Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 226-641-8 | CAS number: 5444-75-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Negative results in Salmonella typhimurium TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA
1537 and E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101 with and without metabolic activation
(OECD 471).
Negative results in mammalian chromosomal aberration test in human
lymphocytes (OECD 473).
Negative results in mammalian gene mutation test in L5178Y mouse
lymphoma cells (OECD 476).
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 12 Jun - 7 Jul 2000
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP-Guideline study.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5375 - In vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Target gene:
- Not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: cultured peripheral human lymphocytes
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media:
RPMI 1640 supplemented with
- 10% fetal calf serum (FCS)
- penicillin / streptomycin (20 IU/mL / 20 µg/mL)
- 2 mM glutamine - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with Aroclor 1254
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- First experiment
3 h treatment: 18.3, 36.6, 73.1, 146.3, 292.5, 585, 1170 and 2340 µg/mL without metabolic activation (for mitotic index data)
3 h treatment: 292.5, 585 and 1170 µg/mL with and without metabolic activation
Second experiment
21 h treatment: 146.3, 585, 1170 and 2340 µg/mL without metabolic activation
3 h treatment: 585, 1170 and 2340 µg/mL with metabolic activation - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle and exposure concentrations: the test substance was found to form a dosable suspension in DMSO at 100 mg/mL. On dosing at 1% (v/v) into aqueous tissue culture medium, giving a final concentration of 1000 µ/mL, a precipitate was observed. A precipitate was also observed at 125 µg/mL, but was soluble after 3 h incubation. Concentrations with high ionic strength and osmolality may cause chromosomal aberrations (Galloway et al., 1987). Therefore, concentrations greater than 5000 µg/mL or 10 mM are not used in this test system. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- cyclophosphamide, 25 µg/mL in water (3 h exp), +S9; mitomycin C, 0.8 µg/mL in water (3 and 21 h exp), -S9
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 3 and 21 h
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 3 h treatment: 21 h; 21 h treatment: 21 h
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): colcemid (Sigma) 0.1 µg/mL medium
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa 10% (v/v) in buffered water (pH 7.2)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 per culture
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index of 1000 cells (except for positive control treated cultures; only dose level causing a decrease in mitotic index of at least 50% of the solvent control or if there was no decrease, the maximum concentration was used as the highest dose level for the metaphase analysis)
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes - Evaluation criteria:
- A test substance was considered positive (clastogenic) in the chromosome aberration test if:
It induced a dose-related statistically significant increase (p < 0.01) in the frequency of metaphases with aberrant chromosomes (excluding gaps) at one or more test concentrations.
The increases exceed the negative control range of the laboratory, taken at the 99% confidence limit.
The increases are reproducible between replicate cultures.
The increases are not associated with large changes in osmolality of the treatment medium or extreme toxicity.
Evidence of a dose-relationship is considered to support the conclusion.
A negative response is claimed if no statistically significant increases in the number of aberrant cells above concurrent control frequencies are observed, at any dose level.
A further evaluation may be carried out if the above criteria for a positive or a negative response are not met. - Statistics:
- Fisher´s test, p < 0.01, p < 0.001
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: cultured peripheral human lymphocytes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
In the second experiment (-S9), the test material caused a small statistically significant increase in the proportion of cells with chromosomal aberrations at 1170 µg/mL in comparison to the solvent control. This increase, to 3.5% (p < 0.01), lied just outside the upper 99% confidence limit of the historical control range (2.5%). However, it lied just within the upper limit (3.68%) when not applying the 99% level. To further investigate this response, a higher dose level (2340 µg/mL) was subsequently analysed. As no response was seen at this higher dose level, the increase was not considered indicative of a clastogenic response. - Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 20 Jul - 11 Dec 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP Guideline study.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- The Department of Health of the Government of the United Kingdom
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- TK locus
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: RPMI 1640 medium with Glutamax-1 and HEPES buffer, supplemented with Penicillin (100 units/mL), Streptomycin (100 µg/mL), Sodium pyruvate (1 mM), Amphotericin B (2.5 µg/mL) and 10% donor horse serum (giving R10 media)
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- co-factor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with phenobarbital/β-naphthoflavone
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary toxicity test
With and without S9 mix: 9.14, 18.28, 36.56, 73.13, 146.25, 292.5, 585, 1170 and 2340 µg/mL (4 h)
Without S9 mix: 9.14, 18.28, 36.56, 73.13, 146.25, 292.5, 585, 1170 and 2340 µg/mL (24 h)
Experiment I
Without S9 mix: 0.63, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40 and 60 µg/mL (4 h)
With S9 mix: 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 140 and 160 µg/mL (4 h)
Experiment II
Without S9 mix: 0.63, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 60 µg/mL (24 h)
With S9 mix: 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120 and 140 µg/mL (4 h) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: following solubility checks, the test item was accurately weighed and formulated in dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO).
