Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Effects on fertility

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
Remarks:
based on test type (migrated information)
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2013
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study was conducted according to GLP and valid methods and is considered relevant and reliable for classification.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Limit test:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
other: CD® / Crl:CD(SD)
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Source: Charles River Laboratories Research, Models and Services Germany GmbH, Sandhofer Weg 7, 97633 Sulzfeld, Germany
- Age at start of dosing : Males 55 days; Females: 48 days
- Weight range at start of dosing: Males: 281.0 to 308.0 g; Females: 68.9 to 195.7 g
- Fasting period before study: Ad libitum with exception of the night before the day of blood withdrawal for laboratory examination.
- Housing: With exception of the mating period, the animals were kept singly in MAKROLON
cages (type III plus) with a basal surface of approx. 39 cm x 23 cm and a height of approx. 18 cm. Granulated textured wood (Granulat A2, J. Brandenburg, 49424 Goldenstedt/ Arkeburg, Germany) is used as bedding material in these cages. The cages were cleaned and changed once a week.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ssniff® R/Z V1324 (ssniff Spezialdiäten GmbH, 59494 Soest, Germany, ad libitum with exception of the night before the day of blood withdrawal for laboratory examination.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Tap water is offered daily ad libitum.
- Acclimation period: At least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22°C ± 3°C (maximum range)
- Humidity (%): 55% ± 15% (maximum range)
- Air changes (per hr): Not provided
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES:
Males From: August 27, 2012 To: October 2, 2012
Females From: August 27, 2012 To: October 19, 2012
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
other: tap water
Details on exposure:
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
Application volume: 5 mL/kg bw/day. The test item was dissolved in the vehicle tap water to concentrations of 20, 60 and 200 mg test item /mL tap water and was administered orally at a constant volume once daily. The amount of the test item was adjusted to the animal's current body weight daily. The test item-vehicle mixture was freshly prepared every day.


Details on mating procedure:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1/1 (1 male and 1 female animal were placed in one cage during the dark period)
- Length of cohabitation: The female was placed with the same male until pregnancy occurred or 2 weeks had elapsed.
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug / sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- After approx. 14 days of unsuccessful pairing replacement of first male by another male with proven fertility.
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: yes. This mating-procedure was repeated until at least 8 pregnant dams were available for each group.
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged (how): singly in MAKROLON cages (type III plus) with a basal surface of approx. 39 cm x 23 cm and a height of approx. 18 cm. On the other side of the animal room than the males with each dose group separated by an empty row.



Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
For the analysis of the test item-vehicle mixtures samples of approx. 2 x 5 mL were taken at the following time points and stored at ≤ -20°C until analysis at LPT.
*Start of treatment period: Analysis of stability and concentration: Immediately after preparation of the test item-vehicle mixtures as well as 8 and 24 hours after storage of the test item preparations at room temperature: 3 samples/dose level group = 9 samples
*End of treatment period: Concentration: During treatment with the test item always before administration to the last animal/dose level group: 3 samples
The samples were labelled with the study number, test item, test species, type of sample, aliquot number, concentration, test day, sampling time and date.
The validation of the analytical method is part of LPT study No. 28344 (14-day dose-range-finding).
The measured actual concentrations of the test item in the test item vehicle mixtures were between 99.99% and 102.96% of the nominal concentrations (table 26).
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Males: 2 weeks prior to mating, during the mating period and approx. 2 weeks post mating at least until the minimum total dosing period of 28 days has been completed (up to and including the day before sacrifice).
Females: 2 weeks prior to mating and continuing up to, and including, day 3 post-partum or the day before sacrifice.
Frequency of treatment:
daily
Details on study schedule:
- Age at mating of the mated animals in the study:10 weeks
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
actual ingested
No. of animals per sex per dose:
10
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale:
The dose levels have been selected in agreement with the Sponsor based on the results of a 14-day dose-range-finding study in rats dosed at 100, 300 and 1000 mg act. ingr./kg bw by oral gavage (LPT Study No. 28344). None of the animals died prematurely. None of the male and female rats treated orally with 100 or 300 mg act. ingr./kg bw/day revealed any changes in behaviour, external appearance or faeces. Salivation was noted for 2 of 5 male animals treated at 1000 mg/kg bw/day on 1 or 3 test days starting on test day 9 and increased faeces was noted for 3 of 5 male and 2 of 5 female high dosed animals on 6 or 9 test days starting on test day 5. No test item-related changes on body weight and body weight gain were noted for the male and female rats up to 1000 mg act. ingr./kg bw/day. No test item-related changes on food consumption were noted for the male and female rats treated orally with 100 or 300 mg act. ingr./kg bw/day. The food consumption of the male and female animals treated with 1000 mg act. ingr./kg bw/day was slightly increased by 9% for the males and by 10% for the females in test week 2 (statistically significant at p ≤ 0.01 for both sexes). No test item-related influence was noted for the drinking water consumption at any of the tested dose levels. None of the male and female rats treated orally with 100, 300 or 1000 mg act. ingr ./kg bw/day revealed changes at macroscopic inspection at necropsy or organ weights.
Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Throughout the test period, each animal was observed for clinical signs at least once daily. Mortality was recorded twice daily. In addition, animals were checked regularly throughout the working day from 7:00 a.m. to 3:45 p.m. On Saturdays and Sundays animals were checked regularly from 7:00 a.m. to 11 :00 a.m. with a final check performed at approximately 3:30 p.m.
- Individual animals were observed before and after dosing at each time of dosing for any signs of behavioural changes, reaction to treatment or illness. Cageside observations included skin/fur, eyes, mucous membranes, respiratory and circulatory systems, somatomotor activity and behaviour patterns. The onset, intensity and duration of any signs observed were recorded.

