Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

Undecanal was neither mutagenic in bacterial (Salmonella typhimurium) nor mammalian cells (HGPRT assay) in vitro. Undecanal was not clastogenic in-vitro in human leucocytes. All assays were conducted with and without metabolic activation.

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP guideline study.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD TG 487
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
Species / strain / cell type:
other: human
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Cell type. lymphocytes
- Type and identity of media: RPMI 1640 medium, containing fetal calf serum, gentamycin and heparin
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: no
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not applicable
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S-9 mix, contained 10% v/v S9 fraction from Aroclor induced male Sprague Dawley rat liver fraction, and cofactors
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
0, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160, 300, and 600 µg/mL (precipitation at 600 µg/mL)
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle used:DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: low water solubility of the test substance
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: mitomycin and cyclophosphamide
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium; in agar (plate incorporation); preincubation; in suspension; as impregnation on paper disk

DURATION
- Preincubation period:
- Exposure duration: 4 hrs (withand without out S-9 mix) and 24 hrs inteh absnece of S-9 mix
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 24 hrs
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent):
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): up to 48 hrs

SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays):
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): cytochalasin B
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): acridine orange

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 2000 binucleated cells/dose level

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index, CBPI (cytokinesis block proliferation index)

OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: no
Evaluation criteria:
The vehicle/negative control results should lie within or close to the negative historical control range. The positive controls should produce a substantial increase in the incidence of MBC (at least twice) compared with the concurrent control; values should lay beyond the 99% upper limit of the historical negative/vehicle control range.
Key result
Species / strain:
lymphocytes: human
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: at 600 µg/mL
- Other confounding effects:

COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: yes
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Summary of Results

Treatment

Conc. (mg/mL)

Average CBPI

 Cytotoxicity (%)a

Total No. of BC examined

Total Number of MBC

% MBC

4 hours treatment in the absence of S9 (0S9)

Vehicle

-

1.9

0

2000

12

0.6

n-Undecanal

80.0

1.8

10

2000

14

0.7

 

160

1.9

6

2000

10

0.5

 

300

1.8

14

2000

8

0.4

 

600

1.5

45

1698b

8

0.5

MMC

0.3

1.6

30

2000

134

6.7*

4 hours treatment in the presence of S9 (+S9)

Vehicle

-

1.9

0

2000

8

0.4

n-Undecanal

160

1.8

11

2000

16

0.8

 

300

1.7

24

2000

9

0.5

 

600

1.6

30

2000

12

0.6

CP

10

1.5

41

2000

91

4.6*

24 hours treatment in the absence of S9 (0S9)

Vehicle

-

2.0

0

2000

3

0.2

n-Undecanal

40.0

1.9

10

2000

4

0.2

 

80.0

1.7

25

2000

10

0.5

 

160

1.5

44

2000

15

0.8

 

300

1.2

84

NR

MMC

0.2

1.6

42

2000

334

16.7*

CBPI                   Cytokinesis-Block Proliferation Index

BC, MBC            Binucleated cells, micronucleated binucleated cells (%MBC calculated based on rounded values)

NR                        Not reported as considered excessively toxic (Cytotoxicity > 60% relative to vehicle control)

*                            Substantial positive response (at least twice the concurrent vehicle control in terms of %MBC)

a                            Cytotoxicity calculation based on unrounded values

b                            Not enough cells available

 

Conclusions:
N-undecanal was not clastogenic in an in-vitro micronucleus test using human lymphoctyes, with and without metabolic activation.
Executive summary:

N-undecanal (80, 160, 300, 600 µg/mL; dosed selection was based on preliminary studies. Precipitation at 600 µg/mL) was tested in an in-vitro micronucleus test using human lymphocytes, with and without metabolic activation, for its potential to induce micronuclei. The test was conducted under GLP conditions and according to the OECD guideline 487. Human blood cell cultures were treated for 48 hours with phytohemagglutinin to stimulate lymphocyte division. Cells were then treated with the test substance for 4 hours in the presence and absence of metabolic activation (and additionally for 24 hours in the absence of metabolic activation). At the end of a 24-hour expression period under cytochalasin B the cells were harvested, stained, and 2000 binucleated cells/dose level were then examined for the occurrence of micronuclei. The results were compared with those of the concurrent and historical vehicle (DMSO) and positive controls (mitomycin and cyclophosphamide).

