Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 210-521-7 | CAS number: 617-62-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- from 2014-05-22 to 2014-12-05
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP study, OECD 474 compliant
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 014
- Report date:
- 2014
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.12 (Mutagenicity - In Vivo Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- 2013-05-06
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-methylglutaric acid
- EC Number:
- 210-521-7
- EC Name:
- 2-methylglutaric acid
- Cas Number:
- 617-62-9
- Molecular formula:
- C6H10O4
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-methylglutaric acid
- Test material form:
- solid: crystalline
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 6 - 8 weeks old at the start of the treatment
- Weight at study initiation: The mean body weights were for males 34.7 ± 1.5 g and for females 27.7 ± 1.4 g and the range was for males 32 - 37 g and for females 25 - 31 g.
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
- Fasting period before study: Feed will be withheld 3 - 4 hours prior to dosing
- Housing: Group housing of maximum 5 animals per sex in labeled Macrolon cages (type MIII height: 18 cm,length 380 mm and width 220 mm ) containing sterilised sawdust as bedding material (Lignocel S 8-15, JRS - J.Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH + CO. KG, Rosenberg, Germany) and a shelter (disposable paper corner home, MCORN 404, Datesand Ltd, USA) and paper as cage-enrichment (Enviro-dri, Wm. Lilico & Son (Wonham Mill Ltd), Surrey, United Kingdom).
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Free access to pelleted rodent diet (SM R/M-Z from SSNIFF® Spezialdiäten GmbH, Soest, Germany)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Free access to tap-water
- Acclimation period: The acclimatisation period was at least 6 days before the start of treatment under laboratory conditions.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21.0 ± 3.0°C, (actual range: 21.0 - 22.6°C)
- Humidity (%): 40 - 70% (actual range: 39 - 69%)
- Air changes (per hr): approximately 10 air changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hour light/12 hour dark cycle
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: physiol. saline (Eurovet Animal Health, Bladel, the Netherlands)
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage or dermal): 10 mL/kg - Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
No correction was made for the purity/composition of the test substance.
2-Methylglutaric acid was dissolved in physiological saline (Eurovet Animal Health, Bladel, the Netherlands). The specific gravity of physiological saline is 1.0 g/ml. 2-Methylglutaric acid concentrations were dosed within 2.5 hours after preparation. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Once
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once
- Post exposure period:
- 24 and 48 depending on the dose
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg
Basis:
actual ingested
Males
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 38, 875 and 1750 mg/kg
Basis:
actual ingested
Females
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- At least five male and five female mice were used per sampling time in each treatment group
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- cyclophosphamide
- Route of administration: oral (gavage)
- Doses / concentrations: 40 mg/kg 10 mL/kg
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION:
In a dose range finding study, in total three male animals were dosed with 2000 mg Methylglutaric acid per kilogram body weight. No signs of toxicity were observed within 2 days after dosing (2 male animals). One animal had a hunched posture within 1 hour after dosing. Within 21 hours after dosing the animal had recovered from the treatment.
One female dosed with 2000 mg/kg body weight had a hunched posture, was lethargic and showed ataxia and died within 21 hours after dosing. No signs of toxicity were observed within 2 days after dosing in one female dosed with 1500 mg/kg body weight. In total three female animals were dosed with 1750 mg/kg body weight. One animal had no signs of toxicity. Both other animals had a hunched posture. One animal recovered from the treatment within 21 hours after dosing. The other animal had the following toxic signs within 21 hours after dosing: hunched posture, rough coat, eyes closed and a blue staining of the tail.
Based on the results of the dose range finding study dose levels of 2000, 1000 and 500 mg/kg body weight (male animals) and 1750, 875 and 438 mg/kg body weight (female animals) were selected as appropriate doses for the micronucleus main test.
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields):
See table 1: sampling scheme
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
Isolation of bone marrow
Bone marrow of the groups treated with 2-Methylglutaric acid was sampled 24 or 48 (highest dose only) hours after dosing. Bone marrow of the negative control group was isolated 24 hours after dosing and bone marrow of the positive control group was isolated 48 hours after dosing. The animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Both femurs were removed and freed of blood and muscles. Both ends of the bone were shortened until a small opening to the marrow canal became visible. The bone was flushed with approximately 2 ml of fetal calf serum (Invitrogen Corporation, Breda, The Netherlands). The cell suspension was collected and centrifuged at 216 g for 5 min.
