Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1987
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Protocols and results reviewed and accepted by the National Toxicology Program's Board of Scientific Counselor's Technical Reports Review Subcommittee, USA National Institutes of Health

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1998
Report date:
1998

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
mammalian cell gene mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
sodium xylenesulfonate
IUPAC Name:
sodium xylenesulfonate
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Sodium xylenesulphonate
EC Number:
215-090-9
EC Name:
Sodium xylenesulphonate
Cas Number:
1300-72-7
Molecular formula:
C8H10O3S.Na
IUPAC Name:
sodium dimethylbenzenesulfonate
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): sodium xylenesulfonate
- Molecular formula (if other than submission substance): no data
- Molecular weight (if other than submission substance): no data
- Substance type: organic
- Physical state: powder
- Analytical purity: 65%
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): not identified from NMR spectrum provided
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: 11.5% ortho, 38% meta, 15.5% para
- Purity test date: February 13, 1986
- Lot/batch No.: RO92085 / 03
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: no data
- Stability under test conditions: stable
- Storage condition of test material: glass bottles with Teflon lined caps or double bagged in metal drums at room temperature in the dark
- Other:

Method

Target gene:
mouse lymphoma cells - TK locus
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
125, 250, 500, 1000 and 2500 microgram active ingredient per milliliter
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: no data
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
not specified
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
methylmethanesulfonate
Remarks:
Migrated to IUCLID6: without S9 and methlcholanthrene with S9
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in Fischer medium

DURATION
Normal cycling time for L5178Y cells was 10 hours. Treated cultures contained 6 x 10-6 cells in 10mL medium.
Incubation with test substance continued for 4 hours, at which time the medium plus test substance was removed and the cells were resuspended in fresh medium and incubated for an additional 2 days to express the mutant phenotype. Cell density was maintained at log phase growth. After the 48-hr expression period, cells were plated in medium and soft agar supplemented with TFT (trifluorothymidine) for selection of TFT-resistant cells. Cells were plated in nonselective medium and soft agar to determine cloning efficiency. Plates were incubated at 37 degrees C in 5% CO2 for 10-12 days.


NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: each treatment level was replicated, including positive and solvent controls


OTHER:
Evaluation criteria:
Minimum criteria for accepting an experiment as valid are presented in Caspary et al 1988
Statistics:
All data were evaluated statistically for trend and peak responses. Both responses had to be significant (P<=0.05) for the test substance to be considered positive; i.e., capable of inducing TFT resistance. A single significant response led to a "questionable" conclusion, and absence of both a trend and a peak response resulted in a "negative" conclusion.

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
Negative in one replicate series and positive in other replicate series with metabolic activation; leads to "equivocal" conclusion with metabolic activation
Remarks on result:
other: strain/cell type: L5178Y
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative without metabolic activation questionable with metabolic activation

Not mutagenic without metabolic activation, equivocal with metabolic activation