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Additionally, once before the first exposure (to allow within-subject comparisons) and once a week thereafter, detailed clinical observations were made in all animals outside the home cage in a standard arena and at the same time, each time preferably by observers unaware of the treatment. Signs noted included changes in skin, fur, eyes, mucous membranes, occurrence of secretions and excretions and autonomic activity (e.g. lacrimation, pilo-erection, pupil size, and unusual respiratory pattern). Changes in gait, posture and response to handling as well as the presence of clonic or tonic movements, stereotypies (e.g. excessive grooming, repetitive circling), difficult or prolonged parturition or bizarre behaviour (e.g. self-mutilation, walking backwards) were also recorded.

BODY WEIGHT: Yes. Body weights were recorded individually for each adult animal.
- Time schedule for examinations:
Males and females were weighed on the first day of dosing, weekly thereafter and at termination. During gestation, females were weighed on days 0, 7, 14 and 20 and within 24 hours of parturition (day 0 or 1 post-partum) and day 4 post-partum.

FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes
The quantity of food left by individual animals was recorded on a weekly basis throughout the experimental period with the execution of the mating period. Food intake per rat (g/rat/week) was calculated using the total amount of food given to and left by each rat in each group on completion of a treatment week.

WATER CONSUMPTION:
- Time schedule for examinations: Water consumption was monitored daily by visual appraisal throughout the study.

HAEMATOLOGY: see Section 7.5.1

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: See Section 7.5.1

NEUROLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS: see Section 7.5.1

REPRODUCTIVE PARAMETERS:
Number of pregnant females
Pre-coital time
Gestation length calculated from day 0 of pregnancy
Corpora lutea
lmplantation sites
Number of (viable) pups day0/4


REPRODUCTIVE INDICES:
Gestation Index
Fertility Index
Birth Index
Live Birth Index
Viability Index
Pre-implantation loss [%]
Post-implantation loss [%]


Sperm parameters (parental animals):
Parameters examined in P male parental generations:
testis weight, epididymis weight
At the time of sacrifice or death during the study, the adult animals were examined macroscopically for any abnormalities or pathological changes. Special attention was paid to the organs of the reproductive system.
The following organs or parts of organs of all male adult animals were fixed in 7% formalin; testes and epididymides were fixed in Bouin' s fixative:
Epididymis (2), Gross lesions, Prostate, Seminal vesicle, Testicle (2).
Detailed histopathologic examination was performed on one testicle and one epididymis (with special emphasis on the qualitative stages of spermatogenesis and histopathology of interstitial testicular structure) of all adult males of groups 1 to 4 following H-E and PAS staining.


Litter observations:
STANDARDISATION OF LITTERS
- screening study: Dead pups and pups sacrificed at day 4 post-partum, or shortly thereafter, were carefully examined externally for gross abnormalities.

PARAMETERS EXAMINED
Number of pups absolute (total/live)
Number of pups per dam (total/live)
Number of male and female pups (total/live)
Number of stillbirths
Mean pup weight

GROSS EXAMINATION OF DEAD PUPS:
yes, for external and internal abnormalities; possible cause of death was not determined for pups born or found dead.
Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
SACRIFICE
- Male animals: All surviving animals: The male animals are sacrificed after a minimum total dosing period of 28 days if no longer needed for further mating.
- Maternal animals: All surviving animals: Dams with offspring are sacrificed on day 4 postpartum, or shortly thereafter. Females showing no evidence of copulation are sacrificed 24 days after the last day of the mating period.

GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.

HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
Microscopic examination and organ weights of all adult male animals identified as left or right: Epididymis (2) ,Testicle (2)
The following organs or parts of organs of all adult animals are fixed in 7% formalin; testes and epididymides will be fixed in Bouin' s fixative:
Epididymis (2), Gross lesions, Mammary gland, Ovary (2), Prostate, Seminal vesicle, Testicle (2), Uterus (incl. cervix and oviducts), Vagina.


Postmortem examinations (offspring):
SACRIFICE
- The F1 offspring were sacrificed at 4 days of age.
- These animals were subjected to postmortem examinations macroscopic examination) as follows:
Dead pups and pups sacrificed at day 4 post-partum, or shortly thereafter, were carefully examined externally for gross abnormalities.
The animals were sacrificed under ether anaesthesia by cutting the aorta abdominalis, exsanguinated, weighed, dissected and inspected macroscopically. All superficial tissues were examined visually and by palpation and the cranial roof removed to allow observation of the brain, pituitary gland and cranial nerves. After ventral midline incision and skin reflection all subcutaneous tissues were examined. The condition of the thoracic viscera were noted with due attention to the thymus, lymph nodes and heart.
The abdominal viscera were examined before and after removal; the urinary bladder was examined externally and by palpation. The gastro-intestinal tract was examined as a whole and the stomach and caecum were incised and examined.
The lungs were removed and all pleural surfaces examined under suitable illumination.
The liver and the kidneys were examined. Any abnormalities in the appearance and size of the gonads, adrenals, uterus, intra-abdominal lymph nodes and accessory reproductive organs were recorded.

GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.

Statistics:
Toxicology and Pathology data were captured, whenever possible, using the departmental computerized systems (Provantis®8 Integrated preclinical software, Instem LSS Ltd.). Raw data not fully compatible with the computerized systems were maintained on paper according to appropriate SOPs.
The test item-treated groups (2 - 4) were compared with the control group (1 ).