Preparation of bone marrow smears
The supernatant was removed with a Pasteur pipette. A drop of serum was left on the pellet. The cells in the sediment were carefully mixed with the remaining serum. A drop of the cell suspension was placed on the end of a clean slide, which was previously immersed in a 1:1 mixture of 96% (v/v) ethanol (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany)/ether (Merck) and cleaned with a tissue. The slides were marked with the study identification number and the animal number. The drop was spread by moving a clean slide with round-whetted sides at an angle of approximately 45° over the slide with the drop of bone marrow suspension. The preparations were air-dried, fixed for 5 min in 100% methanol (Merck) and air-dried overnight. Two slides were prepared per animal.
Staining of the bone marrow smears
The slides were automatically stained using the "Wright-stain-procedure" in an "Ames" HEMA-tek slide stainer (Miles, Bayer Nederland B.V.). This staining is based on Giemsa. The dry slides were automatically embedded in a 1:10 mixture of xylene (Klinipath, Duiven, The Netherlands)/pertex (Klinipath) and mounted with a coverslip in an automated coverslipper (Leica Microsystems B.V., Rijswijk, The Netherlands).
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
Analysis of the bone marrow smears for micronuclei
To prevent bias, all slides were randomly coded before examination. An adhesive label with the study identification number and code was stuck over the marked slide. At first the slides were screened at a magnification of 100 x for regions of suitable technical quality, i.e. where the cells were well spread, undamaged and well stained. Slides were scored at a magnification of 1000 x. The number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes was counted in at least 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes (with a maximum deviation of 5%). The ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes was determined by counting and differentiating at least the first 1000 erythrocytes at the same time. Micronuclei were only counted in polychromatic erythrocytes. Averages and standard deviations were calculated.
Electronic data capture
Observations/measurements in the study were recorded electronically using the following programme: REES Centron Environmental Monitoring system version SQL 2.0 (REES Scientific, Trenton, NJ, USA). - Evaluation criteria:
- A micronucleus test is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
a) The incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in the positive control animals should be above the historical control data range.
b) The positive control substance induced a statistically significant (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, one-sided, p < 0.05) increase in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes.
c) The incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in the control animals should reasonably be within the laboratory historical control data range
A test substance is considered positive in the micronucleus test if:
- It induced a biologically as well as a statistically significant (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, one-sided, p < 0.05) increase in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (at any dose or at any sampling time) in the combined data for both sexes or in the data for male or female groups separately and the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in the animals are above the historical control data range.
A test substance is considered negative in the micronucleus test if:
- None of the tested concentrations or sampling times showed a statistically significant (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, one-sided, p < 0.05) increase in the incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes either in the combined data for both sexes or in the data for male or female groups separately and the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in the animals are within the historical control data range.
Equivocal results should be clarified by further testing using modification of experimental conditions. - Statistics:
- A test substance is considered positive in the micronucleus test if:
- It induced a biologically as well as a statistically significant (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, one-sided, p < 0.05) increase in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (at any dose or at any sampling time) in the combined data for both sexes or in the data for male or female groups separately and the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in the animals are above the historical control data range.
A test substance is considered negative in the micronucleus test if:
- None of the tested concentrations or sampling times showed a statistically significant (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, one-sided, p < 0.05) increase in the incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes either in the combined data for both sexes or in the data for male or female groups separately and the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in the animals are within the historical control data range.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- See additional information on results
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Dose range:males 2000 mg/kg (3 animals) and females 2 animals at 2000 mg/kg and 1 animal at 1500 mg/kg then 3 animals at 1750 mg/kg
- Solubility: yes
- Clinical signs of toxicity in test animals:
Males: 1 animal with hunched posture within 1 hour after dosing. Within 21 hours after dosing the animal had recovered from the treatment and 2 animals without clinicals signs
Females: One female dosed with 2000 mg/kg body weight had a hunched posture, was lethargic and showed ataxia and died within 21 hours after dosing. No signs of toxicity were observed within 2 days after dosing in one female dosed with 1500 mg/kg body weight. at 1750 mg/kg, One animal had no signs of toxicity. Both other animals had a hunched posture. One animal recovered from the treatment within 21 hours after dosing. The other animal had the following toxic signs within 21 hours after dosing: hunched posture, rough coat, eyes closed and a blue staining of the tail.
RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
see result tables
Any other information on results incl. tables
Mean number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes and ratio of polychromatic or normochromatic erythrocytes
Sexe |
Group |
Treatment |
Dose (mg/kg) |
Sampling time (hours) |
Number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (mean ± S.D.) (1,2) |
Ratio polychromatic/ normochromatic erythrocytes (mean ± S.D.)(1,3) |
Males |
A |
Vehicle control |
0 |
24 |
0.6 ± 0.5 |
0.93 ± 0.22 |
B |
Methylglutaric acid |
2000 |
24 |
1.4 ± 0.9 |
0.82 ± 0.40 |
|
C |
Methylglutaric acid |
2000 |
48 |
1.2 ± 1.8 |
0.60 ± 0.32 |
|
D |
Methylglutaric acid |
1000 |
24 |
0.4 ± 0.5 |
1.08 ± 0.15 |
|
E |
Methylglutaric acid |
500 |
24 |
2.8 ± 0.4(4) |
1.10 ± 0.06 |
|
F |
Cyclophosphamide |
40 |
48 |
32.4 ± 12.9 |
0.60 ± 0.17 |
|
Female |
A |
Vehicle control |
0 |
24 |
1.2 ± 1.6 |
1.21 ± 0.22 |
B |
Methylglutaric acid |
1750 |
24 |
2.0 ± 1.6 |
0.88 ± 0.18 |
|
C |
Methylglutaric acid |
1750 |
48 |
1.4 ± 1.5 |
1.33 ± 0.11 |
|
D |
Methylglutaric acid |
875 |
24 |
1.6 ± 0.9 |
1.07 ± 0.35 |
|
E |
Methylglutaric acid |
438 |
24 |
2.4 ± 0.9 |
1.28 ± 0.13 |
|
F |
Cyclophosphamide |
40 |
48 |
24.4 ± 10.8(4) |
0.85 ± 0.9 |
Vehicle control = physiological saline
CP = Cyclophosphamide.
(1) Five animals per treatment group.
(2) At least 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes were evaluated with a maximum deviation of 5%.
(3) The ratio was determined from at least the first 1000 erythrocytes counted.
(4) Significantly different from corresponding control group (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, P = 0.01).
Individual data (Males)
Group |
Animal number |
Number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes |
Number of polychromatic erythrocytes scored for micronuclei |
Number of poly-chromatic erythrocytes(1) |
Number of normo-chromatic erythrocytes(1) |
Ratio polychromatic/ normochromatic erythrocytes(1) |
A |
1 |
0 |
2011 |
490 |
510 |
0.96 |
A |
2 |
0 |
2011 |
561 |
439 |
1.28 |
A |
3 |
1 |
2007 |
474 |
526 |
0.90 |
A |
4 |
1 |
2001 |
413 |
587 |
0.70 |
A |
5 |
1 |
2005 |
443 |
557 |
0.80 |
B |
11 |
0 |
2000 |
329 |
671 |
0.49 |
B |
12 |
2 |
2012 |
266 |
734 |
0.36 |
B |
2 |
2 |
2018 |
541 |
459 |
1.18 |
B |
1 |
1 |
2016 |
558 |
442 |
1.26 |
B |
2 |
2 |
2016 |
447 |
553 |
0.81 |
C |
21 |
0 |
2003 |
487 |
513 |
0.95 |
C |
22 |
0 |
2020 |
276 |
724 |
0.38 |
C |
23 |
2 |
2001 |
377 |
623 |
0.61 |
C |
24 |
4 |
2009 |
465 |
535 |
0.87 |
C |
25 |
0 |
2001 |
151 |
849 |
0.18 |
D |
31 |
0 |
2021 |
564 |
436 |
1.29 |
D |
32 |
1 |
2023 |
535 |
465 |
1.15 |
D |
33 |
1 |
2008 |
480 |
520 |
0.92 |
D |
34 |
0 |
2007 |
494 |
506 |
0.98 |
D |
35 |
0 |
2007 |
517 |
483 |
1.07 |
E |
41 |
3 |
2014 |
519 |
481 |
1.08 |
E |
42 |
3 |
2036 |
543 |
457 |
1.19 |
E |
43 |
3 |
2010 |
525 |
475 |
1.11 |
E |
44 |
3 |
2002 |
527 |
473 |
1.11 |
E |
45 |
2 |
2009 |
502 |
498 |
1.01 |
F |
51 |
30 |
2003 |
402 |
598 |
0.67 |
F |
52 |
16 |
2006 |
346 |
654 |
0.53 |
F |
53 |
26 |
2004 |
337 |
663 |
0.51 |
F |
54 |
49 |
2015 |
464 |
536 |
0.87 |
F |
55 |
41 |
2003 |
298 |
702 |
0.42 |
(1) The ratio was determined from the first 1000 erythrocytes counted.
(group A : oral intubation of the vehicle)
(group B & C : oral intubation of Methylglutaric acid at 2000 mg/kg body weight)
(group D : oral intubation of Methylglutaric acid at 1000 mg/kg body weight)
(group E : oral intubation of Methylglutaric acid at 500 mg/kg body weight)
(group F : oral intubation of cyclophosphamide at 40 mg/kg body weight)
Individual data (Female)
Group |
Animal number |
Number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes |
Number of polychromatic erythrocytes scored for micronuclei |
Number of poly-chromatic erythrocytes(1) |
Number of normo-chromatic erythrocytes(1) |
Ratio polychromatic/ normochromatic erythrocytes(1) |
A |
6 |
1 |
2000 |
522 |
478 |
1.09 |
A |
7 |
1 |
2006 |
580 |
420 |
1.38 |
A |
8 |
0 |
2003 |
478 |
522 |
0.92 |
A |
9 |
4 |
2000 |
591 |
409 |
1.44 |
A |
10 |
0 |
2006 |
552 |
448 |
1.23 |
B |
16 |
1 |
2009 |
524 |
476 |
1.10 |
B |
17 |
0 |
2019 |
503 |
497 |
1.01 |
B |
18 |
2 |
2002 |
449 |
551 |
0.81 |
B |
19 |
4 |
2002 |
449 |
551 |
0.81 |
B |
20 |
3 |
2011 |
455 |
545 |
0.83 |
C |
26 |
0 |
2010 |
290 |
410 |
1.44 |
C |
27 |
3 |
2011 |
557 |
443 |
1.26 |
C |
28 |
0 |
2003 |
569 |
431 |
1.32 |
C |
29 |
3 |
2010 |
590 |
410 |
1.44 |
C |
30 |
1 |
2006 |
546 |
454 |
1.20 |
D |
36 |
1 |
2000 |
389 |
611 |
0.64 |
D |
37 |
3 |
2024 |
527 |
473 |
1.11 |
D |
38 |
2 |
2007 |
521 |
479 |
1.09 |
D |
39 |
1 |
2009 |
614 |
386 |
1.59 |
D |
40 |
1 |
2002 |
481 |
519 |
0.93 |
E |
46 |
2 |
2005 |
563 |
437 |
1.29 |
E |
47 |
4 |
2001 |
595 |
405 |
1.47 |
E |
48 |
2 |
2016 |
565 |
435 |
1.30 |
E |
49 |
2 |
2016 |
528 |
472 |
1.12 |
E |
50 |
2 |
2007 |
550 |
450 |
1.22 |
F |
56 |
13 |
2009 |
318 |
682 |
0.47 |
F |
57 |
22 |
2012 |
391 |
609 |
0.64 |
F |
58 |
30 |
2005 |
513 |
487 |
1.05 |
F |
59 |
40 |
2006 |
590 |
410 |
1.44 |
F |
60 |
17 |
2020 |
395 |
605 |
0.65 |
(1) The ratio was determined from the first 1000 erythrocytes counted.
