Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 220-481-2 | CAS number: 2781-10-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 26 July 2010 and 14 September 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: A GLP compliant study conducted in accordance with OECD guidelines.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Dibutyltin dilaurate
- EC Number:
- 201-039-8
- EC Name:
- Dibutyltin dilaurate
- Cas Number:
- 77-58-7
- IUPAC Name:
- dibutyltin dilaurate
- Details on test material:
- Sponsor's identification : CAS No 77-58-7
Description : clear colourless liquid
Batch number : LA6K05N001
Date received : 26 March 2010
Expiry date : 26 March 2011
Storage conditions : ~4°C in the dark under nitrogen
The integrity of supplied data relating to the identity, purity and stability of the test item is the responsibility of the Sponsor.
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Laboratories U.K. Ltd., Loughborough, UK
- Age at study initiation: Twelve to twenty weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 2.30 or 2.79 kg
- Housing: The animals were individually housed in suspended cages
- Diet : Free access to food (2030 Teklad Global Rabbit diet supplied by Harlan Laboratories U.K. Ltd., Oxon, UK)
- Water : Free access to mains drinking water
- Acclimation period: At least five days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17 to 23°C
- Humidity (%): 30 to 70%
- Air changes (per hr): The rate of air exchange was at least fifteen changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): The lighting was controlled by a time switch to give twelve hours continuous light (06:00 to 18:00) and twelve hours darkness
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 ml of the test item was placed into the conjunctival sac of the right eye, formed by gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The upper and lower eyelids were held together for about one second immediately after treatment, to prevent loss of the test item, and then released. The left eye remained untreated and was used for control purposes. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 72 hours
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 14 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 2 male rabbits
- Details on study design:
- SCORING SYSTEM:
Immediately after administration of the test item, an assessment of the initial pain reaction was made according to the six point scale shown in table 1.
Assessment of ocular damage/irritation was made approximately 1 hour and 24, 48 and 72 hours following treatment, according to the numerical evaluation shown in table 2, (from Draize J H (1977) "Dermal and Eye Toxicity Tests" In: Principles and Procedures for Evaluating the Toxicity of Household Substances, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC p.48 to 49).
The numerical values corresponding to each animal, tissue and observation time were recorded. The data relating to the conjunctivae were designated by the letters A (redness), B (chemosis) and C (discharge), those relating to the iris designated by the letter D and those relating to the cornea by the letters E (degree of opacity) and F (area of cornea involved). For each tissue the score was calculated as follows:
Score for conjunctivae = (A + B + C) x 2
Score for iris = D x 5
Score for cornea = (E x F) x 5
Using the numerical data obtained a modified version of the system described by Kay J H and Calandra J C (1962), J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 13, 281-289 (see table 3) was used to classify the ocular irritancy potential of the test item. This was achieved by adding together the scores for the cornea, iris and conjunctivae for each time point for each rabbit. The group means of the total scores for each observation were calculated. The highest of these group means (the maximum group mean score) together with the persistence of the reactions enabled classification of the eye irritancy potential of the test item.
If evidence of irreversible ocular damage is noted, the test item will be classified as corrosive to the eye. The results were evaluated according to EU labelling regulations Commission Directive 2001/59/EC for classification and labelling of dangerous substances.
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: xamination of the eye was facilitated by the use of the light source from a standard ophthalmoscope.
Any other ocular effects were also noted. Any clinical signs of toxicity, if present, were also recorded.
Additional observations were made on Days 7, 14 and 21 to assess the reversibility of the ocular effects.
Individual bodyweights were recorded on Day 0 (the day of dosing) and at the end of the observation period.
Results and discussion
In vivo
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 1 hour
- Score:
- 12
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 days
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24 hours
- Score:
- 17
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 days
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 48 hours
- Score:
- 39
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 days
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 72 hours
- Score:
- 39
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 days
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 7 days
- Score:
- 30
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 days
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 14 days
- Score:
- 6
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 days
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24 hours
- Score:
- 19
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- other: Almost fully recovered by day 21
- Remarks on result:
- other: (irritation score of 2 at 21 days)
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 1 hour
- Score:
- 12
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- other: Almost fully recovered by day 21
- Remarks on result:
- other: (irritation score of 2 at 21 days)
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 39
- Score:
- 48
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- other: Almost fully recovered by day 21
- Remarks on result:
- other: (irritation score of 2 at 21 days)
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 72 hours
- Score:
- 39
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- other: Almost fully recovered by day 21
- Remarks on result:
- other: (irritation score of 2 at 21 days)
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 7 days
- Score:
- 32
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- other: Almost fully recovered by day 21
- Remarks on result:
- other: (irritation score of 2 at 21 days)
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 14 days
- Score:
- 11
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- other: Almost fully recoverd by day 21
- Remarks on result:
- other: (irritation score of 2 at 21 days)
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 21 days
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 110
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 1 hour
- Score:
- 12
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- other: Almost fully recovered by day 21
- Remarks on result:
- other: Group mean score of 1
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 hours
- Score:
- 18
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- other: Almost fully reversible by day 21
- Remarks on result:
- other: Group mean score of 1.0 at 21 days
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 48 hours
- Score:
- 39
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- other: Almost fully recovered by day 21
- Remarks on result:
- other: Group mean score of 1.0 at day 21
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 72 hours
- Score:
- 39
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- other: Almost fully recovered by day 21
- Remarks on result:
- other: Group mean score of 1.0 at day 21
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 7 days
- Score:
- 31
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- other: Almost fully recovered by day 21
- Remarks on result:
- other: Group mean score of 1.0 at day 21
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 14 days
- Score:
- 8.5
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- other: Almost fully recoved by day 21
- Remarks on result:
- other: Mean group score of 1.0 at day 21
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 21 days
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- other: One rabbit (1 out of 2) was fully recovered by day 21.
