Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-077-5 | CAS number: 78-04-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 4 August - 9 December 1988
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted to GLP
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 989
- Report date:
- 1989
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Internal Method No. 515.0 Main Dept. Exp. Toxicology
- Deviations:
- not specified
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Internal Method No. 515.0 Main Dept. Exp. Toxicology
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Dibutyltin dichloride
- EC Number:
- 211-670-0
- EC Name:
- Dibutyltin dichloride
- Cas Number:
- 683-18-1
- IUPAC Name:
- dibutyltin dichloride
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): ZK 22.663 (DBTCl)
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media:
Stocks of the V79 cell line are stored in liquid nitrogen allowing the repeated use of the same cell culture batch in experiments.
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: Yes, the cells have a stable karyotype with a modal chromosome number of 22. - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Without metabolic activation: 0.000001, 0.000003, 0.000010, 0.000030, 0.000060 µl/ml
With metabolic activation: 0.00020, 0.00030, 0.00040, 0.00045, 0.00050 µl/ml - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: The solid test material was heated in a 50°C waterbath and diluted as a liquid in DMSO to give final
concentrations of 0.000001-0.00050 µl/ml.
Stability in DMSO is unknown, therefore, the solutions were prepared immediately before the start of the test.
In aqueous solution the test material hydrolizes.
The test compound was strongly toxic at 0.0005 µl/ml with metabolic activation therefore 0.0005 µl/ml was chosen as the highest final concentration in the activation assay.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: ethylmethane sulfonate and 9,10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene
- Remarks:
- The positive control used without metabolic activation was ethylmethane sulfonate dissolved in MEM medium in a final concentration of 1 µl/ml; with S9 mix 9,10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene was used dissolved in DMSO to yield a final concentration of 15 µg
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION:
Thawed stock cultures were propagated at 37°C and c. 5% COˇ2 in 25 cm2 plastic-flasks (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark). Seeding was done with about 5 x 10ˆ4 cells per flask in 5 ml of MEM-medium (Minimal Essential Medium, Gibco-Europe, Karlsruhe, FRG) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum = FCS (Gibco-Europe, Karlsruhe, FRG) and neomycin sulfate (0.01%; Byk Gulden, Konstanz, FRG). The cells were subcultured twice a week.
For the selection of mutants the medium was supplemented with 11 µg/ml 6-thioguanine (EGA (Aldrich), Steinheim, FRG).
DURATION
- Preincubation period: After 24 h incubation at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with c. 5% COˇ2 the medium was replaced by serum free medium containing the test substance and in the test with metabolic activation additionally 40 µl S9 mix/ml. After 4 h in the COˇ2 incubator this medium was replaced by medium containing FCS.
- Exposure duration: 7 days
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): For mutation expression the cells were grown for seven days with one subculturing (c. 10ˆ6 cells/175 cmˆ2 flask). For subsequent mutant selection five 80 cmˆ2 plastic flasks per concentration (c. 5 x 10ˆ5 cells/flask) containing selective medium were established.
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 7 days
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): After a selection period of c. 7 days the colonies were fixated and stained with 10 % methylene blue in 0.01% KOH solution.
Exponentially growing cultures more than 50% confluent were trypsinised (trypsin concentration: 0.2 % in Ca-Mg-free salt solution) and for the mutagenicity experiment a single cell suspension was prepared with about 10ˆ6 cells in 31 ml medium per 175 cmˆ2 flasks (1 flask per concentration) and for the plating efficiency test with about 500 cells in 5 ml medium per 25 cmˆ2 flask (in duplicate).
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: number of cells per flasks
OTHER:
Mutagenicity of test material measured as number of mutant colonies - Evaluation criteria:
- Experience has shown that the following predetermined descriptive criteria are the most useful for interpretation of the results:
- the test substance is classified as mutagenic if it induces with one of the test substance concentrations reproducibly a mutation frequency that is three times higher than the spontaneous mutant frequency in this experiment.
- the test substance is classified as mutagenic if there is a reproducible concentration-related increase in the mutation frequency. Such evaluation may be considered independently from the enhancement factor for induced mutants.
However, in a case by case evaluation both decisions depend on the level of the corresponding negative control data. If there is by chance a low spontaneous mutation rate as compared to the range found in this laboratory a seemingly concentration-related increase of the mutations or a factor of three or even more within this range may be regarded as to be irrelevant. - Statistics:
- So far no satisfactory mathematical methods are available for statistical analysis of mammalian cell mutagenicity experiments such as those performed here. An evaluation is made only after a repeat experiment has been carried out.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Not reported
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Without metabolic activation by S9 mix a marked toxicity was seen with the test material at 0.00006 µl/ml, with metabolic activation a clear toxic effect could be observed at 0.0003 µl/ml in the first experiment and at 0.0005 µl/ml in the second assay of the second experiment. The positive control EMS revealed also a high cytotoxicity. The plating efficiencies of untreated cells were in the expected high range of > 50%.
In the test without S9 mix the mutation rates of the negative controls ranged from 1 to 12 mutant colonies per 10^6 cells; the cultures treated with ZK 22.663 (0.000001-0.00006 µl/ml) showed comparable results. The positive control substance EMS was clearly mutagenic.
In the assay with S9 mix the mutation rate of the negative controls was 6 to 27 mutant colonies per 10^6 cells. The cells treated with ZK 22.663 at various concentrations (0.0001 to 0.0005 µl/ml) showed mutation rates which were comparable to those of the negative controls. The positive control DMBA was clearly mutagenic.
The test material did not show a mutagenic potential in the HGPRT/V79 mammalian cell gene mutation test neither in the absence nor in the presence of rat liver S9 mix in two independently performed experiments.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Without metabolic activation by S9 mix a marked toxicity was seen with the test material at 0.00006 µl/ml, with metabolic activation a clear toxic effect could be observed at 0.0003 µl/ml in the first experiment and at 0.0005 µl/ml in the second assay of the second experiment. The positive control EMS revealed also a high cytotoxicity.
The test material did not show a mutagenic potential in the HGPRT/V79 mammalian cell gene mutation test neither in the absence nor in the presence of rat liver S9 mix in two independently performed experiments. - Executive summary:
In an evaluation of gene mutations in mammalian cells in culture study: HGPRT-test with V79 cells (Schering report number: IC16 -89) the test material was found to have cytotoxic effects without metabolic activation by S9 mix at 0.00006 µl/ml and with metabolic activation a clear toxic effect could be observed at 0.0003 µl/ml in the first experiment and at 0.0005 µl/ml in the second assay of the second experiment. The test material did not show a mutagenic potential in the HGPRT/V79 mammalian cell gene mutation test neither in the absence nor in the presence of rat liver S9 mix in two independently performed experiments.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.