 

N-undecanal was tested up into cytotoxic concentrations, but did not induce the formation of micronuclei, with or without metabolic activation. The negative and positive controls performed as expected. Thus, n-undecanal was not genotoxic (clastogenic) in this assay (Charles River, 2010).

This study is considered to be valid and useful for assessment.

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
06 July - 10 September, 2010
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Target gene:
HPRT (hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase)
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Type and identity of media: MEM (minimal essential medium) containing Hank’s salts, neomycin (5 µg/mL) and amphotericin B (1 %).
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Phenobarbital/ß-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9 from male Wistar rats
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
1st experiment: exposure 4 hours; 0.6-15 µg/mL without //7.2-230 with S-9 mix
2nd experiment:
exposure 24 hours; 0.6-25 µg/mL without S-9 mix;
exposure 4 hours; 7.8-500 µg/mL with S-9 mix
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: low solubility of test article
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: EMS (ethylmethane sulfonate), DMBA (7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium;

DURATION
- Preincubation period: 24 hours
- Exposure duration: 4 hrs in the 1st experiment; 24 hrs without S-9 mix, 4 hrs with S-9 mix, in the 2nd experiment
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 7 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 7 or 8 days
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 7 or 8 days

SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 6-thioguanine
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): not required
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): not required

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2

NUMBER OF EXPERIMENTS: 2

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: all surviving colonies counted

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency
Evaluation criteria:
A test item is classified as positive if it induces either a concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency or a reproducible and positive response (i.e. at least 3 times the spontaneous mutation frequency) at one of the test points.
Statistics:
A linear regression (least squares) was performed to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies. The number of mutant colonies obtained for the groups treated with the test item were compared to the solvent control groups. A trend is judged as significant whenever the p-value (probability value) is below 0.05.
Key result
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
7.5-20 µg/mL/without S-9 mix); 250 mµ/mL with S-9 mix
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: precipitation was seen at 115 µg/mL and above


Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Tab 1: The cell cultures were evaluated at the following concentrations:

exposure
period

S9
mix

concentrations in µg/mL

 

 

Experiment I

4 hours

-

0.6

1.3

 2.5

 5.0

 7.5

 10.0*

 15.0*

4 hours

+

 

 

28.8

57.5

115.0P

172.5P

230.0P

 

 

Experiment II

24 hours

-

 

 

 2.5

 5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

4 hours

+

 

 

31.3

62.5

125.0P

187.5P

500.0P

P = precipitation

*     mutagenicity evaluation was performed only in culture II

For further details see the Summary of results (attached document)

Conclusions:
Undecanal was not mutagenic in a mammalian cell HPRT assay.
Executive summary:

Undecanal was tested for its genotoxic potential in mammalian cells in-vitro (Chinese hamster, V79 cells) at concentrations from 0.6 to 500 µg/mL in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. The assay was conducted according to the OECD TG 476 and under GLP conditions. Precipitation of undecanal was seen at 115 µg/mL and above. In the first experiment, cytotoxicity was seen at 7.5 and 20 µg/mL and higher in the absence of metabolic activation after a 4-hour exposure period. In the second experiment, cytotoxicity was seen at 25 µg/ml without S-9 mix (exposure period 24 hours), and at 500 µg/mL (with S-9 mix, exposure period 4 hours).

Undecanal did not increase the mutation frequency such that the evaluation criteria for rating the test substance as positive were met. Vehicle and positive controls performed as expected and were comparable with historical control data of this laboratory. Therefore, undecanal was considered to be non-mutagenic in this HPRT assay (Harlan, 2010).