The following statistical methods were used:

STUDENT' s t-test: All numerical functional tests (p ≤0.01)

Multiple t-test based on DUNNETT, C. W., New tables for multiple comparisons with a control, Biometrics, 482-491 (Sept 1 964): Body weight I Food consumption I Haematology I Clinical chemistry I Absolute and relative organ weights: (p ≤ 0.05 and ≤0.01)

For all numerical values (e.g. body weight, food consumption and organ weight data) homogeneity of variances was tested by using the BARTLETT chi2-test.

lf the variances are homogeneous, the DUNNETT test (p ≤ 0.01) was used to compare the experimental groups with the control group.

In case of heterogeneity of variances, the STUDENT's t-test was carried out; limit of significance is p ≤ 0.01.

Exact test of R. A. FISHER: Histopathology, if applicable (p≤0.05)

For the comparison of classification measurements (for example the fertility index) the FISHER's exact test, n < 100 or chi2-test with Yates' correction for continuity, n ≥ 100 (p ≤0.05 and p ≤0.01) were employed.

These statistical procedures were used for all data. Significantly different data were indicated in the tables of the report.
The mean values and standard deviations were calculated to the highest possible degree of accuracy and then rounded to the reported number of decimal places. Hence, deviations to the last decimal place of up to ± 1 may occur caused by rounding.

Reproductive indices:
Gestation Index
Fertility Index
Pre-implantation loss [%]
Post-implantation loss [%]


Offspring viability indices:
Birth Index
Live Birth Index
Viability Index
Clinical signs:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
slightly increased salivation in one male rat dosed at 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
slight reduction iin male and female rats dosed at 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
slight reduction iin male and female rats dosed at 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
effects observed, treatment-related
Other effects:
no effects observed
Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
not examined
Reproductive function: sperm measures:
not examined
Reproductive performance:
no effects observed
CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
No test item-related premature death was noted in any treatment group (100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day).
No signs of clinical toxicity were noted for the male and female rats of the low and intermediate dose groups (100 and 300 mg/kg bw/day).
A slightly increased salivation was noted in one male rat, no further signs of clinical toxicity were noted for the male and female rats of the high dose group (1000 mg/kg bw/day). No test item related influence was noted for the male and female rats of all treatment groups (100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day) during the observational and functional (grip strength and spontaneous motility) neurological screenings.

BODY WEIGHT AND FOOD CONSUMPTION (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
A slight reduction in body weight was noted for the male and female rats of the high dose group (1000 mg/kg bw/day). For the male rats the reduction in body weight was noted from test day 8 (4.4%) until test day 36 (5.5%) and for the female rats from gestation day 0 (7.6%) until lactation day 4 (9.5%). The body weight at autopsy was reduced accordingly.

A slightly statistically significant (p ≤ 0.01) increase in relative food consumption by 10.3% was noted in the high dose males during the 2nd test week. This was caused by the reduced body weight of the rats of the high dose group.
No influence on food consumption was noted in any treatment group in the females.

REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
Pre-coital time: No test item-related influence was noted.
Gestation length: No test item-related influence was noted.
Evaluation of reproduction parameters of the dams:
No test item-related differences were noted in the number of corpora lutea, the number of implantation sites and the number of pups between the dams from the control group and those from the treatment groups.

ORGAN WEIGHTS (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
No test item-related influence was noted.
For other organs: see Section 7.5.1.

GROSS PATHOLOGY (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
No effects on the reproductive organs.
For other organs: see Section 7.5.1.

HISTOPATHOLOGY (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
No effects on the reproductive organs.
For other organs: see Section 7.5.1.
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Remarks:
reproductive toxicity
Effect level:
>= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Based on:
act. ingr.
Sex:
male/female
Clinical signs:
not examined
Mortality / viability:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Sexual maturation:
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
not examined
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings:
not examined
VIABILITY (OFFSPRING)
No test item-related influence was noted on the survival rate of the pups.

BODY WEIGHT (OFFSPRING)
No test item related influence was noted on the mean and the total body weight of the pups on lactation day 1 and 4.

GROSS PATHOLOGY (OFFSPRING)
No visible gross abnormalities were noted between the control and the treatment groups

Reproductive effects observed:
not specified

Table 1. Fertility and Reproductive parameters Parental generation

Parameter

Group 1

Control

Group 2

100 mg/kg

Group 3

300 mg/kg

Group 4

1000 mg/kg

No. of females evaluated for pre-coital time

10

10

10

10

Mean precoital interval (days)

4.5

3.4

3.9

2.6

No. of females evaluated for fertility

10

10

10

10

Number of pregnant dams

8

9

9

10

Fertility index (%)

80

90

90

100

No. of females evaluated for gestation length

8

9

9

10

Gestation length (days)

22.0

22.2

22.2

22.1

Number of dams with live pups

8

9

9

10

Gestation Index (%)

100

100

100

100

Corpora lutea(total)

110

137

129

142

Corpora lutea(mean)

13.8

15.2

14.3

14.2

Implantation sites (total)

110

131

128

139

Implantation sites (mean)

13.8

14.6

14.2

13.9

Number of pups at birth (total)

96

125

123

127

Number of pups at birth (mean)

12.0

13.9

13.7

12.7

Birth Index (mean %)

90.4

95.5

95.9

90.1

Birth Index (total# %)

87

951

96 1

90.1

Number of stillbirths

0

0

1

0

No. of dams with stillborn pups

0

0

1

0

Number of live born pups (total)

