Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 609-946-4 | CAS number: 41637-38-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Read-across is proposed with Ethoxylated Bisphenol A diacrylate and 2 moles Ethoxylated Bisphenol A diacrylate (read-across is justified in the section 13 of IUCLID).
Ethoxylated Bisphenol A diacrylate was administered daily for 4 weeks by oral route to male and female Sprague-Dawley rats at dose‑levels of 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg/day in corn oil. The No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was considered to be at 300 mg/kg/day based on the effects seen at 1000 mg/kg/day on mean blood cholesterol levels, which were observed in presence of non-adverse increase of mean liver weight and liver microscopic findings (hepatocellular hypertrophy).
Treatment with 2 moles ethoxylated bisphenol A dimethacrylate (second read-across substance) by oral gavage in male and female Wistar Han rats at dose levels of 62, 250 and 1000 mg/kg revealed no parental toxicity up to 1000 mg/kg. Based on these results, a parental No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) of at least 1000 mg/kg was derived.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 07 August 2012 - 06 December 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Compliant to GLP and testing guidelines; adequate consistence between data, comments and conclusions.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 407 (Repeated Dose 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.7 (Repeated Dose (28 Days) Toxicity (Oral))
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: breeder: Charles River Laboratories France, l’Arbresle, France
- Age at study initiation: approximately 5 weeks old on the first day of treatment
- Mean body weight at study initiation: the males had a mean body weight of 183 g (range: 168 g to 203 g) and the females had a mean body weight of 157 g (range: 145 g to 172 g)
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: the animals were housed by five in polycarbonate cages with stainless steel lids
- Diet: SSNIFF R/M-H pelleted diet (free access)
- Water: tap water filtered with a 0.22 µm filter (free access)
- Acclimation period: 8 days before the beginning of the study.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 2°C (except rare increase up to 25.6°C)
- Humidity (%): 50 ± 20%
- Air changes (per hr): approximately 12 cycles/hour of filtered, non-recycled air
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 h/12 h.
IN-LIFE DATES: 17 August 2012 to 14 September 2012. - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on oral exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The test item was administered as a suspension in the vehicle. It was mixed with the required quantity of vehicle. No correction factor was applied.
The frequency of dose formulation preparation was on a daily basis. The dose formulations were delivered to the study room at room temperature and protected from light.
VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 20, 60 and 200 mg/mL
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 5 mL/kg/day. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Type of method: HPLC-UV
Test item concentrations: within an acceptable range of variation compared to nominal values.
Homogeneity: homogenous - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 weeks
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day
Basis:
actual ingested - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 animals per sex per dose.
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale:
The dose-levels were selected in agreement with the Sponsor based on the results of a previous 2-week toxicity study performed in the same species and strain. In this study, three groups of three males and three females received the test item by gavage at 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg/day as a suspension in corn oil. Another group of three males and three females received the vehicle only. There was no mortality and the only test item-related clinical sign was ptyalism in all high-dose animals and one mid-dose male. There were no toxicologically significant effects on mean food consumptions or on mean body weights and no clear effects on mean body weight gains. At necropsy, there were no test item-related macroscopic findings.
Therefore, 1000 mg/kg/day was selected as the high-dose level for this 4-week study. Mid and low-dose levels were selected in order to cover approximately three fold intervals.
- Rationale for animal assignment: computerized stratification procedure. - Positive control:
- no (not required)
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- MORTALITY:
- Time schedule: each animal was checked for mortality and morbidity once a day during the acclimation period and at least twice a day from the start of the treatment period, including weekends.
- CLINICAL SIGNS:
Each animal was observed once a day, at approximately the same time, for the recording of clinical signs.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS:
- Time schedule: detailed clinical examinations were performed on all the animals once before the beginning of the treatment period and then once a week until the end of the study
BODY WEIGHT:
- Time schedule: the body weight of each animal was recorded once before the beginning of the treatment period, on the first day of treatment, and then at least once a week until the end of the study.