This study is considered to be valid and suitable for assesement.

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From 23 APR 2010 to 13 JUL 2010
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study (OECD 471)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
according to Chemikaliengesetz (Chemicals act) of the Federar Republio of Germany (ChemG) §19a and §19b and annexes 1 and 2 in the version of 02 July 2008 published in Bundesgesetzblatt No. 28/2008, pp. 1146 - 1184
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium, other: TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
microsomal fraction (S9) produced from the livers of male Sprague-Dawley rats treated i.p. with 500 mg Aroclor 1254/kg body weight
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
1st experiment: 4982, 1495, 498, 150, and 50 µg/plate (plate incorporation)
2nd experiment: 5036,2518, 1259, 630, and 315 µg/plate (pre-incubation method)
Vehicle / solvent:
- Solvent: Ethanol
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: high tolerance for the tester strains, complete dissolution of the test substance
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
(water)
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
(ethanol and DMSO)
True negative controls:
not specified
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: see below "Details on test system"
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION:
1st experiment: plate incorporation
2nd experiment: preincubation

DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 min, 37 °C
- Exposure duration: 48 h, 37 °C

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 4

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth ==> inhibition of growth of the background lawn

POSITIVE CONTROLS
sodium azide (1 µg/plate; TA 100 and TA 1535 without metabolic activation)
4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine (20 µg per plate; TA 97a, TA 98 and TA 102 without metabolic activation)
2-aminoanthracene (1 µg/plate; TA 97a, TA 100, TA 102 and TA 1535 with metabolic activation)
benzo(a)pyrene (20 µg/plate; TA 98 with metabolic activation)
Evaluation criteria:
A test item is considered to have mutagenic potential, if a significant, reproducible increase of in the number of revertant colonies per plate (increase factor (f(I)) >= 2) in at least one strain can be observed. A concentration-related increase can also be taken as a sign of mutagenic activity.
Statistics:
calculation of mean values with standard deviations
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 97a
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
In general, the determined values for the spontaneous reversion rates as well as the positive controls were within the normal range of the laboratory.
In isolated cases of outliers, the differences to the respective maximum or minimum of the history were marginal only.

Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Mean revertant values of first experiment (plate incorporation assay)

Strain

TA97a

TA98

TA100

TA102

TA1535

Induction

-S9

+S9

-S9

+S9

-S9

+S9

-S9

+S9

-S9

+S9

H20

Mean

121

115

10

20

119

101

178

155

10

9

sd

9.0

1,7

1.9

3.7

7.7

23.5

15.5

13.6

3.4

1.5

DMSO

Mean

125

128

7

12

118

118

154

164

11

10

sd

10.5

12.7

1.7

5.9

11.4

22.9

35.7

14.3

4.3

4.8

Ethanol

Mean

142

130

8

14

107

115

204

130

9

10

sd

223

9.0

2.4

3.9

15.0

10.1

60.3

9.7

3.0

1.5

Pos.Contr.

Mean

652

878

1000

849

717

567

687

599

533

573

sd

• 138

122

231

79

53

112

95

125

64

22

f(l)

5,22

6.86

142.9

7075

6,03

4.81

4.46

3.65

53.30

57.30

4982 µg/pl.

Mean

116

121

11

9

108

108

169

154

11

9

sd

6

4

2

1

17

14

10

31

4

1

f(l)

0.82

0.93

1.38

0.64

1.01

0.94

0.83

1.18

112

0.90

12

2

1495 µg/pl.

Mean

121

122

7

10

120

122

154

169

12

sd

15

8

3

1

22

17

22

12

2

f(l)

0.85

0.94

0.88

0.71

1.12

1.06

0.75

1.30

1.33

1.20

498 µg/pl.

