Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 287-836-1 | CAS number: 85586-34-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- April 15, 1992 - June 25, 1992
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP compliant. According to guidelines.
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 992
- Report date:
- 1992
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not relevant
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- ESBO
- IUPAC Name:
- ESBO
- Reference substance name:
- Epoxidised Soybean Oil
- IUPAC Name:
- Epoxidised Soybean Oil
- Reference substance name:
- Soybean oil, epoxidized
- EC Number:
- 232-391-0
- EC Name:
- Soybean oil, epoxidized
- IUPAC Name:
- 232-391-0
- Reference substance name:
- 8013-07-8
- Cas Number:
- 8013-07-8
- IUPAC Name:
- 8013-07-8
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Epoxidised Soybean Oil
- Physical state: Yellow liquid
- Lot/batch No.: 08380306
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature in the dark
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Constituent 3
Constituent 4
Method
- Target gene:
- tk gene locus
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- L5178Y TK +/- mouse lymphoma cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. They were stored as frozen stocks in liquid nitrogen. Each batch of cells was purged of TK mutants, checked for spontaneous mutant frequency and that they were mycoplasma free. For each experiment the vials were thawed rapidly, the cells were diluted in RPMI 10 and incubated in a humidified atmosphere of 5 % v/v CO2 in air. When the cells were growing well, subcultures were established in an appropriate number of flasks.
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S-9 mammalian liver post-mitochondrial fraction
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- The concentrations were selected using a cytotoxicity range-finder. See Table 1 below.
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Acetone was used as a solvent. The test item was added and the culture was then vortexed for approx. 10 seconds to obtain a good emulsion. A top dose of 5000 ug/ml was achievable using an emulsion.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Comprised of solvent, acetone, diluted 100-fold in the treatment medium.
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- Remarks:
- Migrated to IUCLID6: Please see Below
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION:
Preparations of cofactor solutions with and without S-9
Quantity (ml)
With S-9 Without S-9
Glucose-6-phosphate (180 mg/ml) 1.0 -
NADP (25 mg/ml) 1.0 -
150 mM KCL 1.0 5.0
Rat Liver S-9 2.0 -
The above were used at the rate of 1.0 ml per 19 ml of cell culture containing the test chemical (to achieve the required final concentration in a total of 20 ml).
Three types of RPMI 1640 medium were prepared as follows:
Final Concentration in:
RPMI A RPMI 10 RPMI 20
Horse Serum (heat inactivated) 0 % v/v 10 % v/v 20 % v/v
Gentamycin 100 ug/ml 100 ug/ml 100 ug/ml
Fungizone 2.5 ug/ml 2.5 ug/ml 2.5 ug/ml
Pluronic 0.5 ug/ml 0.5 ug/ml -
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 9- 15 days
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 2 days
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 1 x E7 cells per flask
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
Following adjustment of the cultures to 2 x E5 cells/ml after treatment, samples from these were diluted to 8 cells/ml as seen in table 3. using a 8-channel pipette, 0.2 ml of concentration C of each culture was placed into each well of two 96-well microtitre plates (192 wells, at an average of 1.6 cells per wall). The plates were incubated at 37 C in a humidified incubator gassed with 5 % v/v CO2 in air until scorable (9-15 days). Wells containing viable clones were identified by eye using background illumination and counted. - Evaluation criteria:
- At the end of the expression period the cell densities in the selected cultures were adjusted to 1 x E4/ml. TFT (300 ug/ml) was diluted 100-fold into these suspensions to give a final concentration of 3 ug/ml. Using a 8-channel pipette, 0.2 ml of each suspension was placed into each well of four 96-well microtitre plates (384 wells at 2 x E3 cells per well). Plates were incubated until scorable (13 days) and wells containing clones were identified as above and counted. In addition, the number of wells containing large colonies and the number containing small colonies were scored for the negative and positive controls and for doses of test chemical showing a significant increase in mutant frequency over the negative control.
- Statistics:
- All calculations were performed on a microcomputer.
Determination of survival or viability: Poison distribution, plating efficiency, % relative survival
Determination of mutant frequency: Mutant frequency, plating efficiency,
Statistical significance of mutant frequencies.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: Please see table 4 below
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 4: raw plate counts and % relative survival for Epoxidised Soybean Oil in the cytotoxicity range-finder.