96

125

123

126

Number of live born pups (mean)

12.0

13.9

13.7

12.6

Live birth index (mean %)

100.0

100.0

100.0

97.5

Live birth index (total#1 %)

100

100

100

99

Pre-implantation loss (mean %)

0.0

4.4

0.7

1.9

Pre-implantation loss (total#2  %)

0.0

4.42

0.8

2.1

Post-implantation loss (mean %)

9.6

4.5

4.1

11.2

Post-implantation loss (total#3 %)

12.7

4.62

3.92

9.4

Number of runts

0

0

0

0

Number of malformed pups

0

0

0

0

# based on the total No. of implantation sites and total No. of pups at birth (alive and dead)

#1 based on the total No. live born pups and total No. of pups at birth (alive and dead)

#2 based on the total No. corpora lutea and total No. of implantation sites

#3 based on the total No. implantation sites and toal number of live born pups

1 p≤0.05 Chi2-test

2 p<0.05 Chi2-test

Conclusions:
NOAEL (no-observed-adverse-effect level) for reproductive toxicity: >= 1000 mg/kg bw/day, p.o.
Executive summary:

The aim of the study was to obtain information on possible effects of the test item on general toxicity, reproduction and/or development according to OECD guideline 422. The test item was administered orally by gavage to rats at dose levels of 100, 300 and 1000 mg active ingredient/kg bw/day. The application started two weeks before mating on test day one and ended on the day or one day before sacrifice. Day of sacrifice was on test day 37 for the male rats and between lactation day 4 and 7 for the female rats.

Effects on the parental generation (general toxicity)
No test item-related premature death was noted in any treatment group (100, 300 and 1000 mg test item/kg bw/day).

No signs of clinical toxicity were noted for the male and female rats of the low and intermediate dose groups (100 and 300 mg test item/kg bw/day). A slightly increased salivation was noted in one male rat, no further signs of clinical toxicity were noted for the male and female rats of the high dose group (1000 mg test item/kg bw/day). A slight reduction in body weight was noted for the male and female rats of the high dose group (1000 mg test item/kg bw/day). For the male rats the reduction in body weight was noted from test day 8 (4.4%) until test day 36 (5.5%) and for the female rats from gestation day 0 (7.6%) until lactation day 4 (9.5%). The body weight at autopsy was reduced accordingly.

Effects on reproduction parameters and organs

No test item-related influence was noted on the reproduction parameters in any treatment group (100, 300 and1000 mg/kg bw/day).

Microscopic examination revealed no changes in the reproductive organs from the male and female rats of the high dose group (1000 mg/kg bw/day).

Effects on the F0-generation

NOAEL (no-observed-adverse-effect level): 300 mg/kg bw/day, p.o.

Effects on reproductive toxicity

NOAEL (no-observed-adverse-effect level): >=1000 mg/kg bw/day, p.o.

 

Effect on fertility: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
1 000 mg/kg bw/day
Study duration:
subacute
Species:
rat
Quality of whole database:
Reliable quality (Klimisch2)
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Additional information

Reproductive screening
No test data were available for current substance, however read across data were available from 'Butanedioic acid, 2(or 3)-sulfo-, 4-[2-[(1-oxo(C12-C18(even numbered) and C18unsaturated)alkyl))amino]ethyl]esters, disodium salts'. Justification for read across within the subgroups of N-containing sulphosuccinates is documented in a separate document attached in Section 13.

A key study for repeated dose toxicity was performed by means of an oral combined repeated dose and reproduction/development screening study according to OECD guideline 422 (Hansen, 2013e). The test item (liquid formulation) containing 41.5% active ingredient was administered orally by gavage to rats at dose levels of 100, 300 and 1000 mg act. ingr./kg bw/day for for at least 28 days in male rats and at least 39 days in females. No test item-related premature death was noted in any treatment group. No signs of clinical toxicity were noted for the male and female rats of the low and intermediate dose groups (100 and 300 mg/kg bw/day), whereas slightly increased salivation was noted in one male rat as the only finding at 1000 mg/kg bw/day. A slight reduction in body weight was noted for the male and female rats dosed at 1000 mg/kg bw/day. Other parameters such as neurological observations, haematology and serum chemistry are discussed in the repeated dose toxicity section.
No test item-related influence was noted on the reproduction toxicity parameters in any treatment group (100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day).
Microscopic examination revealed no changes in the reproductive organs from the male and female rats of the high dose group (1000 mg/kg bw/day). NOAEL for systemic toxicity was 300 mg/kg bw/day, whereas NOAEL for reproductive toxicity was >= 1000 mg/kg bw.

 

Multigeneration studies
Further data on reproductive toxicity were available from read across substance Docusate sodium (CAS No. 577-11-7). Justification for read across with the category of Di-ester sulphosuccinates is documented in a separate document attached in Section 13.

