Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
other: Body responsible for the test
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2003
Report date:
2003

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.2600 (Skin Sensitisation)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: JMAFF (japanese test guidelines draft), July 2000
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
study already available

Test material

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
female

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
other: 1% aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose
Concentration / amount:
Concentration of test material and vehicle used at induction:
Intradermal: 0.5%

Epidermal: 50%

Vehicle for control: 1% Aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose.

Concentration of test material and vehicle used for each challenge:
50%

Vehicle for control: 1% Aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose.
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, semiocclusive
Vehicle:
other: 1% aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose
Concentration / amount:
Concentration of test material and vehicle used at induction:
Intradermal: 0.5%

Epidermal: 50%

Vehicle for control: 1% Aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose.

Concentration of test material and vehicle used for each challenge:
50%

Vehicle for control: 1% Aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose.
No. of animals per dose:
Number of animals in test group: 10
Number of animals in negative control group: 5
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
Seperate, 6-monthly reliability test with alpha-hexylcinnamicaldehyde, tech. 85%

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 0 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
50 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 50 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 0 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
50 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 50 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
50 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 50 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
50 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 50 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
20% solution in water
No. with + reactions:
5
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
some animals also showed scalines
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation
Remarks:
Independent reliability test
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
20% solution in water
No. with + reactions:
2
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
some animals also showed scaliness
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation
Remarks:
Independent reliability test

Any other information on results incl. tables

Maximum concentration not causing irritating effects in preliminary test: 50 %
Signs of irritation during induction:
Intradermal:Erythema: 8 animals grade 1, 2 animals grade 0.
Epidermal:Erythema: 2 animals grade 1, 8 animals grade 0.
Evidence of sensitisation of each challenge concentration: 0/10
Other observations: None.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
not classified