Treatment ug/mL) |
In the absence of S-9 |
In the presence of S-9 |
||
Survival (1) at Day 0* |
% Relative survival |
Survival (1) at day 0* |
% relative survival |
|
0 |
18 |
100.0 |
23 |
100.0 |
78.125 |
21 |
129.2 |
21 |
84.2 |
156.25 |
16 |
83.8 |
17 |
59.7 |
312.5 |
18 |
100.0 |
19 |
71.0 |
625 |
15 |
76.5 |
15 |
49.9 |
1250 |
15 |
76.5 |
15 |
49.9 |
2500 |
16 |
83.8 |
18 |
65.2 |
5000 |
19 |
109.0 |
23 |
100.0 |
(1) 1.6 cells/well plated
* 32 wells scored
Table 5: Summary of Results Experiment 1
Treatment (ug/ml) |
Absence of S-9 |
Treatment (ug/mL) |
Presence of S-9 |
||
% RS |
Mutant Frequency |
% RS |
Mutant Frequency |
||
0 |
100.0 |
312.57 |
0 |
100.0 |
401.83 |
312.5 |
95.8 |
389.82 NS |
312.5 |
97.9 |
484.86 NS |
625 |
86.6 |
326.20 NS |
625 |
87.9 |
563.19 NS |
1250 |
79.9 |
439.82 NS |
1250 |
86.0 |
518.57 NS |
2500 |
131.9 |
520.41 * |
2500 |
152.9 |
426.40 NS |
5000 |
143.9 |
467.96 * |
5000 |
178.7 |
433.74 NS |
Linear Trend |
** |
Linear Trend |
NS |
||
NQO |
BP |
|
|
||
0.05 |
83.5 |
1676.58 |
2 |
55.2 |
1794.55 |
0.1 |
45.3 |
2078.73 |
3 |
39.4 |
2122.84 |
Table 6: Summary of Results Experiment 2
Treatment (ug/ml) |
Absence of S-9 |
Treatment (ug/mL) |
Presence of S-9 |
||
% RS |
Mutant Frequency |
% RS |
Mutant Frequency |
||
0 |
100.0 |
410.98 |
0 |
100.0 |
304.98 |
312.5 |
112.9 |
334.82 NS |
312.5 |
91.7 |
331.46 NS |
625 |
87.7 |
466.23 NS |
625 |
82.6 |
331.03 NS |
1250 |
71.4 |
404.74 NS |
1250 |
87.7 |
313.73 NS |
2500 |
84.5 |
461.15 NS |
2500 |
84.5 |
283.11 NS |
5000 $$ |
100.7 |
|
5000 |
83.2 |
311.46 NS |
Linear Trend |
NS |
Linear Trend |
NS |
||
NQO |
BP |
|
|
||
0.05 |
67.5 |
1136.27 |
2 |
59.5 |
883.78 |
0.1 |
37.7 |
1143.11 |
3 |
32.1 |
1443.04 |
NS Not significant
$$ Treatment excluded due to excessive heterogeneity
*, **, *** Significant at 5 %, 1% and 0.1 % level respectively
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
No evidence of mutagenicity was seen under the conditions of this assay. - Executive summary:
Epoxidised Soybean Oil (ESBO) was assayed for its ability to induce mutation at the tk locus (5-trifluorothymidine resistance) in mouse lymphoma cells using a fluctuation protocol. The study consisted of a cytotoxicity range-finder followed by 2 independent experiments, each conducted in the absence and presence of metabolic activation by an Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver post-mitochondrial fraction (S-9).
Following a wide range of treatments in the range-finder experiment, separated by 2-fold intervals and ranging from 78.125 to 5000µg/ml, cells survived all doses of ESBO yielding 109.0 % relative survival in the absence and 100.0 % relative survival in the presence of S-9 at the top dose.
Accordingly, 5 doses were chosen for the first experiment, separated by 2-fold intervals and ranging from 312.5 to 5000µg/ml. All doses were plated for viability and 5-trifluorothymidine resistance 2 days after treatment. The top doses plated yielded 143.9 % and 178.7 % relative survival in the absence and presence of S-9. In the second experiment the same dose range was selected. The top dose plated in this experiment was again 5000µg/ml in the absence and presence of S-9, which yielded 100.7 % and 83.2 % relative survival respectively.
Negative (solvent) and positive control treatments were included in each experiment in the absence and presence of S-9. Mutant frequencies in negative control cultures fell within normal ranges, and statistically significant increases in mutation were induced by the positive control chemicals 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide (without S-9) and benzo(a)pyrene (with S-9). Therefore the study was accepted as valid.
In the absence of S-9, reproducible statistically significant and dose-related increases in mutant frequency were not observed in the 2 experiments over the dose range 312.5 to 2500µg/ml. At 5000µg/ml, a positive point was obtained in Experiment 1 and due to heterogeneity in the data this dose was excluded from analysis in Experiment 2. However, if each of the replicate cultures at 5000µg/ml in Experiment 2 are considered in turn, neither yields a statistically significant increase in mutant frequency. This, combined with the fact that there were no absolute increases in mutant numbers in Experiment 1 at 5000µg/ml and that carry over of the test compound was a problem at this dose, suggests that the increased mutant frequency seen in experiment 1 was not the result of chemically induced mutation.
In the presence of S-9, no statistically significant increases in mutant frequency were observed at any dose level tested in Experiment 1 or 2.
It is concluded that, under the conditions employed in this study, ESBO failed to demonstrate the ability to induce mutation at the tk locus of L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells in the absence and presence of S-9. Therefore, ESBO is not considered to be mutagenic.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.