- A key 3-generation toxicity study at dietary dose levels of 0.1, 0.5 and 1.0% in the diet (MacKenzie, 1986) conducted according to OECD caused a reduction in body weights at the dose levels of 0.5 and 1% in the diet for parental males of all generations and for F1 and F2 females. Pup weights at the 0.5% and 1.0% dose levels were lower than those of the control in all three generations, however this did not interfere with growth and development or reproductive performance, and had no adverse effects at levels on the reproductive function of either sex in any generation up to 1%. There were no other effects on parental or reproductive parameters. The NOEL for body weights of parental animals and offspring was 0.1%; the NOEL for reproductive parameters was 1.0%, which was considered to correspond with approximately 750 mg/kg bw/day.
- In a supporting 2-generation toxicity study in rats, 0.5 and 1% were given in the diet (Levinskas & Shaffer, 1970). In the first mating of the F0 generation and the second mating of the F2 generation, pups were weaned directly onto the diets which were being fed to their parents. In the other 3 matings of this study, dams were given a control diet on the day before delivery to avoid a bitter taste of the milk. Pups of all litters were examined for gross defects. Autopsies were performed, however, only on pups from the first mating of the F2 animals. Portions of all major organs were taken for histopathology processing and examination from one male and female from each litter. The other male and female were skinned and eviscerated, and the carcasses cleared, and the skeletons stained and examined for defects. In both the first mating of the F0 generation and the second mating of the F2 generation, the fertility and gestation indices were high and comparable. The viability index was good, albeit slightly down for the F3b pups, while the lactation index was depressed for both of these matings. In addition, the mean weight of the pups at weaning decreased with increasing concentrations of test material in the diet of the dams. In the second mating of the F0 animals, the viability and lactation indices and the mean weight of the test pups at weaning still showed decreases relative to the control values. However, in the 2 subsequent matings, all indices for the dosed animals were numerically high and compared favorably with the corresponding control values. Also, the mean weight of the pups at weaning was essentially similar for all groups. Consequently, it is concluded that diets containing 1% or less had no adverse effect on the reproduction and lactation performance of rats. The lowering of the survival rate and the mean body weight of the F1a and F3b pups is attributed to an impairment of nutrition as a result of the taste which is believed to have been secreted into the milk of the dams. Microscopic study of tissues showed findings which were similar in all groups. In processing the skeletons, the presence of an extra sternebrae in the sternum between the 5th and 6th sternebrae was not considered to parental exposure of test material. It is concluded that feeding of test material to rats from weaning through reproductive age for successive generations at levels of 1%, or less, did not produce lesions or anomalies in the offspring which could be attributed to the compound.

 

Conclusion
 An oral gavage reproductive screening study with read across substance Butanedioic acid, 2(or 3)-sulfo-, 4-[2-[(1-oxo(C12-C18(even numbered)andC18unsaturated)alkyl)) amino]ethyl]esters, disodium salts showed NOAEL of 300 mg/kg bw for paternal/maternal toxicity, whereas 1000 mg/kg bw was NOAEL for reproductive and developmental toxicity.

Multigeneration studies with read across substance Docusate dodium (CAS 577-11-7) showed slight maternal/paternal toxicity at 0.5 and 1% in the diet, however this was not confirmed in the second study. From both studies, it can be concluded that the substance up to 1% in the diet did not lead to effects on fertility or postnatal development; this concentration corresponds with 750 mg/kg bw/day, which is higher than the NOAEL for paternal/maternal toxicity. Based on the absence of reproductive findings in the screening study, the repeated dose studies and the multigeneration studies with with structurally similar substances, no further testing is needed for registered substance.


Short description of key information:
A key study for reproductive toxicity in rats by was available from an OECD 422 study with a liquid formulation containing 41.5% active ingredient of read across substance Butanedioic acid, 2(or 3)-sulfo-, 4-[2-[(1-oxo(C12-C18(even numbered) and C18unsaturated)alkyl))amino]ethyl]esters, disodium salts, at dose levels of 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day. No reproductive toxicity effects were observed up to 1000 mg/kg bw. At the dose of 1000 mg/kg bw, decrease body weight and other systemic effects were observed, therefore NOAEL for systemic toxicity was 300 mg/kg bw/day, whereas NOAEL for reproductive toxicity was 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Read-across from CAS no. 577-11-7 (Docusate sodium) three-generation study according to OECD TG 416 and GLP showed decreased body weights in P, F1 and F2 generations at 0.5 and 1% dietary concentrations (the latter corresponding with 750 mg/kg bw), however these were not considered adverse and were not associated with any other (reproductive) findings. In a second (supporting) two-generation study the highest concentration of 1% in the diet corresponding with 750 mg act. ingr./kg bw was NOAEL.

Justification for selection of Effect on fertility via oral route:
key study

Effects on developmental toxicity

Description of key information
Developmental toxicity was not observed in the oral combined repeated dose and reproduction/development screening study according to OECD guideline 422 with read across substance Butanedioic acid, 2(or 3)-sulfo-, 4-[2-[(1-oxo(C12-C18(even numbered) and C18unsaturated)alkyl))amino]ethyl]esters, disodium salts. Rats were dosed at 100, 300 and 1000 mg act. ingr./kg bw/day.  No test item related influence was noted on the survival rate and the mean and total body weights of the pups. External examination of the pups revealed no visible changes related to the test item. NOAEL for systemic toxicity was 300 mg/kg bw/day, whereas NOAEL for reproductive and developmental toxicity was >= 1000 mg/kg bw.
Prenatal developmental toxicity was tested by dietary administration of read across substance Docusate sodium in rats from day 6 to 15 of gestation. 1% in the diet was a maternal and developmental NOAEL, whereas at 2% in the diet visceral and skeletal anomalies were observed, which were considered secondary to maternal toxicity. This was confirmed in a similar study with Docusate calcium given at subtoxic and toxic dose levels, where the same could be observed.
Based on the absence of developmental findings in the screening study and teratogenicity study with structurally similar substances, no further testing is needed for registered subtance.
Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
developmental toxicity
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1976
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
only 2 doses tested. Allthough not all details on the study design were provided, the study was performed to the highest standards at the time of conduct. In the current study, a concurrent test article, dioctyl calcium sulfosuccinate (DCS) was also tested at 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2% in the diet.
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
GLP compliance:
no
Limit test:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories
- Age at study initiation: About 2 months
- Weight at study initiation: Not provided
- Fasting period before study: Not provided
- Housing: Individually in hanging wire mesh cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Wayne Lab Meal ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Acclimation period: Not provided