Mean

112

109

'11

10

111

102

124

129

9

12

sd

9

12

1

4

5

16

0.89

9

17

0.99

3

2

f(l)

0.79

0.84

1.38

0.71

1.04

0.61

1.00

1.20

150 µg/pl.

Mean

120

113

11

8

116

114

148

156

10

11

sd

12

8

5

3

4

6

0.99

29

22

0

2

f(l)

0.85

125

0.87

1,38

0.57

1.08

0.73

1.20

1.11

1.10

50 µg/pl.

Mean

113

9

13

116

117

152

147

12

13

sd

15

6

3

2

11

4

25

39

5

4

f(l)

0.88

0.87

1.13

0,93

1.08

1.02

0.75

1.13

1.33

1.30

f(I)= increase factor, see ecaluation criteria

Mean revertant values of second experiment (pre-incubation assay)

Strain

TA97a

TA98

TA100

TA102

TA1535

Induction

-S9

+S9

-S9

+S9

-S9

+S9

-S9

+S9

-S9

+S9

H2O

Mean

109

121

9

7

135

93

204

212

10

16

sd

6.3

11.0

1.4

0.5

3.9

19.1

27.0

42.6

1.9

1.3

DMS0

Mean

110

120

10

10

126

88

137

145

12

14

sd

4.5

1.7

0.6

0.0

6.8

14.8

12.1

21.9

2.9

1.8

Ethanol

Mean

118

108

9

7

84

127

128

225

15

14

sd

7.3

6.3

1.4

1.5

13.6

4.9

9.7

31.4

5.6

1.3

Pos.Contr.

Mean

504

824

218

185

465

727

401

717

291

584

sd

81

178

16

49

41

231

33

82

94

148

f(l)

4.58

6.87

21.80

18.50

3.44

8.26

2.93

4.94

29.10

41.71

5036µg/pl.

Mean

116

97

10

10

114

112

215

212

12

11

sd
f(l)

5

4

0.90

1

0

2

3

14

15

2

1

0.98

1.11

1.43

1.36

0.88

1.68

0.94

0.80

0.79

2518µg/pl..

Mean

108

105

9

10

120

112

192

115

11

11

sd

7

5

1

2

6

2

39

5

1

1

f(l)

0.92

0.97

1.00

1.43

11

1.43

10

0.88

1.50

0.51

0.73

0.79

1259µg/pl.

Mean

114

113

11

11

138

137

13

16

sd

11

13

2

3

1

3

14

17

2

1

f(l)

0.97

1.05

1.22

1.57

0.12

0.09

1.08

0.61

0.87

1.14

630µg/pl.

Mean

110

108

8

8

117

127

135

151

10

13

sd

11

7

2

2

10

5

19

17

1

3

f(l)

0.93

1.00

0.89

1.14

1.39

1.00

1.05

0.67

0.67

0.93

315µg/pl.

Mean

117

109

10

10

130

104

130

145

13

12

sd

15

4

1

0

16

3

27

14

2

1

f(l)

0.99

1.01

1.11

1.43

1.55

0.82

1.02

0.64

0.87

0_86

 

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative

N-undecanal was not mutagenic under the conditions of this study.
Executive summary:

N-undecanal (purity: 92.8%) was examined in the Ames-test according to OECD TG 471 under GLP conditions using the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA102, and TA1535 both in the absence and presence of metabolic activation (S9 from male Aroclor 254 induced rat liver). The test substance concentrations in the first experiment were 4982, 1495, 498, 150, and 50 µg/plate (plate incorporation). To verify the results a second experiment was performed with the pre-incubation method using concentrations of 5036, 2518, 1259, 630, and 315 µg/plate.

Testing up to the limit dose required no cytotoxicity was observed with n-undecanal.

In both tests, the vehicle controls (DMSO, ethanol), the negative (water) and the positive controls performed as expected, while n-undecanal did not increase the number of revertants in any strain at any dose, with or without metabolic activation. Thus, n-undecanal was not mutagenic.

