Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: According to Draft Proposal for a new OECD Guideline 487 and GLP

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2009
Report date:
2009

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Principles of method if other than guideline:
OECD Guideline Draft Proposal for a new Guideline No. 487, Version 3
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
3-hydroxy-N-(o-tolyl)-4-[(2,4,5-trichlorophenyl)azo]naphthalene-2-carboxamide
EC Number:
229-440-3
EC Name:
3-hydroxy-N-(o-tolyl)-4-[(2,4,5-trichlorophenyl)azo]naphthalene-2-carboxamide
Cas Number:
6535-46-2
Molecular formula:
C24H16Cl3N3O2
IUPAC Name:
3-hydroxy-N-(2-methylphenyl)-4-[(2,4,5-trichlorophenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthamide
Test material form:
solid: nanoform, no surface treatment
Details on test material:
Name of test material (as cited in study report): In vitro Micronucleus Test in Chinese Hamster V79 Cells genetic tox: Pigment Red 112
Analytical purity: 99.15%(w/w)

Method

Target gene:
Micronucleus
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
Thawed stock cultures were propagated at 37 °C in 80 cm2 plastic flasks (Greiner,
72632 Frickenhausen, Germany). About 5 x 105 cells per flask were seeded in 15 mL of MEM (minimal essential medium; Invitrogen GIBCO, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany) supplemented with 10 % fetal calf serum (FCS; Invitrogen, 76131 Karrlsruhe, Germany). Additionally, the medium was supplemented with 1 % 100x Penicillin/ Streptomycin solution (10.000 Units/mL Penicillin, 10 mg/mL Streptomycin; PAA Laboratories GmbH, 35091 Cölbe, Germany) and 1 % Amphotericin B (250 µg/mL, PAA Laboratories GmbH, 35091 Cölbe, Germany). The cells were subcultured twice weekly. The cell cultures were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 4.5 % carbon dioxide (95.5% air).
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
rat liver S9
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Exp. I: with and without S9 mix: 2.0, 3.9, 7.8, 15.6, 31.3, 62.5, 125.0 and 250.0 µg/mL
Exp. II: with S9 mix: 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.9, 7.8, 15.6 and 31.3 µg/mL
without S9 mix: 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.9, 7.8, 15.6, 31.3 and 62.5 µg/mL
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent: regard to the ability to formulate a manageable suspension of the test item in DMSO
Controlsopen allclose all
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
mitomycin C
Remarks:
Migrated to IUCLID6: in the absence of S9 mix
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
cyclophosphamide
Remarks:
Migrated to IUCLID6: in the presence of S9 mix
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: griseofulvin - in the absence of S9 mix
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
Two independent experiments were performed. In Experiment I the exposure period was 4 hours with and without metabolic activation. In Experiment II the exposure period was 24 hours without S9 mix and 4 hours with metabolic activation. The cells were prepared 24 hours after start of treatment with the test item.

METHOD OF APPLICATION: in minimal essential medium

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 and 24 hours
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 24 hours
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 24 hours

SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays):
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): May Gruenwald and Giemsa

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 1.5 - 2

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 2000

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Proliferation Index

OTHER: none




Evaluation criteria:
Evaluation of the cultures was performed manually using NIKON microscopes with 40 x oil immersion objectives. The micronuclei were counted in cells showing a clearly visible cytoplasm area. The criteria for the evaluation of micronuclei are described in the publication of Countryman and Heddle. The micronuclei were stained in the same way as the main nucleus. The area of the micronucleus did not extend the third part of the area of the main nucleus. 2000 cells from clones with 2 - 8 cells were scored per test group. The frequency of micronucleated cells was reported as % micronucleated cells.
Statistics:

Statistical significance can be confirmed by means of the Chi square test.

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
The test item, suspended in DMSO, was assessed for its potential to induce micronuclei in Chinese hamster V79 cells in vitro in the absence and presence of metabolic activation by S9 mix.
Two independent experiments were performed. In Experiment I the exposure period was 4 hours with and without metabolic activation. In Experiment II the exposure period was 24 hours without metabolic activation and 4 hours with metabolic activation. The cells were prepared 24 hours after start of treatment with the test item.
In each experimental group two parallel cultures were set up and 1000 cells per culture were scored for micronuclei.
No influence of the test item on pH value or osmolarity was observed (Exp. I: solvent control 314 mOsm, pH 7.8 versus 354 mOsm and pH 7.8 at 250.0 µg/mL; Exp. II: solvent control 365 mOsm, pH 7.7 versus 369 mOsm and pH 7.7 at 62.5 µg/mL).
In Experiment I test item precipitation in culture medium at the end of treatment was observed at 31.3 µg/mL and above in the absence and presence of metabolic activation. In Experiment II precipitation occurred at 15.6 µg/mL and above in the absence of metabolic activation and at 31.3 µg/mL and above in the presence of metabolic activation.
On the evaluated slides neither in the absence nor in the presence of metabolic activation cytotoxicity measured as reduced proliferation index was observed up to the highest evaluable concentration.
In the absence and presence of metabolic activation no statistically significant or biologically relevant increase in the percentage of micronucleated cells was observed up to the highest evaluable concentrations. The rates of micronucleated cells after treatment with the test item (0.20 - 1.50 %) were close to the range of the solvent control values (0.35 – 1.25 %) and within the range of the laboratory´s historical control data.
Mitomycin C (0.1 µg/mL), Griseofulvin (9.0 µg/mL) and CPA (10.0 and 15.0 µg/mL) were used as positive controls and showed a distinct increase in the percentage of micronucleated cells.
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Summary of results of the micronucleus test with test item