- Other: the solvent acetone was used as the vehicle control. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- acetone
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: cyclophosphamide, 2 µg/mL, with S9; ethylmethanesulphonate, 400 µg/mL (4 h), 150 µg/mL (24 h), without S9
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
1st experiment: 4 h exposure with and without S9 mix.
2nd experiment: 4 h exposure with S9 mix and 24 h without S9 mix.
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): On Day 2 of the experiment, the cells were counted, diluted to 10E4 cells/mL and plated for mutant frequency (2000 cells/well) in selective medium containing 4 µg/mL 5-trifluorothymidine (TFT) in 96-well microtitre plates. Cells were also diluted to 10 cells/mL and plated (2 cells/well) for viability (%V) in non-selective medium.
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 10-14 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 4 µg/mL TFT
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicates each in two independent experiments in 96-well microtitre plates
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency and relative total growth
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Other: small and large colonies were differentiated, as small colonies represent large genetic changes involving chromosome 11b (indicative of clastogenic activity). - Evaluation criteria:
- For a test item to demonstrate a mutagenic response it must produce a statistically significant increase in the induced mutant frequency (IMF) over the concurrent vehicle mutant frequency value. Following discussions at an International Workshop on Genotoxicity Test Procedures in Plymouth, UK, 2002 it was felt the IMF must exceed some value based on the global background MF for each method (agar or microwell). This Global Evaluation Factor (GEF) value was set at 126 x 10E-6 for the microwell method. Therefore, any test item dose level that has a mutation frequency value that is greater than the corresponding vehicle control by the GEF of 126 x 10E-6 and demonstrates a positive linear trend will be considered positive.
- Statistics:
- The experimental data was analysed using a computer program (Mutant 240C, York Electronic Research) which follows the statistical guidelines recommended by the UKEMS.
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at ≥ 20 µg/mL (4 h, -S9); ≥ 40 µg/mL (4 h, +S9) and ≥ 10 µg/mL (24 h, -S9)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: there was no marked change in pH when the test item was dosed into media.
- Effects of osmolality: the osmolality did not increase by more than 50 mOsm in the solubility test.
- Precipitation: a greasy oily precipitate was observed at and above 585 µg/mL in the preliminary toxicity test.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: In all three of the exposure groups (with and without S9-mix (4 h) and without S9-mix (24 h)) there was evidence of marked dose-related reductions in the Relative Suspension Growth (%RSG) of cells treated with the test item when compared to the concurrent vehicle controls. From 146.25 µg/mL no or hardly any cell survival was observed during short term exposure. Without S-9 mix (24 h), 0% RSG was observed from 73.13 µg/mL.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
- HIstorical control values of the vehicle control aceton:
with metabolic acitivation 80.37-193.81 mutants per 1E+06 surviving cells
without metabolic acitivation 89.57-169.64 mutants per 1E+06 surviving cells - Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 01 Feb - 07 Feb 2000
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP-Guideline study.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Japan Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. (1985) NohSan No. 4200
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- his operon (for S. typhimurium strains)
trp operon (for E. coli strain) - Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with Aroclor 1254.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- First experiment: 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation
Second experiment: 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test substance at 50 mg/mL was not miscible in water. At 50 mg/mL in DMSO, the test substance was miscible. Therefore DMSO (AnalR grade, Lot no. 9899176468, Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK) was used. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: sodium azide (0.5 µg/plate in DMSO, -S9, TA 1535 and TA 100); 2-Aminoacridine (30 µg/plate in DMSO, -S9, TA 1537); 2-Nitrofluorene (1 µg/plate in DMSO, -S9, TA 98); 2-(2-Furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide (0.05 µg/plate in DMSO, -S9, WP2uvr A/pKM101)
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene (2 and 10 µg/plate in DMSO, +S9, TA 1535 and WP2uvr A/pKM101); Benzo[a]pyrene (5 µg/plate in DMSO, +S9, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation, first experiment), preincubation (second experiment)
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 72 h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: triplicates each in two independent experiments (except the concentrations 5 and 15 µg/plate were tested only once)
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: inspection of the bacterial background lawn - Evaluation criteria:
- The mean number of revertant colonies for all treatment groups is compared with those obtained for the solvent control groups. The mutagenic activity of a test substance is assessed by applying the following criteria:
If treatment with a test substance produces an increase in revertant colony numbers of at least twice the concurrent solvent controls, with some evidence of a positive dose-relationship, in two separate experiments, with any bacterial strain either in the presence or absence of S9 mix, it is considered to show evidence of mutagenic activity in this system.