FOOD CONSUMPTION:
- Time schedule: the quantity of food consumed by the animals in each cage was recorded once a week until the end of the study.
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION:
- Time schedule: each animal was evaluated in week 4.
HAEMATOLOGY, CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, URINALYSIS:
- Time schedule: at the end of the treatment period. - Sacrifice and pathology:
- ORGAN WEIGHTS: see table below
GROSS PATHOLOGY:
Complete macroscopic post-mortem examination of all study animals.
HISTOPATHOLOGY:
- all tissues listed in the Tissue Procedure Table for the control and high-dose animals (groups 1 and 4) sacrificed at the end of the treatment period,
- liver and kidneys for the low and mid-dose animals (groups 2 and 3) sacrificed at the end of the treatment period,
- all macroscopic lesions from all low- and intermediate-dose animals (groups 2 and 3) sacrificed on completion of the treatment period. - Other examinations:
- no
- Statistics:
- Citox software (version D.6, see § Study plan adherence) was used to perform the statistical analysis of body weight, hematology, blood biochemistry and urinalysis data. PathData software (version 6.2d2) was used to perform the statistical analysis of organ weight data (level of significance of 0.05 or 0.01).
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- for clinical signs but no mortality
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- for clinical signs but no mortality
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Urinalysis findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Details on results:
- MORTALITY:
There were no unscheduled deaths during the study.
CLINICAL SIGNS:
All animals treated at 1000 mg/kg/day had ptyalism generally from week 2. This was considered to be related to the treatment with the test item but of minor toxicological importance.
Incidental findings included reflux at dosing, scabs, alopecia and chromorhynorrhea and were generally observed in isolated animals.
BODY WEIGHT (GAIN):
There were a lower mean body weight gain in males treated at 1000 mg/kg/day and a dose-related higher mean body weight gain in females, compared to the control group. However, this was considered not to be of toxicological relevance as the changes were not statistically significant and this had no toxicological impact on the mean body weight at the end of the treatment period.
FOOD CONSUMPTION:
There were no toxicologically relevant effects on mean food consumption.
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION:
There were no toxicologically relevant effects at Functional Observation Battery and motor activity.
HAEMATOLOGY:
In males, there was a trend towards slightly dose-related higher mean red blood cell parameters (count, hemoglobin and hematocrit/PCV) reaching statistical significance at 1000 mg/kg/day and a statistically significant lower mean reticulocyte percentage from 300 mg/kg/day, when compared with controls. In view of the low amplitude of differences from control values, the absence of similar findings in females and the lack of histopathological correlates, these findings were considered to be of limited toxicological importance.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY:
There was a dose-related higher mean cholesterol level from 100 mg/kg/day in males and from 300 mg/kg/day in females when compared with controls, together with a trend towards a slightly higher non-dose-related mean triglyceride blood concentration in males. A tendency towards higher mean bile acid level and ALAT activity was also noted in males from 300 mg/kg/day (bile acids) or at 1000 mg/kg/day (ALAT); the high bile acid level measured in females was due to one female only.
The effect on the cholesterol level was considered to be adverse at 1000 mg/kg/day in view of the amplitude of differences from control and historical control data. The effects observed on mean triglyceride and bile acid levels and on mean ALAT activity were considered to be of no toxicological importance as rare statistical level or dose-relationship and included in historical control data (triglyceride and bile acids) or in view of the very low amplitude of the modification (ALAT).
Females treated at 1000 mg/kg/day also had slightly higher mean urea blood concentration and a slightly lower mean alkaline phosphatase activity than controls. In view of the low severity of the changes and the fact that they were included in historical control data, they were considered not to be adverse and of minor toxicological importance.
The statistical significance observed for proteins, A/G ratio and chloride was considered to be fortuitous as there was no dose-relationship and/or the amplitudes of variations from controls were low.
