Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 931-745-8 | CAS number: 1335203-21-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 44 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: Substance specific informed assessment factors
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 12
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 528 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- No studies have been undertaken by the inhalation route to characterise the dose-response relationship for systemic effects. Therefore, it will be necessary to obtain a long-term inhalation DNEL by route-to-route extrapolation.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The effects seen in the 91-day study are only minor toxicological effects. The possibly substance related effects in high dose males with respect to changes in liver weight without histopathological correlate and increased serum albumin and transaminase activity are regarded as slight and probably reversible. It is therefore not necessary to apply a factor to take account of this.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- It is expected that the severity of effects could increase with duration. Since the dose descriptor is derived from a 91-day study, it is necessary to apply a factor of 2 to take account of extrapolation of subchronic data from the 91-day study to chronic exposure.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- It is not necessary to apply an allometric scaling factor because the starting point has been corrected fordifferences in respiratory volume and this takes account of differences in metabolic rates.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- On the basis of the very low systemic absorption rate of the test substance, the default assumption of aworst case maximum absorption of 1 % and the availability of toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic data nofurther AF is deemed necessary to be included in the interspecies extrapolation.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 3
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify variability in susceptibility to the effects of long-term exposure to IQACs in the human population. The default factor of 3 for workers will therefore be used to take account of intraspecies variability.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The key studies were conducted according to modern regulatory standards and were adequately reported. Furthermore, detailed data on toxicokinetics and toxicodynamic properties are available.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 2
- Justification:
- A default AF of 2 for route extrapolation (oral - > inhalation) to adjust the NOAEC for bioavailability is included. For further information refer to discussion.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 132 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 3
- DNEL extrapolated from long term DNEL
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 12.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: Substance specific informed assessment factors
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 24
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- As a Point of Departure for oral and dermal uptake an upper worst case rate of 1 % is taken forward to the DNEL derivations. The dermal NOAEL is therefore determined to be equal to the oral calculated NOAEL. For further information refer to discussion.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Effects on the male rat liver at the highest dose tested without histopathological correlate and potentially reversible changes in serum levels of albumin, SGPT and SGOT, being the only systemic substance induced effects identified.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- It is expected that the severity of effects could increase with duration. Since the dose descriptor is derived from a 91-day study, it is necessary to apply a factor of 2 to take account of extrapolation of subchronic data from the 91-day study to chronic exposure.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- The starting point is an oral dose descriptor from a rat study. It is therefore necessary to include an allometric scaling factor of 4 to take account of differences in basal metabolic rates between rats and humans.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- There are no data for IQACs to quantify other differences between animals and humans that could affect extrapolation. On the basis of the very low systemic absorption rate of the test substance, the default assumption of a worst case maximum absorption of 1 % and the availability of toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic data no further AF is deemed necessary to be included in the interspecies extrapolation giving an overall assessment factor of 4.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 3
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify variability in susceptibility to the effects of long-term exposure to IQACs in the human population. The default factor of 3 for workers will therefore be used to take account of intraspecies variability.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The key studies were conducted to modern regulatory standards apart from the dose spacing by a factor of ten. Therefore a calculated NOAEL has been derived which would be more appropriate to modern regulatory standards. The DNEL derived from the subchronic oral study in rats therefore departs from the LOAEL of approx. 900 mg/kg bw/d (rel. to active ingredient) and leads to a calculated NOAEL of 300 mg/kg bw/ d (rel. to a. i.)
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No additional AF was deemed necessary. For further information refer to discussion.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
Table. Critical DN(M)ELs for workers
Exposure pattern |
Route |
Descriptors[1] |
DNEL/DMEL (appropriate unit) |
Most sensitive endpoint |
Acute - systemic effects |
dermal (mg/kg bw /day) |
DNEL |
NA |
NA |
Inhalation (mg/m3) |
DNEL |
132 mg/m3/15 min* |
Acute toxicity |
|
Acute - local effects |
Dermal (mg/cm2) |
DNEL |
NA |
NA |
Inhalation (mg/m3) |
Not quantifiable |
NA |
NA |
|
Long-term - systemic effects |
Dermal (mg/kg bw /day) |
DNEL |
12.5 mg/kg bw/d |
Repeated dose toxicity |
Inhalation (mg/m3) |
DNEL |
44 mg/m3(8h – TWA) |
Repeated dose toxicity |
|
Long-term – local effects |
Dermal (mg/cm2) |
Not quantifiable |
NA |
NA |
Inhalation (mg/m3) |
Not quantifiable |
NA |
NA |
* calculated as 3 times the value (default 3) of the long-term DNEL (44 mg/m³ x 3)
[1] Values in IUCLID 5 are DNEL/DMEL/ not quantifiable
Discussion – Worker:
Worker-DNEL acute systemic effects:
A DNEL for acute toxicity is not established for the dermal and the oral route, because no acute toxicity hazard leading to
classification and labelling has been identified, and there is no potential for high peak exposures.