If treatment with a test substance does not produce reproducible increases of at least 1.5 times the concurrent solvent controls, in either mutation test, it is considered to show no evidence of mutagenic activity in this test system.
If the results obtained fail to satisfy the criteria for a clear positive or negative response, additional testing may be performed. Should an increase in revertant colony numbers then be observed which satisfies the criteria, the substance is considered to show evidence of mutagenic activity in this system.
If no clear positive response can be obtained, the test data may be subjected to analysis to determine the statistical significance of any observed increases in revertant colony numbers. The statistical procedures used will be the analysis of variance followed by Dunnett´s test. Biological significance should always be considered along with statistical significance. - Statistics:
- The statistical procedures used will be the analysis of variance followed by Dunnett´s test.
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1. Results of Experiment 1 and 2.
Test item |
Concentration |
Mitotic Index |
Aberrant cells in % |
|
|
in µg/mL |
in % |
with gaps |
without gaps |
Experiment 1 |
||||
DMSO |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
MMC |
0.8 |
- |
20*** |
20*** |
Test substance |
292.5 |
86 |
0 |
0 |
585 |
53 |
2 |
2 |
|
1170 |
48 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
|
Exposure period 3 h, fixation time 21 h, with S9 mix |
||||
DMSO |
|
100 |
0,5 |
0,5 |
CP |
25 |
- |
34*** |
34*** |
Test substance |
585 |
91 |
1 |
1 |
1170 |
66 |
1 |
1 |
|
2340 |
49 |
1 |
1 |
|
Experiment 2 |
||||
DMSO |
|
100 |
0.5 |
0 |
MMC |
0.8 |
- |
30*** |
30*** |
Test substance |
146.3 |
90 |
3 |
1 |
585 |
51 |
4 |
2 |
|
1170 |
51 |
5** |
3.5** |
|
2340 |
56 |
4 |
2 |
|
Exposure period 3 h, fixation time 21 h, with S9 mix |
||||
DMSO |
|
100 |
0,5 |
0.5 |
CP |
25 |
- |
1 |
0.5 |
Test substance |
585 |
93 |
1 |
0.5 |
1170 |
89 |
1,5 |
1 |
|
2340 |
62 |
27*** |
25*** |
MMC: Mitomycin C; CP: Cyclophosphamide (positive controls)
**: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001
Table 2. Mitotic index data of Experiment 1 and 2.