This study is classified as reliable without restrictions. It was performed in accordance with OECD test guideline 471 and GLP (LAUS, 2010).

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Genetic toxicity in vivo

Description of key information

There are no studies available on in vivo genotoxicity of n-undecanal.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Mode of Action Analysis / Human Relevance Framework

In the absence of a species specific mode of action the results of the available assays are regarded as relevant for humans.

Additional information

Bacterial cell mutagenicity

N-undecanal (purity: 92.8%) was examined in the Ames-test according to OECD TG 471 under GLP conditions (RL1) using the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA102, and TA1535 both in the absence and presence of metabolic activation (S9 from male Aroclor 254 induced rat liver). The test substance concentrations in the first experiment were 4982, 1495, 498, 150, and 50 µg/plate (plate incorporation). To verify the results a second experiment was performed with the pre-incubation method using concentrations of 5036, 2518, 1259, 630, and 315 µg/plate.

Testing up to the limit dose required no cytotoxicity was observed with n-undecanal.

In both tests, the vehicle controls (DMSO, ethanol), the negative (water) and the positive controls performed as expected, while n-undecanal did not increase the number of revertants in any strain at any dose, with or without metabolic activation. Thus, n-undecanal was not mutagenic.

This study is classified as reliable without restrictions. It was performed in accordance with OECD test guideline 471 and GLP (LAUS, 2010).

In a study, which is lacking substantial data (not reliable, RL3), the test substance (Undecanal, purity at least 97%) was examined using the Ames-test (Spot test) with the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 (with and without metabolic activation) at a concentration of 3 µmol/plate (~ 500 µg/plate). No cytotoxic and mutagenic effects were observed at this concentration tested (Florin et al., 1980).

Mammalian cell mutagenicity

Undecanal was tested for its genotoxic potential in mammalian cells in-vitro (Chinese hamster, V79 cells) at concentrations from 0.6 to 500 µg/mL in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. The assay was conducted according to the OECD TG 476 and under GLP conditions. Precipitation of undecanal was seen at 115 µg/mL and above. In the first experiment, cytotoxicity was seen at 7.5 and 20 µg/mL and higher in the absence of metabolic activation after a 4-hour exposure period. In the second experiment, cytotoxicity was seen at 25 µg/ml without S-9 mix (exposure period 24 hours), and at 500 µg/mL (with S-9 mix, exposure period 4 hours).

Undecanal did not increase the mutation frequency such that the evaluation criteria for rating the test substance as positive were met. Vehicle and positive controls performed as expected and were comparable with historical control data of this laboratory. Therefore, undecanal was considered to be non-mutagenic in this HPRT assay (Harlan, 2010).

Chromosome damage

N-undecanal (80, 160, 300, 600 µg/mL; dosed selection was based on preliminary studies. Precipitation at 600 µg/mL) was tested in an in-vitro micronucleus test using human lymphocytes, with and without metabolic activation, for its potential to induce micronuclei. The test was conducted under GLP conditions and according to the OECD guideline 487. Human blood cell cultures were treated for 48 hours with phytohemagglutinin to stimulate lymphocyte division. Cells were then treated with the test substance for 4 hours in the presence and absence of metabolic activation (and additionally for 24 hours in the absence of metabolic activation). At the end of a 24-hour expression period under cytochalasin B the cells were harvested, stained, and 2000 binucleated cells/dose level were then examined for the occurrence of micronuclei. The results were compared with those of the concurrent and historical vehicle (DMSO) and positive controls (mitomycin and cyclophosphamide).

 

N-undecanal was tested up into cytotoxic concentrations, but did not induce the formation of micronuclei, with or without metabolic activation. The negative and positive controls performed as expected. Thus, n-undecanal was not genotoxic (clastogenic) in this assay (Charles River, 2010).

This study is considered to be valid and useful for assessment.


Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the available information, no classification is required according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.