The most likely route of human exposure for workers and consumers is the dermal route. Systemic levels of the substance will be low
due to the very low dermal absorption rate of a maximum of 1% for this substance class (section 5.1, Toxicokinetics). Furthermore, its
irritating properties will require the use of protective industrial hygiene measures to keep the skin contact with the substance to
a minimum. Therefore, the dermal route of application is assessed as not relevant for systemic exposure. A dermal DNEL longterm
systemic has been derived by route to route extrapolation from oral uptake using conservative assessment factors for oral and dermal
uptake.
DNEL acute inhalation worker
High peak exposures are usually relevant for the inhalation route only. Vaporisation needs not to be considered due to the very low
vapour pressure of approx.1.41 x 10E-22 kPa.The generation and effects of inhalable particles or droplets such as dust or aerosols is
considered under the specific operational conditions for this substance.
Inhalation exposure via liquid aerosols cannot be completely excluded, however, due to exposure via high-pressure cleaners and other
spray applications in car wash. For this application an acute DNEL for systemic toxicity has been derived, also with regard to
protection of the general population with due consideration of the very low substance concentration in this exposure scenario.
For an assessment of potential respiratory irritation upon inhalation of aerosols, test results with diluted test substance (5% of active
ingredient) are taken as a point of reference. In these studies only mild irritative effects to the eye have been shown which did not
result in classification as an eye irritant and can be regarded as a threshold value for mucous membrane irritation.
The DNEL for acute inhalation toxicity was set for a reference period of 15 minutes at 3 times the value (default 3) of the long-term
DNEL. This approach is appropriate because similar mechanisms of actions are probably involved in the responses to single and
repeated exposure (TGD R8).
Local irritation of the respiratory tract
Inhalation studies are not available. A reliable dose descriptor for local irritation of the respiratory tract could not be derived from the
available studies. From eye irritation studies it can be assumed that a potential risk for mucosal tissues exists. In the absence of studies
addressing irritation to the upper respiratory tract, the relevance for more generalised respiratory tract irritation, especially for the
lower respiratory tract, is an open issue. The risk characterisation will consider which specific risk management measures are
necessary to protect against local effects.
Local effects dermal
Local irritation of the skin can occur after acute and long-term exposure to undiluted IQACs. Tests with diluted substances show that
a specific concentration limit can be established for preparations with 5% active ingredient. Only mild irritative effects to the skin have
been reported for this substance concentration.
Worker-DNEL long-term for dermal route (systemic)
The RA concluded that long-term repeated exposure to IQACs might have the potential to cause mild systemic effects on the liver
accompanied with decreased serum albumin concentration and increased levels of serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase. These are the
only critical systemic substance induced effects identified and the relevance of the findings is probably low due to their appearance
without a histopathological correlate and possibly being due to a decreased food intake of male animals at the highest dose tested
where these effects have been observed. Moreover, the dose setting with intervals of a factor of ten in this study does not comply
with the current dose setting strategy. Therefore, a NOAEL has been calculated from the highest dose level as the LOAEL with an
Assessment Factor of 3 instead of departing from the reported NOAEL of 10 mg/kg bw/d, which was the middle dose level in this
study. On this basis a dose descriptor has been determined from the 91-day oral study on rats taking a NOEL of 300 mg/kg bw/d.