Concentration of test substance (µg/mL) |
|||||||||
|
DMSO |
18.3 |
36.6 |
73.1 |
146.3 |
292.5 |
585 |
1170 |
2340 |
Exposure period 3 h, fixation time 21 h, without S9 mix |
|||||||||
Relative mitotic index (%) |
100 |
107 |
90 |
96a |
78a |
86a |
53a |
48b |
43b |
Exposure period 3 h, fixation time 21 h, with S9 mix |
|||||||||
Relative mitotic index (%) |
100 |
89 |
82 |
79a |
90a |
87a |
91a |
66b |
49b |
Exposure period 21 h, fixation time 21 h, without S9 mix |
|||||||||
Relative mitotic index (%) |
100 |
n.d. |
n.d. |
86 |
90a |
48a |
51a |
51b |
56b |
Exposure period 3 h, fixation time 21 h, with S9 mix |
|||||||||
Relative mitotic index (%) |
100 |
n.d. |
n.d. |
n.d. |
n.d. |
84a |
93b |
89b |
62b |
a: Precipitate apparent on dosing, not apparent at end of treatment (3 h)
b: Precipitate apparent on dosing, still apparent at end of treatment (3 h)
Table 1: Experiment I - 4 h exposure - Without Metabolic Activation
Concentration |
Relative Total Growth [%] |
RTG |
Mutants per 1E+06 surviving cells |
[µg/mL] |
|||
0 (aceton) |
100 |
1 |
149.83 |
0.63 |
107 |
1.16 |
127.46 |
1.25 |
112 |
0.95 |
176.83 |
2.5 |
98 |
0.89 |
159.43 |
5 |
99 |
0.95 |
157.31 |
10 |
84 |
0.8 |
150.74 |
20 |
60 |
0.56 |
192.46 |
40 |
1 |
- |
- |
60 |
0 |
- |
- |
EMS, 400 |
79 |
0.51 |
1060.03 |
EMS = Ethylmethanesulphonate
Table 2: Experiment I - 4 h exposure - With Metabolic Activation
Concentration |
Relative Total Growth [%] |
RTG |
Mutants per 1E+06 surviving cells |
[µg/mL] |
|||
0 (aceton) |
100 |
1 |
183.23 |
20 |
92 |
1.03 |
164.05 |
40 |
81 |
0.87 |
175.58 |
60 |
69 |
0.68 |
167.72 |
80 |
53 |
0.57 |
185.44 |
100 |
21 |
0.21 |
232.47 |
120 |
6 |
0.03 |
364.1 |
140 |
2 |
- |
- |
160 |
2 |
- |
- |
CP, 2 |
49 |
0.25 |
1631.36 |
CP = Cyclophosphamide
Table 3: Experiment II - 24 h Exposure - Without Metabolic Activation
Concentration |
Relative Total Growth [%] |
RTG |
Mutants per 1E+06 surviving cells |
[µg/mL] |
|||
0 (aceton) |
100 |
1 |
122.09 |
0.63 |
96 |
1.02 |
107.09 |
1.25 |
84 |
0.85 |
115.48 |
2.5 |
70 |
0.9 |
94.05 |
5 |
57 |
0.89 |
66.83 |
10 |
31 |
0.5 |
135.92 |
20 |
19 |
0.34 |
149.46 |
40 |
6 |
- |
- |
60 |
1 |
- |
- |
EMS, 400 |
38 |
0.37 |
1285.3 |
EMS = Ethylmethanesulphonate
Table 4: Experiment II - 4 h exposure - With Metabolic Activation
Concentration |
Relative Total Growth [%] |
RTG |
Mutants per 1E+06 surviving cells |
|
0 (aceton) |
100 |
1 |
91.27 |
|
10 |
92 |
0.93 |
123.48 |
|
20 |
83 |
0.84 |
92.73 |
|
40 |
70 |
0.56 |
68.92 |
|
60 |
44 |
0.33 |
88.43 |
|
80 |
11 |
0.05 |
129.9 |
|
100 |
1 |
- |
- |
|
120 |
1 |
- |
- |
|
140 |
1 |
- |
- |
|
CP, 2 |
64 |
0.42 |
1112.23 |
CP = Cyclophosphamide
Table 1. Results of Experiment 1 (plate incorporation).