Exp.

Preparation

Test item

Proliferation

Micronucleated

interval

concentration

Index

Cells*

in µg/mL

in %

Exposure period 4 hrs without S9 mix

I

24 hrs

Solvent control1

2.92

 0.35

Positive control2

2.60

 6.90S

7.8

2.95

 0.35

15.6

3.02

 0.45

31.3P

2.95

 0.65

Exposure period 24 hrs without S9 mix

II

24 hrs

Solvent control1

3.04

 1.25

Positive control2

2.58

11.05S

Positive control3

2.55

24.20S

3.9

3.08

 0.70

7.8

2.99

 1.15

15.6P

2.97

 1.50

Exposure period 4 hrs with S9 mix

I

24 hrs

Solvent control1

2.53

 0.75

Positive control4

1.86

 4.95S

2.0

2.61

 0.55

3.9

2.69

 0.70

7.8

2.67

 0.20

II

24 hrs

Solvent control1

2.09

 0.95

Positive control5

1.66

 7.25S

2.0

2.04

 0.50

3.9

2.11

 0.40

7.8

2.00

 0.25

*     The number of micronucleated cells was determined of each test group in a sample of 2000 cells

P      Precipitation occurred at the end of treatment

S     Number of micronucleated cells statistically significantly higher than corresponding control values

1           DMSO       0.5% (v/v)

2           Mitomycin C        0.1 µg/mL

3           Griseofulvin 9.0 µg/mL

4           CPA   10.0 µg/mL

5           CPA   15.0 µg/mL

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
In an in-vitro micronuclus assay in Chinese hamster V79 cells, the test item at concentrations up to 31.3 µg/ml did not induce micronuclei in the absence and presence of metabolic activation. Therefore, Pigment Red 112 can be considered as non-mutagenic in this in vitro test system, when tested up to precipitating concentrations.
Executive summary:

The test item, suspended in DMSO, was assessed for its potential to induce micronuclei in Chinese hamsterV79cells in vitro in the absence and presence of metabolic activation by S9 mix. The following study design was performed:

Experiment I

Experiment II

Without S9 mix

With S9 mix

Without S9 mix

With S9 mix

Exposure period

 4 hours

 4 hours

24 hours

 4 hours

Recovery

20 hours

20 hours

 0 hours

20 hours

Preparation interval

24 hours

24 hours

24 hours

24 hours

In each experimental group two parallel cultures were analysed and 1000 cells per culture were scored for micronuclei.

The highest applied concentration (250 µg/mL) was chosen with respect to the ability to formulate a homogeneous suspension of the test item in DMSO. The following test item concentrations were applied:

Exp. I:   with and without S9 mix: 2.0, 3.9, 7.8, 15.6, 31.3, 62.5, 125.0 and 250.0 µg/mL

Exp. II:             without S9 mix:             0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.9, 7.8, 15.6, 31.3 and 62.5 µg/mL
             with S9 mix: 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.9, 7.8, 15.6 and 31.3 µg/mL.

On the evaluable slides neither in the absence nor in the presence of metabolic activation cytotoxicity measured as reduced proliferation index was observed. Due to strong test item precipitation in culture or on the slides higher concentrations could not be evaluated for cytogenetic damage.

In the presence as well as in the absence of metabolic activation, no biologically relevant increase in the percentage of micronucleated cells was observed after treatment with the test item with respect to the evaluation criteria mentioned in the current guideline forin vitrogenotoxicity studies.

Appropriate mutagens were used as positive controls. They induced statistically significant increases (p < 0.05) in the percentage of micronucleated cells.

In conclusion, it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported, the test item Pigment Red 112 did not induce micronuclei in V79 cells (Chinese hamster cell line) in vitro in the absence and presence of metabolic activation.

Therefore, Pigment Red 112 is considered to be non-mutagenic in thisin vitrotest system, when tested up to precipitating concentrations.