Though a subchronic study conducted in rabbits for 91 days has been identified (NICNAS 1999), this study was regarded an
inadequate for an assessment of systemic toxicity induced by dermal exposure, the reason being that it has been conducted with only
two dose groups and was limited to low doses due to irritative skin effects. In order to characterise the dose-response relationship for
systemic effects via the dermal route it was therefore necessary to obtain a long-term dermal DNEL by route-to-route extrapolation.
According to NICNAS (1999) toxicokinetic data show low oral uptake judged by intestinal absorption performed on bile duct
canulated rats based on a study that was conducted with the objective to distinguish if the substance was not absorbed at all or if it
was subject to biliary excretion. According to the report, excretion with the bile proved not to be a relevant route as over 72 hours
only 0.07 % of the material was detected in the bile. Consequently, it can be confirmed that the oral bioavailability of IQACs is
minimal, and can be expected to be far less than 1 % (Ref.: Procter & Gamble, 1979; TheProcter & Gamble Company (1979):
Metabolism Screen – MTBL (rats; modified P&G standard procedure 23; oral dosing with bile duct canulation; being prepared by
MVL).
In a study with radiolabelled oleic-acid based IQAC, DMS quaternised CAS-No. 72749-55-4) the intestinal absorption was studied
for 96 hrs after application to female rats (Wistar SPF-Cpb) after a single oral dose of approx.10 mg/kg bw.The 14C radiolabel was
in the N-methyl group of the imidazolinium ring. After 96 hrs an intestinal absorption of approx. 0.79 % of the administered dose was
found (Henkel 1986a).
In a study with radiolabelled oleic-acid based, DMS quaternised CAS-No. 72749-55-4) the dermal absorption was studied by
dermal application to female rats (Wistar SPF-Cpb) after a single dermal dose in two test groups of 5 and 8 females (body weights
approx. 222 and 241 gm, respectively, in groups 1 and 2). The 14C-radiolabel was in the N-methyl group of the imidazolinium ring.
Approximately 200 mg of the compound solution was applied cutaneously as solution in water at a concentration of 0.1 % (group 1)
and 0.5 % (group 2) for 48 hrs under non-occlusive conditions. The application area of 10 cm2 was covered with a glass capsule,
cemented in place, which allowed gas exchange with the ambience but impeded oral uptake. In the 48 hrs exposure period less
than 0.51 % (group1) and 2-3 % (group2) were absorbed through the skin of the rats. The latter uptake rate occurred in the presence
of irritative skin damage with accompanying significant scatter of data (Henkel 1986b).
As reported by NICNAS (1999) three male Sprague Dawley rats (body weight 196-201 gm) were treated topically with radiolabelled
[N-14C-methyl-labelled]fully saturated IQAC, DMS (tallow fatty acids) CAS-No.72623-82-6), radiochemical purity: 98.8 %.
Each animal received a dose of 5.9 mg/kg bw in approximately 0.1 ml of water, corresponding to approx.14 µCi per animal.Animals
were housed in metabolic cages, and sacrificed 72 hours after treatment. 14C was analysed upon necropsy in a wide range of organs
including skin. Analyses were also performed on urine, faeces, expired CO2, blood, and plasma. Furthermore, cage washes and
residual activity in dosing syringes were monitored.
Following topical administration to the skin of rats of radiolabelled test material, 89 % of the cutaneously applied dose remained at the
test site. The carcass contained a mere 0.02 % of the 14Cactivity, and excretion accounted for 0.03 % of the dose with the urine, and
0.03 % of the dose with the faeces. Detectable, but low radioactivity was present in only two other tissues, adjacent skin (0.0002 %
of dose) and bone marrow (0.02 µg/g; Ref.: The Procter & Gamble Company (1978): Metabolism Screen – MTBL (rats; P&G
standard procedure 23; dermal dosing).
Regarding the toxicokinetic behaviour of IQAC compounds, the above cited studies show that there are very low levels of absorption
of the test substance from the gastrointestinal tract or dermally. The small amounts absorbed were rapidly excreted. One can conclude
from these studies that imidazolium quaternary ammonium compounds do not exhibit any significant systemic accumulation following
repeated ingestion or dermal contact (The Procter & Gamble Company (1978): Metabolism Screen – MTBL (rats; P&G standard
procedure 23; dermal dosing).
As a Point of Departure for oral and dermal uptake an upper worst case rate of 1 % is taken forward to the DNEL derivations.