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration |
Mean number of revertant colonies per plate |
|||||
(μg/plate) |
(average of 3 plates ± Standard deviation) |
||||||
|
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
|||||
|
TA 1535 |
TA100 |
E coli |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
||
– |
Solvent |
19 ± 2 |
112 ± 3 |
185 ± 9 |
19 ± 2 |
10 ± 4 |
|
– |
5 |
17 ± 3 |
90 ± 5 |
161 ± 7 |
18 ± 4 |
10 ± 2 |
|
– |
15 |
12 ± 2 |
94 ± 6 |
219 ± 3 |
23 ± 0 |
9 ± 1 |
|
– |
50 |
11 ± 1 |
100 ± 11 |
186 ± 4 |
24 ± 1 |
6 ± 4 |
|
– |
150 |
13 ± 3 |
105 ± 2 |
193 ± 16 |
19 ± 4 |
9 ± 2 |
|
– |
500 |
15 ± 2 |
83 ± 5 |
192 ± 7 |
21 ± 3 |
6 ± 1 |
|
– |
1500 |
18 ± 4 |
93 ± 9 |
194 ± 22 |
19 ± 1 |
7 ± 2 |
|
– |
5000 |
15 ± 1 |
98 ± 19 |
184 ± 8 |
17 ± 4 |
5 ± 3 |
|
Positive controls, –S9 |
Name |
NaAz |
NaAz |
AF-2 |
NF |
9AC |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.05 |
1 |
30 |
||
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD) |
146 ± 4 |
454 ± 15 |
1911 ± 18 |
191 ± 31 |
67 ± 5 |
||
+ |
Solvent |
15 ± 2 |
122 ± 5 |
185 ± 11 |
27 ± 1 |
12 ± 4 |
|
+ |
5 |
11 ± 4 |
109 ± 14 |
191 ± 23 |
27 ± 2 |
9 ± 2 |
|
+ |
15 |
14 ± 3 |
112 ± 8 |
197 ± 18 |
26 ± 3 |
13 ± 2 |
|
+ |
50 |
16 ± 3 |
107 ± 1 |
202 ± 18 |
30 ± 5 |
12 ± 1 |
|
+ |
150 |
16 ± 2 |
116 ± 16 |
207 ± 19 |
25 ± 8 |
11 ± 3 |
|
+ |
500 |
18 ± 4 |
122 ± 11 |
216 ± 20 |
21 ± 3 |
12 ± 0 |
|
+ |
1500 |
19 ± 6 |
114 ± 6 |
184 ± 10 |
30 ± 2 |
13 ± 2 |
|
+ |
5000 |
15 ± 0 |
93 ± 4 |
153 ± 22 |
18 ± 3 |
9 ± 2 |
|
Positive controls, –S9 |
Name |
2AA |
BP |
2AA |
BP |
BP |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
2 |
5 |
10 |
5 |
5 |
||
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD) |
211 ± 9 |
814 ± 38 |
1856 ± 26 |
304 ± 20 |
113 ± 9 |
NaAz = Sodium azide
9AC = 9-Aminoacridine
2AA = 2-Aminoanthracene
BP = Benzo(a)pyrene
NF = 2-Nitrofluorene
AF-2 = 2-(2-Furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide
Table 2. Results of Experiment 2 (preincubation).
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration |
Mean number of revertant colonies per plate |
|||||
(μg/plate) |
(average of 3 plates ± Standard deviation) |
||||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
||||||
TA 1535 |
TA100 |
E coli |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|||
– |
Solvent |
13 ± 5 |
94 ± 14 |
176 ± 7 |
25 ± 3 |
11 ± 2 |
|
– |
50 |
11 ± 5 |
84 ± 7 |
186 ± 6 |
20 ± 2 |
11 ± 3 |
|
– |
150 |
14 ± 5 |
91 ± 9 |
178 ± 9 |
20 ± 2 |
7 ± 2 |
|
– |
500 |
15 ± 5 |
97 ± 11 |
204 ± 2 |
19 ± 4 |
6 ± 1 |
|
– |
1500 |
14 ± 4 |
99 ± 9 |
146 ± 11 |
24 ± 2 |
7 ± 4 |
|
– |
5000 |
15 ± 3 |
96 ± 6 |
179 ± 13 |
27 ± 5 |
9 ± 1 |
|
Positive controls, –S9 |
Name |
NaAz |
NaAz |
AF-2 |
NF |
9AC |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.05 |
1 |
30 |
||
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD) |
165 ± 18 |
476 ± 16 |
2170 ± 56 |
209 ± 18 |
192 ± 21 |
||
+ |
Solvent |
16 ± 3 |
93 ± 9 |
176 ± 10 |
28 ± 3 |
14 ± 3 |
|
+ |
50 |
17 ± 1 |
79 ± 2 |
195 ± 12 |
25 ± 2 |
12 ± 2 |
|
+ |
150 |
16 ± 2 |
86 ± 11 |
185 ± 8 |
25 ± 7 |
12 ± 4 |
|
+ |
500 |
14 ± 4 |
89 ± 6 |
199 ± 12 |
28 ± 2 |
11 ± 2 |
|
+ |
1500 |
13 ± 2 |
72 ± 13 |
146 ± 36 |
32 ± 1 |
10 ± 3 |
|
+ |
5000 |
11 ± 2 |
80 ± 19 |
158 ± 6 |
21 ± 4 |
13 ± 3 |
|
Positive controls, –S9 |
Name |
2AA |
BP |
2AA |
BP |
BP |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
2 |
5 |
10 |
5 |
5 |
||
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD) |
124 ± 32 |
726 ± 4 |
1515 ± 15 |
288 ± 3 |
100 ± 5 |
NaAz = Sodium azide
9AC = 9-Aminoacridine
2AA = 2-Aminoanthracene
BP = Benzo(a)pyrene
NF = 2-Nitrofluorene
AF-2 = 2-(2-Furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
A bacterial gene mutation assay (Ames test) was performed with 2-ethylhexyl benzoate following OECD guideline 471 in compliance with GLP. The tested strains were Salmonella typhimurium TA 98, TA 100, TA 1537 and TA 1538 and E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101 (Kitching, 2000).
