Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 211-077-7 | CAS number: 629-15-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- three-generation reproductive toxicity
- Remarks:
- based on test type (migrated information)
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Acceptable, well documented publication which meets basic scientific principles.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 986
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 416 (Two-Generation Reproduction Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- limited documentation; no examination of oestrus cycle or sperm parameters
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Ethane-1,2-diol
- EC Number:
- 203-473-3
- EC Name:
- Ethane-1,2-diol
- Cas Number:
- 107-21-1
- Molecular formula:
- C2H6O2
- IUPAC Name:
- Ethane-1,2-diol
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Ethylene glycol (EG) or 1,2-ethanediol
- Physical state: clear, odorless, colorless liquid
- Analytical purity: 99.82%
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): 0.18% diethylene glycol
- Purity test date: 1978-03-27
- Source: Union Carbide Corporation, Hahnville, Louisiana, USA
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Fischer 344
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Wilmington, USA
- Age at study initiation: 7 weeks
- Housing: animals were housed in groups of 2 in stainless-steel wire cages.
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-24°C
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on exposure:
- DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): fresh diet was prepared every 2 weeks with the percentage of ethylene glycol adjusted, based on the group mean body weight and food consumption, to maintain a relatively constant dosage level. - Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage: at approximately 100 days of age, 10 males were mated to 20 females in each dosage group (1/2)
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged: individually - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- through 3 generations (not further information)
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily, 7 days/week
- Details on study schedule:
- - F1 parental animals not mated until 100 days after selected from the F1 litters.
- Selection of parents from F1 generation when pups were 100 days of age.
- Age at mating of the mated animals in the study: 100 days
- Brother and sister matings were avoided for each generation.
- The F1 and F2 rats were treated as described for the P animals until approximately 100 days of age, at which time the animals were cohabited.
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
40, 200 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
nominal in diet
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10 males, 20 females
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Details on study design:
- - Other: the concentration of ethylene glycol in the diet was not changed during gestation or during the first week of lactation, but was reduced two- and threefold during the second and third weeks of lactation, respectively, to adjust for increased food consumption by the dams. This change in concentration was based on earlier unpublished results from the laboratory. Increased food consumption during lactation has since been reported in another study performed at the laboratory (Yang et al., 1984).
- Two untreated diet control groups were included to estimate the variation between two groups treated alike. - Positive control:
- In the dominant lethal study, 15 male F2 rats per dosage group from the reproduction study were removed from their ethylene glycol dosing regimen at 155 days of age and bred to three separate sets (one set per week) of 15 untreated females. Each female was killed on Day 12 of gestation, and the ovaries and uteri were examined for the number of live and dead fetuses. In addition, 15 diet control F2 males were given an ip dose of 0.50 g/kg of triethylenemelamine (TEM, Polysciences, Inc., Warrington, Pa.) on the day before mating (positive controls), and mated with three groups of females as previously described.
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: weekly except during gestation and lactation
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: weekly calculated dosage except during gestation and lactation - Litter observations:
- PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in [F1/F2/F3] offspring: the date of parturition and the number of live and dead newborn were recorded for each litter. The appearance and behaviour of dams and pups were observed daily. Offspring were weighed as litters at 4 and 14 days and individually at 21 days postpartum, the day they were weaned. Litter size was randomly reduced to 10, if necessary, on Day 4 postpartum. F1 rats were randomly selected within each dosage group for the next mating. Each litter was represented except for those conceived very late in the mating period. - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- SACRIFICE
- Necropsies were performed on five males and five females randomly selected from each dosage level of the F2 parents and the F3 weanlings
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of liver, kidneys, lung, heart, adrenals, thyroid, trachea, accessory sex glands, adipose tissue, lymph nodes, pituitary, thymus, and testes and epididymis, or uterus and ovaries
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
Microscopic examinations were performed on sections of liver, kidneys, lung, heart, adrenals, thyroid, trachea, accessory sex glands, adipose tissue, lymph nodes, pituitary, thymus, and testes and epididymis, or uterus and ovaries - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- SACRIFICE
- Necropsies were performed on five males and five females randomly selected from each dosage level of the F2 parents and the F3 weanlings
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of liver, kidneys, lung, heart, adrenals, thyroid, trachea, accessory sex glands, adipose tissue, lymph nodes, pituitary, thymus, and testes and epididymis, or uterus and ovaries
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
Microscopic examinations were performed on sections of liver, kidneys, lung, heart, adrenals, thyroid, trachea, accessory sex glands, adipose tissue, lymph nodes, pituitary, thymus, and testes and epididymis, or uterus and ovaries - Statistics:
- Continuous data such as body weights were compared by analysis of variance validated by Bartlett’s test for homogeneity of variance. Duncan’s multiple range test was used to identify individual mean differences when indicated by a significant F value. Where Bartlett’s test indicated heterogeneous variances tests for equal or unequal variances were used to delineate differences between groups. Pup weights were compared by the method of Weil (Weil, 1970). Discontinuous data such as implantations and reproductive indices were compared by a multiple sum of ranks test. Frequency data were compared by the x2 test and by exact test.