The dermal NOAEL is therefore determined to be equal to the oral calculated NOAEL, i.e. approx. 300 mg/kg bw/day
Table: Assessment factors and DNEL calculation for worker DNEL long-term dermal systemic effects
Uncertainties |
AF |
Justification |
|
interspecies differences; |
4 |
The starting point is an oral dose descriptor from a rat study. It is therefore necessary to include an allometric scaling factor of 4 to take account of differences in basal metabolic rates between rats and humans. There are no data for IQACs to quantify other differences between animals and humans that could affect extrapolation. On the basis of the very low systemic absorption rate of the test substance, the default assumption of a worst case maximum absorption of 1 % and the availability of toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic data no further AF is deemed necessary to be included in the interspecies extrapolation giving an overall assessment factor of 4. |
|
intraspecies differences; |
3 |
There are no data to quantify variability in susceptibility to the effects of long-term exposure to IQACs in the human population. The default factor of 3 for workers will therefore be used to take account of intraspecies variability. |
|
differences in duration of exposure; |
2 |
Sub-chronic to chronic |
|
Dose response and endpoint specific/severity
|
1 |
Effects on the male rat liver at the highest dose tested without histopathological correlate and potentially reversible changes in serum levels of albumin, SGPT and SGOT, being the only systemic substance induced effects identified. |
|
quality of whole database. |
1 |
The key studies were conducted to modern regulatory standards apart from the dose spacing by a factor of ten. Therefore a calculated NOAEL has been derived which would be more appropriate to modern regulatory standards. The DNEL derived from the subchronic oral study in rats therefore departs from the LOAEL of approx. 900 mg/kg bw/d (rel. to active ingredient) and leads to a calculated NOAEL of 300 mg/kg bw/ d (rel. to a.i.) |
|
Overall AF: 24 (300) |
|||
Endpoint specific DNEL (from 91-day study) |
300/24 = 12.5 mg/kg bw/d |
||
Worker-DNEL long-term for inhalation route (systemic)
No studies have been undertaken by the inhalation route to characterise the dose-response relationship for systemic effects. Therefore, it will be necessary to obtain a long-term inhalation DNEL by route-to-route extrapolation. Human
data is not available.
The NOAEL for systemic toxicity identified from an oral 91-day-study in the rat was 300 mg/kg bw/d. As has been already discussed,
a 1 % oral absorption, based on toxicokinetic data is taken forward for IQACs for a route-to-route extrapolation. As a worst-case
assumption a 1 % absorption after inhalation exposure is assumed, as the available toxicodynamic data have shown a generally low
membrane penetration rate (intestinal / dermal) independent of the route of exposure. Therefore, for inhalation uptake the assumption
of a similar low absorption rate appears appropriate. Nevertheless, a default AF of 2 for route extrapolation (oral - > inhalation) to
adjust the NOAEC for bioavailability is included, though toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic date indicate a similar low absorption
through biological membrane barriers.
For the derivation of a NOAEC for the worker the following corrections have to be applied to the oral NOAEL (rat).
The oral NOAEL (rat) is multiplied with 1/0.38 m³/kg bw/8h (default respiratory volume in rat, Table R.8.2 of CSR guidance) to give
the corresponding rat inhalation 8h-NOAEC (no-observed adverse effect concentration). To obtain the starting point for workers, a
factor of 0.67 is applied to the NOAEC to account for the differences in inhalation rates between animals at rest and humans involved
in light activity.
For workers the corrected inhalation NOEC is calculated according to the following equation:
corrected inhalation NOAEC = oral NOEL x 1/sRVratx ABSoral-rat/ ABSinh-humanx sRVhuman/ wRV[1]
= 300 x 1/0.38 x 6.7/10
The corrected inhalation NOAECworker(8h) is therefore:
= 528 mg/m³(8h-TWA)
Adjustment for route extrapolation (oral - > inhalation) is made by introducing an AF of 2 (see below)
Table: Assessment factors and DNEL calculation for worker DNEL long-term inhalation systemic effects
Uncertainties |
AF |
Justification |
interspecies differences; |
1 |
It is not necessary to apply an allometric scaling factor because the starting point has been corrected for differences in respiratory volume and this takes account of differences in metabolic rates. On the basis of the very low systemic absorption rate of the test substance, the default assumption of a worst case maximum absorption of 1 % and the availability of toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic data no further AF is deemed necessary to be included in the interspecies extrapolation. |
intraspecies differences; |
3 |
There are no data to quantify variability in susceptibility to the effects of long-term exposure to IQACs in the human population. The default factor of 3 for workers will therefore be used to take account of intraspecies variability.