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Scattered or diffuse corneal opacity was noted in both treated eyes at the 48-Hour,
72- Hour and 7-Day observations and persisted in one treated eye at the 14-Day observation.
Iridial inflammation was noted in both treated eyes at the 24, 48, and 72-Hour and 7-Day observations.
Moderate conjunctival irritation was noted in both treated eyes one hour after treatment and at the 24, 48 and 72-Hour and 7-Day observations. Minimal conjunctival irritation was noted in both treated eyes at the 14-Day observation with minimal conjunctival redness in one treated eye at the 21-Day observation.
A hardened dark brown/black coloured scab (up to 15mm x 15mm) on the outer surface of the lower and/or upper eyelids was noted in both treated eyes at the 7, 14 and 21-Day observations with alopecia also noted in both treated eyes at the 14 and 21-Day observations. - Other effects:
- Both animals showed expected gain in bodyweight during the study.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 4: IndividualScores and Individual Total Scores for Ocular Irritation
Rabbit Number and Sex |
69446Male |
69549Male |
|||||||||||||
IPR = 2 |
IPR = 2 |
||||||||||||||
Time After Treatment |
1 |
24 |
48 |
72 |
7 |
14 |
21 |
1 |
24 |
48 |
72 |
7 |
14 |
21 |
|
CORNEA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E = Degree of Opacity |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
F = Area of Cornea Involved |
0 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
|
Score (E x F) x 5 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
20 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
20 |
15 |
5 |
0 |
|
IRIS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Score (D x 5) |
0 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
|
CONJUNCTIVAE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A = Redness |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
B = Chemosis |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
C = Discharge |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
Score (A + B + C) x 2 |
12 |
12 |
14 |
14 |
10 |
6 |
0 |
12 |
14 |
14 |
14 |
12 |
6 |
2 |
|
Other ocular reactions |
- |
- |
- |
- |
St |
StAl |
StAl |
- |
- |
- |
- |
St* |
St*Al |
St*Al |
|
Total Score |
12 |
17 |
39 |
39 |
30 |
6 |
0 |
12 |
19 |
39 |
39 |
32 |
11 |
2 |
|
IPR= Initial pain reaction St = A hardened dark brown/black coloured scab (approximately 15mm x 10mm) on the outer surface of the upper eyelid St* = A hardened dark brown/black coloured scab (approximately 15mm x 15mm) on the outer surface of the lower and upper eyelids Al = Alopecia - = Not applicable |
Table 5: Individual Total Scores and Group Mean Scores for Ocular Irritation
Rabbit Number and Sex |
Individual Total Scores At: |
||||||
1 Hour |
24 Hours |
48 Hours |
72 Hours |
7 Days |
14 Days |
21 Days |
|
69446Male |
12 |
17 |
39 |
39 |
30 |
6 |
0 |
69549Male |
12 |
19 |
39 |
39 |
32 |
11 |
2 |
Group Total |
24 |
36 |
78 |
78 |
62 |
17 |
2 |
Group Mean Score |
12.0 |
18.0 |
39.0 |
39.0 |
31.0 |
8.5 |
1.0 |
Table 6: Individual Bodyweights and Bodyweight Changes
Rabbit Number |
Individual Bodyweight (kg) |
Bodyweight Change (kg) |
|
Day 0 |
Day 21 |
||
69446Male |
2.79 |
3.14 |
0.35 |
69549Male |
2.30 |
2.41 |
0.11 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- highly irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- The test item produced a maximum group mean score of 39.0 and was classified as a severe irritant (Class 6 on a 1 to 8 scale) to the rabbit eye according to a modified Kay and Calandra classification system.
The test item was also classified as irritant according to EU labelling regulations Commission Directive 2001/59/EC. The symbol “Xi”, the indication of danger “Irritant” and the risk phrase R 36 “IRRITATING TO EYES” are therefore required. - Executive summary:
The test material was administed into the eyes of two New Zealand White rabbits to assess the irritation potential in a GLP compliant study conducted in accordance with the OECD guideline 405. The test item produced a maximum group mean score of 39.0 and was classified as a severe irritant (Class 6 on a 1 to 8 scale) to the rabbit eye according to a modified Kay and Calandra classification system.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.