URINALYSIS:
At 1000 mg/kg/day, mean urine pH of males was slightly lower than that of controls (6.0 vs. 6.9, p<0.01). As the severity of the differences from controls was low, this non adverse finding was considered to be of minor toxicological importance.
There were 4/10 animals at 1000 mg/kg/day with more calcium oxalate crystals in their urine than controls. As the incidence was not high and as calcium oxalate crystal is one of the most common urine crystals, a relationship with the test item treatment was considered to be doubtful.
ORGAN WEIGHTS:
When compared with controls, statistically significant increase in mean liver weights was seen in females treated at 300 mg/kg/day (absolute weight), and in males (relative weight) and females (absolute and relative weights) treated at 1000 mg/kg/day.
Other organ weight changes were considered not to be related to the test item as they were small in amplitude, were not dose-related, had no gross or microscopic correlates and/or were not consistent between the sexes.
GROSS PATHOLOGY:
There were no test item-related macroscopic findings.
The macroscopic findings that were observed had no histological correlates or correlated with common histological findings in control rats, and were considered to be incidental.
Specifically the 0.3 cm in diameter brown mass found in the para-renal region from a male treated at 300 mg/kg/day corresponded to an atrophic kidney (noted as agenesis at necropsy). The 0.3 cm in diameter white mass in the subcutis found in a female treated at 1000 mg/kg/day was a cyst containing hair (considered as a developmental abnormality). Both findings were considered as incidental.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: NON-NEOPLASTIC:
Non adverse microscopic findings were seen in the liver and kidneys.
. liver
Minimal to slight hepatocellular hypertrophy was seen in males and females treated at 1000 mg/kg/day. No changes were observed in males and females at 300 mg/kg/day. This correlated with the increased mean liver weights in both sexes.
There were no associated degenerative changes at any of the dose-levels.
. kidney
Minimal increased of vacuolation was seen in the proximal tubules from females treated at 300 mg/kg/day, and in males and females treated at 1000 mg/kg/day. The vacuoles were round, pale and located in the cytoplasm. They had various sizes (about 1-5 µm in diameter).
There were no associated degenerative or necrotic lesions. Consequently, this finding was considered as non adverse.
Other microscopic findings noted in treated animals were considered incidental changes, as they also occurred in controls, were of low incidence, and/or are common background findings for the Sprague-Dawley rat. - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- Minimal
- Slight
- Minimal
- Conclusions:
- The test item was administered daily for 4 weeks by oral route to male and female Sprague-Dawley rats at dose levels of 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg/day in corn oil.
Under the experimental conditions of this study, the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was considered to be at 300 mg/kg/day based on the effects seen at 1000 mg/kg/day on mean blood cholesterol levels, which were observed in presence of non-adverse increase of mean liver weight and liver microscopic findings (hepatocellular hypertrophy). - Executive summary:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of the test item, following daily oral administration (gavage) to rats for 4 weeks,according to OECD (No. 407, October 2008) and EC (No. 440/2008, B7, May 2008) guidelines.
The study was conducted in compliance with the principles of Good Laboratory Practice Regulations.
Methods
Three groups of five male and five female Sprague-Dawley rats received the test item by daily oral administration for 28 days at dose‑levels of 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg/day. The test item was administered as a suspension in the vehicle (corn oil) at a constant dosage-volume of 5 mL/kg/day. A control group of five males and five females received the vehicle alone under the same experimental conditions.
Test item concentrations were checked on formulations used in weeks 1 and 4.
The animals were checked at least twice daily during the dosing period for mortality and morbidity and once daily for clinical signs. In addition, detailed clinical examinations were performed at least once weekly. Body weight was recorded once before the beginning of the treatment period, and then at least once a week during the study as food consumption. Towards the end of the dosing period, a Functional Observation Battery including motor activity measurement, and hematology, blood biochemistry and urinalysis were performed on all animals.