|
differences in duration of exposure; |
2 |
It is expected that the severity of effects could increase with duration. Since the dose descriptor is derived from a 91-day study, it is necessary to apply a factor of 2 to take account of extrapolation of subchronic data from the 91-day study to chronic exposure.
|
Dose response and endpoint specific/severity
|
1 |
The effects seen in the 91-day study are only minor toxicological effects. The possibly substance related effects in high dose males with respect to changes in liver weight without histopathological correlate and increased serum albumin and transaminase activity are regarded as slight and probably reversible. It is therefore not necessary to apply a factor to take account of this.
|
quality of whole database. |
1 |
The key studies were conducted according to modern regulatory standards and were adequately reported. Furthermore, detailed data on toxicokinetics and toxicodynamic properties are available.
|
Adjustment for bioavailability |
2 |
A default AF of 2 for route extrapolation (oral - > inhalation) to adjust the NOAEC for bioavailability is included, though toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic date indicate a similar low absorption through biological membrane barriers.
|
Overall AF: 12 |
||
Endpoint specific DNEL (from 91-day study) |
528/12 = 44 mg/m3(8h-TWA) |
[1]
ABS: Absorption; sRV: standard Respiratory Volume; wRV: worker Respiratory Volume
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 13 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: Substance specific informed assessment factors
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 20
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 260 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- No studies have been undertaken by the inhalation route to characterise the dose-response relationship for systemic effects. Therefore, it will be necessary to obtain a long-term inhalation DNEL by route-to-route extrapolation.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The effects seen in the 91-day study are only minor toxicological effects. The possibly substance related effects in high dose males with respect to changes in liver weight without histopathological correlate and increased serum albumin and transaminase activity are regarded as slight and probably reversible. It is therefore not necessary to apply a factor to take account of this.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- It is expected that the severity of effects could increase with duration. Since the dose descriptor is derived from a 91-day study, it is necessary to apply a factor of 2 to take account of extrapolation of subchronic data from the 91-day study to chronic exposure.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- It is not necessary to apply an allometric scaling factor because the starting point has been corrected fordifferences in respiratory volume and this takes account of differences in metabolic rates.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- On the basis of the very low systemic absorption rate of the test substance, the default assumption of aworst case maximum absorption of 1 % and the availability of toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic data nofurther AF is deemed necessary to be included in the interspecies extrapolation.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify variability in susceptibility to the effects of long-term exposure to IQACs in the human population. The default factor of 5 for general population will therefore be used to take account of intraspecies variability.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The key studies were conducted according to modern regulatory standards and were adequately reported. Furthermore, detailed data on toxicokinetics and toxicodynamic properties are available.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 2
- Justification:
- A default AF of 2 for route extrapolation (oral - > inhalation) to adjust the NOAEC for bioavailability is included. For further information refer to discussion.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 39 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 3
- DNEL extrapolated from long term DNEL
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 7.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: Substance specific informed assessment factors
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 40
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- As a Point of Departure for oral and dermal uptake an upper worst case rate of 1 % is taken forward to the DNEL derivations. The dermal NOAEL is therefore determined to be equal to the oral calculated NOAEL. For further information refer to discussion.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Effects on the male rat liver at the highest dose tested without histopathological correlate and potentially reversible changes in serum levels of albumin, SGPT and SGOT, being the only systemic substance induced effects identified.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- It is expected that the severity of effects could increase with duration. Since the dose descriptor is derived from a 91-day study, it is necessary to apply a factor of 2 to take account of extrapolation of subchronic data from the 91-day study to chronic exposure.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- he starting point is an oral dose descriptor from a rat study. It is therefore necessary to include an allometric scaling factor of 4 to take account of differences in basal metabolic rates between rats and humans.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify variability in susceptibility to the effects of long-term exposure to IQACs in the human population. The default factor of 5 for general population will therefore be used to take account of intraspecies variability.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify variability in susceptibility to the effects of long-term exposure to IQACs in the human population. The default factor of 5 for general population will therefore be used to take account of intraspecies variability.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The key studies were conducted to modern regulatory standards apart from the dose spacing by a factor of ten. Therefore a calculated NOAEL has been derived which would be more appropriate to modern regulatory standards. The DNEL derived from the subchronic oral study in rats therefore departs from the LOAEL of approx. 900 mg/kg bw/d (rel. to active ingredient) and leads to a calculated NOAEL of 300 mg/kg bw/ d (rel. to a. i.)