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 24 ± 2°C
- Humidity (%): 50 ± 5%
- Air changes (per hr): Not provided
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12


Route of administration:
oral: feed
Vehicle:
corn oil
Details on exposure:
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: 40% solution in corn oil

DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): Not provided
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): 1.0% and 2.0% admixed in Wayne Lab Meal
- Storage temperature of food: Not provided

VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water):
- Concentration in vehicle: 40% solution in corn oil
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage):/
- Lot/batch no. (if required): Not provided
- Purity: Not provided
Details on mating procedure:
Not provided
Duration of treatment / exposure:
gestational days 6 through 15: dosing
Duration of test:
gestational days 6 through 15: dosing
gestational day 21: killing of the mothers and removing fetuses by cesarean section
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
1.0 % DSS , 2.0% DSS
Basis:

No. of animals per sex per dose:
22 female rats in dose 1.0% DSS
20 female rats in dose 2.0% DSS
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
Not provided
Maternal examinations:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes (clinical condition and signs of illness)
- Time schedule: each day
- Cage side observations were not included.

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations:

FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Yes
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: Yes

POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day #21
- Organs examined: Ovaries and uterine content


Ovaries and uterine content:
The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: No
- Number of corpora lutea: No
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of resorptions: Yes
Fetal examinations:
- External examinations: Yes (3336 of conceptuses)
- Soft tissue examinations: No
- Skeletal examinations: Yes (one half of the total number of fetuses)
- Head examinations: No
-Visceral examinations: Yes (one-half of the total number of fetuses were fixed in Bouin’s fluid for a detailed examination of visceral anomalies, using the slicing method of Wilson)

Statistics:
Maternal body-weight gains, maternal food consumptions and fetal weights were analyzed by Dunnett’s two-sided, multiple comparison test. Frequencies of resorptions and fetal abnormalities among litters were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test or the Chi-square test (with Yate’s correction), as appropriate.
Dose descriptor:
NOAEC
Effect level:
1 other: %
Based on:
act. ingr.
Remarks:
in the diet
Basis for effect level:
other: maternal toxicity
Dose descriptor:
NOAEC
Effect level:
1 other: %
Based on:
act. ingr.
Remarks:
in the diet
Basis for effect level:
other: developmental toxicity
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
1 074 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Based on:
act. ingr.
Basis for effect level:
other: maternal toxicity
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
1 074 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Based on:
act. ingr.
Basis for effect level:
other: developmental toxicity
Abnormalities:
not specified
Developmental effects observed:
not specified

TABLE 1. Maternal and fetal results of pregnant rats given various amounts if DSS in their diets during   

                gestational days 6 through 15.

Parameter

Dose:      Control        

1.0% DSS

2.0% DSS

Maternal

Groups:            (I-A)

(II-A)

(II-B)

No. of pregnant rats

43

22

20

No. of pregnancies with total resorptions

0

0

1

No. of pregnancies with viable fetuses

43

22

19

Average weight gain of dams with viable fetuses(g):

 

 

 

Days 6 to 15

78

86

52*

Days 15 to 21

66

67

77

Avarage, apparent food intake of dams with viable fetuses (g/rat/day):

 

 

 

Days 6 to 15

22.5

24.8

21.4

Days 15 to 21

28.6

32.1

33.4

Calculated compound consumed (mg/kg/day)

--

1074

1988

Litters

 

 

 

Total number of:

implantations

 

411

 

203

 

219

Resorptions

(% occurence)

23

(5.6)

8

(3.9)

30*a

(13.7)

Dead fetuses

(% occurrence)

3

(0.7)

0

1

(0.5)

Viable fetuses

(% occurrence)

385

(93.7)

195

(96.1)

188

(85.5)

Fetal weight (g)

4.6

5.2

4.7

Litters size (viable fetuses)

8.9

8.9

9.9

External major malformations1:

No. of litters affected

(% occurrence)

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

 

5*

(25.0)

No. of fetuses affected

(% occurrence)

 

0

 

0

36*a

(20.2)

* Significantly different from control (p< 0.05)

a Significance by Chi-square, but not Mann-Whitney U test

1 Primarily, exencephaly varying degrees and associated anomalies (See TABLE 2)

    

TABLE 2. Morphological observations of fetuses delivered from rats given DSS in their diets on

                gestational days 6 through 15.

Morphology

Dose:        Control

1.0% DSS

2.0% DSS

External observations1:

Groups:    (I-A)

(II-A)

(II-B)

Total number examined

388a

195

189

Major anomalies:

  Adactyly

 

0

 

0

 

0

  Hemimelia

0

0

0

  Schistocelia

0

0

2

  Dome shaped head

0

0

0

  Cranial bubble (1-2mm)

0

0

9*

  Exencephaly

0

0

18*

  Exencephaly (cleft condition)

0

0

7*

  Anencephaly

0

0

0

  Spina bifida

0

0

6

  Macroglossia

0

0

0

  Micro- or anophtalmia

0

0

3

Defects:

  Hematoma (subcutaneous)

 

2

 

0

 

0

  Edamatous abdomen

0

0

0

  Tail short & curled

0

0

0

  Abducted fifth digit, left

   Rear foot

0

0

1

1 Fetuses may have more than one defect

a Fifty-four fetuses examined grossly only. (Shipment c valid as controls only)

      *Significantly different from control (p< 0.05) by Chi-square only

 

TABLE 3. Visceral observations of fetuses delivered from rats given DSS in their diets on gestation days

                 6 through 15.