On completion of the treatment period, the animals were euthanized and submitted to a full macroscopic post-mortem examination. Designated organs were weighed and selected tissues were preserved. A microscopic examination was performed on selected tissues from control- and high‑dose animals sacrificed at the end of the treatment period and on all macroscopic lesions.
Results
The test item concentrations in the administered dose formulations analyzed in weeks 1 and 4 were within the acceptance criteria.
There were no unscheduled deaths during the study. The only test item-related clinical sign was ptyalism in all animals treated at 1000 mg/kg/day and was considered to be of minor toxicological importance. There were no toxicologically relevant effects at Functional Observation Battery and motor activity, and on mean food consumption, mean body weight and mean hematology parameters.
At blood biochemistry analysis and when compared with controls, there was a dose-related higher mean cholesterol level from 100 mg/kg/day in males (2.1, 2.6 (p<0.01) and 3.6 (p<0.01) mmol/L at 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day, respectively, vs. 1.6) and from 300 mg/kg/day in females (2.4 and 4.3 (p<0.01) at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day, vs. 1.8). This effect was considered to be adverse at 1000 mg/kg/day. Females treated at 1000 mg/kg/day also had slightly higher mean urea (5.6 mmol/L vs. controls, p<0.05) blood concentration and a slightly lower mean alkaline phosphatase activity (220 IU/L vs. 325, p<0.01) than controls, which were considered not to be adverse and of minor toxicological importance.
At 1000 mg/kg/day, mean urine pH of males was slightly lower than that of controls (6.0 vs. 6.9, p<0.01) which was considered to be non adverse and of minor toxicological importance.
At pathology, mean liver weights were higher in females treated at 300 mg/kg/day, and in males and females treated at 1000 mg/kg/day. There were no test item-related macroscopic findings. Microscopic findings were seen in the liver (non adverse hepatocellular hypertrophy in males and females treated at 1000 mg/kg/day) and kidney (non adverse increased vacuolation in proximal tubules in females treated at 300 mg/kg/day and in males and females treated at 1000 mg/kg/day).
Conclusion
The test item was administered daily for 4 weeks by oral route to male and female Sprague-Dawley rats at dose‑levels of 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg/day in corn oil.
The No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was considered to be at 300 mg/kg/day based on the effects seen at 1000 mg/kg/day on mean blood cholesterol levels, which were observed in presence of non-adverse increase of mean liver weight and livermicroscopic findings(hepatocellular hypertrophy).
Reference
Table 1: mean body weight and mean body weight changes (g)
Sex | Males | Females | ||||||
Dose level (mg/kg /day) | 0 | 100 | 300 | 1000 | 0 | 100 | 300 | 1000 |
Bodyweight change | ||||||||
Days 1 to 28 | +209 | +223 | +205 | +186 | +72 | +79 | +83 | +86 |
Difference to controls | / | +7% | -2% | -11% | / | +10% | +15% | +19% |
Bodyweight | ||||||||
Day 1 | 184 | 182 | 187 | 180 | 154 | 158 | 159 | 159 |
Difference to controls | / | -1% | +2% | -2% | / | +3% | +3% | +3% |
Day 28 | 392 | 404 | 392 | 366 | 226 | 237 | 242 | 244 |
Difference to controls | / | +3% | 0 | -7% | / | +5% | +7% | +8% |
Table 2: Relevant differences in hematology
Sex | Males | Females | ||||||
Dose level (mg/kg /day) | 0 | 100 | 300 | 1000 | 0 | 100 | 300 | 1000 |
Red blood cell count (T/L) | 7.90 | 8.15 | 8.33 | 8.40* | 7.83 | 7.93 | 7.77 | 7.65 |
Hemoglobin (g/g/dL) | 15.0 | 15.5 | 15.7 | 15.9* | 14.7 | 14.9 | 15.0 | 14.6 |
Packed cell volume (L/L) | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.50* | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.45 |
Reticulocytes percentage (%) | 2.87 | 2.49 | 2.00** | 2.04** | 1.76 | 1.64 | 2.08 | 2.20 |
Statistically significant from controls: * p<0.05, ** p<0.01
Table 3: Statistically relevant differences in blood biochemistry
Sex | Males | Females | ||||||
Dose level (mg/kg /day) | 0 | 100 | 300 | 1000 | 0 | 100 | 300 | 1000 |
Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.6 | 2.1 | 2.6** | 3.6** | 1.8 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 4.3** |
Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 0.60 | 1.11* | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.30 | 0.32 | 0.39 | 0.39 |
Bile acids (µmol/L) | 12.3 | 14.6 | 17.7* | 17.0 | 15.2 | 13.1 | 14.7 | 18.2 |
Alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) (IU/L) | 34 | 37 | 33 | 43* | 29 | 32 | 31 | 33 |
Urea (mmol/L) | 3.5 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 4.7 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 5.6* |
Alkaline phosphatase (IU/L) | 458 | 423 | 507 | 387 | 325 | 267 | 297 | 220** |
Proteins (g/L) | 59 | 63* | 61 | 62* | 63 | 60 | 60 | 66 |
A/G ratio | 1.56 | 1.48 | 1.52 | 1.50 | 1.53 | 1.76** | 1.65 | 1.60 |
Chloride (mmol/L) | 104.5 | 102.3* | 104.6 | 104.3 | 105.3 | 107.8 | 106.5 | 107.0 |
Statistically significant from controls: * p<0.05, ** p< 0.01
Table 4: Test item-related differences (expressed in %) noted between test item-treated and control animals in the absolute and relative organ weights
sex | male | female | ||||
Dose-level (mg/kg/day) | 100 | 300 | 1000 | 100 | 300 | 1000 |
Exam.animals / Num. of animals | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
Body weight | +6 | +2 | -8 | +4 | +7 | +5 |
Liver (absolute) | +13 | +9 | +5 | +7 | +19* | +40** |
Liver (relative) | +6 | +7 | +14** | +3 | +12 | +34** |
Statistically significant from controls: * p<0.05, ** p< 0.01
The significance concerned the organ weights values and not the percentages.
Table 5: Incidences and severity of microscopic findings on liver and kidneys
sex |
|
| ||||||
Dose-level (mg/kg/day) | 0 | 100 | 300 | 1000 | 0 | 100 | 300 | 1000 |
Liver : Hepatocellular hypertrophy | ||||||||
- - | - - | - - | 2 1 | - - | - - | - - | 4 - | |
Kidney: Increased vacualisation; proximal tubules | ||||||||
- | - | - | 4 | - | - | 3 | 5 |
-: no affected animal
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 300 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Both studies are considered to be reliable (study with a klimisch score of 1).
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
28 -day repeated toxicity study on Ethoxylated Bisphenol A diacrylate (read-across)
Three groups of five male and five female Sprague-Dawley rats received the test item by daily oral administration for 28 days at dose‑levels of 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg/day (OECD 407 study). The test item was administered as a suspension in the vehicle (corn oil) at a constant dosage-volume of 5 mL/kg/day. A control group of five males and five females received the vehicle alone under the same experimental conditions.
The test item concentrations in the administered dose formulations analyzed in weeks 1 and 4 were within the acceptance criteria.
There were no unscheduled deaths during the study. The only test item-related clinical sign was ptyalism in all animals treated at 1000 mg/kg/day and was considered to be of minor toxicological importance. There were no toxicologically relevant effects at Functional Observation Battery and motor activity, and on mean food consumption, mean body weight and mean hematology parameters.
