Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study with acceptable restrictions; analytical purity of test material not specified

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2010
Report date:
2010

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
analytical purity of test material not specified
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Diisodecyl azelate
EC Number:
249-044-4
EC Name:
Diisodecyl azelate
Cas Number:
28472-97-1
Molecular formula:
Main component: C29H56O4
IUPAC Name:
C9-11 branched alcohols , C10 rich diesters with nonanedioic acid
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Diisodecyl azelate
- Physical state: clear yellow liquid
- Analytical purity: not indicated by the sponsor; treated as 100% pure
- Lot/batch No.: 033175
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 30 Nov 2011
- Stability under test conditions: stable
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature in the dark
- Density: 0.91 g/mL

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Deutschland, Sulzfeld, Germany
- Age at study initiation: approx. 11-12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: mean for males 323 g, mean for females 210 g, body weight variation did not exceed ± 20% of the sex mean
- Housing: individually housed in labeled Macrolon cages (MIII type, height 18 cm.) containing sterilized sawdust as bedding material (Litalabo, S.P.P.S., Argenteuil, France) and paper as cage enrichment (Enviro-dri, Wm. Lillico & Son (Wonham Mill Ltd), Surrey, United Kingdom)
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21.0 ± 3.0
- Humidity (%): 40-70
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 05 Jan 2010 To: 19 Jan 2010

Administration / exposure

Type of coverage:
occlusive
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on dermal exposure:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 25 cm² for males and 18 cm² for females
- % coverage: 10
- Type of wrap if used: surgical gauze patch (Surgy 1D), successively covered with aluminum foil and Coban elastic bandage, a piece of Micropore tape was additionally used for fixation of the bandages in females only

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Residual test substance was removed with tap water.
- Time after start of exposure: 24h

TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 2.20 mL/kg bw



Duration of exposure:
24 h
Doses:
2000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Mortality/Viability: Twice daily; Body weights: Days 1 (pre-administration), 8 and 15; Clinical signs: at periodic intervals on the day of dosing (Day 1) and once daily thereafter, until Day 15
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
No mortality occurred.
Clinical signs:
other: Flat posture and/or chromodacryorrhoea was observed among several animals on Day 1. Scales were seen in the treated skin-area of several animals between Days 4 and 13.
Gross pathology:
No abnormalities were found at macroscopic post mortem examination of the animals

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified