Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 245-910-0 | CAS number: 23847-08-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Toxic effect type:
- dose-dependent
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
No study required as available repeated dose toxicity studies do not indicate adverse effects on reproductive organs or tissues or reveal other concerns in relation with reproductive toxicity.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- extended one-generation reproductive toxicity - basic test design (Cohorts 1A, and 1B without extension)
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- other:
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
Reference
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
Developmental Toxicity: Han Wistar rats, 20/ group, 0, 25, 75 or 250 mg/kg/day on Day 6 to 19 after mating
, oral (gavage): NOAEL = 250 mg/kg/day (maternal toxicity & embryo-fetal survival and development) (OECD 414, GLP)
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
- Remarks:
- OECD 407
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
- Remarks:
- Range-finding study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- current guideline
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.31 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- current guideline
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.3700 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- current guideline
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Department of Health of the Government of the United Kingdom
- Limit test:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: At ambient temperature (15-25°C)
- Stability under test conditions: Stability of the formulation was confirmed for up to 8 days when stored refrigerated (2 to 8°C), and 24 hours when stored at ambient temperature (15 to 25°C)) at 1 and 100 mg/ml. - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Remarks:
- RccHan™;WIST rat
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Envigo RMS Limited
- Age at study initiation: 77 to 83 days old
- Weight at study initiation: 177 to 211 g (Day 0 of gestation)
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing:
Cages comprised of a polycarbonate body with a stainless steel mesh lid; changed at appropriate intervals.
Solid (polycarbonate) bottom cages were used during the acclimatization and gestation periods.
Grid bottomed cages were used during pairing. Cages were suspended above absorbent paper which was changed daily during pairing.
The cages constituting each group were blocked by group and mounted in batteries.
Solid bottom cages contained softwood based bark-free fiber bedding, which was changed at appropriate intervals each week.
Environmental Enrichment:
Aspen chew block : A soft white untreated wood block; provided to each cage throughout the study (except during pairing) and replaced when necessary.
Plastic shelter: Provided to each cage throughout the study (except during pairing) and replaced at the same time as the cages.
Number of animals per cage:
Acclimatization: up to four animals
During pairing: one (stock) male and one female
Gestation: one female
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): SDS VRF1 Certified pelleted diet ad libitum. The diet contained no added antibiotic or other chemotherapeutic or prophylactic agent.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Potable water ad libitum from the public supply via polycarbonate bottles with sipper tubes. Bottles were changed at appropriate intervals.
- Acclimation period: Five days before commencement of pairing
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): Monitored and maintained within the range of 20-24ºC.
- Humidity (%): Monitored and maintained within the range of 40-70%.
- Air changes (per hr): not stated, filtered fresh air which was passed to atmosphere and not recirculated.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): Artificial lighting, 12 hours light : 12 hours dark
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 8 March 2017 (animal arrival) To: 3 to 6 April 2017 (necropsy) - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: 98% Water with 2% Kolliphor EL(cremophor) v/v
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The required amount of test item was ground in a mortar using a pestle to a fine powder and mixed with a small amount of the vehicle to form a paste. Any agglomerates were broken down. Further amounts of vehicle were gradually added and mixed to produce a smooth, pourable suspension. The suspension was transferred to a measuring cylinder which had been wetted with vehicle, the mortar was rinsed with vehicle and this was added to the measuring cylinder. Vehicle was added to achieve the final volume and the suspension was transferred to a beaker and mixed using a high shear homogenizer.
A series of suspensions at the required concentrations were prepared by dilution of individual weighings of the test item.
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): Comparability with previous studies
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 2.5, 7.5, 25 mg/ml
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 10 ml/kg bw - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Before commencement of treatment, the suitability of the proposed mixing procedures was determined and specimen formulations at 1 and 100 mg/mL were analyzed to assess the stability and homogeneity of the test item in the liquid matrix.
Stability was confirmed for up to 8 days when stored refrigerated (2 to 8°C), and 24 hours when stored at ambient temperature (15 to 25°C)) at 1 and 100 mg/ml.
CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONSCHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS
High performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC)
Column: Poroshell 120 SB-C18 2.7 µm, 150 × 4.6mm
Column temperature: 45ºC
Sample temperature: Ambient
Mobile phase: Acetonitrile/0.05% aqueous formic acid 50/50 v/v
Flow rate: 0.8 mL/min
Rinse solvent: Acetonitrile/water 50/50 v/v
Detector wavelength: UV, 252 nm
Injection volume: 10 µL
Time constant: 1.0 sec
Sampling rate: 2 points/sec
Run time: 8 minutes
These conditions were established using a Waters Alliance 2695 separation module and 2487 detector.
Calibration standard range: 2 µg/mL – 10 µg/mL.
Extraction solvent: Acetonitrile / 0.05% aqueous formic acid 80/20 v/v
Diluent: Acetonitrile / 0.05% aqueous formic acid 50/50 v/v - Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- If cohoused:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1:1 with identified stock males
- Length of cohabitation: until pregnancy
- Proof of pregnancy: Ejected copulation plugs in cage tray and vaginal smears were checked for the presence of sperm. When positive evidence of mating was detected, this day referred to as day 0 of pregnancy. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Day 6-19 of pregnancy
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Duration of test:
- mating to necropsy (day 20 of pregnancy), 22-25 days
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- control
- Dose / conc.:
- 25 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 75 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 20 females, 20 stock males (not part of the study)
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: The doses used in this study (0, 25, 75 and 250 mg/kg/day) were selected in conjunction with the Sponsor.
The dose levels were chosen based on the results of the preliminary study for effects on embryo-fetal development in the Han Wistar rat by oral gavage administration.
In that study, dose levels of 10, 40 and 160 mg/kg/day were well tolerated with no clinical signs and no effect upon body weight or food consumption. There was no clear effect of maternal treatment upon numbers of corpora lutea, implantations, early, late and total resorptions, number of live young and sex ratio and the extent of pre and post-implantation loss. Placental, litter and fetal weights and litter size were also all unaffected by treatment.
As there were no clear treatment related findings, a dose level of 250 mg/kg/day was selected for the high dose (250 mg/kg/day was assessed on a 14 day dose range finder study where the main findings were changes in the forestomach, but not deaths). This was to try and elicit a slight treatment related response, as required by the regulatory authorities.
Therefore it was considered that dose levels of 25, 75 and 250 mg/kg/day would be suitable for use on this main study.
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): random
- Other: The oral gavage route of administration was chosen to simulate the conditions of possible human exposure. - Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Animals were inspected visually at least twice daily for evidence of ill-health or reaction to treatment. Cages were inspected daily for evidence of animal ill-health amongst the occupant(s). Any deviation from normal was recorded at the time in respect of nature and severity, date and time of onset, duration and progress of the observed condition, as appropriate.
During the acclimatization period, observations of the animals and their cages were recorded at least once per day.
Signs Associated with Dosing: Detailed observations were recorded daily during the treatment period at the following times in relation to dose administration: One to two hours after completion of dosing, As late as possible in the working day
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: A detailed physical examination was performed on each animal on Days 0, 5, 12, 18 and 20 after mating to monitor general health.
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: The weight of each adult was recorded on Days 0, 3 and 6-20 after mating.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE
The weight of food supplied to each adult, that remaining and an estimate of any spilled was recorded for the periods Days 0-2, 3-5, 6-9, 10-13, 14-17 and 18-19 after mating inclusive.
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day # 20
- Organs examined: All adult animals were subject to a detailed necropsy. After a review of the history of each animal, a full macroscopic examination of the tissues was performed. All external features and orifices were examined visually. Any abnormality in the appearance or size of any organ and tissue (external and cut surface) was recorded and the required tissue samples preserved in appropriate fixative.
OTHER: Reproductive Assessment
The following were recorded for all animals:
Uterus: Gravid uterine weight (including cervix and ovaries).
For each ovary/uterine horn, number of Corpora lutea, Implantation sites, Resorption sites (classified as early or late), Fetuses (live and dead).
Apparently non pregnant animals: The number of uterine implantation sites were checked after staining with ammonium sulphide [modification of the Salewski staining technique (Salewski, E, 1964)]. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes, including cervix and ovaries
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes
- Other: Fetuses (live and dead) - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: half per litter; 50% Sexed internally and eviscerated
- Skeletal examinations: Yes
- Head examinations: Yes: - Statistics:
- Due to limitations of this free text field, see "Any other information on materials and methods"
- Indices:
- Reproductive Assessment
Prenatal losses are separated into pre- and post-implantation phases. Pre-implantation loss was considered to reflect losses due to non-fertilization of ova and failure to implant. It was calculated from the formula:
Pre-implantation loss (%) = (Number of corpora lutea – Number of implantations) x 100 / Number of corpora lutea
Where the number of implantations exceeded the number of corpora lutea observed, pre implantation loss was assumed to be zero (i.e. no pre-implantation loss was considered to have occurred).
Post-implantation loss was calculated from the formula:
Post-implantation loss (%) = (Number of implantations – Number of live fetuses) x 100 / Number of implantations
All group values and SD (as appropriate) were calculated from the individual litter values. - Historical control data:
- available
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no clinical signs or signs observed following dose administration that were considered to be related to treatment with Caprolactam disulfide.
Two females receiving 250 mg/kg/day were observed with slight piloerection on Day 19 of gestation. - Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Overall group mean bodyweight gain (Days 6-20) and bodyweight gain on Days 6-7, 12-13 and 15-16 of gestation was slightly but statistically significantly lower for females receiving 250 mg/kg/day when compared with Controls.
Mean bodyweight and bodyweight gain for females receiving 25 or 75 mg/kg/day was similar to that of the Controls and were considered to be unaffected by treatment with Caprolactam disulfide.
Gravid uterine weight was essentially similar across all groups of females, with only females that received 250 mg/kg/day having a slightly but statistically significant lower adjusted maternal bodyweight change (Day 6 20) when compared with Controls (approximately 83% of Controls). - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Overall food consumption was considered unaffected by treatment with Caprolactam disulfide during Days 6- 19 of gestation when compared with Controls.
Food intake was slightly but statistically significantly lower during Days 6-9 of gestation for females receiving 250 mg/kg/day when compared with Controls. - Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Macroscopic examination of females treated with Caprolactam disulfide up to dose levels of 250 mg/kg/day on Day 20 of gestation did not reveal any findings considered to be related to treatment.
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- not examined
- Number of abortions:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- For females examined on Day 20 of gestation litter data showed no clear effects of maternal treatment, with mean numbers of implantations, early, late and total resorptions, number of live young and sex ratio and the extent of pre and post-implantation loss, essentially similar to Controls.
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- For females examined on Day 20 of gestation litter data showed no clear effects of maternal treatment, with mean numbers of implantations, early, late and total resorptions, number of live young and sex ratio and the extent of pre and post-implantation loss, essentially similar to Controls.
Sex ratio (% male) and pre-implantation loss was statistically significantly higher for females that received 25 mg/kg/day when compared with Controls, however, as the mean percentage of pre implantation loss was within the Historical Control Data range (4.6-11.4%, 4 main embryo-fetal studies, 2016-2017) and there was no dose response, hence these findings were not considered related to treatment. - Total litter losses by resorption:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- For females examined on Day 20 of gestation litter data showed no clear effects of maternal treatment, with mean numbers of implantations, early, late and total resorptions, number of live young and sex ratio and the extent of pre and post-implantation loss, essentially similar to Controls.
- Early or late resorptions:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- For females examined on Day 20 of gestation litter data showed no clear effects of maternal treatment, with mean numbers of implantations, early, late and total resorptions, number of live young and sex ratio and the extent of pre and post-implantation loss, essentially similar to Controls.
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- none stated
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Pregancy was terminated on Day 20.
Migrated Data from removed field(s)
Field "Effects on pregnancy duration" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsMaternalAnimals.MaternalDevelopmentalToxicity.EffectsOnPregnancyDuration): not specified
Field "Description (incidence and severity)" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsMaternalAnimals.MaternalDevelopmentalToxicity.DescriptionIncidenceAndSeverityEffectsOnPregnancyDuration): Pregancy was terminated on Day 20. - Changes in number of pregnant:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- One female receiving 250 mg/kg/day was not pregnant, all other females were pregnant.
- Other effects:
- not examined
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 250 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- changes in number of pregnant
- clinical signs
- dead fetuses
- early or late resorptions
- effects on pregnancy duration
- food consumption and compound intake
- gross pathology
- maternal abnormalities
- mortality
- necropsy findings
- number of abortions
- pre and post implantation loss
- total litter losses by resorption
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
- Remarks:
- highest dose tested
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
- Fetal body weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Placental, litter and fetal weights were unaffected by treatment with Caprolactam disulfide when compared with Controls.
Migrated Data from removed field(s)
Field "Fetal/pup body weight changes" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsFetuses.FetalPupBodyWeightChanges): not examined - Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- number of live young essentially similar to Controls
- Changes in sex ratio:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Sex ratio (% male) and pre-implantation loss was statistically significantly higher for females that received 25 mg/kg/day when compared with Controls, however, as the mean percentage of pre implantation loss was within the Historical Control Data range (4.6-11.4%, 4 main embryo-fetal studies, 2016-2017) and there was no dose response, hence these findings were not considered related to treatment.
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Placental, litter and fetal weights were unaffected by treatment with Caprolactam disulfide when compared with Controls.
- Changes in postnatal survival:
- not examined
- External malformations:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The incidence of major and minor abnormalities and skeletal variants showed no relationship to treatment.
- Skeletal malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The incidence of major and minor abnormalities and skeletal variants showed no relationship to treatment.
In all groups that received Caprolactam disulfide, there was a slight increased incidence of delayed ossification of cranial centres when compared to Controls, but this incidence was within the Historical Control Data range. A delay in ossification is a transient stage in fetal development and not considered adverse.
At 25 mg/kg/day there was an isolated high incidence of 20 thoracolumbar vertebrae compared to Control. This finding was outside of the Historical Control Data range, but in the absence of any other vertebral configuration abnormalities, this finding is not thought to be adverse or related to treatment. - Visceral malformations:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The incidence of major and minor abnormalities and skeletal variants showed no relationship to treatment.
- Other effects:
- not examined
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 250 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- reduction in number of live offspring
- changes in sex ratio
- changes in litter size and weights
- external malformations
- skeletal malformations
- visceral malformations
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
- Remarks:
- highest dose tested
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Localisation:
- skeletal: vertebra
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At 25 mg/kg/day there was an isolated high incidence of 20 thoracolumbar vertebrae compared to Control. This finding was outside of the Historical Control Data range, but in the absence of any other vertebral configuration abnormalities, this finding is not thought to be adverse or related to treatment.
- Key result
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
- Conclusions:
- The study was perfomed acc. OECD TG 414 under GLP and was sufficiently documented, hence, the results can be considered sufficiently reliable to assess the developmental toxicity of Caprolactam disulfide in rats. No effects related to treatment were observed up to the highest dose tested, 250 mg/kg bw/d, but doses were considered to be well-chosen as other repeated dose toxicity studies revealed i.a. a NOAEL of 40 mg/kg bw/d for general toxicity.
It was concluded from this study that the dosage of 250 mg/kg/day was the maternal no observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) and 250 mg/kg/day was the no observed adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) for embryo-fetal survival and development. - Executive summary:
The purpose of this study acc. OECD TG 414 under GLP was an assessment of the influence of Caprolactam disulfide on embryo-fetal survival and development when administered during the organogenesis and fetal growth phases of pregnancy in the Han Wistar rat.
Three groups of 20 females received Caprolactam disulfide at doses of 25, 75 or 250 mg/kg/day by oral gavage administration, from Day 6 to 19 after mating. A similarly constituted Control group received the vehicle, 98% water with 2% Kolliphor EL (cremophor) v/v at the same volume dose as treated groups. Animals were killed on Day 20 after mating for reproductive assessment and fetal examination.
Clinical observations, body weight and food consumption were recorded. Adult females were examined macroscopically at necropsy on Day 20 after mating and the gravid uterus weight recorded. All fetuses were examined macroscopically at necropsy and subsequently by detailed internal visceral examination or skeletal examination.
Results
Maternal clinical condition, bodyweight, food consumption and macroscopic evaluation were not adversely affected by treatment with Caprolactam disulfide at doses up to 250 mg/kg/day when compared with Control animals. At 250 mg/kg/day, there was a slight reduction in mean body weight gain during Days 6-7 of gestation and marginal reductions in adjusted body weight gain, and mean food consumption during Days 6-9 of gestation.
Embryo fetal survival, growth and development were unaffected by treatment with Caprolactam disulfide at doses up to 250 mg/kg/day.
Conclusion
It was concluded from this study that the dosage of 250 mg/kg/day was the maternal no‑observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) and 250 mg/kg/day was the no‑observed‑adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) for embryo-fetal survival and development.
Reference
see attachments
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- high quality (OECD 414 study under GLP)
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Mode of Action Analysis / Human Relevance Framework
As there were no adverse effects on reproduction or development were noted, no MoAA can be performed, and there is no indication that the observed absence of adverse effects in rats is not relevant for humans as no indication of species-specifity is given.
Justification for classification or non-classification
As there were no adverse effects on reproduction or development were noted, no classification as reproductive toxicant is triggered.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.