Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 274-570-6 | CAS number: 70321-86-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study, but outdated version of guideline (treatment only up to gestation day 15), GLP study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 987
- Report date:
- 1987
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- (adopted May 1981)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-(2H-benzotriazol-2-yl)-4,6-bis(1-methyl-1-phenylethyl)phenol
- EC Number:
- 274-570-6
- EC Name:
- 2-(2H-benzotriazol-2-yl)-4,6-bis(1-methyl-1-phenylethyl)phenol
- Cas Number:
- 70321-86-7
- Molecular formula:
- C30H29N3O
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-(2H-1,2,3-benzotriazol-2-yl)-4,6-bis(2-phenylpropan-2-yl)phenol
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Details on test material:
- - Physical state: white powder
- Analytical purity: commercial grade
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature
- Solubility: practically insoluble in water
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Analytical purity: 99.7%
- Batch No.: EN 02885.32 (commercial grade)
- Physical state: solid
- Storage: room temperature
- Solubility in water: insoluble
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: RAIf (SPF),
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Further characterisation: hybrids of RII/1 x RII/2
- Source: Animal Production, WST 455, Ciba Geigy Ltd., Stein, Switzerland
- Age at study initiation: about 2 months
- Weight at study initiation: 180 g - 200 g
- Housing: groups of 4 in macrolon cages with a wire mesh top and with standardised granulated soft wood
- Diet: pelleted, certified standard diet (Nafag No. 890 Tox); ad libitum
- Water: tap water; ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 6 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21 ± 1
- Humidity (%): 55 ± 15
- Air changes (per hr): about 16
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
All batches of diet were assayed for composition and contaminant levels by the manufacturer. The drinking water quality fulfilled the specifications of the "Schweizerisches Lebensmittelbuch" (1972).
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- polyethylene glycol
- Remarks:
- (50% in water)
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The suspensions of the test material were freshly prepared daily and the homogeneity of the suspensions was maintained by means of a magnetic stirrer. The suspensions prepared contained 0, 30, 100 and 300 mg/mL of the test material.
VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 1:1 mixture of distilled water and polyethylene glycol 400
- Amount of vehicle: 10 mL/kg
- Purity: polyethylene glycol 400 (practical grade, Fluka AG, Switzerland) - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The content analysis of the test article suspensions showed values ranging from 93.5 to 100.8 % of the nominal values.
- Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- M/F ratio per cage: 1/3
- Length of cohabitation: 4-6 h
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug / sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- from day 6 to day 15 of the pregnancy
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Duration of test:
- 21 days
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 300, 1,000 and 3,000 mg/kg bw (higher concentrations were technically not feasible)
Basis:
actual ingested
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 24 per group at study initiation
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale:
The dose levels were selected on the basis of a previously conducted preliminary teratogenicity study. Groups of each 12 pregnant rats were treated with 0, 1,000 mg/kg and 3,000 mg/kg body weight from day 6 until day 15 of pregnancy with the test substance.
The females of both the experimental groups remained unaffected by the treatment. Food consumption, body weight development, general health and all litter parameters were comparable to those of the control group. One female of the control group died on day 20 post coitum: Necropsy revealed bloody liquid in the uterus. One malformation was found amongst the fetuses of the control group (cleft palate in combination with maldeveloped tongue). Based on the foregoing results, it was decided that the high dose should be 3000 mg/kg, the indermediate dose 1000 mg/kg and the low dose 3,000 mg/kg, a dose expected to yield a no-effect level.