At blood biochemistry analysis and when compared with controls, there was a dose-related higher mean cholesterol level from 100 mg/kg/day in males (2.1, 2.6 (p<0.01) and 3.6 (p<0.01) mmol/L at 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day, respectively, vs. 1.6) and from 300 mg/kg/day in females (2.4 and 4.3 (p<0.01) at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day, vs. 1.8). This effect was considered to be adverse at 1000 mg/kg/day. Females treated at 1000 mg/kg/day also had slightly higher mean urea (5.6 mmol/L vs. controls, p<0.05) blood concentration and a slightly lower mean alkaline phosphatase activity (220 IU/L vs. 325, p<0.01) than controls, which were considered not to be adverse and of minor toxicological importance. At 1000 mg/kg/day, mean urine pH of males was slightly lower than that of controls (6.0 vs. 6.9, p<0.01) which was considered to be non adverse and of minor toxicological importance.
At pathology, mean liver weights were higher in females treated at 300 mg/kg/day, and in males and females treated at 1000 mg/kg/day. There were no test item-related macroscopic findings. Microscopic findings were seen in the liver (non adverse hepatocellular hypertrophy in males and females treated at 1000 mg/kg/day) and kidney (non adverse increased vacuolation in proximal tubules in females treated at 300 mg/kg/day and in males and females treated at 1000 mg/kg/day).
The test item was administered daily for 4 weeks by oral route to male and female Sprague-Dawley rats at dose‑levels of 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg/day in corn oil. The No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was considered to be at 300 mg/kg/day based on the effects seen at 1000 mg/kg/day on mean blood cholesterol levels, which were observed in presence of non-adverse increase of mean liver weight and livermicroscopic findings(hepatocellular hypertrophy).
Screening repeated toxicity and reproduction study on 2 moles ethoxylated Bisphenol A dimethacrylate
Combined 28-day repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening
test was performed in rats with 2 moles ethoxylated bisphenol A dimethacrylatebyoral gavage (OECD guideline 422).
Based on the results of a 14-day dose range finding study, the dose levels for this study were 62, 250 and 1000 mg/kg. After acclimatization, four groups of ten male and ten female Wistar Han rats were exposed by oral gavage to the test substance. Males were exposed for 29 days, i.e. 2 weeks prior to mating, during mating, and up to termination. Females were exposed for 43-46 days, i.e. during 2 weeks prior to mating, during mating, during postcoitum, and during at least 4 days of lactation.
The following observations and examinations on parental animals were evaluated: mortality / viability, clinical signs (daily), functional observations and locomotor activity (end of treatment), body weight and food consumption (at least at weekly intervals), clinical pathology (end of treatment), macroscopy at termination, organ weights and histopathology on a selection of tissues.
No parental toxicity was observed up to the highest dose level tested (1000 mg/kg).
No toxicologically relevant changes were noted in any of the parental parameters investigated in this study (i.e. clinical appearance, functional observations, body weight, food consumption, clinical laboratory investigations, macroscopic examination, organ weights, and microscopic examination).
Treatment with 2 moles ethoxylated bisphenol A dimethacrylate by oral gavage in male and female Wistar Han rats at dose levels of 62, 250 and 1000 mg/kg revealed no parental toxicity up to 1000 mg/kg. Based on these results, a parental No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) of at least 1000 mg/kg was derived.
Justification for selection of repeated dose toxicity via oral route - systemic effects endpoint:
A read-across is proposed for this endpoint with Ethoxylated bisphenol A diacrylate and 2 moles Ethoxylated bisphenol A dimethacrylate. The study on Ethoxylated bisphenol A diacrylate is flagged as key study because of the composition of target substance (Ethoxylated bisphenol A dimethacrylate).
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the 28 -day study on Ethoxylated Bisphenol A diacrylate and the screening test on 2 moles ethoxylated Bisphenol A dimethacrylate, no organ toxicity was observed in rats treated 28 -day or more. As read-across are proposed for the target substance, Ethoxylated Bisphenol A dimethacrylate with both studies, no organ toxicity is expected. Therefore, no classification of ethoxylated bisphenol A dimethacrylate is required for repeated toxicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

Route: .live2