- Reproductive indices:
- The following reproductive indices were calculated and evaluated statistically by the previously described nonparametric methods: fertility index (male and female), days from first mating to parturition, gestation index, fraction of pregnancies that resulted in litters with live pups
- Offspring viability indices:
- Gestation survival index (fraction of newborn pups alive at birth), 0 to 4day survival index, 4 to 14 day survival index, 4 to 21-day survival index.
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
General toxicity (P0)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
Reproductive function / performance (P0)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
Details on results (P0)
No effects were observed.
BODY WEIGHT AND FOOD CONSUMPTION (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
No effects were observed.
TEST SUBSTANCE INTAKE (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
The calculated dosages based on the nominal concentrations of EG in the diet were generally very close to the dosage goals. The weekly calculated dosages ranged from 1.0 to 1.3, 0.2 to 0.3,and 0.04 to 0.05 g/kg/day for males and from 0.9 to 1.2, 0.2 to 0.3, and 0.04 to 0.06 g/kg/day for females.
REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
No effects were observed.
GROSS PATHOLOGY (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
No effects were observed.
HISTOPATHOLOGY (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
No effects were observed.
OTHER FINDINGS (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
Ethylene glycol administration did not lead to statistically significant adverse effects on any of the parameters measured in the three mating intervals. Slight apparent increases in the dominant lethal mutation index, observed during the Week 2 mating for the high-dose (1000 mg/kg bw/day) group and during the Week 3 mating for the low dose (0.04 g/kg bw/day) group, were probably random occurrences unrelated to EG treatment. This interpretation is consistent with the absence of a dose-response relationship and the fact that a negative index of similar magnitude (-8.2%) was observed for the low dose group in the Week 2 mating. When compared to the combined control groups, significant decreases were observed as a result of TEM treatment for the number of females with implants, the total number of implants and the number of live implants.
Effect levels (P0)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: overall effects
Results: F1 generation
General toxicity (F1)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Sexual maturation:
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- no effects observed
Details on results (F1)
There was no mortality of pups in any generation.
CLINICAL SIGNS (OFFSPRING):
No clinical signs had been observed.
BODY WEIGHT (OFFSPRING):
Treatment did not affect neonatal body weight at Days 4, 14 and 21 postpartum.
SEXUAL MATURATION (OFFSPRING):
The fertility inidces of any generation were not changed.
ORGAN WEIGHTS (OFFSPRING):
There were no treatment related findings in any weanlings.
GROSS PATHOLOGY (OFFSPRING):
No effects were observed.
HISTOPATHOLOGY (OFFSPRING):
There were no treatment related histopathological findings in F2 parents or F3 weanlings
OTHER FINDINGS (OFFSPRING):
The fertility index for male and female offspring, the days from first mating to parturition, the gestation index and the fraction of pregnancies that resulted in litters with live pups were not affected by treatment in any dose group.
Effect levels (F1)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: overall effects
Results: F2 generation
Effect levels (F2)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F2
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: overall effects
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.