(group A : oral intubation of the vehicle)
(group B & C : oral intubation of Methylglutaric acid at 2000 mg/kg body weight)
(group D : oral intubation of Methylglutaric acid at 1000 mg/kg body weight)
(group E : oral intubation of Methylglutaric acid at 500 mg/kg body weight)
(group F : oral intubation of cyclophosphamide at 40 mg/kg body weight)
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA FOR MICRONUCLEUS STUDIES
|
Number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes per 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes |
|
|
Males |
Females |
Range |
0-5 |
0-5 |
Mean |
1.1 |
1.5 |
SD |
1.2 |
1.3 |
N |
168 |
35 |
SD = Standard deviation
n = Number of observations
Historical control data from experiments performed between May 2011 and May 2014
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
It is concluded that 2-Methylglutaric acid is not clastogenic or aneugenic in the bone marrow micronucleus test when sampled at 24 and 48 hours post dosing of male and female mice up to a dose of 2000 and 1750 mg/kg, respectively (maximum recommended/tolerated dose in accordance with current regulatory guidelines in males and females, respectively). - Executive summary:
- 2-Methylglutaric acid was tested in the
Micronucleus Test in mice, to evaluate its genotoxic effect in developing
erythrocytes (polychromatic erythrocytes) in the bone marrow. This study
was performed according to OECD guideline N° 474 and in compliance with
GLP.
The test substance was dissolved in physiological saline.
In the dose range finding test, in total three male animals were dosed with 2000 mg 2-Methylglutaric acid per kilogram body weight. No signs of toxicity were observed within 2 days after dosing (2 male animals). One animal had a hunched posture within 1 hour after dosing. Within 21 hours after dosing the animal had recovered from the treatment.
One female dosed with 2000 mg/kg body weight had a hunched posture, was lethargic and showed ataxia and died within 21 hours after dosing. No signs of toxicity were observed within 2 days after dosing in one female dosed with 1500 mg/kg body weight. In total three female animals were dosed with 1750 mg/kg body weight. One animal had no signs of toxicity. Both other animals had a hunched posture. One animal recovered from the treatment within 21 hours after dosing. The other animal had the following toxic signs within 21 hours after dosing: hunched posture, rough coat, eyes closed and a blue staining of the tail.
In the main study animals were dosed via oral gavage with vehicle or with 2000, 1000 and 500 mg 2-Methylglutaric acid per kg body weight (male animals) or with 1750, 875 and 438 mg Methylglutaric acid per kg body weight (female animals). A positive control group was dosed via oral gavage with 40 mg cyclophosphamide (CP) per kg body weight. In total 12 treatment groups were used, each consisting of at least 5 animals. Three additional female animals, treated with 1750 mg 2-Methylglutaric acid /kg body weight, were used to correct for possible deaths. The male animals, dosed with 2000 mg 2-Methylglutaric acid per kg body weight, showed the following toxic signs after dosing: lethargy(2 males), a hunched posture (3 males) and rough coat (2 males). No treatment related clinical signs or mortality were noted all other animals dosed with 2 -Methylglutaric acid or in control animals receiving vehicle or cyclophosphamide.
Bone marrow of the groups treated with 2-Methylglutaric acid was sampled 24 or 48 (highest dose only) hours after dosing. Bone marrow of the negative and positive control groups was harvested 24 and 48 hours after dosing, respectively.
No biological relevant increase in the mean frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes was observed in the bone marrow of animals treated with 2-Methylglutaric acid compared to the vehicle treated animals.
The incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in the bone marrow of all negative control animals was within the historical vehicle control data range. Cyclophosphamide, the positive control substance, induced a statistically significant increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in both sexes. Hence, both criteria for an acceptable assay were met.
Male animals treated for 48 hours and dosed with 2000 mg 2-Methylglutaric acid /kg body weight showed a decrease in the ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes compared to the concurrent vehicle control group, indicating toxic effects of this test substance on erythropoiesis. The other groups that were treated with 2-Methylglutaric acid showed no decrease in the ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes compared to the concurrent vehicle control group, indicating a lack of toxic effects of this test substance on erythropoiesis. The group that was treated with cyclophosphamide showed an expected decrease in the ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes compared to the vehicle control, demonstrating toxic effects on erythropoiesis.
It is concluded that 2-Methylglutaric acid is not clastogenic or aneugenic in the bone marrow micronucleus test when sampled at 24 and 48 hours post dosing of male and female mice up to a dose of 2000 and 1750 mg/kg, respectively (maximum recommended/tolerated dose in accordance with current regulatory guidelines in males and females, respectively) under the experimental conditions described.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.