.0 |
|
||
Solvent control 2 (DMSO) |
0.0 |
- |
9 |
11 |
6 |
3 |
6 |
7.0 |
3.08 |
30.2 |
|
+ |
3 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
2 |
3.0 |
2.35 |
20.9 |
|
||
Positive control (EMS) |
1000.0 |
- |
166 |
147 |
161 |
156 |
148 |
155.8 |
8.20 |
777.9 |
* |
Positive control (DMBA) |
7.7 |
+ |
35 |
35 |
45 |
40 |
36 |
38.2 |
4.32 |
189.4 |
* |
T-9601 |
5.0 |
- |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
1.0 |
1.22 |
5.3 |
|
+ |
5 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2.2 |
1.79 |
9.0 |
|
||
7.5 |
- |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1.0 |
0.71 |
7.3 |
|
|
+ |
8 |
5 |
12 |
10 |
6 |
8.2 |
2.88 |
35.1 |
* |
||
12.5 |
- |
3 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
2.6 |
1.52 |
12.1 |
|
|
+ |
3 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
2.0 |
1.00 |
8.6 |
|
||
25.0 |
- |
5 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
3.2 |
1.79 |
12.2 |
|
|
+ |
1 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
2.6 |
1.52 |
10.2 |
|
||
50.0 |
- |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
1.2 |
1.64 |
5.3 |
|
|
+ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
1.2 |
1.10 |
5.8 |
|
||
75.0 |
- |
1 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
3.4 |
1.82 |
13.3 |
|
|
+ |
5 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
8 |
4.6 |
3.05 |
22.7 |
|
||
125.0 |
- |
1 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1.8 |
1.48 |
6.8 |
|
|
+ |
2 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
3 |
3.0 |
2.35 |
12.9 |
|
||
250.0 |
- |
5 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
3.8 |
1.79 |
14.7 |
|
|
+ |
5 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
2.6 |
1.95 |
9.0 |
|
||
500.0 |
- |
4 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3.0 |
2.00 |
13.6 |
|
|
+ |
4 |
1 |
8 |
3 |
5 |
4.2 |
2.59 |
19.0 |
|
||
750.0 |
- |
6 |
7 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
4.8 |
1.79 |
19.4 |
|
|
+ |
11 |
8 |
2 |
7 |
11 |
7.8 |
3.70 |
29.5 |
|
||
1285.0 |
- |
1 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
4.0 |
2.00 |
31.6 |
|
|
+ |
1 |
7 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3.0 |
2.35 |
11.5 |
|
Mutation frequency (mutant colonies per 1 million cells); mean value / cells surviving
* Statistical significant (p≤0.05) Mann-Whitney-U-Test
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- T-9601 did not induce gene mutation, i.e. was not mutagenic, in this HPRT-test with V79 Chinese hamster cells, either in the presence or in the absence of metabolic activation.
- Executive summary:
The present study was conducted in compliance with OECD Guideline For Testing Of Chemicals, 476 "Genetic Toxicology: In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test". Adopted: July 21, 1997 and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Health Effect Test Guidelines, OPPTS 870.5300, In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test, august 1998 and In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test EEC Directive 87/302, L133, pp. 61 - 63, March 1987. This study was conducted in compliance with the Principles of Good Laboratory Practice (GLP).
The study was performed to investigate the potential of T-9601 to induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in V79 cells of the Chinese hamster in vitro.
Two independent experiments were conducted both with and without an exogenous rat liver microsomal activation system (S9-mix).
The compound was suspended in DMSO and tested at the following concentrations:
without S9-mix; 5.0, 7.5, 12.5, 25.0, 50.0, 75.0. 125.0, 250.0, 500.0, 750.0 and1285.0 μg/ml (main mutation experiment)
50.0, 75.0, 125.0, 250.0, 500.0, 750.0, 1000.0 and 1285.0 μg/ml (repeat mutation experiment)
With S9 -mix: 5.0, 7.5, 12.5, 25.0, 50.0, 75.0, 125.0, 250.0, 500.0, 750.0 and 1285.0 μg/ml (main mutaation experiment)
50.0, 75.0, 125.0, 250.0, 500.0, 750.0, 1000.0 and 1285.0 μg/ml (repeat mutation experiment)
The concentration ranges were based on the results of preliminary tests for solubility and toxicity. The highest concentration showed slight toxic effects with and several toxic effects without metabolic activation.
In the presence of metabolic activation a significant increase of the mutation frequency was observed only at a concentration of 7.5 μg/ml. This effect was not dose-dependent and not three fold higher than the corresponding controls and therefore of no biological relevance.
Up to the highest investigated dose no further increase in mutant colony numbers was obtained in two independent experiments.
Appropriate reference mutagens used as positive controls showed a distinct increase in induced mutant colonies, thus indicating the sensitivity of the assay, and the efficacy of the S9-mix.
In conclusion, T-9601 does not induce gene mutations in the HPRT-test with V79 Chinese hamster cells, both in the presence as well as in the absence of a metabolic activation system under the experimental conditions described.
T-9601 is therefore considered to be non-mutagenic in this HPRT assay.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.