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: daily
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE: Yes
- Time schedule: days 6, 11, 16 and 21 of pregnancy
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food per period/ days per period x no. of animals per cage: Yes
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE: No
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day 21
- Organs examined: main organs of the thoracic and abdominal cavities, in particular the genitals; number of corpora lutea in each ovary, weight of the uterus including contents, uterine contents - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included: number and location of live and dead fetuses in the uterine horns, number and location intrauterine resorption sites (early/late),
- early embryonal resorptions: implantation sites without placenta
- late embryonal/fetal resorptions: implantation sites with placenta
- abortions: "empty" implantation sites with white or yellow stained nodules in the uterus horn visible from the outside
Uterine horns showing no implantation sites were placed into an aqueous solution of ammonium sulfide to visualize possible haemorrhagic alterations of such sites. - Fetal examinations:
- - Sex determination: Yes (ano- genital distance criteria)
- Careful external (gross) examinations: Yes (live fetuses): extremities or parts thereof, tail, trunk, head (brain, eyes, pinnae, jaws, oral orifice cleft lip/jaw/palate), all body regions
- Body weight determination: Yes
- Visceral examinations: Yes (one third of the fetuses per litter): skin, central nervous system (brain, spinal cord, eyes), body cavities (pericardial cavity, pleural cavity, diaphragm), respiratory system (nasal cavity, nasal septum, choanae, trachea, bronchi, lungs), digestive system (oral cavity, palate, tongue, oesophagus, stomach, intestine, rectum, liver), endocrine system (thyreoidea, pancreas, adrenals, thymus), circulatory system (spleen, heart, major vessels), excretory system (kidneys, ureters, ruinary bladder), genital system (testes, epididymides, deferent ducts, seminal vesicles, ovaries, oviducts, uterus)
- Skeletal examinations: Yes (two thirds of the fetuses per litter): cranial skeleton (nasals, frontals, parietals, interparietals, supraoccipital, exoccipitals), axial skeleton (vertebrae, ribs, sternebrae), appendicular skeleton (shoulder girdle, pelvic girdle, upper and lower extremities) - Statistics:
- All values were analysed by the Student's t-test, except for the analysis of fetal anomalities, which were analysed by the CHI-square test.
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:no effects
Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Clinical signs: A few animals, such as two from the control group, five from the low-dose group and one from each the intermediate and high dose groups developed some necrotic areas on the skin which were not considered to be due to the treatment.
- Mortality: No mortality occurred during treatment or post-treatment period.
- Body weight: Body weight and corrected body weights were comparable for all groups over the study period (see table 1). In the intermediate dose group body weight change was superior to that of the control group during days 6 through 11 of pregnancy (significant difference confirmed by Student's t-test, p < 0.05). No other differences and no treatment-related changes were observed.
- Food consumption: Food consumption was not adversely influenced for all the three dose groups in comparison to controls. Neither in the pre-gestation phase (d0 - d6) (19.42 g, 19.50 g and 19.72 g versus 19.07 g in controls) nor during gestation (d6 - d21) (24.85 g, 24.49 g and 25.09 g versus 23.61 g in controls).
- Macroscopic findings: No changes were recorded which might be related to the treatment with the test substance.
Maternal postmortem examination:
- 0 mg/kg bw: 2 females bore no implantation sites and 1 female had a dead foetus. All three animals were excluded from the calculation of means.
- 300 mg/kg bw: no effects detected
- 1000 mg/kg bw: 1 female with partial abortion, mean number of corpora lutea and implantation sites was slightly but not significantly increased
- 3000 mg/kg bw: 1 female with partial abortion, 1 female with haemorrhagic changes of the uterine epithelium, 1 female with no left uterus horn, mean number of corpora lutea was slightly but not significantly increased while the mean number of implantation sites was slightly decreased (no statistical significance). This implies the preimplantation loss was higher in comparison to controls. For one female of the high dose group, premature birth of three foetuses was observed on day 21 post coitum. Since body weight and uterus weight could not be determined on the day of expected delivery (day 21 p.c), this female was excluded from calculation of the corresponding means. The animal was considered, however, for means concerning pregnancy and fetal data.
Effect levels (maternal animals)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 3 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: other:
Maternal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Results (fetuses)
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
The rates of embryo and foetal lethality (resorptions indicating post-implantation loss) were found to be similar for all groups. One dead fetus was found amongst a litter of the high-dose group. The uterine contents of a female from the control group consisted of one dead fetus only. In the high-dose group the mean litter size showed a slight but statistically not significant reduction and remained unchanged in the low and intermediate dose groups. The average number of male and female foetuses per litter was similar for all groups. The male-to-female sex ratios were comparable for all groups in this study. The average body weight of the live foetuses was not significantly altered in the experimental groups on the per litter basis. However, comparing the mean foetal body weights per group, a significant reduction of the average female body weight in the low dose group (t-test, p < 0.05) and of the average male and average female and overall average weight of the intermediate dose group (p < 0.05) was observed. The latter findings were not assumed to be of experimental significance.
Gross malfomations upon external examination were found in 1 male of the control group which exhibited a generalised oedema and in one female of the high dose group which exhibited omphalocele. No gross malformations were observed in the low and intermediate dose groups. No visceral malformations or anomalies were detected in any group on about one third of live fetuses per litter. The incidence of skeletal anomalies was comparable between treated groups and the control group (4, 2 and 6 versus 4 in controls, for 300, 1,000, 3,000 mg/kg bw). Most of these anomalies were consistent irregular ossification of sternebrae (sternebrae 1 and/or 6 and 2).
Effect levels (fetuses)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 3 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no adverse effects observed
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Body weight
|
Dose (mg/kg bw) |
|||
0 |
300 |
1000 |
3000 |
|
No. pregnant females |
22 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
day |
Mean body weight (g) |
|||
0 |
194.1 |
194.9 |
197.2 |
196.5 |
21 |
365.1 |
368.8 |
368.3 |
362.5 |
|
Mean body weight changes (g) |
|||
0-6 |
32.9 |
32.0 |
31.0 |
32.8 |
6-11 |
27.3 |
29.4 |
30.5 |
30.1 |
11-16 |
45.0 |
42.5 |
41.8 |
39.8 |
16-21 |
66.0 |
70.0 |
67.8 |
63.3 |
0-21 |
171.0 |
173.9 |
171.1 |
166.0 |
6-21 |
138.3 |
142.0 |
140.1 |
133.2 |
6-16 |
72.3 |
71.9 |
72.3 |
69.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gravid uterus weight (g) |
113 |
108 |
111 |
103 |
Corrected body weight (g)* |
252 |
261 |
258 |
260 |
Corrected body weight gain (g) ** |
26 |
34 |
29 |
30 |
Corrected body weight gain (%)*** | 11 | 15 | 13 | 13 |
* "corrected" body weight is the difference of the body weight (day 21) minus the uterus weight
** "corrected" body weight (day 21) minus body weight (day 6)
*** "corr." body-weight gain divided by the body weight (day 6), times 100
Table 2: Summary of results
|
Dose (mg/kg bw) |
|||
0 |
300 |
1000 |
3000 |
|
Number of females mated |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
Number pregnant females |
22 (91.7%) |
24 (100%) |
24 (100%) |
24 (100%) |
Dams with live foetuses |
21 (87.5%) |
24 (100%) |
24 (100%) |
23 (100%)* |
Dams with partial resorptions |
9 (37.5%) |
15 (62.5%) |
13 (54.2%) |
14 (58.3%) |
Dams with partial abortion |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
1 (4.2%) |
1 (4.2%) |
|
||||
Corpora lutea (mean) |
16.1 |
16.0 |
16.9 |
16.9 |
Implantation sites (mean) |
15.3 |
15.2 |
16.0 |
14.3 |
Pre-implantation loss (%)** |
6.6 |
5.7 |
7.6 |
15.0 |
Implantation efficiency (%) |
93.4 |
94.3 |
92.4 |
85 |
Early resorptions = embryonic resorptions (mean/total/(%)***) |
0.48/10/(3.1%) |
0.88/21/(5.8%) |
0.96/23/(6.0%) |
0.87/20/(6.1%) |
Late resorptions = foetal resorptions (mean/total/(%)***) |
0.05/1/(0.3%) |
0 |
0.04/1/(0.3%) |
0.08/2/(0.6%) |
Total resorptions (mean/total/(%)***) |
0.52/11/(3.4%) |
0.88/21/(5.8%) |
1.00/24/(6.3%) |
0.96/22/(6.7%) |
|
||||
Litters evaluated |
21 |
24 |
24 |
23 |
Number live foetuses |
311 |
344 |
359 |
306 |
Foetal viability % |
100 |
100 |
100 |
99.7 |
Litter weight (g) |
81.8 |
78.4 |
79.9 |
72.6 |
Sex-ratio (m/f), per litter |
0.46 |
0.49 |
0.46 |
0.5 |
Sex-ratio (m/f), per group |
0.46 |
0.48 |
0.46 |
0.51 |
Mean body weight per group (g) |
5.5 |
5.5 |
5.3 (p< 0.05) |
5.5 |
|
||||
Foetuses with gross malfunction/ foetuses examined |
1/311 |
0/344 |
0/359 |
1/324 |
Foetuses with visceral anomalies and or malfunction/foetuses examined |
0/101 |
0/114 |
0/120 |
0/108 |
Foetuses with skeletal malfunction/foetuses examined |
0/210 |
0/230 |
0/239 |
0/216 |
Foetuses with skeletal anomalies/foetuses examined |
4/210 |
4/230 |
2/239 |
6/216 |
Total number malfunction/anomalies |
4 |
4 |
2 |
7 |
% anomalous/malfunction foetuses |
1.29 |
1.16 |
0.56 |
2.28 |
* one female excluded from further calculations due to partial premature birth of part of its litter
** %-values are indicated as per cent of total number of corpora lutea
*** %-values are indicated as per cent of total implantations
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The substance is not teratogenic in rats at doses of up to 3000 mg/kg bw.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.