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No additional AF was deemed necessary. For further information refer to discussion.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 7.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: Substance specific informed assessment factors
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 40
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Effects on the male rat liver at the highest dose tested without histopathological correlate and potentially reversible changes in serum levels of albumin, SGPT and SGOT, being the only systemic substance induced effects identified.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- It is expected that the severity of effects could increase with duration. Since the dose descriptor is derived from a 91-day study, it is necessary to apply a factor of 2 to take account of extrapolation of subchronic data from the 91-day study to chronic exposure.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- The starting point is an oral dose descriptor from a rat study. It is therefore necessary to include an allometric scaling factor of 4 to take account of differences in basal metabolic rates between rats and humans.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify variability in susceptibility to the effects of long-term exposure to IQACs in the human population. The default factor of 5 for general population will therefore be used to take account of intraspecies variability.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- There are no data to quantify variability in susceptibility to the effects of long-term exposure to IQACs in the human population. The default factor of 5 for general population will therefore be used to take account of intraspecies variability.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The key studies were conducted to modern regulatory standards apart from the dose spacing by a factor of ten. Therefore a calculated NOAEL has been derived which would be more appropriate to modern regulatory standards. The DNEL derived from the subchronic oral study in rats therefore departs from the LOAEL of approx. 900 mg/kg bw/d (rel. to active ingredient) and leads to a calculated NOAEL of 300 mg/kg bw/ d (rel. to a. i.)
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No additional AF was deemed necessary. For further information refer to discussion.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - General Population
Discussion – General population:
DNEL acute systemic effects:
A DNEL for acute toxicity is not established for the dermal and the oral route, because no acute toxicity hazard leading to classification and labelling has been identified, and there is no potential for high peak exposures.
Inhalation exposure via liquid aerosols cannot be completely excluded, however, due to exposure via high-pressure cleaners and other spray applications in car wash. For this application an acute DNEL for systemic toxicity has been derived, also with regard to protection of the general population with due consideration of the very low substance concentration in this exposure scenario.
For an assessment of potential respiratory irritation upon inhalation of aerosols, test results with diluted test substance (5% of active ingredient) are taken as a point of reference. In these studies only mild irritative effects to the eye have been shown which did not result in classification as an eye irritant and can be regarded as a threshold value for mucous membrane irritation.
The DNEL for acute inhalation toxicity was set for a reference period of 15 minutes at 3 times the value (default 3) of the long-term DNEL. This approach is appropriate because similar mechanisms of actions are probably involved in the responses to single and repeated exposure.
General population-DNEL long-term for dermal route (systemic)
The long term DNEL for general population was derived from the oral 91-day oral study with rats (NOEL 300 mg/kg bw/d) by route to route extrapolation with a default of 1. The following assessment factors were applied: 4 for interspecies variability, 5 for intraspecies variability general population and 2 for time extrapolation. This results in an overall assessment factor of 40.
Endpoint specific DNEL (from 91-day study) |
300/40 = 7.5 mg/kg bw/d |
General population-DNEL long-term for inhalation route (systemic)
Concerning route-to-route extrapolation see discussion above (worker).
For the derivation of a NOAEC for the general population the following corrections have to be applied to the oral NOAEL (rat). The oral NOAEL (rat) of 300 mg/kg bw/d is multiplied with 1/1.15 m3/kg bw/d (default respiratory volume in rat, Table R.8.2 of CSR guidance) to give the corresponding rat inhalation NOAEC (no-observed adverse effect concentration). No adjustment of the NOAEC for bioavailability is performed because toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic date indicate a similar low absorption through biological membrane barriers.