Visceral observations

Dose:      Control

1.0 % DSS

2.0% DSS

Groups:       (I-A)

(II-A)

(II-B)

Total number of fetuses examined

165a

98

91

Defects1:

  Exencephalous   characteristics                     

 

0

 

0

 

11*

  Dilated lateral ventricles

1

3

5

  Microphtalmia

0

1

0

  Anolphtalmia

0

0

23*

  Retinal foldings

0

0

0

  Anotia or microtia

0

0

0

  Cleft palate

0

0

1

  Situs transversus – aorta, esophagus

  & stomach

1

0

0

  Intestinal agenesis

0

0

0

  Arch of aorta absent or right sided

0

0

0

  Diaphragmic hernia

0

0

1

  Dilated renal pelves

2

0

3

  Ectopic kidneys(s) &/or variation in size

1

0

0

  Renal agenesis

0

0

2

  Dilated ureters

6

0

3

  Adrenal agenesis

0

0

1

  Testes – ectopic or enlarged

1

0

1

  Hermaphroditism

0

0

3

1Fetuses may have more than one defect

aExcludes 1 fetus lost

*Significantly different from control (p<0.05) by Chi-square only

TABLE 4. Skeletal observations of fetuses delivered from rats given DSS in their diets on gestation days

                6 through 15.

 

Skeletal observations

Dose:      Control

1.0 % DSS

2.0% DSS

Groups:       (I-A)

(II-A)

(II-B)

Total number of fetuses examined

167a

97

98

Defects1:

  Cranial bones,

  incomplete to lack of ossification :

   Nasal                    

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

4

   Frontal

1

0

20*

   Parietal

1

1

19*

   Interparietal

1

2

18*

   Supraoccipital

0

0

15*

   Exoccipital

0

0

2

   Atlas

0

0

1

   Zygomatic

0

0

1

   Premaxilla

0

0

1

   Tympanic bullae

0

0

5

   Mandibles

0

0

1

   Hyoid

0

0

3

  Eye orbit, reduction

0

0

0

  Exoccipital, fused to atlas

0

0

0

  Vertebrla column, curved &/or open

0

0

5

  Vertebrae:

 

 

 

   misshapened &/or retarded 

   development

0

0

5

   thoracic, bipartite centra

2

1

5

   lumbar, bipartite centra

0

0

2

  Sternebrae:

 

 

 

   fused

0

0

0

   hypoplastic to absent

0

0

1

   one or two absent

1

0

0

   staircase

0

0

3

   bipartite

0

0

2

  Rib(s):

 

 

 

   accesory

6

5

5

   Absent or less developed

0

0

7*

   wavy

2

2

0

   fused

0

0

2

  Pelvic, hypoplastic to absent

0

0

0

  Brachydactyly

0

0

0

  Syndactyly

0

0

0

  Adactyly

0

0

0

  Hemimelia & small scapula

0

0

 0

1Fetuses may have more than one defect

aExcludes 1 fetus destroyed during cleaning process

*Significantly different from control (p<0.05) by Chi-square only

 

Conclusions:
Subtoxic dietary levels of 1.0% docusate sodium ingested on gestational days 6 through 15 showed no adverse effects on the various maternal or fetal parameters. Near toxic or toxic dietary levels of 2.0% DSS produced significant incidences of resorptions (13.7%) and gross abnormalities either among litters (25.0%) or fetal populations (20.2%) as compared to controls. Interpretation of the results of the present experiments, in which only maternally toxic dose levels induce teratogenicity, indicates no real hazard with the recommended human use of these surfactants.
Executive summary:

Prenatal developmental toxicity was studied in rats dosed from day 6 to day 15 of gestation by dietary administration of docusate sodium at dose levels of 1.0 and 2.0 % in the diet.Subtoxic dietary levels of 1.0% showed no adverse effects on the various maternal or fetal parameters. Near toxic or toxic dietary levels of 2.0% docusate sodium produced significant depressions in maternal weight-gains and increased incidences of resorptions (13.7%) and gross abnormalities either among litters (25.0%) or fetal populations (20.2%) as compared the controls. These abnormalities consisted primarily of exencephaly of varying degrees with, at times, spina bifida, anophtalmia and associated skeletal defects. The visceral observations confirmed the significance of the exencephalous characteristics and anophtalmia for the group given dietary levels of 2.0%. In this group, skeletal observations revealed a significant incidence of incomplete ossification to absence of the various cranial bones, a curved or open vertebral column, and a variety of defects of the vertebrae and ribs. There were significant depressions in maternal weight gains in the 2.0% DSS-group . Interpretation of the results of the present experiment, in which only maternally toxic dose levels induce teratogenicity, indicates no real hazard with the recommended human use of these surfactants.

The concentration of 1% in the diet is considered as maternal and developmental NOAEL. This dose level corresponded with 1074 mg/kg body weight, as calculated in the study.

Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
1 000 mg/kg bw/day
Study duration:
subacute
Species:
rat
Quality of whole database:
Reliable quality (Klimisch2)
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Additional information

Developmental screening
No test data were available for current substance, however read across data were available from Butanedioic acid, 2(or 3)-sulfo-, 4-[2-[(1-oxo(C12-C18(even numbered) and C18unsaturated)alkyl))amino]ethyl]esters, disodium salts. Justification for read across within the category of N-containing sulphosuccinates (N2 subcategory) is documented in a separate document attached in Section 13.