The experiment was performed according to the plate incorporation and preincubation procedure at concentrations from 5-5000 µg/plate with and without a metabolic activation system. Cytotoxicity was determined by inspection of the bacterial background lawn.
The included positive and negative controls in the experiments showed the expected results and were therefore considered as valid. No increase in the number of revertant colonies was noted in any of the bacterial strains, with and without metabolic activation system.
No cytotoxicity was observed up to the highest dose tested.
Furthermore, a short abstract of an Ames test with 2-ethylhexyl benzoate is available. The study was performed in the tester strains TA 98 and TA 100 equivalent to OECD guideline 471 (Callander, 2001).
Concentrations of 100-5000 µg/plate of the test material were evaluated with and without metabolic activation.
In both strains, a negative result with and without metabolic activation system was noted.
In summary, the test substance did not induce mutations in the bacterial mutation tests in the absence and presence of a metabolic activation system in any of the strains tested.
An in-vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test was conducted with 2-ethylhexyl benzoate in accordance with OECD guideline 473 under GLP conditions (Akhurst, 2000).
The induction of structural chromosome aberrations was evaluated in human lymphocytes, in-vitro incubated for 3 and 21 h with and without a metabolic activation system. Concentrations of 18.3-2340 µg/mL of the test substance in the vehicle DMSO were applied.
The used negative and positive controls showed the expected results and were considered valid.
In the experiments both with and without metabolic activation, a systematic influence of the test substance was observed, which led to a reduction in the mitotic index. In the second experiment without metabolic activation, the test material caused a small statistically significant increase in the proportion of cells with chromosomal aberrations at 1170 µg/mL in comparison to the solvent control. No response was seen at the higher dose level of 2340 µg/mL, therefore, the increase was not considered indicative of a clastogenic response. Thus, no statistically and biologically significant increase in the incidence of chromosome aberrations was observed under the conditions of the study.
Under the conditions of the study, the test substance did not show clastogenic activity in this chromosomal aberration test performed in human lymphocytes in-vitro.
An in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation study was carried out with 2-ethylhexyl benzoate according to OECD guideline 476 under GLP conditions (Brown, 2013). Gene mutations in the thymidine kinase locus were investigated in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells in the presence and absence of a metabolic activation system. Concentrations of the first experiment without metabolic activation for an exposure time of 4 h ranged from 0.63-60 µg/mL and with metabolic activation (4 h) from 20-160 µg/mL. The second experiment was conducted with concentrations of 0.63-60 µg/mL without metabolic activation (24 h) and from 10-140 µg/mL with metabolic activation (4 h). The vehicle and positive controls in the study showed the expected results and were within the range of historical control data. Marked dose-related reductions in the Relative Suspension Growth of cells treated with the test item at concentrations from ≥ 20 µg/mL (4 h, -S9 -mix), ≥ 40 µg/mL (4 h, +S9 -mix) and ≥ 10 µg/mL (24 h, +S9-mix) were observed. There was no significant increase in the number of forward mutations at the thymidine kinase locus of L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells treated with the test material, neither in the presence nor in the absence of a metabolic activation system. Under the conditions of the study 2-ethylhexyl benzoate did not show gene mutation activity in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells in vitro.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available data on the genetic toxicity of 2-ethylhexyl benzoate do not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008, and the data are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.