For general population in case of 24h exposure/d the corrected inhalation NOEC is calculated according to the following equation:
corrected inhalation NOAEC = oral NOEL x 1/sRVrat[1]
= 300 x 1/1.15
The corrected inhalation NOAECgeneral population(24h) is therefore:
= 260 mg/m3
The following assessment factors were applied: 1 for interspecies variability, 5 for intraspecies variability general population, default AF of 2 for route extrapolation (oral -> inhalation) to adjust the NOAEC for bioavailability and 2 for time extrapolation. This results in an overall assessment factor of 20.
Endpoint specific DNEL (from 91-day study) |
260/20 = 13 mg/m3 |
General population-DNEL long-term for oral route (systemic)
The long term DNEL for general population was derived from the oral 91-day oral study with rats (NOEL 300 mg/kg bw/d). The following assessment factors were applied: 4 for interspecies variability, 5 for intraspecies variability general population and 2 for time extrapolation. This results in an overall assessment factor of 40.
Endpoint specific DNEL (from 91-day study) |
300/40 = 7.5 mg/kg bw/d |
[1]
ABS: Absorption; sRV: standard Respiratory Volume; wRV: worker Respiratory Volume
Overall Discussion – Worker and general population:
Reproductive Toxicity: Fertility
Concerning fertility there are no animal studies specifically investigating this endpoint. However, no effects on organ weights of ovary and testes and histopathology of gonads from the 91-day repeated dose study were detected with doses of up to 1000 mg/kg bw/d. There is no information available in humans.
The key study used for the derivation of a DNEL fertility is the 91 day repeated dose toxicity study with a NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw/d for effects on fertility.
The following assessment factors were applied: 4 for interspecies variability, 5 (3) for intraspecies variability general population (worker) and 2 for time extrapolation subchronic to chronic. Due to the higher degree uncertainty of available data, which is driven by the fact that only a repeated dose toxicity study was available for assessing effects on fertility, an additional assessment factor of 2 was applied. This results in an overall assessment factor of 80 (48).
For inhalation exposure, the AF for interspecies variability is 1, as the Point of Departure is human inhalation exposure assessment. An additional default AF of 2 is introduced, instead, to account for bioavailability by oral to inhalation route extrapolation, though toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic data suggest a similar low absorption via biological membranes. An AF of 5 accounts for intraspecies variability general population (AF of 3 for workers) and an AF of 2 due to the higher degree of uncertainty of available data which is driven by the fact that only a repeated dose toxicity study was available for assessing effects on fertility. This results in an overall assessment factor of 24 (40) for inhalation exposure for workers (general population) for the endpoint fertility.
DNEL worker fertility dermal |
1000/48 = 20.8 mg/kg bw/day |
DNEL worker fertility inhalation |
1763/24 = 73.4 mg/m3/8h-TWA |
DNEL general population fertility dermal |
1000/80 = 12.5 mg/kg bw/day |
DNEL general population fertility oral |
1000/80 = 12.5 mg/kg bw/day |
DNEL general population fertility inhalation |
869/40 = 21.7 mg/m3/day |
The DNELs derived from this study by applying an additional safety factor of 2 to account for higher uncertainty are higher than the DNELs for repeated dose toxicity. Therefore the DNELs for repeated dose toxicity (oral, dermal and inhalation) are also protective for fertility.
Reproductive Toxicity: Developmental toxicity
Concerning developmental toxicity there is one study available covering this endpoint. In this study no effects on maternal reproduction, embryo lethality, or developmental effects were observed following maternal exposure up to 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
A DNEL derived from these studies will be higher than the DNEL derived for repeated dose toxicity as no special assessment factor for exposure time ((‘informed’ AF of 1)) will be introduced (critical time window of effects has been covered in this study). Therefore the DNELs for repeated dose toxicity (oral, dermal and inhalation) are also protective for developmental toxicity.
Carcinogenicity
The mutagenic and clastogenic potential of IQACs has been evaluated in the full range of in vitro andin a single in vivo genotoxicity studies. There was no evidence for genotoxic properties of any of the investigated substances. Although carcinogenicity studies are not available for this structure family, the absence of genotoxicity or inflammatory responses in repeated dose toxicity studies do no raise any specific concerns with regard to carcinogenicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