Supporting data for absence of developmental toxicity were available from an oral combined repeated dose and reproduction/development screening study according to OECD guideline 422 (Hansen, 2013e). The test item was administered orally by gavage to rats with a formulation containing 41.5% active ingredient at dose levels of 100, 300 and 1000 mg act. ingr./kg bw/day for at least 28 days in male rats and at least 39 days in females. No test item-related premature death was noted in any treatment group. No signs of clinical toxicity were noted for the male and female rats of the low and intermediate dose groups (100 and 300 mg/kg bw/day), whereas slightly increased salivation was noted in one male rat as the only finding at 1000 mg/kg bw/day. A slight reduction in body weight was noted for the male and female rats dosed at 1000 mg/kg bw/day. Other parameters such as neurological observations, haematology and serum chemistry are discussed in the repeated dose toxicity section.

No test item-related influence was noted on the developmental toxicity parameters in any treatment group (100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day). Microscopic examination revealed no changes in the reproductive organs from the male and female rats of the high dose group (1000 mg/kg bw/day). No test item related influence was noted on the survival rate and the mean and total body weights of the pups. External examination of the pups revealed no visible changes related to the test item. NOAEL for systemic toxicity was 300 mg/kg bw/day, whereas NOAEL for reproductive and developmental toxicity was >= 1000 mg/kg bw.

 

Teratogenicity testing
Further data on prenatal developmental toxicity were available from read across substance Docusate sodium (CAS No. 577-11-7). Justification for read across with the category of Di-ester sulphosuccinates is documented in a separate document attached in Section 13.

- A key study for prenatal developmental toxicity was performed in rats dosed from day 6-15 of gestation with read across substance Docusate sodium dosed at dietary dose levels of 1.0 and 2.0 % in the diet (Roell et al., 1976). The study was conducted according to OECD 414 guideline, and was considered to be reliable, adequate and relevant. Subtoxic dietary levels of 1.0% showed no adverse effects on the various maternal or fetal parameters. Toxic dietary levels of 2.0% Docusate sodium produced significant depressions in maternal weight-gains and increased incidences of resorptions (13.7%) and gross abnormalities either among litters (25.0%) or fetal populations (20.2%) as compared to controls. These abnormalities consisted primarily of exencephaly of varying degrees with, at times, spina bifida, anophthalmia and associated skeletal defects. The visceral observations confirmed the significance of the exencephalous characteristics and anophthalmia for the group given dietary levels of 2.0%. In this group, skeletal observations revealed a significant incidence of incomplete ossification to absence of the various cranial bones, a curved or open vertebral column, and a variety of defects of the vertebrae and ribs. Interpretation of the results of the present experiment, in which only maternally toxic doses induce teratogenicity, indicates no real hazard with the recommended human use of these surfactants. The concentration of 1% in the diet is considered as maternal and developmental NOAEL. This dose level corresponded with a test article intake of 1074 mg/kg body weight, as calculated in the study.
- As supporting information, prenatal developmental toxicity was also studied in rats by dietary administration of Docusate 'calcium' (DCS) at dose levels of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 % in the diet as well as by oral gavage at 250, 500, 750 and 1000 mg/kg bw (Roell et all., 1976). Subtoxic dietary levels of 0.5 and 1.0% Docusate calcium ingested on gestational days 6 through 15 showed no adverse effects on the various maternal or fetal parameters. Near toxic or toxic dietary levels of 1.5 and 2.0% DCS produced significant incidences of resorptions and gross abnormalities consisting primarily of exencephaly of varying degrees with spina bifida, anophthalmia and associated skeletal defects. However, dietary levels of 2% of DCS fed to pregnant rats for 3 days (days 6-8, 8-10 or 10-12) did not produce teratogenic response. Also, DCS given to pregnant rats by oral intubation at maternally subtoxic doses (250-750 mg/kg) and a slightly toxic dose (1000 mg/kg) did not lead to malformations, however the incidence of resorptions was increased at the 2 toxic doses. Likewise doses of 500 and 750 mg/kg given by gavage from day 6-15 produced an increase in resorptions at the highest dose without a teratogenic effect. Since only maternally toxic doses fed on gestational day 6-15 produced embryotoxic and teratogenic effects, it is concluded that no real hazard exists.

 

Conclusion
An oral gavage reproductive screening study with read across substance Butanedioic acid, 2(or 3)-sulfo-, 4-[2-[(1-oxo(C12-C18(even numbered) andC18unsaturated)alkyl) amino ]ethyl]esters, disodium salts showed NOAEL of 300 mg/kg bw for paternal/maternal systemic toxicity, whereas 1000 mg/kg bw was NOAEL for reproductive and developmental toxicity.

Prenatal developmental toxicity was tested by dietary administration of read across substance Docusate sodium in rats from day 6 to 15 of gestation. 1% in the diet was a maternal and developmental NOAEL corresponding to 1074 mg/kg bw, whereas at 2% in the diet visceral and skeletal anomalies were observed, which were considreed secondary to maternal toxicity. This was confirmed in a similar study with Docusate calcium given at subtoxic and toxic dose levels, where the same could be observed.

Based on the absence of developmental findings in the screening study and teratogenicity study with structurally similar substances, no further testing is needed wiht registered substance.


Justification for selection of Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route:
Supporting study

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on these results and according to the EC Directive (No.93/21/EEC) and CLP (No. 1272/2008 of 16 December 2008), the test item does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labelling requirement for repeated dose toxicity.

Additional information